Too bad he will not get the nomination.

"Why Ron Paul is Obama's Toughest Competitor"

If Ron Paul god the nomination from the plutocrat masters of the GOP Barack Obama just might laugh himself to death.

He will not get the nomination. Xe said so.

god the nomination = got the nomination

Barack Obama just might laugh himself to death.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

I'll take that.

#5 | Posted by STIRSUMUP

I didn't think it would take long, but I did think it might take a bit longer, for a real hater to expose himself.

I can live with that.

You'll have to, chumpy.

Why would Obama laugh himself to death? A dem having to run against an anti-war, anti-torture, anti-patriot act, anti-drug war, anti-rendition, anti-deficit, anti-gitmo, pro-school choice, pro-diplomacy, pro-marriage freedom Republican makes me think it would have him laughing out of fear of all the votes he'd lose from his own party.

Barack Obama just might laugh himself to death.
#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis
I'll take that.
#5 | Posted by STIRSUMUP

President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr?
President Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi?

Everyday I pray for our president's health

Why would Obama laugh himself to death?

Easier than facing the fact that, as a president, he's a failure.

Wow, PA, still living in the nightmare of Pelosi as speaker, huh?

#11 | Posted by STIRSUMUP

Because Ron Paul is a political clown. Period. End of story.

Which is probably why he appeals to clueless folk such as yourself. Period. End of story.

End of story.

Not likely.

The ideas are out there now.

You Ron Paul groupies really are a caution. Like watching a bunch of Dead Heads before the concert, whiffing a bit of the mysterious to keep the buzz on and the prolong the fantasy.

"The ideas are out there now."

"Out there" is definitely the operative term.

So's Paul.

And, together, a non-starter, born-loser, not-ready-for-prime-time, retro-freak laugh fest.

But, hey, it's good to laugh; so, thanks for that.

Like watching a bunch of Dead Heads before the concert, whiffing a bit of the mysterious to keep the buzz on and the prolong the fantasy.

Yeah, they should all just be thrown in jail along with hundreds of thousands of others, by our pot-smoking coke-snorting president. And then lose the right to vote as felons. Cause that's reality.

But, hey, it's good to laugh; so, thanks for that.

#16 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Glad I could help.

Cause that's reality.
#17 | Posted by adammm

You wouldn't know reality if it bit you in the ass, which I suspect it does fairly regularly.

Paul is getting a significant portion of the youth vote this time around.

They don't quite get that under Paul's "State's Rights" derp Paul would be fine with turning back civil rights legislation, making abortion and gay marriage illegal, letting schools teach ID alongside evolution in biology class etc etc.

Also his economic policies would be ruinous, if he ever managed to bring them about, which he prolly never would, just sayin'.

There will be a tremendous dissatisfaction among the teaderper set when it finally sets in that Mittens is their guy this go around.

Enough to launch a third party run that will siphon of votes from the GOP and give the Dems a clear majority?

And if so who will run?

Paul, of course, has been mentioned but Spud finds it highly unlikely.

Sista Sarah, of course, is the Freepers dream candidate but it will never happen.

Prolly no one.

At the end of the day GOPhers are sheep.

Authoritarian-loving, boot-licking, knob-polishing, cowardly, toe-the-line Bobblehead dolls.

They will line up for Mittens and they will like it.

Heard Rush yesterday issuing the talking points on Romney already even though he still clearly doesn't like him as a candidate.

Essentially, he's going with "B,B,But KERRY!!!1!"

Yeah, Spud laughed too.

GL w/ that.

Be Well.

Because Ron Paul is a political clown. Period. End of story.

#13 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-01-19 09:03 AM | Reply | Flag:

Why does individual liberty offend you so?

"Why does individual liberty offend you so?"

It doesn't.

Remember, it's what gives you Ron Paul groupies the freedom to make fools of yourselves.

I'm all for that.

Why would Obama laugh himself to death? A dem having to run against an anti-war, anti-torture, anti-patriot act, anti-drug war, anti-rendition, anti-deficit, anti-gitmo, pro-school choice, pro-diplomacy, pro-marriage freedom Republican makes me think it would have him laughing out of fear of all the votes he'd lose from his own party.

#9 | Posted by adammm

Because the entitlement mentality would never vote for the likes of a Ron Paul. That's why the O-Man would be laughing 'cause he'd have the election in the bag.

RP would require the American people to make massive personal monetary and lifestyle sacrifices to get the country back in the black. And those personal sacrifices would have to continue. RP would also require the US to sacrifice much of its global presence, mostly in the form of the extended military deployments and bases around the planet. The American people would rather continue the Death Spiral of Debt than make the necessary sacrifices.

But what is really pathetic is the American people will more than likely put in the seat of power one the likes of a Mitt Romney, who is already one of the quite wealthy power elite, and one who is guilty in creating and continuing the Death Spiral of Debt. Which is why Mitt has so many off-shore cash stashes. He ain't gonna get caught with his knickers down and displaying his certified Mormon undies to the world.

Why does individual liberty offend you so?

#21 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD

Same reasons it offends Obama.

Liberty has, can, and will exist apart from a deeply flawed candidate like Ron "Newsletter? What Newsletter" Paul.

They don't quite get that under Paul's "State's Rights" derp Paul would be fine with turning back civil rights legislation, making abortion and gay marriage illegal, letting schools teach ID alongside evolution in biology class etc etc.

#20 | Posted by dethspud at 2012-01-19 09:12 AM | Reply | Flag:

Perhaps because the chance of that happening is 0.00%.

RP would require the American people to make massive personal monetary and lifestyle sacrifices to get the country back in the black.

You'll be making those soon anyway.

#26 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD at 2012-01-19 09:17 AM | Reply | Flag:

Now come on... Spud knows that... I mean just the other day the dirty potato was claiming the he lives in reality, he is a pragmatist... he understands that nothing and no one is perfect. Are you insinuating that his previous claims are in opposition with his view of Ron Pau?

(If yes, you would be correct)

Liberty has, can, and will exist
#25 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-01-19 09:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

Wishful thinking with the current crop of fascists in charge.

Individual Liberty Doc... Not group think social justice bullshit that just makes us all indentured servants.

Oh, BTW, the drug war is racist. Do you fail to grasp the irony that the "land of the free" has the highest per capita incarceration rate in the civilized world? Largely for victimless crimes, which, by being victimless, are not really crimes against any ONE...

The "War on Drugs" is, among other things, one of the single greatest contributing factors to the undermining of individual rights in this country. Right up there with the "War on Terror." The "War on Drugs" really got the fascists' ball rolling.

hey .. if people like doc want a president who approves of no trial detention for americans , someone who ran against lobbist and then surrounded himself with them.... then obama is a great choice ( or any other GOP candidate)
if you want freedom, vote for paul... but that does scare some people who like government up there ass.. makes them feel safe i guess
enjoy your war with iran!

#30 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Then you voted for the wrong candidate and have a chance to correct that.

So you acknowledge the attack on liberty and individual right, yet the one man in the race that agrees with you is a kook?

Sound like a little cognitive dissonance.

Obama certainly seems to like incarcerating, murdering, bombing, and starving brown people all over the world, not just here at home.

"The American people would rather continue the Death Spiral of Debt than make the necessary sacrifices."

Baloney. The majority of the American people favor significant increases in tax rates for the wealthy. The tax cuts largely created our deficits, only tax increases will ever actually reduce them.

Right up there with the "War on Terror." The "War on Drugs" really got the fascists' ball rolling.

#30 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-01-19 09:31 AM | Reply | Flag:

Agrees with Paul on his two biggest issues.

Must also be a kook.

"The American people would rather continue the Death Spiral of Debt than make the necessary sacrifices."

Baloney. The majority of the American people favor significant increases in tax rates for the wealthy. The tax cuts largely created our deficits, only tax increases will ever actually reduce them.

#34 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 09:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

Again, the problem with that is... it doesn't do nearly enough to even cover the interest payments on our debt, let alone begin reducing it.

Danni, another death spiral fan.

If you leftist think he is such an easy candidate to beat, then, if you have the opportunity, vote for Ron Paul in the Republican Primary.

If he gets the nomination, Well, you think it will be an easy win for Obama and if he did beat Obama, I think you will agree with Paul more than Romney or Newt.

Win, Win.

The majority of the American people favor significant increases in tax rates for the wealthy.

Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 09:40 AM | Reply

Won't make a dent. Go ahead, tax them at 100%.

Folks here on the drudge should really become aquanted with the stories of: Weimar, Zimbabwe, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Peru, France, etc etc etc. It always happends the same way and we've earned it big time.

Congrats!

Actually, the Death Spiral sounds like fun. Would certainly make a catchy campaign slogan.

Obama 2012.

Won't make a dent. Go ahead, tax them at 100%.

Hyperbole much?

Here's the deal.

Mittens, a guy with a quarter billion in the bank, is being taxed at a lesser rate than many Americans making far, far, far less.

The argument that the left want to bring in unfair levels of taxation in order to supposedly punish the wealthy for their success is pure BS.

The fact is their is an unhealthy level of wealth disparity in the US and a lot of that can be traced back to unfair and regressive taxation whereby the wealthiest party the least because they are enabled to make use of fancy tax dodges, shelters and a lower capital gains rate.

When Warren Buffet pointed out that he paid a lesser tax rate than his secretary people took note.

You should to.

Be Well.

Income taxes don't raise as much money as you think. But, it's a great tool for class warfare.

2005 - 2006 $1,043,908,000,000.00. Just under a trillion and a half from income taxes.

That's about what we are going to raise the debt ceiling.

"Again, the problem with that is... it doesn't do nearly enough to even cover the interest payments on our debt, let alone begin reducing it."

Tell that talking point to the CBO who said what Congress needs to do about the deficits.....do nothing....don't extend the Bush tax cuts.
That's number one, 2 would be end the wars, and 3 fix the Republican Medicare drug bill so Medicare can negotiate for lower prices.

Now return to your regular dishonest talking points.

So what random percentage is fair Spud?

a. 15%
b. 45%
c. 75%
d. 96%
e. All of the above, it all belongs to government anyway.
f. None of the above, no matter how much they take they'll figure out how to blow it out their asses.

Arguing tax rates is a completely subjective value judgement... There is no "fair" tax rate as no two people will ever agree on the exact marginal utility of government instrusion.

It is not hyperbole, it is a simple reductio ad absurdum.

"But, it's a great tool for class warfare."

About time working folks had a tool to use to fight the class warfare which has been waged on us for thiry years...since that fuck head Reagan slashed taxes and turned us from the largest creditor nation to the largest debtor nation.
But hey, his rich friends have piled up the loot ever since, I would rip the flag pins off those hypocrite's lapels if I ever got the chance. Then I'd turn them over and force those POS to acknowledge they were made in China.
It is time for CLASS WAR!!!!

The fact is their is an unhealthy level of wealth disparity in the US and a lot of that can be traced back to unfair and regressive taxation whereby the wealthiest party the least because they are enabled to make use of fancy tax dodges, shelters and a lower capital gains rate.

#40 | Posted by dethspud at 2012-01-19 09:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

All taxes are regressive and oppressive by definition it is plunder.

The worst tax of all that creates the disparity you so kindly point out is inflation. The simple exercise of charting the expansion of the money supply (definition of inflation) against the wealth gap shows this. Messing with tax rates in order to redistribute wealth is a mere exercise in making a blanket longer by cutting a foot off one end and sewing it on the other. The periods of greatest prosperity around the world have come with stable money stock and increases in productivity. Taxation is destruction of wealth for all, not just its victims.

#42 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 10:00 AM | Reply | Flag:

I am spewing talking points? Interesting. You are the one that seems to be under the false belief that simply raising taxes is going to do something significant to stop our debt.

"So what random percentage is fair Spud?"

Look to our history, ask Eisenhower, ask Kennedy, ask Truman.
What is fair is for everyone to do what they can to help the country, those of us in the working class do our jobs for less money today, those who make extra profits because of our poverty should then be willing to pay more until we make our nation solvent. Don't pretend to be an American if you're rich and want to hoard money while your nation goes broke.

It is time for CLASS WAR!!!!

#44 | Posted by danni

I know others here know you better than I do, but you are much more stupid than I originally thought.

Conservatives in Brittain understand you need to tax the rich, so why are conservatives so unpatriotic here in the US???

"New 50% tax rate comes into force for top earners"

"A new 50% tax rate for top earners has come into force at the start of the financial year.

The new rate will affect the 300,000 highest earners in the UK, out of the 29 million people who pay income tax.

It will be levied on taxable incomes greater than £150,000 a year and aims to raise an extra £2.4bn by next year.

The 600,000 people who earn more than £100,000 a year will have their personal tax allowance eroded too, raising £1.5bn for the government.

Together with increased tax on pension contributions, which starts next year, the UK's top 600,000 earners are expected to be paying an extra £7.5bn a year in tax."

"I know others here know you better than I do, but you are much more stupid than I originally thought."

Yawn.

It is time for CLASS WAR!!!!

Danni dodges the eraser thrown at her while she shoots a spitwad from the clear plastic shell of her Bic pen

It is time for CLASS WAR!!!!

#44 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 10:08 AM | Reply | Flag:

Release your inner Jacobin Danni! Viva Maximilien!!!

So you acknowledge the attack on liberty and individual right, yet the one man in the race that agrees with you is a kook?

Sound like a little cognitive dissonance.
#33 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD

Not even close. That fact that Ron Paul agrees with me on something doesn't make either him or me a kook.

Don't worry, ol' Ron's got plenty of baggage in his kook chest.

Right up there with the "War on Terror." The "War on Drugs" really got the fascists' ball rolling.
#30 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-01-19 09:31 AM | Reply | Flag:

Agrees with Paul on his two biggest issues.
Must also be a kook.
#35 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD

Not nescessarily. I'll betcha Ron Paul believes the earth orbits the sun. So do I. That doesn't mean he's not a kook.

Are all of his supporters lazy thinkers like you two?

#34 | Posted by danni

Are you a card carrying OWS member?

#49 | Posted by danni

And they are about to go back into a recession because of it.

What is fair is for everyone to do what they can to help the country

#47 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 10:11 AM | Reply | Flag:

Funny, when they passed the income tax, 3% was "fair".

I guess we are just a lot more "fairererer" now?

""[The socialists declare] that the State owes subsistence, well-being, and education to all its citizens; that it should be generous, charitable, involved in everything, devoted to everybody; ...that it should intervene directly to relieve all suffering, satisfy and anticipate all wants, furnish capital to all enterprises, enlightenment to all minds, balm for all wounds, asylums for all the unfortunate, and even aid to the point of shedding French blood, for all oppressed people on the face of the earth.
Who would not like to see all these benefits flow forth upon the world from the law, as from an inexhaustible source? ... But is it possible? ... Whence does [the State] draw those resources that it is urged to dispense by way of benefits to individuals? Is it not from the individuals themselves? How, then, can these resources be increased by passing through the hands of a parasitic and voracious intermediary?
...Finally...we shall see the entire people transformed into petitioners. Landed property, agriculture, industry, commerce, shipping, industrial companies, all will bestir themselves to claim favors from the State. The public treasury will be literally pillaged. Everyone will have good reasons to prove that legal fraternity should be interpreted in this sense: "Let me have the benefits, and let others pay the costs." Everyone's effort will be directed toward snatching a scrap of fraternal privilege from the legislature. The suffering classes, although having the greatest claim, will not always have the greatest success."

Bastiat.

How many times do we need to see how the story ends before we acknowledge how it ends?

"“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

"“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

Are all of his supporters lazy thinkers like you two?

#53 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-01-19 10:20 AM | Reply | Flag:

Lazy thinkers? Did I hurt your feeling? Sorry, sarcastic old men that like to tell imaginary stories as a method of argumentation are lazy thinkers.

Someone who opposes stupid wars and incarceration of the innocent and then support Obama, simply cannot or does not think at all.

Maybe Vermin will be around soon and you can go back to flirting with him instead of displaying your cognitive dissonance for all the retort to see.

#58 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 10:25 AM | Reply | Flag:

Maybe just post the link next time?

You're appeal to authority is Warren Buffett? Phail.

The first presidential candidate I voted for was Barry Goldwater. It was a lesson in politics to be repeated with regularity. When voters have a choice between comfortable lies and uncomfortable truths, they'll vote for comfortable lies. I pick Obama to win this election. I would be very much surprised if Paul gets past the primaries.

#23 | POSTED BY ZOT

You nailed it. Cavuto missed it. Ron Paul can't draw away the hard-core Obama supporter because Ron Paul won't hand out free money. He pummels Obama on every other point, but there is a sizable percentage of the electorate who gives far more of a shit about themselves than they do about the country, and those parasites will choose Obama over Paul. Paul running as a third-party independent will put Obama back in office.

62 | Posted by MUSTANG

I just had same conversation with someone. Libertarians have a hard roe to hoe because they don't offer free shit. Running on the platform of "Elect us and we will leave you the hell alone" doesn't apeal to everyone.

Are all of his supporters lazy thinkers like you two?
#53 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2012-01-19 10:20 AM | Reply | Flag:

Lazy thinkers? Did I hurt your feeling? Sorry...
#59 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD

No need to apologize. I give your views all the credit they merit.

I like your use of "cognitive dissonance." It's certainly a step in the right direction in the quest for you to better understand how whatever it is you've got inside your pointed little noggin works. While you're plowing through the DSM IV see if there's any other term you can come up with that'll provide some shorthand terminology for pointing out whatever it is you think it is you're doing when you post rubbish. 'Kay? Thanks!

The Ron Paul Facebook group in my county has more members than there are registered Republicans or Democrats. Mostly younger people. This really is more about ideas than it is about Ron Paul.

When voters have a choice between comfortable lies and uncomfortable truths, they'll vote for comfortable lies. I pick Obama to win this election. I would be very much surprised if Paul gets past the primaries.

#61 | Posted by Ray at 2012-01-19 10:41 AM | Reply | Flag:

Agreed, and then we can resume the idiotic game of R v D, like it was some college football game where every ends up poor, drunk, and a loser. By the looks of it, Doc's already got his front row seat and its not even lunchtime.

Agreed, and then we can resume the idiotic game of R v D, like it was some college football game where every ends up poor, drunk, and a loser. By the looks of it, Doc's already got his front row seat and its not even lunchtime.

#66 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD at 2012-01-19 11:27 AM | Reply | Flag:

Idiots like Doc love the way things are. As long as they can put their heads up their ass, everything is ok. I can't even blame politicians that much anymore as even when people see they are born liars and corrupt to the bone, they still vote for them.

Either way on the subject of the post, this is why I think the GOP does not want to win the election. Paul can draw an independent crowd that was very much in support of Obama last election and has been totally disenfranchised. If he had the support of the GOP robots (people who vote for whoever the party tells them to), he definitely would do a lot better than Romney.

Won't happen daniel GOP big wigs will never tell the GOPbots to vote for Paul. For one thing they like the status quo for another that would amount to letting the GOP faithful know they had been lied to. It won't happen Ray is right Paul doesn't make it past the primaries. Bow to Romney or start looking at a third party candidate. If all the Paul supporters were to vote libertarian this election it could give the party a base to grow from sure 12-15% isn't much but it would be the strongest 3rd party draw since Perot and going to an existing party could be the start of change. Course that won't happen either

"I Have a Dream ... And when this happens, when we allow freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:

Free at last! Free at last!

Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"
-MLK

"The Ron Paul Facebook group in my county has more members than there are registered Republicans or Democrats. Mostly younger people. This really is more about ideas than it is about Ron Paul"

I honestly wonder how many of those young people really understand what a Ron Paul presidency would mean. I believe they hear his views on war and the the war on drugs which I like as well but do they hear the part about eliminating the Dept. of Education, eliminating Pell Grants. federally guaranteed student loans, etc.? I somehow think they haven't thought through their support for Ron Paul who I believe is a sincere person with some very good ideas and some very bad ideas.

#69 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 12:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

He is very clear that it is not just an overnight ending of these systems. Are you so slow as to believe it will be?

#69 | Posted by danni at 2012-01-19 12:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

Don't forget, you are going to vote for Obama in spite of even more immediate and realistic concerns.

#69 | POSTED BY DANNI

That same selective hearing is what got Obama elected in the first place, and is what keeps people supporting him now. They selectively ignored and/or ignore his background, his hollow promises that never were fulfilled, his continuation of the worst of the Bush presidency and his assault on the US economy. They choose to accept his promises despite his performance.

if you want freedom, vote for paul...

Can't- he's not running for anything in November.

And as far as the "freedom fighter" scam goes, you really do need to read his positions. He wants a constitutional amendment banning abortions, even though he (sometimes) believes it's a state right issue.

so much for being anti-big government.

If he could shut the federal government down, he wouldn't give a rats ass if states started executing pot smokers, gays, women who have miscarriages, or reintroduced slavery.

And as far as the "freedom fighter" scam goes, you really do need to read his positions. He wants a constitutional amendment banning abortions, even though he (sometimes) believes it's a state right issue.
so much for being anti-big government.
If he could shut the federal government down, he wouldn't give a rats ass if states started executing pot smokers, gays, women who have miscarriages, or reintroduced slavery.

#73 | POSTED BY NORTHGUY3 AT 2012-01-19 02:30 PM | REPLY | FLAG

But he'll legalize pot, so that makes everything else okay in the eyes of the stupid.

Wow. There was almost a reasonable discussion here. Almost.

The "War on Drugs" is, among other things, one of the single greatest contributing factors to the undermining of individual rights in this country. Right up there with the "War on Terror." The "War on Drugs" really got the fascists' ball rolling.

And yet you sit atop your high horse, ripping on anyone who supports Ron Paul (the only person who would do anything about those wars). I don't think he's perfect, but you can't deny that he would take on those issues in a substantive way, instead of just giving them lip service like Obomney.

I don't think he's perfect, but you can't deny that he would take on those issues in a substantive way, instead of just giving them lip service like Obomney.

This is why I want Ron Paul part of the debate and any person who wins in 2012 would be well served by finding a spot for him in their administration, but I do not want Ron Paul having the role of C-in-C as he has too many looney ideas as well.

Asked and answered up-thread.

Some "answer." When you're ready to be a big boy and address the fact that Ron Paul is the only candidate who will end the war on drugs and the war on terror (two wars you believe are the "greatest contributing factors to the undermining of individual rights" and promote "fascism"), instead of talking about the earth orbiting the sun, let me know.

If, Ron Paul gets the GOP nomination: Ron Paul gets the following voters:

(A) 2008 Obama voters who thought they were going to get 'Change'
(B) 2008 Obama voters who voted to end the wars.
(C) The VAST majority of the Independent vote,
(D) The entire GOP voting block who dislikes Obama enough to vote for Ron Paul instead.
(E) Ron Paul supporters coming out to vote in DROVESand, a machine like no other for the General Elections! (No other candidate can compete against Obama's machine but Ron Paul! Wake Up People!)
(F) Same-sex couples who want to be set free.
(G) Democratic, disillusioned Anti-Drug war voters.
(H) Libertarians.
(I) Youth Vote (Obama has lost them to Ron Paul but, if RP does not get the nomination, they will go back to Obama)

Also, keep in mind, that the Independents have the largest voting block in this country. Republicans and Democrats are the minorities. For the GOP to attack the only candidate on the GOP ticket that can beat Obama is truly insane!

The GOP did not learn anything from 2008. They keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results! Only idiots do that!

Listen up MINORITY GOP...If, you do not get behind Ron Paul, YOU WILL get 4 more years of Obama! GUARANTEED!!!!!!!!

No Ron Paul supporter will vote for any other GOP Candidate. Independents will go back to Obama as will the disenfranchised Democrats and the youth vote!

"If, Ron Paul gets the GOP nomination..."

You'll have a hard time making to the polls without colliding into droves of beggars riding flying pigs piloted by screeching monkeys warbling the Martian national anthem.

That's not nice to call O'bama voters beggars Doc. They aren't beggars, they are "victims".

That's not nice to call O'bama voters beggars Doc. They aren't beggars, they are "victims".

Begroes, please.

Begroes, please.

Posted by goatman at 2012-01-20 10:42 AM | Reply

Now that's just wrong. You're going to make one of our overly sensitive posters wet themselves. Do you really want that on your conscience?