Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, March 21, 2010

A rise in the number of marriages between cousins among Pakistani immigrants in Britain has prompted calls for a crackdown on the practice amid warnings it is putting children's health at risk. Figures show up to 75 per cent of British Pakistanis in some areas are married to first cousins.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

mysterytoy

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I wonder if this practice has anything to do with the rise of birth defects in Iraq.

Holy crap, I wonder what kind of bizarre genetics gave Lady Deech that face she has.

Marrying of first cousins should be banned completely.

that's why their birth rate is so high, they'll sleep with anyone.

The Brits should understand the perils of inbreeding. All they have to do is look at the Royal Family who have been doing it since 1066 AD.

I don't want to hear any jokes about Tosser's cousin, I mean sister, I mean wife, I mean mother. Ah, just forget it.

"The Brits should understand the perils of inbreeding. All they have to do is look at the Royal Family who have been doing it since 1066 AD.

#4 | Posted by goatman"

It was nobility throughout all of Europe who had this little problem, most especially the Hapsburgs.

Majority of the popes were from haupsburg family.

Now I see why most
Muslims and Haupsburgs believe everything they are told.

Majority of the popes were from haupsburg family.

I thought the Hapsburgs had more influence in the empirical role than the religious role. I know that they made sure the pope (thereby the church) stayed in power througout European history, but I didn't realize they controlled the Holy See

"I thought the Hapsburgs had more influence in the empirical role than the religious role."

Weren't they really just one in the same for many centuries?

Ban marriage.

It just occurred to me that marriage and mortgage are similar.

Ban them both. People would be happier.

Weren't they really just one in the same for many centuries?

If not the same person, they were certainly each other's puppets. A good example of this is how Charles V and Clement VI (?, maybe VII) tried to stop Henry VIII's reformation in England.

It was nobility throughout all of Europe who had this little problem, most especially the Hapsburgs.

Very true. Talk about a family tree with no branches

"I was going to marry my first cousin, but then I didn't want to, because she kicked my dog.

- Kerpal

Great!soon they'll be too "tarded" to become terrorists.

Very true. Talk about a family tree with no branches

Dear god.

Marrying of first cousins should be banned completely.

#2 | POSTED BY GRUMPY_TOO

look it up...first cousin marriage is legal in more states than ghey marriage..its a fact.

look it up...first cousin marriage is legal in more states than ghey marriage..its a fact.

#16 | Posted by jubal_harshaw at 2010-03-21 07:53

I have looked it up and it is surprising the number of states ... as you mention. The practice has not performed real well here in Alabama, dang, you get some funny looking folks that way, even worse than Lady Deech.

Well well well, it looks like those "optimized ethics" that Zombie speaks of are making their way into the mainstream!

Doesn't everyone think it's high-time we add another letter to the GLBT social grouping? Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Incestuous.

Or maybe it's still too early for our society to recognize this new sexual minority? Not to worry, enlightenment will soon come and the "rights of all" will be recognized and celebrated!

We Shall Overcome!

Doesn't everyone think it's high-time we add another letter to the GLBT social grouping? Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Incestuous.

Sabati, the Incentuous are already covered by the term "Conservative".

Well well well, it looks like those "optimized ethics" that Zombie speaks of are making their way into the mainstream!

It looks like, once again, you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. Always beating on that dead horse with your homophobic rants. Why can't you ever keep to the topic? You can argue well enough against incest, but you can never manage to put forth an argument pertaining to precisely why homosexual rights are so evil.

Dumb superstitious fuck.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable