Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, February 03, 2011

A video has surfaced showing the love progressives have for conservatives like Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and talk show host Glenn Beck.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Beachbuzz

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Code Pink: code for commie, pinko, fags.

Guess the right doesn't own the racist badge afterall.

You libs happy with this disgusting display of brainwashed Americana?

Code Pinkers make the Tea Baggers look like nuns.

Is it expected that a group of woman act rationally?

Glen Beck incites violence.

I would support putting this pink mafia on the terror list.
Refer to husbands everywhere for testimony.

Bill Orielly incites violence.

#3 Of course not.

There are alot of "guys" in the video though. Must be friends of Moder8 the ballless wonder.

#4 and #6 Bullshit & Bullshit.

The left is the violent group around here. Look at what they said about Bush. Go to ANY leftiest demonstration and see the hate for yourself.

Sister Sledge incites violence.

The left have always been noted for their civility - LOL

If I was Clarence, I'd drop a few Hershey Kisses around these broads and kick them in the Pink when they're on all fours.

"Of course if this had been a Tea Party rally, you wouldn't need to come to NewsBusters to see the video, since it would be running on a loop on every nightly news broadcast. But that said, is it fair to call the entire "progressive movement" racist because of these few loons? Of course not. Still, it does give you quite a taste of the left's ungodly hatred for black conservatives."

#11 | Posted by wisgod

They would probably prefer Hershey on a rope.

"If I was Clarence..."

He could always offer them a pubified Coke.

How many leftest demonstrations do you attend Beach?

Man - I have been thinking all day...

How many leftest demonstrations do you attend Beach?

I'm a cut and paster...I don't go out in public.

Amusing thinking of Beck in a duel with a woman.

Wonder which of them would break down in tears first.

"How many leftest demonstrations do you attend Beach?"

Is that demonstration how to catch a leftest fish?

Next time they want to hold a meeting in Palm Springs, have it in July at about two in the afternoon.

He could always offer them a pubified Coke.

#14 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

It was Pepsi, Annita.

No, Ginny, it was, "Who has pubic hair on my Coke?"

Regardless, she should have been drinking Diet Rite. Fucking cow.

So...No liberal will refute the Code Pink rally?

Rogers?

Just bury this story on page c22.

Pretty disgusting.

Nothing anywhere about this on the telly...

Our heads would spin if this was tea party folks.

And don't bring up that lying Annnita either...

So...No liberal will refute the Code Pink rally?

Rogers?

Just bury this story on page c22.

#23 | Posted by Beachbuzz

They're all praying Sarah Palin will forget to flush or wash her hands tomorrow morning and Rogers can break out the Dancing Liberals.

This is the kind of rhetoric that libbies point to when some lefty lunatic shoots a politician in the face, claiming that, again, it was the righties' fault.

When Palin puts a bullseye on a Congressional district, she's being recklessly irresponsible. But when limp-wristed libbies call for the lynching of a Supreme Court justice, no big deal.

#27, your "side" is the one has the morons to actually do it, there is a difference. :-P

anyways, this is a total troll thread.

anyways, this is a total troll thread.

#28 | Posted by ichir

yep...truth hurts. Unless you are a liberal.

Did Kate Curic cover this?

Nope. Not on her progressive play list.

Did Chris Mathews cover this?

Nope. No tingles there.

But a tea bagger killing a niger? Now that is news.

If you're scared of Code Pink, you have bigger problems than can be addressed in the limited scope of this blog.

Besides, we're smart enough now to know that words don't cause people to commit violence.
That's why, when hundreds of thousands of people chant "Death to America!" in Iran, it's not a big deal.
And when Osama bin Laden releases a videotaped message, it doesn't have any effect either.
It's just words. They have no effect on people.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2011-02-04 06:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

So you are condemning or condoning the actions of "code pink" not only are they racist, but they are violent and threatening. All things that the democrats and liberals keep telling us that they are not.

I guess they are liars too, or at least emotionally uncontrolled.

Either way, the left loses with code pinks actions compared the the lefts claims.

animalnewyork.com

Damn this video makes my weiner grow.

How do you turn a dishwasher in to a snow blower?
-Put a pair of boots on her

"One activist called for a revolution, similar to what is happening in Egypt."

Except their revolution would have to break around 2:30 every day so they can be home in time to catch Oprah.

Besides, we're smart enough now to know that words don't cause people to commit violence.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2011-02-04 06:40 AM

lol, you gotta love it. Anytime it's Beck or some other right wing shit stain, words cause violence. As soon as the left or Iran does it, they don't.

If you're scared of Code Pink, you have bigger problems than can be addressed in the limited scope of this blog.

Besides, we're smart enough now to know that words don't cause people to commit violence.
That's why, when hundreds of thousands of people chant "Death to America!" in Iran, it's not a big deal.
And when Osama bin Laden releases a videotaped message, it doesn't have any effect either.
It's just words. They have no effect on people.

Unless of course, the words are conservative.
These people -
teresamerica.blogspot.com - are just too caring to insight violence.

This is stupid. The videographer, right-wing activist Christian Hartsock, is fishing for idiots by asking leading questions. Anyone could do that. It means as little as if I went to a Tea Party rally and asked 100 people with a laugh, "what should we do to Obama after we impeach him?"

Anytime it's Beck or some other right wing shit stain, words cause violence.

Show me a left-wing figure as prominent as Beck inciting violence. Comparing him to random people attending a rally is bogus.

#36 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 11:02 AM | Reply | Flag:

Put it on the front page, we will see just how the left reacts to it, dismissing it just like you are.

In typical liberal fashion:

MSNBC's "Cenk Boasts About Conservatives: 'I'm Going To Rip 'Em Apart'"
newsbusters.org

"On Monday, it was an assassination rap targeting the Tea Party, Fox News, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and yours truly.
Yesterday, it was a pro-illegal immigration nut sending death threats to a GOP congressional rep in Florida."
michellemalkin.com

The left wants so much for conservatives to act the way the left does. They try so desperately to hide the truth with lies. Even to the point of pretending to be fanatic conservatives at conservative events.

Put it on the front page ...

I think it's weak. Anybody can troll for dopes with man-on-the-street interviews at political events. If it was people on the stage saying that stuff I'd feel differently.

Show me a left-wing figure as prominent as Beck inciting violence. Comparing him to random people attending a rally is bogus.

#37 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 11:03 AM

I'm absolutely certain the left does not make issue of random people at tea party rallies saying racist or violent things.

Sometimes people on the left do make a big deal out of this kind of stuff. I don't. I can't recall it ever making the front page.

#40 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 11:18 AM | Reply | Flag:

Don't you realize that these are the real life proponents of the thoughts and policies that are being spoken from the stage (well according to the leftist opinion on the subject).

If you were consistent (lets hope more consistent than with your thoughts on tolerance) you would put this up on the front page, as it shows that what the dems say they and their constituents stand for does not appear to be the case.

The democrat position seems to think that people do not become violent toward some group by their own doing, they have to hear it from some higher up... so taking that line of thought (that the democrats hold) one would imagine that these "code pink" people would have had to hear this vitriolic thought process from democrat supportive personalities on the stage.

Let me get this straight ...

If Glenn Beck incites violence on his show, you don't think that has an effect on his followers.

But if left-wingers say tasteless things in a crowd, that means that the speakers incited them. Even though no one on stage is shown to be inciting them.

Genius.

#44 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 12:09 PM | Reply | Flag:

Again, you are missing the point.

I was not the one that proposed that the proponents of a view were violent because they heard something from the stage... that was the democrats.

So, if they are going to be consistent ( and not hypocritical like with tolerance) they will have to recognize that these code pink people are sharing this vitriol because of something that was stated on the stage.

They are the ones that have the onus to hold up their position, as they were the ones that say the vitriol from the proponents comes from the speakers on the stage.

Again, put this up on the front page and we can get this figured out.

You won't though, because it shows another inconsistent, hypocritical thought process of the left.

I can't recall it ever making the front page.

#42 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 11:31 AM

The Democratic congressman who claimed he heard the word "nigger" come from a protester made it on the front, if I recall correctly.

#46 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2011-02-04 12:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

I recall that myself.

It would only make sense to even it out by presenting this article to the front page.

It won't make it up there though.

The Democratic congressman who claimed he heard the word "nigger" come from a protester made it on the front ...

Different situation. Several Congressmen claimed something and their claims made national news. The people in this video are nobodies. The story's going nowhere so far outside of Breitbart's fever swamp.

#48 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 12:48 PM | Reply | Flag:

And yet when "tea party" members (even if they are found not to be "tea party" members) claim something, it gets put up all over the news.

Ends up on the DR... then like the congressman case, ends up on the front page.

Now when democrats who propose not to be racist or violent advocate both racism and violence, contradictory to their claims... it goes nowhere.

Especially at a time where the democrats just called for civility and then their own followers are being anything but civil.

Of course it goes nowhere on the television, and especially not on the DR.

You see, it is tolerable when the democrats take this behavior, but it is not tolerable when anyone else takes this behavior.

I love it when people try to tell Rogers how to run his site.

I think Rogers should ban taxman. Why? Why the fuck not!

Viva la revolution!

www.drudge.com

It seems that Rogers thinks that the "Boehner cheated on his wife" article from the National Enquirer is more important than the fact that there is a group calling for the lynching of a SC justice.

That is the difference between the articles

Boehner article is about a rupublican accused of something by a rag mag.

Code Pink calling for lynching has video of a democratic group being contradictory and hypocritical of their own proposed views.

_______

Taxman, I am not trying to tell Rogers what to do with his site. I am simply pointing out that there seems to be an inconsistency, contradiction, hypocrisy in the way that he thinks about certain things.

Exp,

Members of a crowd who say something to a camera is not news worthy IMHO. As the Tea Party people rightfully so often claim: there is no way to know whether these people on camera are real supporters or plants put to make the whole group look crazy?

#53 | Posted by kanrei at 2011-02-04 01:15 PM | Reply | Flag

That would be fine if democrats were coming from a tea party perspective... however they are not. They are coming from the perspective that members of a crowd who say something to a camera is newsworthy. Thus they are the ones acting hypocritical, which I am pointing out in this situation.

Also, I don't find rag mag news from the National Enquirer about someone cheating on their wife as newsworthy.

Yet, Rogers things that is more newsworthy than real people making recorded claims on camera.

My point is that the position that is supposedly held by the democrats is untenable, as is shown in these cases.

Also, I don't find rag mag news from the National Enquirer about someone cheating on their wife as newsworthy.


Look up their track record over the last 11 years with these stories and how many they busted. Ignore them at your own folly.

Also, I don't find rag mag news from the National Enquirer about someone cheating on their wife as newsworthy.

Yet, Rogers things that is more newsworthy than real people making recorded claims on camera.

It's his site, he does what he wants, and no one cares about your opinion more than anyone else's here.

#55 | Posted by kanrei at 2011-02-04 01:25 PM | Reply | Flag

And the track record of the stories that have been ridiculous and untrue? Should I include that into the factors?

So from what you are seeming to propose,

If someone says something into a camera from an identifiable group aligned with another identifiable group that claims their groups don't do or say the things that the individuals are doing on the camera, that is not newsworthy.

But if some random anonymous person submits a story to a magazine about a person, it is newsworthy?

Keep in mind the democratic view of someone speaking into a camera but not necessarily being part of the group.

#56 | Posted by taxman at 2011-02-04 01:29 PM | Reply | Flag:

I never said they did. I am simply pointing something out. No one makes it that you have to read my posts any more than you have to read other peoples posts.

And the track record of the stories that have been ridiculous and untrue? Should I include that into the factors?


Yes. It is up to you if you trust them or not.

If someone says something into a camera from an identifiable group aligned with another identifiable group that claims their groups don't do or say the things that the individuals are doing on the camera, that is not newsworthy.

Anyone can say anything. Verify. I can go to a Tea Party rally tomorrow and say "All blacks should be crated back to Africa" and I guaranteee you I would make national news as a Tea Party racist.

Look into the 60's and how the FBI would infiltrate the anti-war movement to try and steer them towards violence in an attempt to discredit them. This is fact. If you think the practice has stopped, you are only fooling yourself.

Kanrei - Do you really think these people are plants -
These people -
teresamerica.blogspot.com - are just too caring to insight violence.

"Different situation. Several Congressmen claimed something and their claims made national news."

Yeah, they were just over heard and it was taken out of context. They went on the fucking House floor and those same claims are part of the Congressional records forever. They have echoed the same lie for over 6 months, and to this day you and the lser from our little sister Country up north not only believe them, you fucking defend them or downplay their actions and blatant race rousing lies.

Funny how it is different as you wrote. In this case there is actual evidence and proof. As opposed to believing a politican wouldn't lie. Too bad you didn't take Breibart up on the 100k if anyone provided proof, would have been a nice start to your kids college fund. More importantly, bragging rights for you and your beloved dems.

Updated Link - teresamerica.blogspot.com

What a bunch of cry babies around here today.


What a bunch of cry babies around here today.

#64 | Posted by taxman

I think the PC way to say that would be: What a bunch of Boehners around here today.

RCade,

I think you should change the background color of this site. Also, allow us to have pictures associated with our user tags. Additionally, you should offer your users a few gig of free storage.

Also, allow us to have pictures associated with our user tags. Additionally, you should offer your users a few gig of free storage.

Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2011-02-04 02:07 PM |

And a puppy!

Also, allow us to have pictures associated with our user tags.
Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

Yeah! Of course I'll need a 9" margin for mine.

It seems that Rogers thinks that the "Boehner cheated on his wife" article from the National Enquirer is more important than the fact that there is a group calling for the lynching of a SC justice.

What group? It was one person answering a loaded question by a Breitbart stooge.

As for Boehner, the Enquirer has credibility now because they caught Edwards cheating. If that was a front-page story, then it's a story for the Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency).

When people have just had it up to here, whether in Egypt or wherever uglies like the Kochs congregate, they have a right to make their feelings known. They may express them too colorfully for some tastes ... but I don't think that the tea baggers have any right to complain. herm

Different situation. Several Congressmen claimed something

Fine. If this video was emailed to a Congressman and he "claimed" to have viewed it, would the video itself then be news to you? That's a pretty stupid standard for determining what's significant and what isn't, given that it's the content that's been called into question and not the person that heard it.

I think you should change the background color of this site. Also, allow us to have pictures associated with our user tags. Additionally, you should offer your users a few gig of free storage.

#66 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE

I think he should drop the "s" at the end of his name. I also think a catered lunch or a fucking card on our birthdays isn't a lot to ask. he's such an uncaring and insensitive cuntress.

The congressmen claimed some nobodies from a crowd of nobodies said "nigger"...

In this story we have some nobodies on tape actually saying what they're accused of saying.

So I guess I don't see the difference. The people on tape saying things about Clarence Thomas are nobodies, and so are the people that were alleged to have called those niggers "niggers".

code pink are are a modern KKK - the rest of the libs must be so proud.

"I don't see the difference"

That's because there isn't one, but RCade is pretending there is. He claims that the only "news" in the first case was the fact that Congressmen claimed to hear the offensive speech, and not that the speech occurred (even though the focus of the story was on the speech itself).

Anyone can say anything. Verify. I can go to a Tea Party rally tomorrow and say "All blacks should be crated back to Africa" and I guaranteee you I would make national news as a Tea Party racist.

#59 | Posted by kanrei at 2011-02-04 01:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

Kanrei, that is my point exactly.

If it was some "random" tea party member it would be all over the national news, over and over again as a sign of racism.

However this time it is a couple members of a liberal organization who are calling for the lynching of Clarence Thomas, a S.C.J. Also calling for other violence, but of course it does not get placed all over the media. It is put in the archives.

"That's because there isn't one, but RCade is pretending there is."

Reminds me of the time he pretended the 2nd leading Senator, 3rd leading congressman, and NY Times editorial were equal voices to some campaign aide in charge of Palin's graphics after the AZ shooting.

It would make national news because the Tea Party is current news while Code Pink is old news. Most people don't even know they are still around after teh DNC threw Sheehan under the bus in 2006. One loon at an irrelevent Code Pink rally saying something stupid is not news IMHO.

What you missed Exp, is that my quote would be attributed to the Tea Party even though I would be there just to make them look bad. Anyone can say anything and pretend they represent a larger cause. Doesn't make it so.

So I guess I don't see the difference.

A member of Congress is important. A random douchenozzle on video filmed in a crowd isn't. If Rep. John Lewis says racist epithets were yelled at him, that's news. It was a major story across the media.

Watch this video and tell me that gray-haired guy at the beginning, who the Breitbart stooge talked to for a while, is newsworthy.

If these people were at a Tea Party rally, would you folks be telling me it was front-page material? I doubt it. The only reason it's being pressed is because it fits a narrative that left-wingers are hateful.

Reminds me of the time he pretended the 2nd leading Senator, 3rd leading congressman, and NY Times editorial were equal voices to some campaign aide in charge of Palin's graphics after the AZ shooting.

The whole country was talking about Palin's target graphic. Palin was too.

I would bet if Thomas released an official response to this RCADE would put it on the front page - that would be newsworthy. You cry babies need to find something else to focus on.

You cry babies need to find something else to focus on.

#82 | Posted by taxman at 2011-02-04 04:15 PM

We also brought up the lack of user pics and the 's' on the end of his name.

#82 | Posted by taxman at 2011-02-04 04:15 PM | Reply | Flag:

I guess you don't have anything better to do than to respond to cry babies huh? Maybe you need to be able to focus on something else.

I would bet if Thomas released an official response to this RCADE would put it on the front page - that would be newsworthy.

Yep.

Tommy Christopher on Mediaite writes more about this stunt:

www.mediaite.com

The only reason it's being pressed is because it fits a narrative that left-wingers are hateful.

#80 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 04:10 PM

Nah... It's not like the narrative Palin was responsible for Giffords being shot, right? Fuck, less than a month and already out of the lib's minds.

"I would bet if Thomas released an official response to this RCADE would put it on the front page - that would be newsworthy."

Did the story about Thomas'wife wanting an apology make it as an official front page story?

Also, don't forget Code Pink can be found in the Captitol building for hearings, and events. Somehow they seem to be invited by the dems and given a seat right in the camera's view.

It's not like the narrative Palin was responsible for Giffords being shot, right? Fuck, less than a month and already out of the lib's minds.

As you know, Crispee, even before we knew who the shooter I said it was wrong to pin it on violent right-wing rhetoric. I said it could just be a random crazy, not an ideologically motivated person.

Did the story about Thomas' wife wanting an apology make it as an official front page story?

From Anita Hill? Yes.

Also, don't forget Code Pink can be found in the Captitol building for hearings, and events. Somehow they seem to be invited by the dems and given a seat right in the camera's view.

You don't need an invite to attend hearings. The public gets to attend them on a first-come, first-serve basis. That's how the assclowns who get up and yell get in.

Did the story about Thomas'wife wanting an apology make it as an official front page story?

I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. Moreover, what does his wife have to do with this?

Watch this video and tell me that gray-haired guy at the beginning, who the Breitbart stooge talked to for a while, is newsworthy.

#80 | Posted by rcade

As newsworthy as a nameless faceless yeller of the word nigger.
So what if a congressman claims to have heard something that nobody else heard. We actually have a code pink person on tape saying that about a Supreme Court Justice.

How many congressmen are there? How many Supremes are there? What's more newsworthy?

Would you feel this is more important if Clarence Thomas said he saw the tape and heard what was said?

91 | Posted by taxman at 2011-02-04 04:32 PM

rcade recovered my fumble in post #89.

Would you feel this is more important if Clarence Thomas said he saw the tape and heard what was said?

#92 | Posted by 101Chair

Sorry, I see this was already covered.

So what if a congressman claims to have heard something that nobody else heard.

John Lewis is one of the most respected Congress members in its history because of his role in civil rights.

The anti-war group's members are often arrested on Capitol Hill for disrupting congressional hearings and events.

However, few protests have been as dramatic as Wednesday's, at which protester Desiree Anita Ali-Fairooz screamed at the secretary of State and yelled that the blood "of millions of Iraqis" is on the hands of the administration.

She was one of five protesters arrested at the hearing and was charged with disorderly conduct, defacing of government property and assault on a federal officer, U.S. Capitol Police spokeswoman Sgt. Kimberly Schneider said.

Perino thanked Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) for "trying to restore order to that hearing."

Protester Paul Zulkowitz, who had already been arrested on Monday, was charged with unlawful conduct and disruption of Congress. Also arrested were Susan Benjamin and Lori Perdue, as well as an unnamed protester.

So which leading Democrat light will pay her fine?

Probably the same one who invited her and the rest of Code Pink there in the first place.

And how many times will "Medea" Benjamin be given a "get out of jail free" card?

sweetness-light.com

Probably the same one who invited her and the rest of Code Pink there in the first place.

Did you not read my comment? They don't get invited. They attend as members of the public.

John Lewis is one of the most respected Congress members in its history because of his role in civil rights.

#95 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 04:44 PM

Meaning what? He get's a free pass? He is a fucking politician. Duke Cunningham is a fucking war hero, and responsible for the fact we have the most skilled fighter pilots in the world. Had he said he didn't take any money, should there not have been an investigation? Blumenthall lied a half a dozen times about serving in Vietnam and got elected to the US Senate. Politicians LIE rcade, sorry to break that to you.

The fact they were yelled at was deserving and justified. The stunt they pulled was nothing less of a pathetic and staged display of the worthless party. But it did cost them eight months later.

Mind you, Mr. Conyers is the Congressman who usually invited Code Pink to such hearings, and pays their fines when they are jugged for being disrupted.

sweetness-light.com

my.democrats.org

On October 12, Scott Swett at the American Thinker reported that Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) along with Representatives Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and Henry Waxman (D-CA) secured diplomatic courtesy letters that allowed anti-American Code Pink activists to travel to Fallujah, Iraq. The radicals traveled to Fallujah in late 2004 to donate $600,000 worth of humanitarian aid to the people who had just killed 51 Americans and wounded 560 more earlier that month. Operation Phantom Fury in Fallujah was the heaviest US urban combat since the Vietnam War.

www.frugal-cafe.com

John Lewis is one of the most respected Congress members in its history because of his role in civil rights.

#95 | Posted by rcade

There are 9 Supreme Court justices. I think they hold a little more prestige than 1 of 435, and deserve more respect than a congressman.

I think you're wrapped up in a "my side good/your side bad" frame of mind because you don't seem to be getting what's being said...

People made a big deal about a person that can't be identified, whose words can't be verified, because he is alleged to have said nigger.
On the other hand, we have peoplle with names and faces, whose words are recorded.
One guy supposedly called congressman a name. The other basically said a black supreme court justice should be lynched, on a videotaped recording. How in the fuck is your example more newsworthy than the other? (mind you, I'm not lobbying for you to put this story anywhere. It's your house, your rules. I'm just arguing to argue).

Meaning what? He get's a free pass?

Meaning that when one of the most respected Congressmen in history says racial epithets were yelled at him and other black Congressmen outside the Capitol, it's news. Whether you believe him or not, the fact he alleged it is news.

If you want a site that only presents the news you want to hear with the spin most advantageous to your side, there's an entire cable network for you. I don't play that game.

All libs are moon bats - just some are battier than others :)

Meaning that when one of the most respected Congressmen in history says racial epithets were yelled at him and other black Congressmen outside the Capitol, it's news. Whether you believe him or not, the fact he alleged it is news.

If you want a site that only presents the news you want to hear with the spin most advantageous to your side, there's an entire cable network for you. I don't play that game.
#102 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-04 09:00 PM

You play the game, you just can't remember which game you are playing. Today's game is the fact Lewis said it makes it news. The other games has been Lewis said it and you believed it, and insisted a respected Congressman who was a civil rights hero wouldn't lie about something like that.

As for the pathetic whine about news? How soon you forget the Pulitzer story about a Congressional candidate who faked a Air Force 1 photo at the Reagan library.

Wow! What a scary bunch of racist, hate filled freaks!

CODEPINK plays a specialized role -- it is supposed to represent women -- and it uses a specialized tactic -- it claims to represent non-political women aroused by injustice. But one wonders why it bothers with the pretense.

One need only look at the biography of 54- year-old Medea Benjamin. Born Susie Benjamin to a wealthy family, she changed her first name to that of the enraged woman in the Greek tragedy who seeks revenge against her husband by murdering her children. Benjamin's own vengeance against America has led her to support murderous dictators across the globe. She is an ardent pro-Castro advocate, having once lived in Cuba and married a pro-Castro Cuban. For years she led guided tours to Cuba. After returning from her first trip to Cuba in the early 1980s, Benjamin told the San Francisco Chronicle that Cuban life "made it seem like I died and went to heaven."

In the 1980s, Benjamin helped form the Institute for Food and Development Policy (IFDP), which sent aid to the Marxist Sandinistas ruling Nicaragua. During the 1990s, she and other members were field marshals during the anti-globalist riots in Seattle. In 2000, she was the Green Party candidate for the California U.S. Senate seat held by incumbent Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat. She chronicled her radical, Socialist agenda in her book, I Senator.

CODEPINK's Jodie Evans has a pedigree equal to Benjamin's. She is a trustee of the Rainforest Action Network (RAN), a coalition of anti-capitalist environmentalists. RAN's co-founder, Michael Roselle, also founded the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), which the FBI has ranked alongside the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) as one of the top terrorist groups in the U.S. Evans took her most recent anti-American junket in January 2006 when she joined Benjamin and their newest convert, Cindy Sheehan, on a visit to meet Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. On an earlier trip to Iraq, Evans helped to found the International Occupation Watch (IOW) in Baghdad. With assistance from Benjamin and Leslie Cagan, IOW helps U.S. soldiers declare themselves conscientious objectors and monitors alleged American abuses in Iraq. Its declared mission is to be a "watchdog regarding the military occupation and U.S.-appointed government, including possible violations of human rights, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly."
www.cfl912project.org

Code Pink?

Yuppo, they sure got their share of wingnuts.

But here's the thing.

The essential difference between the Dems and the GOP in terms of their respective crazies is that the Dems tend to minimize and politically neuter them while the GOP tends to promote them and their insane ideas and rhetoric.

Big difference.

Be Well.

The other games has been Lewis said it and you believed it, and insisted a respected Congressman who was a civil rights hero wouldn't lie about something like that.

You're making stuff up, Crisp. I said they claimed it had happened. I never said anything about how it was definitely true.

Just goes to show the left has always been more violent and intolerant then the right. I don't know of any tea party disturbance and ugliness like this group. In fact, this group was so disorderly that a couple of them were arrested.

You're making stuff up, Crisp. I said they claimed it had happened. I never said anything about how it was definitely true.

#108 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-05 09:59 AM

Like I said, the "games" you played are right there for all to see...

I can't believe Andrew Breitbart thinks a thrown egg is comparable to calling a U.S. Congressman a "nigger" as he walks from one Capitol building to another. Rep. John Lewis would not lie about what he heard. He's never been a provocateur in his entire public life, even when he was beaten by police during the civil rights area.
Posted by rcade at 2010-04-03 11:02 AM

The denial that this incident occurred is understandable, since no video of it has emerged. But I'll take the word of John Lewis any day over Andrew Breitbart.
Posted by rcade at 2010-04-03 12:28 PM |

You're making stuff up, Crisp. I said they claimed it had happened. I never said anything about how it was definitely true.
#108 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-05 09:59 AM

You have no evidence that story was made up. Andrew Breitbart claimed it was, but it was more of his nonsense. Rep. John Lewis -- a civil rights icon and highly respected Congressman -- said that it happened to him and other members. I believe him.
#27 | Posted by rcade at 2010-11-09 10:08 AM

Lacking video, I believe the civil rights icon who is one of the most respected Congress members on the planet, not the race baiter known for releasing misleading information to smear people.

It's not even a tough call.
#49 | Posted by rcade at 2010-11-09 12:33 PM |

Rcade,

Surely you can't deny there is a double standard in the media. The fact that this story is not on the Today Show, the Evening news nor ANY of the MSNBC variety shows proves the aforementioned double standard.

You and others can deny, deflect and declare the story a non-story, but the facts are that if a Tea Partier had said anything like what was said in the video, the above liberal news outlets would STILL be running the video clip demonizing the entire Tea Party as a bunch of racists.

Oh well, I guess we can only argue the point into oblivion on this progressive liberal blog.

The Tea Party has initiated a worldwide movement as seen by their anti-Mubarak brothers in Egypt. Code Pink reminds me of the violence of the Pro-mubarak goons.

Lacking video, I believe the civil rights icon who is one of the most respected Congress members on the planet, not the race baiter known for releasing misleading information to smear people.

It's not even a tough call.
#49 | Posted by rcade at 2010-11-09 12:33 PM |

Wouldn't make it in a court of law----hearsay evidence. Personally, I don't care who it is. Will not accept hearsay from people I even respect---I've learned through life that you make your judgements about people and situations through your own personal interaction, not what someone else says. You're on dangerous grounds when you do and Rcade, you're on dangerous grounds.

Crispee: I was talking about the current discussion we are engaged in, not the one that took place in April 2010 here.

Even back then, though, I said that the disagreement over whether it happened was understandable.

In retrospect, it's funny anyone thought Andrew Breitbart was a credible source of information on that issue or any other. The guy's a rabid partisan hack.

You're on dangerous grounds when you do and Rcade, you're on dangerous grounds.

So you think we should only talk about things we witnessed personally?

So a few individuals say something stupid and this is indicative of a progressive agenda or even widely shared beliefs among us? Yet the numerous examples of racism and ignorance in video from Tea Party rallies is not indicative of widespread racism and ignorance in that movement? Folks, you can't have it both ways. The comments made by these fools (in the video) are as worthy of excoriation as anything uttered by some Beck followers and Tea Partiers. But neither are indicative of the larger group. Deal with it.

#114 | Posted by matsop at 2011-02-05 01:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

You obviously aren't a lawyer. Look up the definition of hearsay. Lewis was the one spoken to, Matlock.

You're on dangerous grounds when you do and Rcade, you're on dangerous grounds.

So you think we should only talk about things we witnessed personally?

#116 | Posted by rcade

Or verified and not "he said, she said".

"Or verified and not "he said, she said"."

Well, that leaves out something like 70% of what's posted here. And possibly about 90% of what rw critics of our president say about him and about what progressives in general seem to believe.

You obviously aren't a lawyer. Look up the definition of hearsay. Lewis was the one spoken to, Matlock.

#118 | Posted by taxman

And I'm referring to the "declarant" of the supposed message, not to Lewis.

#115 | Posted by rcade at 2011-02-05 01:31 PM |

I wasn't intending on bringing up old shit, much less re-hashing an old argument. I have a tough time dealing with anyone that says I make shit up. Bad enough I can't remember why I walked into a room sometimes, but I can still retain useless and irrelevant posts.

#121 | Posted by matsop at 2011-02-05 02:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

You do understand, Matlock, that Lewis could take the stand and say, "I heard someone call me a n*&&#$," and that wouldn't be hearsay, correct?

You do understand, Matlock, that Lewis could take the stand and say, "I heard someone call me a n*&&#$," and that wouldn't be hearsay, correct?

#123 | Posted by taxman

Correct, but you get my point?

"I heard someone call me a n*&&#$," and that wouldn't be hearsay, correct?

Ahh, but Lewis and every other mysterious victim tend to use what others heard or said. Like, "You have heard ____________ here talk about being spit on and called..." "We have seen ____________ being spit on and called..."

Seems to me a testifying an untruth is a hell of a lot worse than hearsay.

And possibly about 90% of what rw critics of our president say about him and about what progressives in general seem to believe.

#120 | Posted by pragmatist at 2011-02-05 01:56 PM

Not sure why there is any reason to make up anything just to be critical of Obama. Just sit back, wait and let the inexperience take over. Kind of like Biden's gaff machine. It turns on when his mouth opens.

"Not sure why there is any reason to make up anything just to be critical of Obama. Just sit back, wait and let the inexperience take over. Kind of like Biden's gaff machine. It turns on when his mouth opens."

I'm not sure either (though I don't share your negative view of his policies or experience); there's plenty of stuff even for a lefty to find fault with. But people make shit up all the time. Muslim, Kenyan, blah blah blah. So take it up with those people. I can't fathom their behaviors.

Correct

And you do realize that it would be up for a jury to decide if they believed him or not, based on his testimony and other evidence, correct?

But people make shit up all the time. Muslim, Kenyan, blah blah blah. So take it up with those people. I can't fathom their behaviors.

#127 | Posted by pragmatist at 2011-02-05 02:36 PM

I like to think I am one of the 10%'s of RW critics. So I can't help you out. As for the questioning of my observation about his experience? I doubt there are any bullets in your holster big enough to break that wall of truth.

#123 | Posted by taxman

Correct, but you get my point?

#124 | Posted by matsop

Taximan, leave your cab. I'm waiting for you to confer to me my Juris Doctor.

And you do realize that it would be up for a jury to decide if they believed him or not, based on his testimony and other evidence, correct?

#128 | Posted by taxman at 2011-02-05 02:37 PM |

Which makes me even more confused, seeing as hearsay is not allowed as evidence, but the opportunity for perjury is in play.

Correct

And you do realize that it would be up for a jury to decide if they believed him or not, based on his testimony and other evidence, correct?

#128 | Posted by taxman

Absolutely.

By and large, yes, Crisp, I would put you in my phantom totally made-up 10%. I find you generally to be intelligent and able to hold an adult conversation. Even when we seem to get each other overly nettled.

I'm not interested in arguing about the "experience gap" with you. Much of the criticism of Obama that's not founded in paranoia, delusion, or racism is founded in ideological differences of opinion and pure extrapolation (guesswork really) of what "his" policies will lead to. I agree that some of his mistakes (those I see as mistakes) come from a lack of a certain kind of experience. I argue that "the other guy" would have made as many mistakes, of different kinds, despite his extensive experience. And if we started listing what you see as mistakes and what I see as mistakes, I bet we'd have very different lists (with some overlap). That's why I made the comment in a brief parenthetical. I wasn't interested in the argument. : )

gee..who would have thought a liberal group would say something like this..

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

what about civility and new tone??

nevermind, we on the right understood all along that people calling for that were one sided at best and lying fucks at worst.

134: Afk, group? What group? Were these spokespersons in this video, or simply attendees?

Not to repeat myself, but I guess I have to:

So a few individuals say something stupid and this is indicative of a progressive agenda or even widely shared beliefs among us? Yet the numerous examples of racism and ignorance in video from Tea Party rallies is not indicative of widespread racism and ignorance in that movement? Folks, you can't have it both ways. The comments made by these fools (in the video) are as worthy of excoriation as anything uttered by some Beck followers and Tea Partiers. But neither are indicative of the larger group. Deal with it.

Afk, you're a Tea Partier of some sort. Is your movement well represented by those assholes who have said stupid (evil?) CRAP and been caught on video? If they're not, then the same applies to the other side here. Think and read before you open your mouth, will you? I know you're smarter than this...

And btw, I've been calling for a better tone for years now. Would you really qualify me as one sided or a lying fuck?

I have a tough time dealing with anyone that says I make shit up.

Fair enough. If I had known you were referring to the entire discussion of that alleged incident, I wouldn't have said you made anything up.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable