Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Human rights groups are protesting Wednesday on the 10th birthday of the U.S. military detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. "I wonder if the U.S. government wants to keep us here forever," wrote Suleiman al-Nahdi, 37, in a letter to his attorneys. Al-Nahadi was cleared to be released five years ago but remains in detention.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

let's throw a party and waterboard little bush, darth and rummy.

...and obammy for continuing on this path of extremism

Obama owns it now. He never pushed hard enough to close the place.

Prisons. They grow up so fast.

Just another Obama lie.

The only thing that will close Gitmo is a nuclear blast.


The only thing that will close Gitmo is a nuclear blast.

Posted by BruceBanner at 2012-01-11 03:34 PM |

Even then it will remain open: can't have mutants roaming free.

#1 seems fair. #2 to a lesser extent.

#1 seems fair. #2 to a lesser extent.

#8 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2012-01-11 03:50 PM | Reply

#2 seems fair. #1 to a lesser extent. I hold fabricators to a different standard.

#2 seems fair. #1 to a lesser extent. I hold fabricators to a different standard.

#9 | Posted by matsop at 2012-01-11 03:57 PM | Reply |

Also, hypocrits

"Obama owns it now. He never pushed hard enough to close the place."

So he gets the blame instead of the people in Congress who prevented him from closing it?? That's ridiculous. The people responsible are the one's wh prevented the prisoners from being transferred stateside.

He should have known that before he ran his mouth during the election. Dems didn't want them in their districts as well. Did not take much to see that coming.

$800K per prisoner per year to keep them there.

Happy Birthday!

www.youtube.com

$800K per prisoner per year to keep them there
#13 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce

I think there are 180 prisners there but for sake of the argument lets say 200. What would mean that GITMO costs $160,000,000.00 a year. I have my doubts.

Obama lied, and freedom died We Long To Be Free Again (reitze).

Guantanamo is still open and the NDAA is a National Disgrace Against America (NDAA) (reitze). Nazis and Commies takin over for you!

It can't have turned 10, Obama's been president for 3 years now!

So he gets the blame instead of the people in Congress who prevented him from closing it?? That's ridiculous. The people responsible are the one's wh prevented the prisoners from being transferred stateside.

#11 | POSTED BY DANNI AT 2012-01-11 04:03 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

You mean the Democrat-controlled Congress he had for his first two years?

What has been the recidivism rate of those released? In war POW's are usually kept until the war is over. Is the war over with radical Islam. Obama may be withdrawing the troops from Iraq and later Afghanistan so we will not be warring with them, but will they still be warring with us. If so, the war is not over. To release potential anti-U.S. combatants would seem to be an irrational and unrewarding action.

Happy birthday!

I look forward to the 20th.

Hopefully, we can merge the event with a celebration of the School of Americas and commemorate it with a national holiday that replaces one of the useless ones we've heretofore endured in the month of February.

and January, for that matter.

Danni: So he gets the blame instead of the people in Congress who prevented him from closing it?? That's ridiculous. The people responsible are the one's who prevented the prisoners from being transferred stateside.

Soheifox: You mean the Democrat-controlled Congress he had for his first two years?

That's the one. Don't act like you don't know about Blue Dogs in the Congress or the fact that the GOP also threatened to kill any legislation to close Gitmo in the Senate where the so-called 60 vote majority vote was mostly a myth due to Kennedy's illness and Franken being deliberately delayed in taking his seat. Obama tried again and again to get funding to move the prisoners from Gitmo to the US and was cock blocked time and time again by Republicans deadset on preventing Obama from fulfilling a campaign promise.

Which he is still trying to fulfill, btw.

FTA: White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday that Mr. Obama still wants to close Guantanamo because "it's the right thing to do for our national security interest," a view that he says is shared by senior members of the military. He noted President George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain, while running for president in 2008, also supported closing the prison.

"The commitment that the president has to closing Guantanamo Bay is as firm today as it was during the campaign ... I think this is a process that faces obstacles that we're all aware of and we will continue to work through them," Carney said.

People who try to pretend that not closing Gitmo wasn't a cheap political ploy by the Repubs are usually also the same morons trying to assert that the Repubs didn't hold middle class tax cuts and unemployment relief hostage to keep the BushCo tax cuts to the rich.

Which is to say, they are either radically uninformed, deliberately misinformed or just idiots.

Some combination of the above anyway.

Be Well.

Obama has now had a full two years in office, and the possibility of keeping this extremely difficult promise seems even more remote now than when his presidency began. Some argue that Congress is largely to blame, while others say Obama simply made a political calculation not to expend too much political capital on it. But blame is not the final arbiter of whether a promise is kept or broken. The administration has clearly not backed off claims that it continues to pursue this promise. But even those who think this promise is merely stalled instead of broken acknowledge that it's unlikely Guantanamo will be closed by the end of Obama's four-year term. We're not inclined to extend the timeline for this promise into a second term when resolution between now and then seems unlikely. We will revisit our rating should the situation change dramatically, but for now, we are moving this to a Promise Broken.

www.politifact.com

And the checks in the mail...

But blame is not the final arbiter of whether a promise is kept or broken.

No one's arguing that Gitmo didn't close, numbnutz.

The question is who was mostly responsible for Gitmo not closing.

Answer there is "GOP in Congress and Senate".

Thanks for playing.

Be Well.

$800K per prisoner per year to keep them there.

#13 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce

911 cost the World trillions, and the bill keeps on rising. And that act was achieved by just a handful of these subhumans.

Think it's so hard to outwit the nitwit in the White House. Think again. These subhumans remain behind bars for a very good reason.

A headline everyone knew we'd see.

The dumbfuck pantpissing libs dont care that it's not closed. Actions don't matter. The only thing that counts is Obama SAID he'd close it. That's good enough for those retards.

Man, you easily led fools are a hoot...

Man 101QueerBorne, you sure like to hear yourself talk.

Why don't you read Spuds post and shut up already.

BS Spud. The minority Republicans stopped Obama with threats and so you blame the R's?

So, why didn't the Dems stop Bush in the last two years of his presidency? Why is it Bush's fault, not the Dems, for everything in the last two years of his term. They were the minority. The minority can stop the majority, right?

Or were they just spineless and the R's have shown backbone.

Don't worry. Both parties suck. Doesn't matter whether it's a D or R. We need third party more than anything.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable