Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, January 23, 2012

Buoyed by his resounding win in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich leads Mitt Romney 41 percent to 32 percent in Florida, according to a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely GOP voters in the state. Ten days earlier, the same pollster had Romney leading Gingrich 41 percent to 19 percent in Florida.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Obama 51%.

I would love nothing more than to face this fat tub of corrupt lard in the general. The women vote will be 60% for Obama. Newt is the absolute worse candidate possible. The only speaker in history to be reprimanded for ethics violations.
Republican stupidity has become incredibly reliable.
Four more years for the black ninja dude.

Obama 51%.
#1 | Posted by donnerboy

That's just Danni voting a couple thousand times.

Florida will be interesting because it is a closed primary. We'll know which lying sack of shit the GOPpers adore without wondering if the Dems played them in SC.

Do YA think some here don't like Repub's much at all? If you want Obama, go for it! Not everyone likes a staged idiot who talks, tho!

When he can go thru an entire day of talking WITHOUT the teleprompter I'll be fully impressed! If you're NOT in a Union, he's screwed you! If you are, he's screwed you too! He's just done it through surrogates - Dept of State, DOE, and the best of all EPA - whatever you do, DON'T work at a Coal Powered Electrical Generation Plant - they're endangered as of a 23 Dec 2011 news conference - at a Hospital dedication (childrens hospital no less) ALL concerning PARTICULATES!

More (LESS) to come!

Do YA think some here don't like Repub's much at all?

Yup. Then again, what's to like about corrupt, lying, sexually confused,philandering war mongers? I mean, other than their entertainment values as the klowns they are?

Tax returns are people too, my friend.

Interesting!

Obama vs. Newt

So what will it be ...Obama care..
Or the Newt plan.. ...Either buy health care insurance or a bond to cover your expenses!

You will buy health insurance ...now won't you punk.. the free ride is over...

Newt won't even get all of his ex-wives' votes.

Newt won't even get all of his ex-wives' votes.

Newt won't even get all of his ex-wives' votes.

sorry for the multiple post.

Didn't that underwear guy have some kind of health plan too?


Didn't that underwear guy have some kind of health plan too?

Posted by axe at 2012-01-23 02:12 PM |

Anyone mocking Romney's faith cannot say anything to those who mock Obama's race. Both are disgusting.

The only speaker in history to be reprimanded for ethics violations.
Republican stupidity has become incredibly reliable.
Four more years for the black ninja dude.

#2 | Posted by rawron at 2012-

correct techincally...but it would be nice if goddamn dems and libfux hypocrites would just ONCE start asking questions of pelosi and her husbands bank records and such,..but we all know that would never happen...

as to what happens next...who knows...but this also shows the deep anger of people who see how barry is turning us into a euro socialist entittlement dependent country...

romney will still be the canidate

but you know me I DONT MAke predictions.. :)

The only speaker in history to be reprimanded for ethics violations.
Republican stupidity has become incredibly reliable.
Four more years for the black ninja dude.

#2 | Posted by rawron at 2012-

correct techincally...but it would be nice if goddamn dems and libfux hypocrites would just ONCE start asking questions of pelosi and her husbands bank records and such,..but we all know that would never happen...

as to what happens next...who knows...but this also shows the deep anger of people who see how barry is turning us into a euro socialist entittlement dependent country...

romney will still be the nominee

but you know me I DONT MAke predictions.. :)

AND Of course posters of you ilk just cant help from being 'salinsky clones'...

Bl2 that retarded idiot was wrong about Sekula-Gibbs. He will be wrong again many more times. He wasn't a good teacher but he is an even worse political prognosticator.

Frankly, as a Republican I would have a hard time even voting if Gringrich is the candidate. But I would watch every debate because Gringrich would mop the floor with little zero. Gringrich is far better at thinking on his feet.

Like the way republicans use the word entitlements...
If you pay into social security your whole woking life,its not a entitlement.
I got two pensions and social security and a IRA... I paid into all for many years... So entitlements its not.It was a investment,now its paying off..

You got to work for it...

"But I would watch every debate because Gringrich would..."

...come across as an overheated bloviator filled with nastiness, condescension, arrogance, and mendacity.

What plays well for The Base will only alienate and piss off the more rational members of the electorate, especially independents.

romney will still be the canidate

I expect you're correct afkabagger. He was anointed by the RNC in 2008, but the Newt has tapped into Republican's sense of victimhood better than the other 3. When you got FOXNEWS instructing the family values crowd that adultery is a good thing, all things are possible.

Its an amazing revival by Newt. I wonder, if Santorum were to drop out,
if Romney could recover.


Its an amazing revival by Newt. I wonder, if Santorum were to drop out,
if Romney could recover.

Posted by tiger150 at 2012-01-23 02:41 PM

Dunno if it is a credit to Newt or a sad statement on the field of choices.

Watching Newt soar is disgusting. Really says something about this country.

"...come across as an overheated bloviator filled with nastiness, condescension, arrogance, and mendacity.

What plays well for The Base will only alienate and piss off the more rational members of the electorate, especially independents."

#20 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I completely agree with the above (amazing) but little O will come across as the zero he is.

Really says something about this country.

#24 | Posted by JOE at 2012-01-23 02:43

It says something about a particular political culture in this country. If the Right wanted a brawler who could go face-to-face with Obama they could have easily have found one who is smarter and more principled than Newt.

You didn't really look for those persons. You have spent the last four years obsessing about who you are mad at and how you can express your anger. "Narcisscism" is the word that comes to mind. This coupled with a brainless lack of respect for history and even an acurrate description of people or events is doing you in.

It shouldn't be surprising, therefore, that your two top candidates are sex/money obsessed weenies. You should hope that a majority of Americans are really assholes, because otherwize neither Newt or Willard have a chance.

You should hope that a majority of Americans are really assholes, because otherwize neither Newt or Willard have a chance.

#26 | Posted by Zed at 2012-01-23 02:53 PM

Why would Joe hope for Newt's success when he just expressed disgust with him?

You should zip that up, your extra chromosome is showing.

#20 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I completely agree with the above (amazing)...
#25 | Posted by FreddyK

Freaky, eh, Freddy?

;>)

Obama can win if:

1) Afganistan settles down (more troops have been killed there in 3 years than 8 years of Bush.

2) Iraq settles down (unlikely)

3) Economy appears to be improving and this may continue Unemployment could be below 8% and falling.

4) Republicans nominate Gingrich.

Republicans can win if:

1) Afganistan gets worse (possible)

2) Iraq gets worse, this is likely (Yes Bush started the war but he is not running). Obama gets credit for ending the war or blame for bring out troops [prematurely].

3) Europe economy tanks and sends us down with it and Obama gets the blame. Unemployment above 9%.

Why would Joe hope for Newt's success when he just expressed disgust with him?

#27 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

You have a point. JOE is a good Joe. Notwithstanding, millions will "hold their noses" and vote for both or either come November.

There is a reason for that. They have invested so, so much emotional energy into at times literally seeing Obama as being the Anti-Christ that they can't back down from that now.

I've expected for the last year that a very large number of Republicans will attempt to salve their consciences by just staying home and not voting at all.

Therefore, you see a number of people on the Right actually hope that the country will destroy itself if Obama gets another term, the better for their "side" to pick up the pieces. I have contempt for such mentally-suspect sillness.

My opinion is that, barring something unsuspected, Obama and the country will have a good four years if Obama gets a second term.

If that happens, I just don't know what a lot of "conservatives" will think or do. Deny the reality, to start, I suspect. But that will not do anything about the anger.

"My opinion is that, barring something unsuspected, Obama and the country will have a good four years if Obama gets a second term."

Of course they will Zeddy... What is up to today? 85% of small business owners think the economy is going in the wrong direction?

My opinion is that, barring something unsuspected, Obama and the country will have a good four years if Obama gets a second term.

#31 | Posted by Zed at 2012-01-23 03:10 PM

He's an authoritarian, he's pro-war, and he's pro-Wall Street and all of it's nastiness, I'm not looking forward to what he'll do when he doesn't have an upcoming election to worry about.

That said, I don't think McCain would have done better, nor a Gingrich or a Romney.

I have a few hopes for the coming years, however. That Warren and other real progressives increasingly become the face of the Democratic party, and that a saner version of Paul gains some traction in the GOP. I'd like to have some real choices next time.

He's an authoritarian, he's pro-war, and he's pro-Wall Street and all of it's nastiness, I'm not looking forward to what he'll do when he doesn't have an upcoming election to worry about.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-23 03:25 PM | Reply

At first I thought you were talking about Gingrich, when I realized you were referring to Obama, it struck me as funny how one could not tell the difference from that statement...

Uh Oh, we're in trouble now.

Anyone mocking Romney's faith cannot say anything to those who mock Obama's race. Both are disgusting.

sorry, Kan-racism is real and black people are real Mitt's beliefs are just ridiculous:

listverse.com

racism is real and black people are real Mitt's beliefs are just ridiculous

So religious persecution is not real or is it that you support it because you don't believe in religion?

Gallup Poll: Romney, Gingrich in dead heat
content.usatoday.com

M'lord 29%
Porky Pig 28%
Sanctorum 11%
Margin of error +/-3%

"Frank Newport, Gallup's editor in chief, had said last week that Romney's support was 'collapsing.' At the beginning of last week, Romney had a 23-percentage point lead over his rivals."

Romney's best hope for Florida is (a) those early votes already cast and (b) Newt imploding/exploding - whatever, self-destructing - in the eight days between now and the primary.

It'll be interesting to see which reporter Newt decides to blame for his past rubbish behavior/views this time around.

Coming up after the 31st:

February 4, 2012 Nevada (caucus)
February 4â€"11, 2012 Maine (caucus)
February 7, 2012 Colorado (caucus)
Minnesota (caucus)
Missouri (primary) â€" *See note below on Missouri
February 28, 2012 Arizona (primary)
Michigan (primary)
March 3, 2012 Washington (caucus)

March 6, 2012
(Super Tuesday) Alaska (caucus)
Georgia (primary)
Idaho (caucus)
Massachusetts (primary)
North Dakota (caucus)
Ohio (primary)
Oklahoma (primary)
Tennessee (primary)
Vermont (primary)
Virginia (primary)

March 6-10, 2012 Wyoming (caucus)
March 10, 2012 Kansas (caucus)
U.S. Virgin Islands (caucus)
March 13, 2012 Alabama (primary)
Hawaii (caucus)
Mississippi (primary)
March 17, 2012 Missouri (GOP caucus) â€" *See note below on Missouri
March 18, 2012 Puerto Rico (primary)
March 20, 2012 Illinois (primary)
March 24, 2012 Louisiana (primary)
April 3, 2012 District of Columbia (primary)
Maryland (primary)
Wisconsin (primary)
Texas (primary)
April 24, 2012 Connecticut (primary)
Delaware (primary)
New York (primary)
Pennsylvania (primary)
Rhode Island (primary)
May 8, 2012 Indiana (primary)
North Carolina (primary)
West Virginia (primary)
May 15, 2012 Nebraska (primary)
Oregon (primary)
May 22, 2012 Arkansas (primary)
Kentucky (primary)
June 5, 2012 California (primary)
Montana (primary)
New Jersey (primary)
New Mexico (primary)
South Dakota (primary)
June 26, 2012 Utah (primary)

*Missouri: Missouri will hold a primary on February 7th, 2012, which will not count for delegates toward the 2012 GOP convention. The Missouri Republican Party will hold a caucus on March 17th, 2012, which will determine the delegates sent to the 2012 GOP convention â€"
www.2012presidentialelectionne
ws.com


Would you vote for this man?

news.yahoo.com

A vote for Dwight Shrute is a vote for Newt Gingrick.

This'll definitely help Rmoney:

INGRAHAM: You’ve also noted that there are signs of improvement on the horizon in the economy. How do you answer the president’s argument that the economy is getting better in a general election campaign if you yourself are saying it’s getting better?

ROMNEY: Well, of course it’s getting better. The economy always gets better after a recession, there is always a recovery. […]

INGRAHAM: Isn’t it a hard argument to make if you’re saying, like, OK, he inherited this recession, he took a bunch of steps to try to turn the economy around, and now, we’re seeing more jobs, but vote against him anyway? Isn’t that a hard argument to make? Is that a stark enough contrast?

ROMNEY: Have you got a better one, Laura? It just happens to be the truth.
###

So religious persecution is not real or is it that you support it because you don't believe in religion?

Laughing at Rmoney's "magic underwear" is persecution?

Obama 51%.
#1 | Posted by donnerboy

That's just Danni voting a couple thousand times.

#3 | Posted by paneocon

Only if she is dead. Then, according to Republicans, she could vote 900 times.

Anyone mocking Romney's faith cannot say anything to those who mock Obama's race. Both are disgusting.

You can't choose your race. You CAN choose your religion. I won't "Persecute" believers in the real sense of the word by cheering on laws passed against any particular religion or outright kill a believer. I sure will laugh my ass off about quaint religious beliefs and make fun of believers who hold them. Religious ideas and thought can be just as wrong as any other idea such as flat-eartherism, earth-centered cosmology etc..

I hope Gingrich wins but I doubt it very much. In the end Romney will probably pull out a "miracle" victory. Republicans were the ones cheering on closed-source and easily corrupted electronic voting machines and I'm sure that the people in charge of the Republican party will manage to deliver a miracle for Romney if he needs one.

This is great.

The right is losing the moderates and undecided voters right before their very eyes.

Obama 2012!

Them Republicans loooooove them a good asshole.

Gringrich is far better at thinking on his feet.

Yeah, that whole little "Anyone who quotes exactly what I said on Sunday is lying" thing sure was smooth.

The right is losing the moderates and undecided voters right before their very eyes.

Poll Date Sample Obama (D) Gingrich (R) Spread
RCP Average 1/5 - 1/22 -- 50.7 39.7 Obama +11.0
Rasmussen Reports 1/20 - 1/22 1500 LV 48 39 Obama +9
PPP (D) 1/13 - 1/16 700 RV 49 42 Obama +7
CBS News/NY Times 1/12 - 1/16 1021 RV 50 39 Obama +11
ABC News/Wash Post 1/12 - 1/15 RV 52 40 Obama +12
FOX News 1/12 - 1/14 906 RV 51 37 Obama +14
CNN/Opinion Research 1/11 - 1/12 928 RV 52 43 Obama +9
Reuters/Ipsos 1/5 - 1/9 896 RV 53 38 Obama +15

www.realclearpolitics.com

I think they don't care. The wing ding kook base wants to nominate someone as far right as possible no matter if they lose in November.

I think they don't care. The wing ding kook base wants to nominate someone as far right as possible no matter if they lose in November.

#48 | Posted by 726 at 2012

Is where they're headed the Far Right? I'm thinking they're wanting to go where no man has gone before.

What's happening to the GOP is confirmation they've gone over to the Dark Side, a short-hand for giving into a lot of very ugly and angry thoughts and feelings that most people would like to detach from.

If you're looking for an explanation for this self-destructive irrationality, it's perhaps necessary to start with race.

Porky Pig and Magic underwearer Man.. same song and dance!
More Wars....we can just end food stamps...
Why more Wars...good......Food stamps...Bad...

We need to end "affordable health care act... It isn't right that insurance companies will have to pay out 80% of the money they take in..How would they ever have enough money left to give to the GOP???

They talk freedom ...who's
1.Stop gay people from getting married.
2. End a women righ to choose.

How about ending the religious control freak crap!

Newt now leads Rmoney nationally.

I might have to give up ridiculing the religious, except Mormons.

There may be a God, after all.

One reason Romney has been outperforming Gingrich in hypothetical match-ups against President Obama is due to independents. Now, both main Republicans are at a disadvantage.

Obama’s numbers in this poll, conducted Wednesday through Sunday, have tilted positive, both among all Americans (53 percent favorable) and among independents (51 percent favorable). The president’s favorability rating had, for the first time, dipped below the 50-percent mark last fall.

In a separate Post-ABC poll released last week, the president kicked off the year with a job approval rating of 48 percent, a bit of a recovery, but still below his recent predecessors at the start of their reelection years.

The new poll shows moderates now giving Obama a better-than-2-to-1 split, with 66 percent expressing favorable views and 31 percent unfavorable. Those are his best numbers in periodic polls back to April 2010.

For his part, Gingrich runs solidly the other way among these middle-of-the-roaders, at 20 percent positive, 58 percent negative. Romney, whom moderates rated about evenly throughout the fall and into early January, are now about 2 to 1 negative: 27 percent hold favorable views, 52 percent negative ones.

One group that continues to elude Obama in his moderate resurgence on favorability is whites with annual household incomes under $50,000. Since December, whites with higher incomes are up eight points in favorable impressions of the president; those under the $50K threshold are basically unmoved at 40 percent favorable, 56 percent unfavorable.

This is also a group â€" whites with incomes under $50K â€" that’s moved away from Romney over the past two weeks, with his unfavorable numbers jumping from 29 to 49 percent (exactly where Gingrich is as well).

Boy howdy!

How many threads and how many discussions on who will win next year? a lot.

I don't care. I'm not the least bit interested in seeing Obama win or lose. I have absolutely no horse in this race. All I care about is the economy and our progress.

If, say...the S&P runs at a 15% clip in 2012, unemployment drops, and other economic indicators move in a positive direction, Obama will be very hard to beat, barring some scandal.

I'm hoping the economy does what I just said.

If that happens, I don't care who gets elected.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable