Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, January 17, 2012

The crowd at the GOP debate in South Carolina Monday booed Ron Paul heartily when he made the following comment during a discussion of foreign policy: "If another country does to us what we do to others, we aren't going to like it very much. So I would say maybe we ought to consider a golden rule in foreign policy."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

adammm

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Video here: www.youtube.com

Lincoln should have let these drunken fools secede.
I think the lowest point of the debate, though, was when they started asking all the candidates about the NDAA, then arrived at Paul, and you can actually see the moderators looking at each other whispering, and quickly changing the topic.

its rare that i agree with a selection of the posters here..

but Paul has it right.

"So I would say maybe we ought to consider a golden rule in foreign policy."

So Ron Paul comes out in favor of Obama's Global Groveling and Apology Tour.

So Ron Paul comes out in favor of Obama's Global Groveling and Apology Tour.

#3 | Posted by vernon at 2012-01-17 10:07 AM

According to Vernon, bombing campaigns, assassinations, and removal of dictators equates to an apology.

#4 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-17 10:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

"Despite our failures and shortcomings, America has been an inspiration and an example in a world filled with little but darkness and despair. For that, I am deeply sorry."

--Messiah Apology Tour, Part 1

Vernon should go on a global groveling and apology tour.

"Guess it's only when one idiot boos a gay soldier that you get news coverage- not an entire crowd booing common sense."

The only idiots are losers like you and the left. Most are too fucking stupid to use their own brain, and rely on others to tell them what they saw. Basically, you are a democrat's dream voter...

What kind of tool thinks a set up using a gay soldier asking if a candidate plans to overturn DADT is somehow booing common sense? HTF can they not see the crowd was booing the question?

Next time an airliner hits a skyscraper, remember Paul's wise words.

Next time an airliner hits a skyscraper, remember Paul's wise words.

#8 | Posted by Diablo

go buy some depends, pants pisser

Vernon should go on a global groveling and apology tour.

vermin has his weekend dumper diving tours behind the bars and hotels of his local village. Throw in a little grovelling for booze money and he's been there and done that.
##
Next time an airliner hits a skyscraper, remember Paul's wise words.

The Republican Way is so much better. Disarm the Air Force and ignore fifty warnings, then when you've been told what was going to happen actually happens, celebrate like a palestinian.

And Diablo-I didn't even add attack the wrong country, protect the one that funded the attack and then forget about the attack entirely.

go buy some depends, pants pisser
#9 | Posted by truthhurts at 2012-01-17 11:08 AM

This of course from the same poster who CRIED about the US not being trusted with nukes? How this pathetic excuse for a man has made it this far in life is a fucking mystery...

"The Republican Way is so much better. Disarm the Air Force and ignore fifty warnings, then when you've been told what was going to happen actually happens, celebrate like a palestinian."

The repubican way would have been to listen to Cheney and shoot them all down...

go buy some depends, pants pisser
#9 | Posted by truthhurts at 2012-01-17 11:08 AM

This of course from the same poster who CRIED about the US not being trusted with nukes? How this pathetic excuse for a man has made it this far in life is a fucking mystery...

#12 | Posted by crispee_oc

and right on schedule another pants pisser chimes in

The repubican way would have been to listen to Cheney and shoot them all down...

#13 | Posted by crispee_oc

no the republican way is to attack the wrong country, dumbass.

no the republican way is to attack the wrong country, dumbass.
Posted by truthhurts at 2012-01-17 11:16 AM | Reply

Anyone other than a whining pathetic excuse for a man like yourself saw that as an american way, not a republican way. Bush had more than enough bi-partisan support to take Saddam out...

Anyone other than a whining pathetic excuse for a man like yourself saw that as an american way, not a republican way. Bush had more than enough bi-partisan support to take Saddam out...

#16 | Posted by crispee_oc

so sayeth the drunk.

Bush is your hero.

I guess that says enough about your attachment to reality.

"I guess that says enough about your attachment to reality."

Simply go back to post #12 and avoid guessing. You actually posted a line we can't be trusted with nukes because we were the only country to use them. To me that reflects the mindset of a broken, pathetic excuse for a man, and explains you being a proud cowardly lib....

Bush had more than enough bi-partisan support to take Saddam out...

#16 | Posted by crispee_oc at 2012-01-17 11:21 AM | Reply | Flag:

The only support Bush had to take Saddam out was based on Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies.

I guess that part slipped your "mind".

The only support Bush had to take Saddam out was based on Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies.

So, IOW, the left was so stupid they fell for those lies and they were too lazy to check out to see if they wree true or not.

And you vote for these stupid lazy people to lead you, bOoB.

Saddam, Iraq, the Middle East, and America would have been much better off had Saddam been left in power. Hundreds of thousands of people wouls still be alive today if not for the Bush murders.

Saddam couldn't have indulged in any more mass murders since he couldn't get anymore weapons of mass destruction from Reagan or Bush the First. Besides, he had Bush the Second already murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent people in what can only be described as truly terrorist attacks on civilian population whil shaing the blood on his hands with all Americans.

The man woman and baby killing heroes of the right---Reagan--Bush I----and Bush II.

#20 exactly. It's not like a president never lied before to get us into war. Skepticism should be a required part of any Congressman's voting mindset. There were certainly some who saw through Bush's lies and propaganda, and voted against the war. To blame Bush alone is unfair.

Yet here we still have ignorant voters willing to send other people to die for unnecessary reasons, and booing the one of the only guys who had the foresight to oppose Iraq.

So, IOW, the left was so stupid they fell for those lies and they were too lazy to check out to see if they wree true or not.

And you vote for these stupid lazy people to lead you, bOoB.

#20 | Posted by goatman at 2012-01-17 11:54 AM | Reply | Flag:

At the time we believed in our President. What was your excuse? I guess you like the thpought of the US killing babies and innocent women in their own homes. Not me. But I guess that is the difference between liberals and conservative. Liberals love life--conservatives love dead babies.

The only support Bush had to take Saddam out was based on Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies Bush Lies.

I guess that part slipped your "mind".

#19 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2012-01-17 11:52 AM

The only "slipped mind" in play is yours Bob. Going back a decade only makes it more so in your case. Bush lied people died? LMAO....

"So, IOW, the left was so stupid they fell for those lies..."
#20 | Posted by goatman

Well, the Democrats certainly were. Either that or complicit.

"... and they were too lazy to check out to see if they wree true or not."
#20 | Posted by goatman

The claims were fact checked before the vote. The information was there to be had to anyone who was interested. Which leads one to consider 'complicit' a more reasonable answer than 'stupid.'

Bob, don't forget about Clinton. He was killing Iraqis in 98 just to distract from the Lewinsky affair.

"At the time we believed in our President."

I never understood that argument coming from Democrats. It's as if they are post facto compensating for what was really at play at the time, the political fear of being seen as un-American. It was a useful epithet being employed at the time, which left me equally baffled. But politicians want to get elected first and foremost. Whether or not they actually accomplish anything once elected is always debatable.

The claims were fact checked before the vote. The information was there to be had to anyone who was interested. Which leads one to consider 'complicit' a more reasonable answer than 'stupid.'

fair enough

At the time we believed in our President.

Which goes back to my assertion of stupidity, bOoB. Thank you.

What was your excuse?

Well, I wasn't a member congress at the time, so they didn't let me vote on the Iraqi war thing, bOoB.

Bob, don't forget about Clinton. He was killing Iraqis in 98 just to distract from the Lewinsky affair.

#26 | Posted by adammm at 2012-01-17 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

Clinton was going after Osama bin Laden while the conservatives were howling about "wag the dog".

"At the time we believed in our President."

I never understood that argument coming from Democrats. It's as if they are post facto compensating for what was really at play at the time, the political fear of being seen as un-American. It was a useful epithet being employed at the time, which left me equally baffled. But politicians want to get elected first and foremost. Whether or not they actually accomplish anything once elected is always debatable.

#27 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at

which is partly why the iraq resolution was worded the way it was.

to confront the ongoing threat posed by Iraq (in stead of a declaration of war against Iraq).

It placed the responsibility for proving the threat on bush's shoulders, which he failed to do.

Going after Osama. In Iraq. Three days after being called to testify for screwing interns and perjury. Got it.

Bob, don't forget about Clinton. He was killing Iraqis in 98 just to distract from the Lewinsky affair.
#26 | Posted by adammm at 2012-01-17 12:04 PM | Reply | Flag:

"Clinton was going after Osama bin Laden while the conservatives were howling about "wag the dog"."

Poor Bob can't even remember what he pasted, much less what happened about 15 years ago.

I never understood that argument coming from Democrats. It's as if they are post facto compensating for what was really at play at the time, the political fear of being seen as un-American.

We have to believe someone. Dems are stupid in supporting and believing a rep President. Reps never support a dem President in anything a dem President chooses to do, even if the Reps wanted to do it first.

If dems can never support reps, and reps can never support dems---why don't we just split into two countries and everyone is happy?

I have said this many times and been attacked for saying it many times, but NO ONE EVER HAS A GOOD REASON TO STAY TOGETHER.

The best way for the future is two counties. The North should have let the South secede. They were never Americans. They were and are, ALWAYS Southerners first.

#27 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2012-01-17 12:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

"I never understood that argument coming from Democrats. It's as if they are post facto compensating for what was really at play at the time, the political fear of being seen as un-American. It was a useful epithet being employed at the time, which left me equally baffled. But politicians want to get elected first and foremost. Whether or not they actually accomplish anything once elected is always debatable."

How many direct quotes by every leading dem long before 9-11 have been posted here? Why is it so hard to believe they all thought Saddam had or was aquiring WMD's? Not even going into the failed oil for food and other sanctions being violated, and sooner than later phased out. Not saying you, but many here are complete idiots to ignore the concensus of not only american politicians, but most other countries as well when it came to Saddam...

We have to believe someone.

Jesus Christ. Talk about self confidence and self security issues.

I trust no one until they have proven themselves trustworthy. It appears bOoB is saying the democrats have to trust someone and will do it whether that person is trustworthy or not. (if I were you, I wouldn't be so bold as to be speaking for them all, bOoB. I know many who don't agree with you)

Well, that certainly goes a long way towards explaining why y'all put the zero "hope and change" in office.

The man woman and baby killing heroes of the right---Reagan--Bush I----and Bush II.

#21 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2012-01-17 12:00 PM | Flag: Cheers when Obama bombs a brown kid

We have to believe someone.
#34 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

I try to reserve belief to the pew as much as possible.

Cheers when Obama bombs a brown kid

#37 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-17 12:28 PM | Reply | Flag:

That would be you Bush Lover. We should have been out of Iraq and Afghanistan on Jan 21st 2009. Th reason we aren't is people like you.

That would be you Bush Lover. We should have been out of Iraq and Afghanistan on Jan 21st 2009. Th reason we aren't is people like you.

I'm pretty sure the president of the USA had more say in that than an anonymous blogger on a backwater blog, bOoB.

But keep telling yourself whatever it takes to deflect from the fact that Obama likes killing brown people.

I try to reserve belief to the pew as much as possible.

#38 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2012-01-17 12:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

Then how can you vote? You certainly don't believe anything a candidate says, or anything others say about the candidate or have written about the candidate. You can't vote on BELIEVING anything, so----how do you make up your mid who to vote for? Tea leaves? Frog intestines?

Just curious---how do you do it?

And people like you, too, dumbfuck. Or are you unaware that the man you voted for was crystal clear about doubling down in Afghanistan, and then tried to EXTEND our stay in Iraq well past Bush's negotiated timeline?

#41 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 12:35 PM | Reply | Flag:

It was the best choice at the time. Numb brains like yourself wanted McCain. Besides, Obama DID get out of Iraq on Bushs schedule, and STILL you hate-filled republicans vilified him.

Two countries is the only solution.

Answer the question---why should we stay together as one nation?

Then how can you vote?
#42 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

I said as much as possible. In the case we're speaking about above, the evidence undermining Bush's justification to go to Iraq was there before the vote to authorize him to do so. It's the same evidence the Democrats later pointed to in criticizing him. Their vote didn't require belief, they had facts at their disposal. They ignored it for political reasons, fear of being branded as unAmerican and thereby unelectable going forward. They wound up hurting their brand in the name of keeping their jobs. Incumbency over constituency.

Obama DID get out of Iraq on Bushs schedule, and STILL you hate-filled republicans vilified him.

ONLY because the Iraqi government made him. Like 101 said, the zero, the asswipe you elected and chose to be CiC wanted to extend that deadline. The Iraqi government said, "NO".

Face it, bOoB, Obama likes killing brown people and had not the Iraqi government told him he couldn't do it anymore, he'd have a chubby gleefully pulling the trigger today.

Deal with it. It's history and you can't change it.

A strong and benevolent central government is the key to having a nation that stands for freedom. States rights advocates are essentially calling for the formation of 50 separate countries with 50 separate laws and goals for the future. However, most of these States Righters are from the South. I say ---let them go. They are just fucking up America by sticking around. America would be a far better country without the recent Southern Presidents like Johnson, Carter, Reagan, and the Bushs.

But answer the question---why should we stay together as one nation?

Answer the question---why should we stay together as one nation?

It's been answered many times. You proved yourself too stupid to get it. I'm convinced you never will. Can we move one to smokestacks on the moon, please?

#44 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2012-01-17 12:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

That's your belief. How about that.

It's been answered many times.

#47 | Posted by goatman at 2012-01-17 12:49 PM | Reply | Flag:

No, it hasn't. Link?

It was the best choice at the time. Numb brains like yourself wanted McCain. Besides, Obama DID get out of Iraq on Bushs schedule, and STILL you hate-filled republicans vilified him.

#43 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

You just blamed another poster for being the reason the wars weren't ended on January 21st, 2009, and now you're admitting you too are responsible.
You don't still wonder why you're a laughing stock here, do you?

Also, I didn't vote for McCain, I voted for Cynthia McKinney, D, Georgia

The ONLY reason Obama got us out of Iraq is because he FAILED at extending our stay, but it wasn't from a lack of trying. How's that make you feel, dumbfuck?

"But answer the question---why should we stay together as one nation?"

Because most people, left and right, still love their differently minded family members, still look at themselves as American, Civil War fetishists notwithstanding.

And people like you, too, dumbfuck. Or are you unaware that the man you voted for was crystal clear about doubling down in Afghanistan, and then tried to EXTEND our stay in Iraq well past Bush's negotiated timeline?

So, do yourself a favor, and shut the fuck up, you punk.

#41 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 12:35 PM

Or Boob could start his own country of people who love to fellate Presidents sitting on thrones of dead brown kids and peace prizes.

#51 -- HC, I've explained that exact point to bOoB as have many others. He'll never get it because he is clueless what America is all about. He thinks it is all about him and how he thinks and fuck everyone else if they don't agree with him. They should just fucking get another country if they don't buy into his mindset.

Like I said, he'll never understand your very simple point because he doesn't understand what America is all about.

No, it hasn't.

Yes it has

Link?

Yes there are

That's your belief. How about that.
#48 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Which part? Certainly not the part about Democrats having information that should have informed their vote but choosing to ignore it anyway.

Or Boob could start his own country of people who love to fellate Presidents sitting on thrones of dead brown kids and peace prizes.

#52 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

boOb is a warmongering racist, just like the president he supported that was crystal clear, pre-election, that he was ramping up the murder of brown people in Afghanistan.

Punks like him disgust me to no end. If that racist punk were 70 years younger, sane, and was allowed out of the home, I'd fuck his shit up.

what reaction did he expect...america's biggest export is weapons, war and terrorism...hard to make those that make this shit happen understand that this needs to change.

Because most people, left and right, still love their differently minded family members, still look at themselves as American, Civil War fetishists notwithstanding.

#51 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2012-01-17 12:52 PM | Reply | Flag

You are completely mistaken. Does this look like someone who still considers liberals as fllow countrymen?

start his own country of people who love to fellate Presidents sitting on thrones of dead brown kids and peace prizes.

#52 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-17 12:52 PM | Reply | Flag:

How about this guy---would you want him at your back in a foxhole? Is this your kind of American?

So Ron Paul comes out in favor of Obama's Global Groveling and Apology Tour.

#3 | Posted by vernon at 2012-01-17 10:07 AM | Reply | Flag:

Your response was simply bullshit that could have been taken from a second grade text. Facts are the right hates liberals, and liberals hate the right. There is no compromise---only hate.

Show anyplace where 101, Goatman, Vernon, Glasshouse, or anyone dedicated to rightist hatred, supports Obama and the goals of the current administration. They would be much happier with one of the rep candidates in office. My suggestion would allow everyone to live in a country they can respect with a leader they can respect.

Two countries is the only answer. I suggest we do it with legislation instead of guns this time.

Like I said, he'll never understand your very simple point because he doesn't understand what America is all about.
#53 | Posted by goatman

The idea that I would have to move away from my family members (or them away from me, according to Bob's scenario) over a difference in political ideology is really insulting to me as an American, and as someone who, in spite of our political differences, couldn't imagine his life without these people. My life is a fuller thing because of them (and even some of you conservative jerks) and I would fight, legislatively and in the traditional sense, against anyone that tried to mess with that.

Which part?

#55 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2012-01-17 12:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

The part where you say you don't rely on belief, but were shown to make ALL of your decisions based on belief.

#59 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine at 2012-01-17 01:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

The people of the 1860's didn't think there was much problem to it. You don't have to move. Who said anything about that? Just resign yourself to living under rep rule if you are a dem or dem rule if you are a republican.

#56 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 01:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

How did we get into those countries? How did Obama do that?

LOL The poor disillusioned bOoB made HC's point crystal clear and he is too stupid to realize it.

Furthermore, IF he had a point with the handful of posts he put up (which he doesn't, of course) he is pretending those 4 or 5 people represent 300 million Americans. Really? LOL

Thanks for proving your idiocies and mental defeciencies again, bOoB!

As I said, move to smokestacks on the moon. As a moonbat, you argue that point with much more humor. Same lack of conviction, of course, but you're a lot more fun to laugh at.

boOb is a warmongering racist

#56 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 01:00 PM

The mere mention of mutilated brown people gives him a half chub, especially if there are women and children involved. Can you imagine what his nurse had to clean up when those Gitmo pics were leaked?

#64 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-17 01:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

What is your logic in saying that since I have advocated getting out or Iraq and Afghanistan since the Bush lies were made public? I say you are just a lying punk.

Now that makes sense.

"Your response was simply bullshit that could have been taken from a second grade text. Facts are the right hates liberals, and liberals hate the right. There is no compromise---only hate."

And I'm being the simplistic one?

Go f*ck yourself, Bob. Every once in a while I try to relate to you as if you are a human being... I should know by now how foolish that is.

How did we get into those countries? How did Obama do that?

Backed into a corner and refusing to acknowledge that messiah wanted to stay in Iraq to keep killing brown people, da bOoB deflects to the distant past.

Stick to the original point, bOoB that your zero wanted to keep on killing brown people. We are not focusing on who got us there (we know, duh, dummy) but that your messiah wanted to stay there and keep killing brown people. Reply accordingly, please

Simple, isn't it? LOL

&#"?)=+{]

But answer the question---why should we stay together as one nation?

Boob,

Right here, you have members of the right, left, and middle all united against you.

You are singlehandedly making the case for a United States of America.

#66

Hag, you should know by now that BBob is just another one of Goatfat's userids. This thread is destined to be another 260 post 'debate' between 'them'.

#70 | Posted by axe at 2012-01-17 01:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

You should pay attention little mind. I'm not even responding to Goatmans idiocy. He's talking to himslf as usual.

You are singlehandedly making the case for a United States of America.

#69 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-17 01:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

Fine. Simply tell me in your views---what are the advantages of having millions of libfux fucking up the future that the GOP has in mind for America.

You are singlehandedly making the case for a United States of America.

It could not have been said better. Yet da bOoB will be here at a later date claiming no one has ever made a case that we don't need two Americas and demand a link. LOL

It seems da bOoB is the only one who thinks we need another country. So what are you waiting for bOoB? Why don't you go start one? No one -- read NO ONE wants it except you. So go do it and STFU already.

And if you allow internet in bOoBistan (which I doubt -- it might leak unsavory ideas into your country) feel free to come back and join us Americans who don't freak out over people who think differently and actually welcome different Points of View.

Let us know how that bOoBistan thing goes and we hope to see you visit us freeedom lovers in America, bOoB.

Andrew Jackson had a pretty clear cut about America's enemies: kill them," Gingrich said.

Aren't these guys supposed to be Christians and follow the teachings of Jesus?
What was it Jesus said about how to treat your enemies?

What was it Jesus said about how to treat your enemies?

#74 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2012-01-17 01:27 PM

I believe it was: "I did not come to bring peace, but a sword."

Fine. Simply tell me in your views---what are the advantages of having millions of libfux fucking up the future that the GOP has in mind for America.

#72 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

In most cases having a good debate is an advantage and can facilitate good government. I think attempting to split the country up would cause a civil war over who would get stuck with you.

It seems that da bOoB's desire for another country has been granted but he doesn't know it. It's called the United States of America, bOoB. It has over 300 million people. Sorry to see that you don't wish to be a part of it. It takes all kinds -- even crazy secesionists like you.

How are things working out in bOoBistan (pop 1) anyway? Exactly on the globe where are you anyway?

I should include the full quote actually. Context is key:

But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

35For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

36And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

37He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

Next time an airliner hits a skyscraper, remember Paul's wise words.

#8 | Posted by Diablo

That's right. If only we'd dumped a trillion dollars into overthrowing Saddam BEFORE 9/11. It never would have happened.

Fucking moron.

In most cases having a good debate is an advantage and can facilitate good government.

The debates are over. There is nothing more to talk about. The division is clear. There is debate among dems as to how to proceed, and there is debate among cons as to how to proceed. There is no common groung---no unity between dems and cons. To deny million of people---whether dems or cons---the government that represents them is not valid just for the cause of "debates". Each country can simply watch the other, and if the other has an idea that works, the other country can try it---or not.

The division is permanent. Why would cons fight against--no more unions---no more affirmative action---no more welfare---no Obamacare---no more abortion rights---no more gay rights---lower taxes for the rich--no more liberals in congress---no more liberals on the Supreme Court---no more liberal Presidents---powerful states rights.

Why would dems fight against--strong union rights---strong affirmative action laws---welfare for the poor---Obamacare---abortion rights for women----gay marriage rights for gays---higher taxes on the rich---no more cons in congress---no more cons on the USSC---no more con Presidents---weak States rights.

These debates are over. People should have the right to choose which government suits them. At this point, neither side is happy. There is no common ground between the two sides. Cons do not support the President on any issue. They should have their own country.

I think attempting to split the country up would cause a civil war over who would get stuck with you.

I don't think it would be your problem. I would live in the country that supports human freedom---not fetal freedom. The country that supports the rights of gays, women, children, and the poor. The country that cares for its citizens with Universal Health Care. The country that taxes the rich more than it taxes the poor.

I don't think you would be anywhere near the place.

#76 | Posted by STIRSUMUP at 2012-01-17 01:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

bOoB -- you and only you do not enjoy freedom of speech. Those of use who do already started another country. It is called the United States of America. We did it in 1776. The people like you who do not like differing opinions and freedom of speech and hate the American way are the ones who have to start their own country. So far, I think there is one of you.

It seems pretty absured that you would expect th 300+ million freedom lovers to give a third of a continent and 50 states to you because you are scared shitless of what other people might say. So it is up to you, idiot, to start the other country -- not the 300+ million who enjoy the one we've had since 1776.

Let us know how that goes, America and freedom of speech hater.

Threads are STILL be hijacked with this "two country" tripe? I though Rcade put his foot down on Bob doing this.

The debates are over. There is nothing more to talk about.

Wow. What a sad fucking world you live in, bOoB. If I felt that way, I'd put a gun to my head. I live -- indeed thrive -- on talking about different ideas and debating them.

You continue to show more and more cards in the hand that made you the pathetic little person you are and it's quite sad. It's admissions like yours above that make me feel bad for making fun of you. I should treat the pathetic souls of this earth like you with more compassion. Indeed, we all should.

You have my deepest and most sincere sympathies that your life's road has brought you to a point to make the statement above.

"Why would dems fight against--strong union rights---strong affirmative action laws---welfare for the poor---Obamacare---abortion rights for women----gay marriage rights for gays---higher taxes on the rich---no more cons in congress---no more cons on the USSC---no more con Presidents---weak States rights."

Because not all of them are as lacking in brain power as you.

"Why would cons fight against--no more unions---no more affirmative action---no more welfare---no Obamacare---no more abortion rights---no more gay rights---lower taxes for the rich--no more liberals in congress---no more liberals on the Supreme Court---no more liberal Presidents---powerful states rights."

Because the bogy man conservative who lives in your head does not exist in reality.

#82

Come on, it's like a fatal accident, you cant help but look when that many dead brain cells are on display.

Come on, it's like a fatal accident, you cant help but look when that many dead brain cells are on display.

#85 | Posted by salamandagator at 2012-01-17 02:47 PM

True, but this is a thread I would have liked to actually discuss instead of it being yet another "Bob's Stupidity on Display" show. The reruns get tiresome.

#86

Alright, lets ask the Internet gods for a once a week limit on letting bob get Internet in his mother's basement. In return we could double his tin foil allowance.

Hag, you should know by now that BBob is just another one of Goatfat's userids. This thread is destined to be another 260 post 'debate' between 'them'.
#70 | Posted by axe

If that's the case then I'm sincerely disappointed with G-Money.

And then why TF is it the liberal version that pisses me off?

Bob is not Goat.

Goat ain't that dumb and Bob ain't smart enough to even post as Bob let alone as anyone else as well.

*Attempting to put thread back on course*

We have to keep in mind that America has been at war now for so long that it is all many of us know. Kids today do not know a pre-9/11 America. The concepts of those freedoms we gave up are only text in history books to them. Many people seem to think of War as the Global Football League with the US Military as our team. If they don't play, we don't win and nobody likes losers. Rah, rah, rah!

I should include the full quote actually. Context is key:

But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

35For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

36And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

37He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

#78 | Posted by kanrei

So Jesus said to kill your family?

Kan,

That is a very depressing appraisal of the situation. I hope you are wrong.

If we were to reinstate the draft, the youngsters might have some incentive to learn a little history.

I don't know the bible for shit, but a Google of "Jesus enemies quote" brings this first....


But I say, love your enemies![b] Pray for those who persecute you! In that way, you will be acting as true children of your Father in heaven.

Seems pretty clear to me. I wonder how guys like Gingrich and Santorum who claim that the bible is absolute don't get it.

*Attempting to put thread back on course*

We have to keep in mind that America has been at war now for so long that it is all many of us know. Kids today do not know a pre-9/11 America. The concepts of those freedoms we gave up are only text in history books to them. Many people seem to think of War as the Global Football League with the US Military as our team. If they don't play, we don't win and nobody likes losers. Rah, rah, rah!

#90 | Posted by kanrei at 2012-01-17 03:06 PM

That is a very depressing appraisal of the situation. I hope you are wrong.

If we were to reinstate the draft, the youngsters might have some incentive to learn a little history.

#92 | Posted by axe at 2012-01-17 03:11 PM

You've been here daily waving the pom-poms for assassinations of American citizens and drone strikes.

You're going to need a heavy duty tractor mower to clean up that hairy mess in your panties.

Threads are STILL be hijacked with this "two country" tripe? I though Rcade put his foot down on Bob doing this.

#82 | Posted by kanrei

Don't insult tripe.....

The draft didn't stop deferment chicken hawks like Santorum, Romeny, Gingrich, or Cheney from starting wars or adopting reservations on sending other people's kids to die. Why would it help today?

That is a very depressing appraisal of the situation. I hope you are wrong.


So do I, but follow the pattern keeping in mind that "those who control the youth, control the future."

1980's- War on drugs introduced random locker searches without cause.
1990's- School shootings introduced metal detectors, random locker and back pack searches, and car searches
2000's- War on Terror introduces Patriot Act, wire taps, monitoring, unprecidented detention, and a general lack of rights in the name of security.

The kids who grew up in the 80's were taught "if you did nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide." They are now in their 40's and 50's voting for Bush, Obama, and extending of war and a limiting of basic rights.

The personal attacks on me simply show you have no response, and I've proen my point

Abortion debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Gay rights debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Welfare debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Affirmative action debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Tax the rich debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Dems and Reps agree on nothing. SO---nothing will be accomplished.
Two countries means both sides get to accomplish their goals.

Your personal attacks don't change the facts. Your personal attacks just prove I am correct, since you can't rebut the statements.

Just like the FACT that many rightists propose the possibility of secession---people like Ron Paul and Rick Perry. No one on the left has said anything about secession---except me.

If we were to reinstate the draft, the youngsters might have some incentive to learn a little history.
#92 | Posted by axe

They might have an actual stake in what our government does in our name, that's for sure.

They might have an actual stake in what our government does in our name, that's for sure.

#99 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

Kinda like paying taxes.

They might have an actual stake in what our government does in our name, that's for sure.

#99 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

They could simply refuse to answer the call, and burn their draft card. Then Corky would wet her panties and praise them for being heros, just like Cassius Clay.

......and I've proen my point

yes you have.

Dems and Reps agree on nothing.

#98 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob at 2012-01-17 03:15 PM

They agree on plenty of stuff. They are, in general, both pro-drug war, pro-bombing brown kids, pro-authoritarian measures to fight terror, etc.

(sorry, I know mentioning the blowing up of children probably gave you an uncomfortable stiffy)

ATTENTION TERRORISTS - PLEASE INVADE SOUTH CAROLINA FIRST, THEY CAN BE PUT TO SLEEP WITH A BLANKET OVER THEIR CAGE.

How many parrots does one party need, sheesh!?

South Carolina Crowd Boos Ron Paul's War On Terror Position 4'28

Paul's point is extremely valid - we should capture and try them in a court of law.

How else could we get intelligence without doing the actual work. It would appear that it's all been falsified to date, directing military at the behest of a racist, greed-oriented agenda.

The collateral damages, the massive numbers of innocents the United States military coalition have murdered purposefully and accidentally, even arming dictators to commit these atrocities - it's performed by design, ignoring laws and ethics.

Did we ever legally declare war on Iraq or Afghanistan? NO?! Then what are we doing out there? Acting on behalf of non-legal interests.

Newt does make persuasive arguments though. An actual terrorist should be handled differently than a non-terrorist, but the label even applies to college students protesting, so he's already glossing over the actual variety of alleged terrorists extradited are GOAT HERDERS, NOT MILITARY EXPERTS.

Also, right after Newt claims "kill them" and the whooping begins, check the guy in the ballcap throwing up a White Power fist..

They could simply refuse to answer the call, and burn their draft card. Then Corky would wet her panties and praise them for being heros, just like Cassius Clay.
#101 | Posted by 101Chairborne

Doing it the hippie route is quite a different thing from what Ali did. Ali didn't hide for what he believed, he faced the music and took the risks. You can call that cowardice, but I'm going to side with Kanrei on this one.

Doing it the hippie route is quite a different thing from what Ali did. Ali didn't hide for what he believed, he faced the music and took the risks. You can call that cowardice, but I'm going to side with Kanrei on this one.

#105 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

I'm going to call it cowardice because that's exactly what it was.

How brave of an affluent celebrity to shirk his civic duty and hide behind an army of lawyers to ensure he didn't face the consequences of his actions...

I notice he never left the country he refused to serve. Talk about courage.

No one on the left has said anything about secession---except me.
#98 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

vermontrepublic.org

Kinda like paying taxes.
#100 | Posted by STIRSUMUP

No, nothing like paying taxes. Unless you want to equate risking your life in service of one's country with paying taxes. But conservatives don't debase the contributions of people who serve that way so I know you must have meant something else by your comment..

bye, bOoB. I don't think anyone wants to talk to you anymore.

Your pathetic existence is bad enough, but to have to endure it alone must be really sobering.

I notice he never left the country he refused to serve. Talk about courage.

#106 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 03:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Same with Romney---but I bet you don't think he is a coward.

Same with Romney---but I bet you don't think he is a coward.

You are right. Romney never struck me as a coward.

Same with Romney---but I bet you don't think he is a coward.

#110 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

Anyone that refuses to answer the call from the country they've taken from is a coward. Except Mitt. He's always struck me as a pretty tough hombre. Those dinks are lucky Mitt had religious duties to perform, or we would have won the war in Vietnam that scumbags like you lost due to your lack of courage and fighting ability.

Same with Romney---but I bet you don't think he is a coward.
#110 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob
Anyone that refuses to answer the call from the country they've taken from is a coward. Except Mitt. He's always struck me as a pretty tough hombre. Those dinks are lucky Mitt had religious duties to perform, or we would have won the war in Vietnam that scumbags like you lost due to your lack of courage and fighting ability.
#112 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 03:51 PM

And I've always felt that the military are pussy cowards for not allowing homosexuals. They even talk tough, but then freak out about showers and shitting.

Courage is also knowing when you've done wrong and rightly attempt to fix it. Vietnam was invaded with a prejudice against their culture and race. Fuck you and your "service of courage".

Rmoney hid out in France during the draft and kept all five of his sons out from the military he wants control of - he's a sack of shit and you're going to vote for him, aren't you?

Rmoney hid out in France during the draft and kept all five of his sons out from the military he wants control of - he's a sack of shit and you're going to vote for him, aren't you?

???

I thought you lefties -- especially you, robot -- were all against the military and applauded people who avoided it, even if done illegally. Now you claim that Romney did it and you claim that is a strike against him. WTF? Make up your mind where you stand on this issue and get back with us.

Leftwing Logic: Only republican presidential candidates and their families need to serve in the military. Democrats and their families can dodge the draft, or fail to fight in wars their dad starts.

You see, it's all perfectly logical, just ask Northgay...

Abortion debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Gay rights debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Welfare debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Affirmative action debate---over---nothing more to be said.

Tax the rich debate---over---nothing more to be said.

I love the potential meta discourse that this can potentially go in.

BB is trying to lead you all into a debate on whether there is anything to debate!

Down the rabbit hole . . .

#116 | Posted by Grendel at 2012-01-17 04:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

Then disprove the point. Say something new that hasn't been said on any of the subjects. Say something that will change someones mind.

Then disprove the point.

bOoB, I realize this is yet more proof of your shitty memory, but you'll just have to trust me. I've explained to you dozens of times that the burden of proof lies with the person making the point. It is not up to someone to disprove it.

Learn this and save yourself some embarrassment and me some keystrokes always correcting you.

"I thought you lefties -- especially you, robot -- were all against the military and applauded people who avoided it, even if done illegally."

You "thought"...what a fucking moron.

That's what you get for "thinking" without the proper equipment.

LOL!

.

The main difference seems to be that the Cons always claim to support the wars they refuse to fight in.
ChickenHawks

Leftwing Logic: Only republican presidential candidates and their families need to serve in the military. Democrats and their families can dodge the draft, or fail to fight in wars their dad starts.

#115 | Posted by 101Chairborne at 2012-01-17 04:10 PM

Bush sends kids to war = chickenhawk.

Obama, who also never saw combat (because he was never in the military) sends kids to war = hero worthy of peace prizes and a legion of DR Democrats on their knees drooling for his load.

Good point.

#118 | Posted by goatman at 2012-01-17 04:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

I believe that anyone who reads the two statements knows that you are mistaken. When someone like Darwin makes a statement about something like evolution, it is not his burden to prove himself to be mistaken.

You "thought"...what a fucking moron.

Please. Your best retort is the ancient, juvenile, and stupid taking "I thought" out of context and childishly commenting on it? Really? That's your final answer? And you call me the moron? LOL indeed.

When someone like Darwin makes a statement about something like evolution, it is not his burden to prove himself to be mistaken.

That's right, bOoB -- it's not anyone's job to prove him wrong. That's what I said.

Thanks for agreeing and admitting you are in error in expecting someone else to prove you wrong.

The main difference seems to be that the Cons always claim to support the wars they refuse to fight in.
ChickenHawks

#120 | Posted by TFDNihilist

Well just think, "the main difference" you hang your hat on is gonna bite you in the ass once you realize the military vote goes republican. Can't think of a better way to show your point to be based off of nothing but sheer ignorance other than to point out if you're in the military, you're by default, supporting the war...

bOoB, I realize this is yet more proof of your shitty memory, but you'll just have to trust me. I've explained to you dozens of times that the burden of proof lies with the person making the point. It is not up to someone to disprove it.

Learn this and save yourself some embarrassment and me some keystrokes always correcting you.

#118 | Posted by goatman

Let him tell his story again even if it's the same as yesterday. If you aggravate him it only makes it harder on the nurses.

once you realize the military vote goes republican.

#125 | Posted by 101Chairborne

That actually has nothing at all to do with my point.
I respect folks who are willing to fight for their cause, no matter how fucked up I believe that cause to be.
My point was about those that say they support the fight, yet refuse to participate in it.

support the wars they refuse to fight in.


Reading is fundamental.

My point was about those that say they support the fight, yet refuse to participate in it.

TFD -- do you eat meat? Would you be willing to work in a slaughterhouse? Do you shit in toilets attached to a public sewer system? Would you be willing to work in the sewers?

What about people who for reasons beyond their control can't serve in the military? Are they not allowed to be for it?

I don't believe people have to participate in bringing about something they support. Those who say it is necessary are more than likely hypocrites.

#126 | Posted by STIRSUMUP at 2012-01-17 04:40 PM | Reply | Flag:Still can't competeB/b>

I bet you wish you had something valid to say on any subject. I bet you dream at night of maybe, just maybe, tomorrow you will say something that won't convince others you are a moron.

Sorry for the complete bold type. I had a stirsumupsized brain fart there.

you might want to check your pants after that.....

Then disprove the point. Say something new that hasn't been said on any of the subjects. Say something that will change someones mind.

If you didn't think that debate was important or at least meaningful to you, you wouldn't do it. You wouldn't come here and debate.

If you believe that no one can be convinced of anything here or in the country at large, all your posts have to be some kind of act of narcissism--speaking for the pleasure of hearing yourself speak-- or trolling, trying to get an emotional rise out someone because you delight in that alone--another form of narcissism.

Moreover, simply asking me the question you asked above retorts your own position.

It is paradoxical/illogical to request a debate on the position that there is nothing to debate.

If you argue against this post with the intention of disproving me, you will further disprove your own point.

But go ahead anyway; have the last word. I am not going any farther into the rabbit hole I am late. . .

TFD -- do you eat meat? Would you be willing to work in a slaughterhouse? Do you shit in toilets attached to a public sewer system? Would you be willing to work in the sewers?
#129 | Posted by goatman

Yes and Yes. I have killed and eaten animals. And I would work in the sewers.
One thing I learned in the USMC and from my brother who was my chef is that the best leadership is by example. I run moving crews and would never ask any of my men to do something I would not do myself.

And I would work in the sewers.

So have you? If not, what gives you the right to have your shit processed by a sewage treatment plant. And you would be willing to sign a four year contract to work in sewers.

What are you waiting for then. Prove to us how strongly you feel about your conviction that one has to walk the walk as well as talk the talk. Let us know when that four year sewer gig starts.

My point was about those that say they support the fight, yet refuse to participate in it.

#127 | Posted by TFDNihilist

So Corky, Americanunity, donnerboy, and the rest of the libs that supported the Afghan war and the assault on Momar? Those guys aren't republicans/conservatives.

and would never ask any of my men to do something I would not do myself.

#134 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2012-01-17 05:15 PM

Like Obama did when he doubled down on Afghanistan, sending kids to die. Obama = chickenhawk.

I don't believe people have to participate in bringing about something they support.
#129 | Posted by goatman

Maybe, but war and killing are a whole different story.

And anyone who can't physically fight can participate in many other ways.

Al Franken and John Stewart have done many USO tours. How many has Rush Limbaugh done?

Does Hannity making oodles of cash over his patriotism tour count?

So Corky, Americanunity, donnerboy, and the rest of the libs that supported the Afghan war and the assault on Momar?

#136 | Posted by 101Chairborne

I agree.

See www.debbieschlussel.com

Like Obama did when he doubled down on Afghanistan, sending kids to die. Obama = chickenhawk.

#137 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

Please show a post of mine where I've supported any military action of Obama's.

Tu quoque ,[1] or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a kind of logical fallacy. It is a Latin term for "you, too" or "you, also". A tu quoque argument attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting his failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This dismisses someone's point of view on an issue on the argument that the person is inconsistent in that very thing.[2] It is considered an ad hominem argument, since it focuses on the party itself, rather than its positions.[3]

en.wikipedia.org

So Corky, Americanunity, donnerboy, and the rest of the libs that supported the Afghan war and the assault on Momar?

#136 | Posted by 101Chairborne

I agree.

#140 | Posted by TFDNihilist

Well I owe you an apology for assuming you were a hypocrite.

How many has Rush Limbaugh done?

I don't know. I'm not a Rush fan. How many has Obama or Bill Maher done, I wonder? These are irrelevent questions you ask.

People die bringing you oil and gas and electricity. They die in coal mines -- sometimes slowly of weird diseases. Yet you utilize their services.

There is nothing wrong with supporting something without actively participating in it.

Tu quoque ,...

en.wikipedia.org

#143 | Posted by Grendel

Oh shit. Another person recognizes that fallacy (my shtick).

--RightisRight

If you didn't think that debate was important or at least meaningful to you, you wouldn't do it. You wouldn't come here and debate.

I never said debate wasn't important. To come away with that thought shows a very poor leap of logic. I said those debates were done, and made the point that reps are opposed to every concept put forward by dems as to how the citizens of the country should be regarded.

If you believe that no one can be convinced of anything here or in the country at large, all your posts have to be some kind of act of narcissism--speaking for the pleasure of hearing yourself speak-- or trolling, trying to get an emotional rise out someone because you delight in that alone--another form of narcissism.

Again, that is your poorly constructed strawman. The point was never ---debate is not valid.

It is paradoxical/illogical to request a debate on the position that there is nothing to debate.

I didn't ask for debate. I asked for correction. All you had to do was prove me mistaken. There could be no debate if you could do that.

If you argue against this post with the intention of disproving me, you will further disprove your own point.

Your point, not mine. My point stands. Those debates are over. Anything said has been said before, and by the same people.

But go ahead anyway; have the last word. I am not going any farther into the rabbit hole I am late. . .

Then you should have just STFU before opening your pie hole in the first place. Taking Goatman's chickenshit way out by saying ---You can have the last word, is just that. The way of a chickenshit.

#133 | Posted by Grendel at 2012-01-17 05:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

#142 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2012-01-17 05:24 PM

Fair enough.

Thanks for all the civil discourse. I know my fairly principled stands and lack of hyperbole driven hypocrisy is an oddity in modern American politics, but I've always found it's pretty easy to stand up for what you believe in if you truly believe it.

So Goat, you believe in order to live in modern America you need to work on an oil rig and work in the sewers and fight in every single war and I don't know, everything else?

I do know that I try to live my life by my principles everyday. Which included serving my country for 3 years. I don't own a car and keep my heating and air very low. I don't eat high-fructose corn syrup or vote for major party candidates.
If I had to heat my home with a fireplace, that would be fine with me.

#150

I think he said the exact opposite.

So Goat, you believe in order to live in modern America you need to work on an oil rig and work in the sewers and fight in every single war and I don't know, everything else?

You didn't read my posts, did you? I said I was against that concept. In fact I said it twice. However if people who don't believe it and feel that one must sign up for four in order to support the war, they'd better walk the walk themselves and get a job in a sewer for four years if they are going to shit in them.

No, I think I got your point. You missed my post where I said that killing and war are a different story. i read your posts all the time so i know that you are just being obstinate to stir things up. You know it's not the same thing. If I thought for a second that say, there was a flood coming and I had to go into the sewers to protect my home, I wouldn't hesitate. If I thought for a second that Al-Queda had the financial, logistical and industrial capability to invade America, I'd be the first guy down in Cape May defending the Delaware.
I heard and read many times how many believed that if we didn't go fight in the Middle East that we'd all be speaking Arabic and forced to convert to Islam. If I believed that even for a second, I'd be in the fight.

But I must go and cook dinner for my family. I have leftover roast so I think I'm gonna make pho'.

Once again, Buffalo Bob gets his pussy kicked in.

It's not what you say, but how you say it. Ron Paul has a problem saying things sometimes.

If done in the right way, a person could have told that entire audience to fuck off, and they would have cheered!

Ron Paul really needs to work on his delivery, if he wants to start making any real headway.

Ron Paul really needs to work on his delivery.

Vernon should go on a global groveling and apology tour.

#6 | Posted by BruceBanner at 2012-01-17 10:49 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag:

I thought he already was.

"Despite our failures and shortcomings, America has been an inspiration and an example in a world filled with little but darkness and despair. For that, I am deeply sorry."

--Messiah Apology Tour, Part 1

Posted by vernon
Vermin Alcohol-Vapor Induced Hallucinatory Made-Up Quotes Tour, Part MMXII

Stay classy, South Carolina GOP!

/And Jesus wept.

Be Well.

The main trouble with becoming two countries - which the great unwashed hates while bowing to unlimited "states' rights" is that it would restore slavery and make nazi yahoos like 101, Eb and The Goat their elected leaders. Much as 101 questions the essential humanity of our darker brothers and sister, I just don't think we can do that. herm

Liberals love life--conservatives love dead babies.

#23 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

This has got to be the dumbest post ever.

it would restore slavery

Do you actually think of the country split into two countries right now, one would restore slavery? Are you stupid?

still waiting for libs to admit that this headline is complete bullshit and incorrect...if they booed the golden rule then I'm spending the night this weekend with a blonde fox tv babe....

but keep saying they did, obamadupes.....it only helps us

Despite our failures and shortcomings, America has been an inspiration and an example in a world filled with little but darkness and despair. For that, I am deeply sorry."

--Messiah Apology Tour, Part 1

Posted by vernon
Vermin Alcohol-Vapor Induced Hallucinatory Made-Up Quotes Tour, Part MMXII

#158 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

CLASSIC ALINSKY RULE 5.....

way to go doc....

those obama quotes are just too FACTUAL to mount an argument, arent they???

For those of you who are talking crap about Ron Paul, numbers don't lie. Which candidate do are active military members support?

Opps...For those of you who are talking crap about Ron Paul, numbers don't lie. Which candidate do our active military members support?

To righties who post here - I mean truly vicious uglies like the pretend paratrooper; you know who you are - people with the balls to resist illegal, unustified, inhumane wars are "cowards." We risk prison and/or exile for principled stands while they sit in their goddam armchairs, spew vitriol at their betters and resist lessons in semantics. Indeed, they're surely proud of being anti-semantic. herm

DAMN BOY

get something off your chest with that last one???

hope you feel better....

still waiting for libs to admit that this headline is complete bullshit and incorrect...if they booed the golden rule then I'm spending the night this weekend with a blonde fox tv babe....

but keep saying they did, obamadupes.....it only helps us

#162 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2012-01-19 11:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

It looked like they were booing the Golden Rule to me. I saw Ron Paul say maybe we should try the Golden Rule when dealing with foreign countries, and then I heard booing. What were they booing from your point of view?

It looked like they were booing the Golden Rule to me

So? The Golden Rule is BS,bOoB.

So? The Golden Rule is BS,bOoB.

#169 | Posted by goatman at 2012-01-19 10:13 PM | Reply | Flag:

Don't tell me. I'm not the one who doubts republicans booed the Golden Rule. AFKABABBLE 2 is the one who doubts that.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable