Reps. Eric Cantor (R-VA; 47 years old), Paul Ryan (R-WI; 40 years old), and Kevin McCarthy (R-CA; 45 years old) have authored a self-aggrandizing new book set to be released next month titled "Young Guns: A New Generation of Conservative Leaders."

The book's marketing campaign comes with a comical ad trailer, featuring a lofty soundtrack and soaring accolades ("They are ready to make history. Together, they are ‘The YOUNG GUNS!' Innovative, energetic, forging new solutions.") Watch it here.

Here's the wildly ridiculous "Young Guns" self-promotion video, complete with frosted camera lenses, stars gleaming on teeth...As was noted on Scarbough's show this morning, this looks like something with which Colbert will have a ball:

Good grief.

*Sigh*

The funny part is, well OK, the OTHER funny part is that only 13 Repubs have signed onto the Young Goon's Roadmap, not wanting to admit to voters that they are all for privatizing SS and taking apart Medicare and defunding Veteran benefits.

They'd much rather blather on about Park51 than admit their fondness for Ryan's Contract On America.

More like The Three Amigos

So the html embed bit only works on the DR when you're filling in the "Body" part of a thread, yes?

More like The Three Amigos
www.youtube.com
#6 | Posted by Corky

FF!

I'm seeing Cantor as Lucky Days, McCarthy as Ned Nederlander, and featuring Paul Ryan as Dusty Bottoms.

#9 | Posted by Corky

We have a winnah!

#7 that's what I thought, but I saw one in the middle of a thread the other day.

Or maybe I had some of what BL2 is smoking.....

These guys are so far right they can't see the middle class from their front porch

Please to be calling it a "terrace."

I haven't watched Young Guns in a long time. Which one of the characters beat an intern he was sleeping with to death and stuffed her under a desk?

I haven't watched Young Guns in a long time. Which one of the characters beat an intern he was sleeping with to death and stuffed her under a desk?
#14 | Posted by BluSky

None of them.
Not even the person you probably have in mind.
You really have a lot of learning ahead of you if you ever hope to get up to speed.

None of them.

That was some other movie?

That was some other movie?
#16 | Posted by BluSky

Indeed. The loop that runs just behind your eyes, 24/7.

Um, OK.

You having a bad day, Doc?

Need a hug?

GOP's "Young Guns" Mocked

♫♫Shot doooooooown in a blaze of glory!♫♫

I have been trying to avoid posting anything more today, but this comment will not leave my mind.

GOP "Young Guns?" Weren't the Young Guns called the "Regulators?" I thought the GOP hated regulation. Maybe they need another metaphor.

"Need a hug?"

"Is that a rabbit in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?"

I wonder, what do the dashing pistoleros have to say about same-sex marriage?

Seems to be quite the thing among the cognoscenti of the GOP's conservative establishment these days.

"There is a strong conservative case to be made in favor of gay marriage," former McCain campaign manager and fellow same-sex marriage fundraiser Steve Schmidt told the Huffington Post on Tuesday. "Marriage is an institution that strengthens and stabilizes society. It is an institution that has the capacity to bring profound joy and happiness to people and it is a matter of equality and keeping faith of one of the charters of the nation, the right to live your life.

Or, as ken mehlman affectionately calls them "Young Buns".

#23 | Posted by northguy3 Hot Pink Funny flag!

They must have been drunk when they decided that was a good idea.

Sort of like a bad tattoo...

Hey, this is an easy one.

Dick (also pejorative) Cheney's daughter, Ken Mehlman, Larry Craig ...

They realized the GOP was a party full of hippos with carrots tied to their noses posing as rhinos.

party full of hippos with carrots tied to their noses posing as rhinos.

#27 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Only because they tend to be poseurs in the first place.....

Wow, another Dorky and Starvis circle jerk thread. Let me know who eats the cracker.

I was just thinking, when will the republicans show up and defend the Young Guns .

thinkprogress.org

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Why is this on the front page?

This is simply Liberals whining.

Then you turn around and whine about Glenn Beck doing the same thing.

for former Republican congressman and MSNBC host Joe Scarborough.

You can't watch it without feeling really embarrassed for Scarborough and the other jackasses with him.

The real embarrassment is to have to lie about being Conservative in order to get a paycheck!

Wow, another Dorky and Starvis circle jerk thread. Let me know who eats the cracker.

#29 | Posted by JOE

It's worse than a circle jerk; they're stroking each other's hair! *vomit!*

WOW!!!!! What a bunch of dorks.

♫♫Shot doooooooown in a blaze of glory!♫♫

#19 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!

Don't you think that you should go and tell them that they were shot down?

This is MSNBC! No one watches it except Lefties. Very small audience.

You didn't know? You thought this was mainstream?

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

WOW!!!!! What a bunch of dorks.

#34 | Posted by Sniper

Can you imagine having to lie about being Conservative in order to get the small salary he's getting?

Scarborough is what a conservative looks like.

Neocons have thoroughly confused idiots into thinking being a snarky hypocrite is being 'conservative'.

Those people living in Ryan's district have to be very proud of their Representative. Les Aspin is probably rolling in his grave.

Scarborough is what a conservative looks like.

#37 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

LOl!!

how embarrassing it must be for this guy to get up there to be a poser for the Libbies to poke fun at.

AU, Conservatives don't claim him!!!

LOL!!!!

Do you really believe that Joe Scarborough is a Conservative?

Sheesh!

EDDIE

Can't you read?

You aren't a 'conservative', you're a "neo-conservative".

Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan wouldn't recognize the GOP of today that's been completely taken over by moronic idiots.

"#29 | Posted by JOE at 2010-09-01"

What a grumpy little man Joe is. You'd think one would have to be Vernon's age to be such a fucking curmudgeon, but nope.

You aren't a 'conservative', you're a "neo-conservative".

#40 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Describe a neo-conservative for me.

I really don't think you know what it is.

Do you think that the Tea Party is neo-conservative?

Look up the prefix 'neo'. Ain't hard.

Look up the prefix 'neo'. Ain't hard.

#43 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

I'm not trolling. I don't think you know.

What is a neo-conservative?

If you think I'm a neocon, then you have no clue what a neocon is.

Again, is the Tea Party neo-conservative?

I know what a neo-conservative is.

It's apparent you don't.

I know what a neo-conservative is.

It's apparent you don't.

#46 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Why are you being obtuse?

Wikipedia has a good explanation.

Those people living in Ryan's district have to be very proud of their Representative.

They are. In 2008 (a heavily Democrat year) he won re-election by nearly 30 percentage points.

I don't need a definition. I know what a neo-conservative is.

Would you call a politician who left millions in debt behind where there was none before their tenure a 'conservative'?

I know what a neo-conservative is.
#46 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Again, according to your response, you have no clue. Please don't pretend that Joe Scarbourough is Conservative. I've watched him. He says "conservative" things, but without conviction. He's very shy about it. And then turns around and agrees with Liberal concepts.

I don't need a definition. I know what a neo-conservative is.

Would you call a politician who left millions in debt behind where there was none before their tenure a 'conservative'?

#49 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Like who?

You're trolling.

Answer the question, EDDIE

Would you call a politician who left millions in debt behind where there was none before their tenure a 'conservative'?

Yes or no

Yes or no

#52 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

sorry you're trolling

doesn't work that way.

come back when you can be honest.

You're probably talking about Sarah Palin.

Yes, she's a neocon in my opinion.

This is boring.

You won't answer the question.

No use debating what a 'conservative' is with you.

You obviously don't know what a real conservative is.

Can't even offer a yes or no answer.

There ought to be a name for liberals who always live in the past and have nothing to offer but "Bush's fault".

How about paleolibs? (tm)

Hmmm. I like that one. Let's see if we can run with it and make it stick.

There oughta be a name for people who want to return to the Bush policies that got us in this mess. There is, but it's dump worthy.

There oughta be a name for people who want to return to the Bush policies that got us in this mess.

I think there is. It's "ultra extreme minority". At least I've never heard a single person endorse a return to all of Bush's failed policies. But I concede there are probably three or four of them out there.

Have you?

Explain how Republicans in Congress are proposing to do anything differently than they did last time they had power. You won't be able to. They want to extend all the deficit/debt creating tax cuts, for example.

When Mitch McConnell was pressed on how he'd pay for extending the cuts on income over %250,000 know what his reply was?

"Who said we have to pay for it?"

There ought to be a name for liberals who always live in the past and have nothing to offer but "Bush's fault".

How about paleolibs? (tm)

Hmmm. I like that one. Let's see if we can run with it and make it stick.

#57 | Posted by goatman at 2010-09-01 08:07 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

The T.O. whore answers..... wow

"Weeeeeeeee, weee weee weeeeeee"
--- The Left ---

There oughta be a name for people who want to return to the Bush policies that got us in this mess. There is, but it's dump worthy.

#58 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

It's like trying to argue with rainman.

Please don't pretend that Joe Scarbourough is Conservative. I've watched him. He says "conservative" things, but without conviction. He's very shy about it. And then turns around and agrees with Liberal concepts.

I see. So you're only happy if they're die hard, uncompromising, inflexible "conservatives?"

All that's left is for you to admit you are part of the problem.

Au,

I think I'm starting to understand what is wrong with you. I am watching Margaret Cho on Netflix, from 2005. She's funny as shit, but is obsessed with Bush (George Bush) LOL!!! Anyway, I'm watching other commidians from the same time frame, 2003 to 2005. All obsessed with anti-capitalism and and Bush-haters!

It occurred to me what your problem is.

The Right is fixing itself and you can't stand it!

I see. So you're only happy if they're die hard, uncompromising, inflexible "conservatives?"

#64 | Posted by jpw

You don't understand. He's faking the conservative.

It's obvious.

The T.O. whore answers..... wow

The leftie idiot bites. LOL

The Right is fixing itself and you can't stand it!

Perhaps in the same way a dog gets "fixed". You have no balls. Only bluster.

You don't understand. He's faking the conservative.

It's obvious.

Out of curiosity, define conservative and list individuals you feel best represent that idea.

*sigh*

So that's a difficult question?

I would have thought it an easy question.

Eric Cantor is still taking the lead in yet another attempt to rebrand the Republicn Party.

After 8 years of supporting a political and economic disaster, aka as the Bush/Cheney era, the GOP is much in need of a "rebranding."

Back in the days of the Old West it was called "running a brand" . . . or rustling a cow.

The GOP . . . Same old spavined bovine but with a different scar on her ass . . . so to speak.

Young Guns . . . LOL

So that's a difficult question?

I would have thought it an easy question.

#71 | Posted by jpw

I'm sorry. You and AU are cowards. We are getting nowhere until you man up.

Saw this at the top of the "Comments" page and, after a good chuckle at the utterly clueless irony, couldn't resist reposting it.

We are getting nowhere until you man up.
#73 | Posted by Eddie

Young Guns . . . LOL

#72 | Posted by Twinpac

Yet you ignore the monumental mistakes of the current administration.

That's amazing!

If you want representation, then you are going to need to find worthy people.

Now get on it!

Back in the days of the Old West it was called "running a brand"

Indeed, and woe to the lonesome cowboy out on the range who caught caught with a running iron. (Or "runnin' arn" as they say south of the Red River.)

Now get on it!
#75 | Posted by Eddie

Betcha say that to all the girls

#74 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

Of ALL people, you respond!

Now THAT's classic!

Now get on it!
#75 | Posted by Eddie

Betcha say that to all the girls

#77 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Duckie, don't get your panties in a wad because we shut down yet another leftie bitching thread.

You think that no one is watching

BWHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!

Paul Ryan has more brains in his little finger than the entire left side of the aisle in the House.

Too bad those brains didn't work their way into his noggin.

"Paul Ryan has more brains in his little finger than the entire left side of the aisle in the House."

As you enter the House, the Dems are sitting on the right and the GOPers on the left.

Too bad those brains didn't work their way into his noggin.

#81 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Is that it? Boy, you sure did a number on Paul. How the hell do you manage to crush people like him with a top-notch one sentence post? What a fucking gift you have!

Paul's doing a number on Paul, Wussy. Pay attention. I mean, hell's bells, that buckaroo is one of the GOP's new "Young Guns." ROTFLMAO.

Too bad Wissy isn't in the House.

He could be the 14th brave GOPher to sign onto running on a platform of giving Social Security to Wall Street bankers safe keeping and cutting Medicaid and Veterans benefits down to nothing. Not to mention defunding education and children's programs, the perennial Repube favorites.

Not many other House Repubs are so brave.

He could be the 14th brave GOPher to sign onto running on a platform of giving Social Security to Wall Street bankers safe keeping and cutting Medicaid and Veterans benefits down to nothing. Not to mention defunding education and children's programs, the perennial Repube favorites.

Not many other House Repubs are so brave.

#85 | Posted by Corky

Too bad you and Sarvis pay more attention to the people providing your lefty talking points and dragging you around by the nose versus actually reading his plan. Do you two ride inside the shopping cart at the grocery store too?

Soooooo sensitive.
.

I've read his plan, and basically it is what I described.

Unless you would care to point out how it is not.

-Soooooo sensitive.

The prepubescent are like that.

Unless you would care to point out how it is not.

#88 | Posted by Corky

Then how about posting the part of the plan giving Social Security to Wall Street bankers? This should be good.

•Preserves the existing Social Security program for those 55 or older.
•Offers workers under 55 the option of investing over one third of their current Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts, similar to the Thrift Savings Plan available to Federal employees. Includes a property right so they can pass on these assets to their heirs, and a guarantee that individuals will not lose a dollar they contribute to their accounts, even after inflation.
•Makes the program permanently solvent – according to the Congressional Budget Office [CBO] – by combining a more realistic measure of growth in Social Security's initial benefits, with an eventual modernization of the retirement age.

Sems to me he wants to allow us to invest the way Congress does. And for a pissant always citing CBO figures, I imagine this is somehow different, right Rachel?

"This proposal addresses the shortcomings of the current system and strengthens the retirement safety net by providing workers with the voluntary option of investing a portion of their FICA payroll taxes into personal savings accounts. Due to the higher rate of return received by investments in secure funds consisting of equities and bonds, these accounts would allow workers to build a significant nest egg for retirement that far exceeds what the current program can provide....

"Beginning in 2012, the proposal allows each worker younger than 55 to shift a portion of his or her Social Security payroll tax payment into a personal retirement account, chosen from a group of investment funds approved by the government (see below)....

There's your Wall Street part, Wuss.

#92 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Bwahahaha.

The argument can, and has, been made that this "Roadmap" is simply another example of GOPer redistribution of wealth up the economic pyramid.

"Young Guns" my ass. Just more of the same from the Party of No.

There's your Wall Street part, Wuss.
#92 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Bwahahaha.
#93 | Posted by wisgod

Wish you were a bit better at comprehending what you read. It might even make your posts interesting.

From Ryan's Roadmap to Ruin:

"Those choosing the personal account option will select from a list of managed investment funds approved by the government for soundness and safety."

That's not Wall Street, either the place itself or the concept?

Jeezus, you're even stupider than I thought.

One can only wonder where millions of retirees SS money would be now had this Wall Street handling of SS been passed several years ago when these Wall Street stooges like Ryan first started peddling it.

In a black hole somewhere. And no, I don't mean Michael Steele.

"Those choosing the personal account option will select from a list of managed investment funds approved by the government for soundness and safety."

Funny, I read that and mortgage backed securities and treasury bonds came to mind.

Second thing that comes to mind is "soundness and safety" for whom? Me or K Street?

"Those choosing the personal account option will select from a list of managed investment funds approved by the government for soundness and safety."

That's not Wall Street, either the place itself or the concept?

Jeezus, you're even stupider than I thought.

#95 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Approved by the Goverment. Corky stated "giving Social Security to Wall Street bankers" Suddenly, a Goverment run program doesn't suit your inebriated agenda.
Sober up and see if you can tell the difference. We'll wait 30 days.

"His ideas are radical, no doubt. Some highlights of the Roadmap: Replace Medicare with a voucher-based system, get rid of the corporate income tax and replace it with a consumption tax, offer a simplified income tax system and personal investment accounts as an alternative to the current Social Security system. He'd also cap revenue at 19% of GDP and put limits on spending, including a decade-long freeze on non-defense discretionary spending.

And you thought getting health care reform passed was difficult.
Critics say the Roadmap does nothing to lower health care costs, reduce the deficit or prevent a debt crisis; it would slash taxes for the rich; it guts Medicaid and could cause health care premiums to rise; and it subjects those under 55 to cuts in Social Security benefits. For a good overview of the criticism, see the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' take on the plan.

Ryan knows that his Roadmap has no chance of being enacted in its current form. Even most Republicans are steering clear of it."

In a black hole somewhere. And no, I don't mean Michael Steele.

#96 | Posted by Corky

Why Corky! How racist of you!

If your reading comprehension skills matched the degree to which you spew bullshit, Wussy, you'd know that what Ryan's talking about is a massive infusion of money into Wall Street (whether as a physical locale or a blanket term for the U.S. financial industry, as in "managed investment funds").

That you can't quite grasp the point indicates you are either (a) incredibly dense, (b) a mindless shill, i.e., partisan tool, or (c) both.

Approved by the Goverment.
#98 | Posted by wisgod

Thought you guys were opposed to government involvement. And in private investment, no less?!?!?! Ooooooooh, the horror.

(c) both

Thought you guys were opposed to government involvement. And in private investment, no less?!?!?! Ooooooooh, the horror.

#102 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

But the CBO said it would salvage the program. Oh, that's right. The Party of no idea's offers one up, the CBO scores it and Sarvis and Corky do the wadded up panty dance.

You girls only favor legislation passed in record time. That way when the CBO has time to figure out how much it'll cost, it's too late. IE Obamacare.

-the CBO said it would salvage the program

Salvage as in scrap.

If you don't care what happens to the enrollees, salvaging the program is a cinch. The CBO is stating numbers, not societal consequences.

The CBO is stating numbers, not societal consequences.

#106 | Posted by Corky

Just like ObamaCare, right two-face?

The new Health Care law is covering children today that couldn't get help before.

And as anti-GOP as that is, I don't seem to be hearing their call for Repeal as an election issue as they promised.

The Ryan Budget's Radical Priorities

Provides Largest Tax Cuts in History for Wealthy, Raises Middle Class Taxes, Ends Guaranteed Medicare, Privatizes Social Security, Erodes Health Care

And here I thought you might retort that. Silly me.

You girls...
#105 | Posted by wisgod '

Oh, kreiest, Wussy's trying his 101 dance hoping to curry favor with the object of his affection again! You sound like some grinning goober sitting by himself on a 4th grade playground. Please, try and act your chronological age.

But the CBO said it would salvage the program....
#104 | Posted by wisgod

Uh oh, another GOPer who didn't read the CBO's cover letter to Roadwreck Ryan.

And here I thought you might retort that. Silly me.

#109 | Posted by Corky

I don't make it a habit to retort left wing talking points. But it figures you couldn't simply stick to the plan itself. That would take thought on your part instead of regurgitating what someone tells you to think.

And here I thought you might retort that. Silly me.
#109 | Posted by Corky

Wussy won't because he can't. He may bob and weave, toss out some spitballs, but even Roadwreck Ryan can't negate those elements of the Plan To Screw Americans.

"I don't make it a habit to retort left wing talking points"

Translation:

B-b-b-b-ut I don' know what to say!?!?!?
~ Wussy

You girls better save your goggled talking points for next year. You're going to need them when you lose the House. I have a feeling Paul Ryan is going to destroy your Liver, Sarvis.

I guess he told us.

The Tax Policy Center--a non-partisan think tank--did a thorough analysis on the impact of the tax changes Ryan proposes--a massive tax cut for the wealthy, paired with substantial tax increases on 90 percent of the country--and found that the so-called "Roadmap" would actually leave the federal government desperately starved for funds....

The result, they conclude, is ballooning, unsustainable deficits--a quirky feature for a plan touted far and wide for its potential to right the country's fiscal course.

worth repeating

So when you don't like the CBO report, let's deflect to some no-name think tank.
Bravo, Corky. You'd make a goldfish on a dry floor jealous the way you flip-flop.

#117 | Posted by wisgod

Corky is still 'all in a tizzy' about the glowing success of 'Recovery Summer'.

Is Tizzy what they call you at home?

Here Tizzy, Tizzy, Tizzy! Good booooy!

Corky is still 'all in a tizzy' about the glowing success of 'Recovery Summer'.

#118 | Posted by 2008ATL

Yeah, I'll bet the Tax Policy Center has high praise for how the $783B was spent. LOL!

#120 | Posted by wisgod

Yeah Really...

That reminded me of this fantastic headline:

Obama Insists $800-Billion Stimulus Pass By This Weekend
February 04, 2009 6:59 PM

I'm sure Corky and Sarvis both completely embraced barry's call to action confident that it was the only way to 'save the country from economic disaster'.

How's that one working out you imbecilic liberal rubes...

"Here it is, Wuss, with glaring caveats: www.cbo.gov"
#110 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-09-02 11:01 AM |

The link was changed and is not valid. FWIW.

Not sure if this makes a difference, but it seems that the criticisms and compliments are still based on guess work. I would say though, some of those proposals can be a starting point and maybe evolve into something of a solution.

Once again showing the modern
G.O.P. (which stands for "Got Zero (0) Plans"),
has nothing left in the ole fuel tank...

Once again showing the modern
G.O.P. (which stands for "Got Zero (0) Plans"),
has nothing left in the ole fuel tank...

#123 | Posted by earthmuse at 2010-09-02 12:20 PM

So what exactly is the CBO scoring?

An anti-conservative, pro-Big Government hatchet piece from "Thinkprogress.org??

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZ

Libbys. They always tell us who they fear.

You girls...
#105 | Posted by wisgod | Flag: Limping 101 Wannabe Impersonation

You girls better...
#114 | Posted by wisgod | Flag: Pathetic 101 Wannabe Impersonation

I wonder if Wussy's voice cracks when he says stuff like this.

"Here it is, Wuss, with glaring caveats: www.cbo.gov"
#110 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-09-02 11:01 AM |

The link was changed and is not valid. FWIW.
#122 | Posted by crispee_oc

#127...

TY, it was the same link I had posted as well.

Crispee...I click on the www.bco.gov in #127 and it comes through for me. Quien sabe?

Crispee...I click on the www.bco.gov in #127 and it comes through for me. Quien sabe?

#129 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2010-09-02 01:58 PM |

I dinna kin doc, this is what I get when I open the link.

GOP's 'Young Guns' Misfire.......
Oh my God!

Premature ejection!

The GOP . . . Same old spavined bovine but with a different scar on her ass . . . so to speak.

Young Guns . . . LOL

#72 | Posted by Twinpac

Deja Moo: You know you've heard the bullshit before

Libbys. They always tell us who they fear.

#125 | Posted by Lon_Seong

Fear the Vienna sausage!

"Those choosing the personal account option will select from a list of managed investment funds approved by the government for soundness and safety."

Approved by the Goverment. Corky stated "giving Social Security to Wall Street bankers" Suddenly, a Goverment run program doesn't suit your inebriated agenda.

Suddenly a Government program that you agree to?

FFlags for Frank and AU, rofl deja moo, rofl premature, well you get it, still laughing, thanks guys.

Donner, my first thought was you were describing conservatives cock size. oh well, funny flag for you too.

"Donner, my first thought was you were describing conservatives cock size. oh well, funny flag for you too."

I doubt Frank 2.5 is laughing, he is a liberal.

So Crispee,

He was describing your cock size, too funny

Young Guns?

Cos they shoot themselves in the foot so often?

These rethug brat-pack wannabes are just more of the same old brand of rethug bullshiat we've come to expect only in a slightly less senile and more photo-friendly package.

More like The Three Amigos

So Crispee,

He was describing your cock size, too funny

#136 | Posted by Dragnlady at 2010-09-03 06:29 PM |

You should be lucky to get any cock dragn. If you are into it, if not I can see why as well.

Awww Crispy is just made cos he's not getting any blowjobs no more.

Ever since the doctor warned his wife about the dangers of choking on small bones...

Be Well.

Too funny Crispee,

I see I hit a nerve, roflmao.

CRISPEE!!!

I'm shocked to see you talk like that.

CRISPEE!!!

I'm shocked to see you talk like that.
#141 | Posted by Lisa at 2010-09-03 07:06 PM |

I uh, well uh, you see I uh...

Too funny Crispee,

I see I hit a nerve, roflmao.

#140 | Posted by Dragnlady at 2010-09-03 07:05 PM

A nerve or a muscle?

Actually, I was pissed you messed up my rip on Frank 2.5. But since you are laughing, do I still need to apologize.

Naww, no need to apologize.

On topic though:

I think this should be nominated for best comedy commercial ever.

Naww, no need to apologize.
#144 | Posted by Dragnlady at 2010-09-03 07:26 PM

Actually, I really do. As well to you Lisa.

Oh stop it, Crispee! I was just nuts'n around with you.