Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, May 14, 2010

An international team of scientists found that rising temperatures have driven 12% of Mexico's lizard populations to extinction. They conclude, in an article in Science, that "lizards have already crossed a threshold for extinctions." Lead researcher Barry Sinervo said, "We are actually seeing lowland species moving upward in elevation, slowly driving upland species extinct, and if the upland species can't evolve fast enough then they're going to continue to go extinct."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Zatoichi

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

"If the upland species can't evolve fast enough they're going to go exinct...."

A lamarckian. Interesting. Even more so that the remark was found in "Science".

"If the upland species can't evolve fast enough they're going to go exinct...."

Isn't that what 'evolution' has been doing for billions of years? Rewarding the adaptable?

Sounds natural to me

JeffNDenmark should be excited. We may have found the key to vanquishing the reptoids.

A lamarckian. Interesting.

There's nothing "lamarckian" to be found in the article.

Once again, Zed, you've proven that you haven't got a fucking clue about biology.

In the weird world of climate paranoia, innuendo is a "link" that "proves" climate change.

"There's nothing lamarckian to be found in the article....."

Let me restate the author---

"If the upland species can't evolve fast enough they're going to go extinct...."

What do you think he meant by that? Think of this as being a chance to prove your genius. I know you want to.

Not to put a finer point on the challenge, but your MO has evolved (hehe) to making drive-by insults without putting up much of your own.

You're the alleged biologist. Explain why that statement is not lamarckian, or could not be taken for such.

Otherwise I'll give ZAT ten seconds to suck your ass.

Zat needs less than 10-seconds to respond to his appetites.

ZOMBIE----Has ZAT sucked you're ass yet? No? Well, that settles it----He doesn't exist.

"You're ass...."

Nothing Freudian there.

"If the upland species can't evolve fast enough they're going to go extinct...."

What do you think he meant by that?

Exactly what he said. If the pace of environmental change is greater than the rate at which the lizard population can evolve, the lizards go extinct. How fast the lizards evolve depends on a lot of factors, none of which deal with anything remotely Lamarckian.

I'm talking about things like the size and genetic diversity of the population, generation time, lifespan, death rate, brood size, mutation rate, the effects of mutation on the specific genes that would be involved in adaptation, the strength of selection from environmental change, etc.

Where the hell do you see "inheritance of acquired characteristics" in this?

Remember - what Lamarck meant by "inheritance of acquired characteristics" is that if frogs who jump more in their lifetimes will produce offspring that jump further.

"How fast the lizards evolve depends on a lot of factors...."

A lot of things to say here. Let's start with: If the upland lizards evolve into lowland lizards then the upland lizards must by definition be extinct, a new species having supplanted them?

Lamarck also meant that species encountering environmental stresses will directly transmit adaptive responses to their offspring. Species that can do this have been identified.

Climate change link to lizard extinction -

This is surprising? Climate change has often been a factor in extinction.

Climate Change happens. Accept it. It also leads to new species of lizards.

Lamarck also meant that species encountering environmental stresses will directly transmit adaptive responses to their offspring.

What Lamarck didn't know is that hormones and purely environmental factors can alter growth and development.

The root cause is purely genetic, though. Variable environmental conditions have favored the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. No mystery there. Your "adaptive response" is just an evolved ability to react to different environments.

Jean-Baptiste Lamarck? (1744-1829)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

If the upland lizards evolve into lowland lizards then the upland lizards must by definition be extinct, a new species having supplanted them?

What the hell are you talking about? The upland and lowland lizards are two extant species. One won't evolve into the other.

Once again, you show you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

Jean-Baptiste Lamarck? (1744-1829)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Don't be so harsh on him. Lamarck was wrong, but for the right reasons. Especially considering what some of his contemporaries advocated, he was on the right track.

"Let's start with: If the upland lizards evolve into lowland lizards then the upland lizards must by definition be extinct, a new species having supplanted them?
#13 | Posted by Zed"

If you want to start with something that makes no sense whatsoever, have at it.

"One won't evolve into the other....."

Um, then where do new species come from, ZOMBIE?

"If you want to start with something that makes no sense whatsoever...."

Oh, if it confuses you I really can explain it further. Right now I'm wondering why you didn't jump on ZOMBIE for asserting that new species don't come from old species.

Seems that would be what evolution is.

Um, then where do new species come from, ZOMBIE?

Key word in that sentence is new. One living species does not evolve into another living species, as you suggested earlier.

"One living species does not evolve into another living species...."

The question asked where was the "another" comes from?

My lizard became extinct when my viagra script ran out.

Pardon me----"Was where the another comes from?" Can you say?

It just became lowland lizard, THOM. It may evolve again.

We don't need no stinking lizards....
(this extends to all lizards except that bright green couple that live under my garage. I enjoy watching them).

By the way, have you ever seen lizards fucking? It's pretty cool. They bite each others necks real hard. Other than that they don't appear to be moving at all. He just climbs on top and they start biting each other.

I can't decide if they are going at it so fast we can't see them, or if he has some kind of magic lizard penis, that does the work so he don't have to.

In any event, it looks painful...but they seem to enjoy it.

Foot in mouth disease causes global warming.

As the foot inserts the mouthal cavity traces of co2 quickly escapes from the mouth interacting with the foot causing extreme co2's to form which are then escaped into the atmosphere. THese super extreme co2's merge into other normal co2's forming gigantuon co2's which cause global warming and the extinction of lizards.

now if we could just get rid of the cockroach.

I think this sums up the global climate up/down thing...

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
Nikola Tesla

Maybe they moved somewhere else. You know, they have legs and everything. Maybe they headed to San Diego or Phoenix, like all other things Mexican.

#30 | POSTED BY PRAGMATOUS
"gigantuon co2's"

FF!

If the upland species can't evolve fast enough they're going to go exinct....

From vernon Isn't that what 'evolution' has been doing for billions of years? Rewarding the adaptable?

Sounds natural to me

Vern you just hit a new low in right wing sanctioned ignorance.

I have been saying for decades now that the problem with global warming is not the change in temperature, it's the speed of the change that is the problem. Vern needs to read a book on evolution. Evolutionary adaption takes hundreds or thousand of generations to progress. It's done by the process of the survival of the fittest. The new off springs that can tolerate the changes survive and pass on those specific genes as long as the change takes place over multiple generations. When change happens in a generation or two, evolution just can't work. That is why we have a mass extinction going on right now.

I'll bet vern will deny that too. These are the kinds of statements that make me avoid any mention of science around a republican.

#33... Yea, right, and maybe they all got shot by banditos.

Your complete ignorance never ceases to amaze me.

Climate Change happens. Accept it. It also leads to new species of lizards.

Here is another pubbie that doesn't have a clue. If they can't evolve, how it that possible genius?

The question asked where was the "another" comes from?

An ancestral species. If you go back far enough, it will be a common ancestral species.

In the weird world of climate paranoia, innuendo is a "link" that "proves" climate change.

#8 | Posted by Diablo at 2010-05-14 11:59 AM | Reply | Flag: Doesn't understand the concept of the scientific method.

I call BS on this whole thing. all predictions... I would like to see how long this study went on and how they did it..

Lead by team from SANTA CRUZ.... really... lol yeah I call BS just a look at it from the surface.

reminds me of this quote.

“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” Nikola Tesla

This is surprising? Climate change has often been a factor in extinction.

#15 | Posted by illogicbuster

That's true. Something will even lead to humans extinction eventually. That's the way it goes.

“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” Nikola Tesla

Things have changed a little since the gay 90's, even in science.

Two of the biggest pieces of evidence that Global Climate Change is happening are first, the mass extinctions going on atm and second, the migration of animal species away from their traditional habitats towards other, more climate friendly, lands.

One would have to be an absolute idiot to look at those two factors and not see something happening.

I call BS on this whole thing

Case in point.

Be Well.

/That's right biatches. Spud's back and
entering the DR as ya do
stage left.

Should we be worried enough to build an Ark, like the last time the crazy people's G-d came down and killed almost everything?

What the hell are you talking about? The upland and lowland lizards are two extant species. One won't evolve into the other.

#19 | Posted by ZombieHunter

So......... I guess they evolve into lowland lizards that live in the highland? Couldn't you then call them highland lizards? Naaaaaaaaaaa.

I can't believe this global warming crap is even still around. The hypnotized, brainless believers of this religion just can't let go.

I would think that the 12% reduction in Mexico has many causes. People are probably eating them for food, unfortunately. And, feral cats and dogs are taking their toll, just as they do with songbirds in the states. Pollution, yes pollution, may also be a big factor. I could see a 12% reduction right there.

#46

Yea, it can't be anything you are guilty of. I can see the logic in that belief.

Leaping lizards! We could link everything from cock size to the price of tea in China to global warming, but who will believe the Warmers since they lost all their credibility in Climategate.

And championship football teams are being pressured to change their native american names to something more Politically Correct!

One thing does not always mean the other thing is linked. Although the NCAA is acting like the NAACP in a fight that on its face is disrecpectful to those who are intended to protect. So the Native americans will fade from view altogether because we will soon forget about the Noble indian their squaw the tribe or any mention of thier life.

so to be politically correct we must lose history forever. Unless we are the chosen oppressed ones. Then no matter what we do to overcome the past the "original sin" remains to be revived when needed.

I for one never owned a slave, my great grand father killed whites to free slaves and the race baiters of this time need to get a new job!

What do you think?

I can't believe this global warming crap is even still around. The hypnotized, brainless believers of this religion just can't let go.

#46 | Posted by LogicRules

Have you popped all the zits yet? I guess not.

Ring is busy this morning.

Get a sense of humor, dude. Just because it's not on Olbermann doesn't mean you can't wonder sometimes if someone is joking or not.

Your life, though.

Constipation is linked to Climate Change.

Get a sense of humor, dude.

Dude, I laugh at dupes like you everyday. My wife does too and she is from Asia. She is also better educated and has more common sense then any right wing American I ever met.

Constipation is linked to Climate Change.

That's an old farts disorder, especially conservatives. They all have a hard time on the throne. The eat too much crow these days.

their squaw

BlueSpringsMo

I agree Blue.Indians used to be on alot of our coinage.But squaw is a term that apparently means piece off ass or something.Squaw peak in Phoenix
is now Piestawa Peak (after the Navajo girl who died in Iraq)
OTOH,Atlanta Braves is ridiculous considering what Georgia did to their Indians

are we going to lose are washington redskins?

#40 | POSTED BY LIBSLAYER
"Lead by team from SANTA CRUZ.... really... lol yeah I call BS just a look at it from the surface. "

Libslayer?
Sure, it's from Santa Cruz, therefore it must be wrong.
How high is that horse you're on?

The only thing you've slain
Is the notion you've a brain

Try harder next time, please, and give us something actually worth responding to.

Retard.

Try harder? Really. What facts do they give? You buy this... They say 12% of the pop is gone.. How do they know this? Did they take a Census? Also they say they will be gone in 70 years but we can stop it by going green.... sorry, if they only have 70 years.. We can't stop it.... also how much c02 do we have to reduce to stop it? What % of C02 do we have to reduce to stop this? Again BS..... Not hard to see...

"Is the notion you've a brain" your the one buying into this BS....

"Sure, it's from Santa Cruz, therefore it must be wrong." www.youtube.com

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable