This is the privilege of power which comes with money and status. Had it been some welfare dad accused of this, there would likely be no bail, and certainly no unsecured bail.

Trying to paint anyone that ever volunteered for or contributed to this charity as perverts is as crazy as saying all Catholics are pedophiles.

Too bad sanity is a rare commodity these days.

no one is doing that shit for brains...

tf put a new bit of news on this shit and snoofy is exactly correct.

what YOUR saying...well who the hell EVER knows the answer to that question...

hee hee heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeee

Sandusky belongs in jail and this judge should have recused himself for his case. I guess when the SC has people like Clarence Thomas on it ethics become irrelevant.

Sandusky belongs in jail and this judge should have recused himself for his case. I guess when the SC has people like Clarence Thomas on it ethics become irrelevant.
#4 | Posted by danni

Let me be the judge of that.
~ Clarence "Ask No Questions" Thomas

Trying to paint anyone that ever volunteered for or contributed to this charity as perverts

Who tried to do that, retard?

this was just an arraignment.

calm down everyone....

Sandusky belongs in jail and this judge should have recused HERSELF for his case.

#4 | POSTED BY DANNI AT 2011-11-14 04:27 PM | REPLY | FLAG

FTFY. realistically, how much of a conflict could exist. she gave a contribution to an organization that is not on trial, not to Sandusky. If anything, Sandusky would want her recused because she gives to kids, and probably would love to throw the book at this mother fucker.

She should have made it known and if asked to be recused--she would have ...

It looks bad!

I don't care if all she ever did is meet him once at a cocktail party. She should have recused.

"this was just an arraignment.
calm down everyone....
#7 | Posted by eberly"

Where the judge lowered the perv's, OK alleged perv's, bail to 20% of the prosecution's recommendation. I wonder how often she does that?

Sandusky's own ex-daughter-in-law got a restraining order to keep the POS away from her kids, he's a danger to society and should be in jail.

If guilty, I hope Sandusky does the honorable thing and takes the easy way out, thus saving the taxpayers a trial. Click BANG!

"Where the judge lowered the perv's, OK alleged perv's, bail to 20% of the prosecution's recommendation. I wonder how often she does that?"

Quite a bit. The prosecution almost always asks for the moon hoping to get enough to keep them around.

As for the judge recusing herself from a bail hearing, she was doing her job. And as a previous poster posted, my guess is that she was more likely to have thrown the book at him than someone that didn't know him.

If convicted, may he burn in hell.

two words for Sandusky-

GENERAL POPULATION.