Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, January 06, 2012

Eastman Kodak, once ranked among America's corporate titans, is preparing to seek bankruptcy protection in the coming weeks, the Wall Street Journal reports. The 131-year-old company is making last-ditch efforts to sell off some patents to avoid Chapter 11 and making preparations if those efforts fail. The company, which has focused on selling consumer and commercial printers the past decade, reportedly needs $1 billion in financing to stay afloat during bankruptcy proceedings.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

ExpsRedemption

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

www.whitehouse.gov

"President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness

Antonio M. Perez
Chairman and CEO, Eastman Kodak Company "

And part of HP before Kodak! A real winner!

Borders was the same thing- complete failure of a company to recognize shifts in consumer demand and lead it rather than chase after it. As sad as it is to see Kodak dying, that's business.

Video killed the radio star.

Digital cameras killed Kodak.

The times, they are a'changing.

Be Well.

None of the new pursuits generated the cash needed to fund the change in course and cover the company's big obligations to its retirees. A Chapter 11 filing could help Kodak shed some of those obligations, but the viability of the company's printer strategy has yet to be demonstrated, raising questions about the fate of the company's 19,000 employees

They're fucked.

But since they aren't union (or at least i didn't see they were in the article) and they aren't govt employees......they'll get ignored.

But since they aren't union (or at least i didn't see they were in the article) and they aren't govt employees......they'll get ignored.

#4 | Posted by eberly at 2012-01-05 09:15 AM | Reply | Flag:

The major point of posting the story is to show Obama has taken the CEO Antonio M. Perez to be on his Council of Jobs and Competitiveness.

It is funny because Kodak and HP are unable to produce both jobs and competitiveness.

Not the kind of guy I would want on the council if I were looking to succeed.

#5

oh, yet another reason why it'll get ignored.

But since they aren't union (or at least i didn't see they were in the article) and they aren't govt employees......they'll get ignored.

#4 | POSTED BY EBERLY AT 2012-01-05 09:15 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

But how can they fail if they don't have union workers to put the blame on?

fair point 726 considering how much blame unions get everytime a company is in trouble.

BTW, there is a Kodak banner ad on this thread. LOL

Maybe Obama just wanted another "lead from behind" guy to work with.

Who the fuck wakes up every morning pissing anger and moaning about shit like this?

Do you worthless fucks cry in your frosted flakes about the demise of the blacksmith? The ice truck guy? The Ferrier?

WTF! This site is a running demonstration of how to be a sniveling, pathetic harpy.

I can't believe they are still in business in this age of home computers, digital cameras, and online photo albums.

Kanrei, Kodak did get into digital cameras but they seemed to be behind the curve as their competitors grew and the film business shriveled. Fuji took away a lot of their film business along the way (I switched to Fuji NPS print film and loved it). Sad.

WTF! I am a running demonstration of how to be a sniveling, pathetic harpy.

#10 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2012-01-05 11:29 AM | Reply | Flag: Fixed

At least you are honest.

Meanwhile they cut a lot of their traditional darkroom supplies leaving Ilford and some smaller companies a monopoly on it. They caught the digital train way too late, and jettisoned their basics too fast. And now, we have the same blind, groping, vision-less "expertise" advising the President.

More cheerleaders for failure blaming everything on Obama.

Good thing for you losers that you will have 5 more years to cry in your corn flakes. And then another 16 or 20 years until the public finally forgets what a colossal clusterfuck the Republican party created in the early 2000's.

Digital cameras killed Kodak.

Smart phones are going to kill digital cameras, except for the high end professional cameras.

Ray, the quality of still/video cameras in phones has really amazed me. I can't see me giving up my DSLR or digital video camera due to the high quality of the image, especially in dim lighting, but for many/most people the imaging hardware built into their phone is good enough. Plus they have it with them everywhere they go -- at least in the under 35 age group. ;~)

My first digital camera had a whopping 2.1Mp sensor. I considered it a toy compared to my film SLR cameras but it taught me how to post process. It was small enough I carried it with me everywhere and as time went by more of my picture-taking was done using it. It led to my first 6Mp DSLR and the film cameras were relegated to a shelf in my closet.

Kodak did get into digital cameras

Kodak had digital image processing back in the 1970's

Smart phones are going to kill digital cameras

Smart phones will eventually replace just about all our electronics. I see the future of smart phones replacing televisions, pc's, point and shoot digital cameras as well as camcorders.

My smart phone takes higher resolution photos than my first digital camera. However it does lack a zoom lens which right now is one of it's limitations.

When you combine in Apples facetime, the future is happening fast. The only limitation is going to be the networks that serve them. In big cities consumers will have access to all the features, but in small cities/rural communities coverage is spotty.

It led to my first 6Mp DSLR and the film cameras were relegated to a shelf in my closet.

I just threw out my Minolta SLR when I bought me Canon DSLR. Comparing the pics from the DSLR to a point and shoot digital camera is night and day. The DSLR just blows the point and shoot away.

More cheerleaders for failure blaming everything on Obama.

Good thing for you losers that you will have 5 more years to cry in your corn flakes. And then another 16 or 20 years until the public finally forgets what a colossal clusterfuck the Republican party created in the early 2000's.

#15 | Posted by axe

Obama wasn't even mentioned until you showed up.

No one is blaming Obummer for Kodaks failure. They are pointing out how STOOPID he is to be useing the leader of a FAILING company as an advisor. MmmmKay?

Chief-think this is bad? You should have heard the righties going on about Polaroid when it went bankrupt.

Not.

On October 11, 2001, Polaroid Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Almost all the company's assets (including the "Polaroid" name itself) were sold to a subsidiary of Bank One. They went on to form a new company, which also operates under the name "Polaroid Corporation".[3] It stopped making Polaroid cameras in 2007 and stopped selling Polaroid film after 2009, to the consternation of many users.[4][5]

The renamed "old" Polaroid now exists solely as an administrative shell.

I'm just surprised Boner and the gopper gang haven't passed a law banning digital cameras and making glass film plate cameras mandatory.

I'm just surprised Boner and the gopper gang haven't passed a law banning digital cameras and making glass film plate cameras mandatory.

#23 | Posted by northguy3

Logic trouble.

Obama wasn't even mentioned until you showed up.

#21 | POSTED BY RIGHTISRIGHT AT 2012-01-06 11:01 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

How did he manage to get a post in before post #1?

I'm just surprised Boner and the gopper gang haven't passed a law banning digital cameras and making glass film plate cameras mandatory.

#23 | POSTED BY NORTHGUY3 AT 2012-01-06 11:15 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

When is the house going to take up the "Protection of the Horse and Buggy" legislation?

My smart phone takes higher resolution photos than my first digital camera. However it does lack a zoom lens which right now is one of it's limitations. -726

Resolution is no longer the issue, so they are making strides in the Focus-Free digital camera....
www.lytro.com

Check out the gallery....

It is funny because Kodak and HP are unable to produce both jobs and competitiveness.

Not the kind of guy I would want on the council if I were looking to succeed.

#5 | Posted by ExpsRedemption

Ok yes to Kodak. I don't think you know what you are talking about in regard to HP.

Digital cameras killed Kodak.

Smart phones are going to kill digital cameras, except for the high end professional cameras.

#16 | Posted by Ray at 2012-01-05 01:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

Now that's a Ray prediction I agree with. I was a marketing/PR consultant for a major camera company until 2010, when they decided they couldn't afford us anymore. The industry is shrinking in a hurry. The main trade show, PMA (Photo Marketing Association), has merged with CES. The industry leader in digital video cameras, Flip, is being eliminated. Phones and tablets make separate cameras extraneous.

Sad, because I loved the work. Absolutely loved it.

And Kodak is one of those names that is synonymous with photography. I can't tell you how many hours I spent in a darkroom early in my career, processing my own film and printing photos. Just about everything but the cameras (usually Nikons) were made by Kodak. And of course my first camera was a Kodak instamatic 110 mm.

Kodak is a complete failure as a company at this point. It will and should be liquidated. I am not sure who will be interested in the film side of the company. The patents are what makes the company valuable.

This is an example of a company that failed to see the writing on the wall and transform itself. That Lady Gaga "incident"? LMAO.

What Kodak should have been doing is leveraging it's patents and creating technology / programs that get included on phones, cameras and such. Instead they launched a whole lot of truly crappy and overpriced cameras.

#5 | Posted by ExpsRedemption

Ok yes to Kodak. I don't think you know what you are talking about in regard to HP.

#28 | Posted by GalaxiePete

Have you noticed? EXspurtDemtion knows very little of what he is talking about.

And he show his dishonesty by misquoting other posters as in #13.

Not that I would want them 'saved'....yet what is the definition of Too Big To Fail??????

EK was an iconic Dow stock for decades.

Btw Only approx 34% of the Dow stocks from 1982 are still on the dow.

Kodak killed Kodak.

They had the right to most all digital patents in the sixties,and chose not to pursue.

Before they get to go Bankrupt are they forced to take a course in money management like People do?

After all Corporations are People!

So Obama's council has a CEO who is going BK and the GM guy who has shipped 55,000 jobs overseas in the last 7 years.

Great advice!!

And watch Obama get Kodak something to keep them going--too big to fail.

Kadachrome paul simon

You can call me Al

www.youtube.com

;o)

Kodak killed Kodak.

They had the right to most all digital patents in the sixties,and chose not to pursue.

#34 | Posted by DavetheWave
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

But every incompetent Kodak CEO involved in this travesty made many millions. CEOs should always receive their bonuses 10 years in arrears. Too many overpaid CEOS have thrown away the USA competitive advantage to Japan or China. As a nation we held patents on everything and now they are lost.

ITS TIME for a government subsidy...the makers of BUGGY WHIPS need your tax money...

WIL NEVER FORGET....family friends brought this new fangled camera over and we posed and all gathered around it when the guy tore out the paper from the camera and we all waited around like we were watching a baby being born...

and TA DA>..there we were...

it was AMAZING

Grace./.

BS Robson, that was in the 1960s.

But if you want to talk salary/bonus malfeasance BY THE GOV, tell us about franklin raines! DARE YOU

yet what is the definition of Too Big To Fail??????

#32 | Posted by DavetheWave,

Of course the dr left avoids questions they can't answer

What was Bush's definition of the term as he presided over the start of the financial debacle?

#44 Left field player, obviously took a few too many hits to the head.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable