Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, March 16, 2010

On the Senate floor, Senators Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), called on the Obama Administration to end its condemnation of Israel over the announcement of new settlements during the recent visit to that country by Vice President Joe Biden. "It's time to lower voices, to get over the family feud between the U.S. and Israel," Lieberman said. "It just doesn't serve anybody's interests but our enemies."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

jackass

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Who could have guessed Lieberman would be siding with the country he really serves?

what a stupid remark...and anti semetic as well...

but what new about that here..

I dont know but I have read where this area they wer building on is recognized as Israel...by WHO..
how about ABBA HIMSLEf who had this part of the city on a map under ISRAEL proper if you will..
and what a wonderfull chance for obama to get some points in with his radical left who doesnt give a fuck if israel is blown to hell or not...

......it's about time that an administration was willing to call out Israel when they are wrong.....

.....the "incident" is NOT a "bureaucratic decision"...in fact, Netenyahu is in favor of expansion into Palestinian lands and theft of all possible Palestinian property.......

.....good on Obama, Biden and Clinton for calling them out......now if we would only stop borrowing money from China to give to Israel, that might really wake them up.....

"ABBA HIMSLEf"

Abba Himslef? He's my tailor!

Joe LIEberman (I)

/The "I" stands for Israel and so does Joe.

McCain has been AIPAC's biatch fer a while now so no surprises there.

Israel smacked America in the face when it deliberately embarrassed Joe Biden (something he's perfectly capable of doing himself most days, btw) by continuing to show intransigence on the peace process when on an official visit the other day.

That Joe and McLame would take Israel's side here speaks volumes.

Be Well.

It is possible to support Israel and America's alliance with Israel but to also condemn the building of these 1600 apartments in disputed East Jerusalem as unnecessarily provocative. President Obama is, once again, correct in his approach. The expansion of this settlement is an aggressive act with both real and symbolic signifigance, especially at a time when the US and George Mitchell is trying to jumpstart indirect discussions for peace.
In large part, our continued support for Israel is based on our belief that this democratic society is the "good guy" in a sea of chaos. Action which make them seem like the instigators and provocateurs simply are not in Israel's best interest, regardless of whatever short term domestic political gain Netanyahu achieves by it.

Ummm, raise your voice, Mr. President. It's about time we did with Israel.

It is possible to support Israel and America's alliance with Israel but to also condemn the building of these 1600 apartments in disputed East Jerusalem as unnecessarily provocative. President Obama is, once again, correct in his approach.

Yes, the "piss and wind" approach. Truly ballsy.

In large part, our continued support for Israel is based on our belief that this democratic society is the "good guy" in a sea of chaos.

In large part, our continued support for Israel is based on the infiltration of AIPAC and their very skilled lobbying prowess.

It was pretty obvious that the announcement was made to embarrass the Vice President and a strong reply was necessary.

AGAIN...this area was supposed to have been included in areas deemed by the LEADER OF THE PALESTINANS as being israeli territorty according to bill krystle and he said it with PodesTA on the panel which he would have said was wrong if it was or he even thought it was...
so even if the palestianins said it was isreali territory then they have NOTHING TO SAY aBOUT IT...as well as hillary or biden or us

I do not know why Obama would care about Israel at all, especially after seeing this vid on Max Blumenthal:

Those Israeli's are quality:

maxblumenthal.com

BTW: Please be advised there is extreme profane language in above vid.

It bothers me when Israel takes this type of action. I strongly support Israel and their right to self defense. But I am also aware of the living conditions of the Palestinians. (Frankly, as a general rule I blame the Palestinians for their current unfavorable situation. Their insistence on violence and unwillingness to negotiate in good faith have always made it difficult for me to take their side in this conflict.) Unnecessary unilateral actions such as this one by the government of Israel tend to place the shoe on the other foot. It highlights the "plight" of the palestinians and makes it seem as if they are not to blame.

So we need to use strong sanctions and words against Iran but we should walk on eggshells for Israel...Fuck that!

I agree: we have every right to put conditions to money we give out and if Israel does not like the conditions, then they can simply refuse the money.

I agree: we have every right to put conditions to money we give out and if Israel does not like the conditions, then they can simply refuse the money.

Seems I agreed twice. Opps

retire those war mongering assholes, NOW!

F Joe LIEberman.

what a stupid remark...and anti semetic as well...

I'm tired of anti-Semitism being invoked every time somebody points out how hardcore Lieberman is about Israel issues. The next time he criticizes Israel on the Senate floor will be the first time.

Pay no attention to the BABBLER...

"and what a wonderfull chance for obama to get some points in with his radical left who doesnt give a fuck if israel is blown to hell or not..."

There are many ignorant people on this site who claim to be pro-Palestinian while advocating idiotic self destructive polices for Palestinians and spreading misinformation about the conflict in general.

But if you think Israelis give a fuck is you are blown to hell or not, you're an idiot.

When someone who is mooching off you slaps you in the face the way Israel did recently, you should do alot more than talk tough. Hell, if our government had any integrity we would have stopped giving them money decades ago. The USS Liberty incident alone was enough to prove how little they respect the US and its people. Plus whether our government is even legally allowed to tax Americans to give the money away to foreigners is debatable in the first place.

I believe the US should use a directed missile strike to teach the Israel's a lesson. Israel could retaliate but it would be very bad for them if they did.

Cheney and Lieberman, America's worst enemies within.

When someone who is mooching off you slaps you in the face the way Israel did recently, you should do alot more than talk tough.

Agreed. Time to put your wallet away and stop sharing weapons and info with Israel. Israel has no interest in a palestinian state., unless it is so divided by Israel expansion and settlements that it can never function.

In 1973 the simplicity of the plan was succinctly described by Ariel Sharon when he was asked what would become of the Palestinians.

"We'll make a pastrami sandwich of them," he boasted to a British journalist at Israel's National Press Club. "Yes, we'll insert a strip of Jewish settlements in between the Palestinians, and then another strip of Jewish settlements right across the West Bank, so that in 25 years' time, neither the United Nations nor the United States, nobody, will be able to tear it apart."

ABBA HIMSLEf

The guy that runs 7-11? What the hell does he have to do with it?


YEAH!!!

The President shouldn't point out that Israel keeps breaking their promises to stop building settlements on Palestinian land.

Funny that the biggest DR Racists will be the first to accuse others of being anti-semitic for mentioning this.

I do not know why Obama would care about Israel at all, especially after seeing this vid on Max Blumenthal:

Those Israeli's are quality:

maxblumenthal.com

#11 | Posted by Sluggo at 2010-03-16 12:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

The only one that was actually from Israel was the one who didn't swear and said Obama liked Jews and Arabs. The rest were drunken Jews from the States there on Vacation.

If they want to hate America so much, perhaps they should denounce our BILLIONS of dollars in aid.

"Let's cut the family fighting, the family feud," Lieberman said. "It's unnecessary; it's destructive of our shared national interest. It's time to lower voices, to get over the family feud between the U.S. and Israel. It just doesn't serve anybody's interests but our enemies."

This quote speaks volumes about how Senator Lieberman perceives the U.S. relationship with Israel. I suspect most Americans would disagree. As if Israel is a part of America. As if Israel's interests and America's interests are completely synonomous. As if we are "family" with the Isrealis. As if our differences should not be aired in public, unlike our differences with any other country on Earth.

was made to embarrass the Vice President

you cannot embarrass joe biden.

Senate floor, Senators Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), called on the Obama Administration to end its condemnation of Israel

Is there any sane soul still left out there who doubts if NeoCon puppet John McCain had been elected President we would not today be in a full-scale war with Iran and having to deal with the resulting upheaval throughout Middle East.

In defense of George W. Bush, he himself was not a Neocon. But unfortunately, unlike his father and Bill Clinton -- both of whom refused to allow Neocons to take over their Administrations -- GWB was weak and allowed the Neocons their long-sought political power.

"Neoconservatism" is an ideology not just restricted to one political party nor to any specific country as Neocons now are in control of the Israeli government. The Israeli people will suffer as much under their Neocon government leaders as the U.S did when we allowed them to control U.S. policy during the Bush Administration. Both the citizens of the U.S. and Israel need to make adamently sure they clean house and never again allow Neocons to regain a political foothold in either government.

Below is a link to an interesting article (dated 2003) as to how Neocons grabbed power in our U.S. government. Don't let the article's "antiwar" websote be a turn-off from reading the article. It is of vital importance that every American citizen, including the citizens of Israel, educate themselves about what they will be up against should they let Neocons remain in political power.

"How Neoconservatives Conquered Washington and Started a War

websote = website

perhaps if Netanyahu began building centrifuges Obama would bow to him

Psssst....dumbfuck....Israel already has nukes.

the French sold them to Israel in the 70's.

Of course they should lower their voices. Wouldn't want the American public to know the dirty little secret to the Muslim-American conflict called AIPAC.

And this is surprising? Joe Fucking Lieberman is an Israeli Republican, this is not news. Now if we could just deport him to the country he actually serves......

Also, can we please just stop handing the Israelis billions of $$ every year. They'll start behaving real quick once the ATM gets tuned off.

websote = website

#32 | Posted by CalifChris at 2010-03-16 05:43 PM

More like wobsite = a mid day drink or three.

Oh yeah. Fuck joe lieberman.

East Jerusalem according to the palistinians is where they want their capitol to be.
Where they want...
So herein lies the problem...where they want.
Who the fuck are they to lay claim to land not owned by them.
They will not participate in local politics because they refuse to do so yet they want a voice in zoning matters...because they want.
They are losers from the bottom up.
Fuck em

rwd

STFU Liebeman

"Lower our voices"?

Hey Joe. Do you really mean "Hey America, shut your face"?

Lieberman: He was one of the Senate's strongest advocates for continued prosecution of the war in Iraq. He is also an outspoken supporter of the U.S.-Israel relationship. Lieberman's approval rating in a poll taken January 45, 2010, was 25% approve versus 67% who disapprove, making him one of the least popular Senators currently in office. A spokesperson told The Hartford Courant in 1994 that Lieberman received an educational deferment from the Vietnam War draft when he was an undergraduate and law student from 1960 to 1967. Upon graduating from law school at age 25, Lieberman qualified for a family deferment because he was already married and had one child, Matt. According to The Center for Responsive Politics, Lieberman currently ranks fourth on the list of candidates who received money from pro-Israel Political Action Committees (PACs) in 2006.

en.wikipedia.org

It highlights the "plight" of the palestinians and makes it seem as if they are not to blame.

#13 | Posted by moder8

I am shocked, shocked I tell ya that you would take this angle.

Because, you know, it's important to figure out who is to blame. Otherwise, how can you feel morally superior?

And let's face it, any jew is better than any palestinian, right? Coincidentally, that distinction only seems to be related to your address, rather than your ethnic lineage.

Lipz: Your post #42 makes me think that you did not understand my post #13. So let me explain it to you using smaller words. When Palestinians launch hundreds of rockets into civilian Israeli towns, it makes it pretty clear to any impartial observer that Israel is justified in responding to this behavior with the use of force. Under such circumstances it is pretty unambiguous that the Palestinians are responsible for their own "plight". When the Israeli government begins building large housing settlements in disputed border territory at a time when the US is trying to jumpstart peace negotiations, ambiguity is introduced. It no longer is so easy to state with confidence that the Palestinians are the aggressors who have brought the situation onto themselves. Get it? I realize being a long time Israel-hater/Palestinian- apologist you reject any observation that does not begin and end with Israel being almost wholly at fault. But that's your problem, not mine.

perhaps if Netanyahu began building centrifuges Obama would bow to him
#33 | Posted by markh

pssst....dumbfuck....Israel already has nukes.
#35 | Posted by LetUsPrey

hmmm, that's curious - -

the Jews elected Obama . . . yet the lefties hate the Jews

the left hates our allies? - - or, the left are eating their own?

hmmm II . . .

if Palestinians disarm, there is peace in the mid-east

if Jews disarm, they are killed

just wonderin' who sounds more like Hitler . . .
the teaparty lady passing out cookies & US Constitutions

OR . . . Lettuce-sprey & company?

Israel is the perfect example of what a waste of money the US's attempt at nation building has been for the past 50 years.

"just wonderin' who sounds more like Hitler . . .
the teaparty lady passing out cookies & US Constitutions

OR . . . Lettuce-sprey & company?
#44 | Posted by markh"

That's right, Marky-Mark. Stating facts sounds JUST LIKE HITLER.

Did you get a good look at that shark when you were jumping over it?

Actually, it has been quite successful. Israel is the most open and democratic society in that region of the World. Also, second only to the U.S. it has the highest per capita number of M.D.s, Ph.D.s, engineers and Nobel Laureates in the world. If our goal was to strengthen a modern technologically advanced ally, I'd say we succeeded. Albeit at a great cost.

I realize being a long time Israel-hater/Palestinian- apologist you reject any observation that does not begin and end with Israel being almost wholly at fault. But that's your problem, not mine.

#43 | Posted by moder8

you give me too much credit. I am actually neither. I don't hate Israel and I don't love the palestinians or vice versa.

This is my problem. I don't see Israel as any more important than any other small country. I don't accept the religious angle. I don't find their race any more intelligent or capable than any other race. So why do I have to pretend that they are something they are not? And that is unacceptable to folks like you. Everyone must drink the Jewlaid.

I don't find their race any more intelligent or capable than any other race. So why do I have to pretend that they are something they are not? And that is unacceptable to folks like you. Everyone must drink the Jewlaid.

#48 | Posted by Lipzoidial

umm, how many Palestinean Nobel Laureates ya seen lately?
excluding luttuce-sprey of course

the Pals are kinda pathetic really . . .
doomed to either Tommy-John surgery from thowing stones or strapping on a bomb vest . . . or both

just a reminder that as the Pals either abandoned or lost that land as the result of a war that the Arabs started . . .
they really got no claim and should be elated with ANYTHING

Jewlaid was funny. No, no, I'm not playing anti-Semitic; it's just a funny play on the usual clich we see so often on this site.

Here's my question... Er, two.

1. Why does the "anti-Semitic" (check your spelling, Afk) have to come up every time someone criticizes Israel? It's absurd. (And righties, pay attention--you rightly call out some people who bring up racism too often in the face of criticism of President Obama. We should apply that same check every time an Israel conversation comes up. Is the critic really being anti-Semitic? And that's an odd word to begin with, but I'll leave the etymology aside for now.)

2. Why is it sooo hard to have an honest conversation about Israel in America? Why is the kneejerk reaction so often--and on both sides of the aisle--blind acceptance or support? Is it really 'cause they're the only Democratic ally we have in the region? Really? Well, shit, for a gov't that uses similar styles of reprisals that the German gov't used against rebellious/resistant Jews in the shtetls, pre- and during the Jewish Holocaust, um, really, what kind of democracy is that? Really something to celebrate? Okay, I'm sure I'm ignoring some very important issues, but Israel is hardly perfect. I so often feel that the Israel conversation, like some other topics in US politics, is too loaded for serious, balanced conversations. But then again, what am I doing on DR looking for serious, balanced conversations? : )

(And yes, I know, I'm missing a lot and I'm pushing some buttons. But really, it's too easy to shout "anti-Semite" and shut down the conversation. And no, I don't have a developed anti-Zionist stance, just questions about why we're so tightly tied to Israel, and so unwilling to call 'em out when they do something we disagree with or that we deem against security purposes. And yes, why do we hold them to different standards than we hold other countries in the region or the world?)

That's WHY they shout "anti-semitic" in order to discourage honest debate and silence all opposition as a result of socially induced guilt.

It's a topic that should be discussed without apology by all Americans.

It affects us financially and socially.
If people find the issue too sensitive, then leave the room and let the grownups talk.

leave the room and let the grownups talk.

#52 | Posted by Sluggo

fair enough, and we'll let ya know what they say, sluggo

the Jews elected Obama . . . yet the lefties hate the Jews

Jews don't equal Israel, except in the righty mind. You really have to learn the difference.

Jews vote overwhelmingly Democrat. Nothing new there.

People vote against their best interests all the time. Like all the unemployed morons who listen to "AM" radio and vote Repub.

This is standard procedure even though we give them billions of dollars in an annual allowance.

Even Sharon said to Perez that they control the USA although some have attempted to debunk it claiming there is no official record of it. It is hard to believe that the leaders of our country have never stood up to Israel. Some think that Israel was behind the Kennedy assassinations because of JFKs intent to clamp down on their nuclear weapon and also the Federal Reserve.

Israel got away with killing 34 seamen and wounding 174 in a daylight and blatant attempt to sink the USS Liberty so they could hide their intentions against Egypt POWs during the 7 day war. Had any other nation done that to us we would have been at war. Instead our President Johnson and the Navy put their tails between their legs hid somewhere. They never had an official inquiry that amounted to anything. The recent AIPAC spy case was dropped and the media hardly mentioned it.

There was a time I was somewhat sympathetic to Israel but that was before the internet and when the only information presented to the public was through the media. I may have to go to back to June 8-10, 1967 newspapers to see if the media even mentioned the USS Liberty.

But that's your problem, not mine. #43 | Posted by moder8

No, it is your problem, as you have a narrow context of the problem in that area. Much like the Eurpeans did to the Native Americans, the Palestinians were brutalized out of their land by the Zionists, with the nod of the British colonists. Much like the Native Americans were reduced to reservations, after brutal atrocities such as The Trail of tears, so are the Palestinians now reduced to a fraction of their land in Gaza and the W. bank. Jimmy Carter wrote an acclaimed, detailed account of the history since Balfour in 1948, when the terrorist Menachim Begin (later Israeli PM) led the brutal Stern Gang. So, your primitive reduction of this lopsided conflict to a peacable people being attacked by rockets is laughable and exposes your complete ignorance on the subject. And that is your problem, if being ignorant concerns you, that is...

When someone who is mooching off you slaps you in the face the way Israel did recently, you should do alot more than talk tough.

I have thought that about lots of people... not just Israel. Start with the poor in this country that get hand outs and then bitch cause they want a 2 story hammock. Include almost every country on the planet that takes our money (mostly borrowed) and spit on us. Horrible waste of money.

Plus whether our government is even legally allowed to tax Americans to give the money away to foreigners is debatable in the first place.

#22 | Posted by Sully

And that I would also have to agree with. Course, taxing citizens to give it to other citizens is probably also not constitutional.

1. Why does the "anti-Semitic"...

I would guess it is because of the type of language used, and the hate that is often apparent. Very few people talk against Israel from facts instead of hate.

And righties, pay attention--you rightly call out some people who bring up racism too often in the face of criticism of President Obama.

True, but there are some people who are racist. The people who attack him from policy differences probably are not racist, but it is an easy charge and it makes people act defensively.

2. Why is it sooo hard to have an honest conversation about Israel in America?

Because most people have an opinion that is formed emotionally, not intellectually. They don't have a true opinion, they have a feeling. When you attack that, they react.

Is it really 'cause they're the only Democratic ally we have in the region? Really?

It is true that they are an ally, and that they are in an important part of the world (all that damn oil in the area), shipping channels, etc.

Well, shit, for a gov't that uses similar styles of reprisals that the German gov't used against rebellious/resistant Jews in the shtetls, pre- and during the Jewish Holocaust, um, really, what kind of democracy is that? Really something to celebrate?

Yes. For all of their faults, and they have plenty, that are better than the neighboring countries. Do you believe that the Jews in Israel would be treated as well if the Arabs had won? Better question might be, if the Arabs had won, do you believe there would be a single Jew in the region that wasn't chained in a cell somewhere?

Okay, I'm sure I'm ignoring some very important issues, but Israel is hardly perfect. I so often feel that the Israel conversation, like some other topics in US politics, is too loaded for serious, balanced conversations.

I would say that the aggressor sets the rules, and that is what you are missing. There was a war, Israel won. When we fought the Brits, we kept what we won. Israel took land when they won. Instead of keeping it, the losers want it back, kind of a do-over. And if Israel gives it back, they will use that land to launch the next set of attacks.

For how many years now has Israel had homicide bombers and rocket attacks? Can you image how much of a police state we would be in this country if we had a 9-11 ever few months? If buses and schools were destroyed routinely? If Canada (those bastards) routinely launched hundreds of rocket attacks a month into our country?

But really, it's too easy to shout "anti-Semite" and shut down the conversation.

True, and sad. It is often easier to attack the person instead of the arguments. You get a lot of that here.

And no, I don't have a developed anti-Zionist stance,

I didn't think you did, which is why I tried to answer your questions, instead of just attacking you. LOL.

just questions about why we're so tightly tied to Israel, and so unwilling to call 'em out when they do something we disagree with or that we deem against security purposes.

A part of that is religious, to be fair. Christians and Jews are, well, 1/2 brothers or something. Just like all families, we may have our own fights and disagreements, but when someone starts beating on your little brother, you feel compelled to help defend them.

And yes, why do we hold them to different standards than we hold other countries in the region or the world?)

#51 | Posted by pragmatist

Because, for all their faults, they are a marked improvement over the other governments in the region.

No, it is your problem... Much like the Eurpeans did to the Native Americans, the Palestinians were brutalized out of their land by the Zionists...

Does that mean you would be OK if the American Indians started blowing up buildings and killing people? If the next plane that flew into a building killed your children, you would say "oh, but they had a right to feel upset". Bullshit.

Much like the Native Americans were reduced to reservations, after brutal atrocities such as The Trail of tears, so are the Palestinians now reduced to a fraction of their land in Gaza and the W. bank.

And American Indians are freely accepted in society, can live anywhere, travel, etc. If Arabs in the region didn't keep a war going, their treatment would be better as well.

Jimmy Carter... He is an anti-Semite.

So, your primitive reduction of this lopsided conflict to a peacable people being attacked by rockets is laughable and exposes your complete ignorance on the subject.

Fuck, dude, if you want to go back far enough, ever people on the planet have been oppressed by someone. The Arabs and the Jews fought. The Jews won. They took land. The Arabs want a do-over. Too fucking bad. Stop killing civilians and maybe, JUST MAYBE, someone will give a fuck about them.

#58 | Posted by Newyawker

Instead of turning down the voices criticizing Isreal, I'd like to see Obama turn off the spigot for a couple years.

Instead of turning down the voices criticizing Isreal, I'd like to see Obama turn off the spigot for a couple years.

Newsworthy Flag!

AU / Twinpac,

I would love to see the spigot turned off and sealed shut, not just for Israel but for the entire fucking world.

Stupid to borrow money from people that don't like us to give to other people who don't like us.

Extra stupid to make future generations pay for supporting people who want nothing good for us.

Read about 'soft power'. It's been very effective. More effective than war.

Israel's thumbing their noses at us while we give them money and our national security is affected by their actions - which we are opposed to - is inexcusable. Aid be brought to a screeching halt. They don't need the money anyway.

AU

Now much does the United States pay those ungrateful bastards anyway? And for what?

Daily U.S. Military Aid to Israel
and the Palestinians, FY2009
Chart showing that the United States gives at least $7 million per day to Israel in military aid and none to the Palestinians.

"Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing the amounts provided to any other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct U.S. economic and military assistance since 1976 and the largest total recipient since World War ll. Total direct U.S. aid to Israel amounts to well over $140 billion in 2003 dollars. Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one-fifth of America's entire foreign aid budget. In per capita terms, the United States gives each Israeli a direct subsidy worth about $500 per year. This largesse is especially striking when one realizes that Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita income roughly equal to South Korea or Spain."

wrmea.org

And for what?

Pissing off the rest of the ME, and nothing that helps move the peace process along - hurting our national security here at home.

BTW, we give the Palestinians: $0

BTW, we give the Palestinians: $0

#68 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Wrong.

In the last half of the 90's it was about 75 million a year. Since 1993 the US has given them about two billion in US taxpayer dollars.

assets.opencrs.com

U.S. offers $900 million to Palestinians

edition.cnn.com

I was referring to military assistance.

While some of our aid to Israel is touted as 'economic aid', that's a fallacy.

They simply put that money into their general fund and buy weapons with it.

Israel is beyond the point of needing any assistance from us. In 1947 it made sense. Doesn't any longer.

I was referring to military assistance.

#70 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Well now, that would be kind of stupid now wouldn't it? Us made missiles used to blow up a bus load of Israeli school children. Not a good headline.

I'm looking forward to the day when people realize we can't afford to waste money on any type of foreign aid.

In 2008 we gave $25 million to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees to buy food, medicine, etc. There was no direct aid given to the Palestinian Authority. Contrast that to $3 Billion given to well-to-do Israel - who don't need the money.

You don't think any of the weapons purchased with U.S. aid killed Palestinians who had nothing to do with missiles or any other act against Israel? Remember the offensive on Gaza? Israel has been using our money in oppressive ways for decades. Building settlements in East Jerusalem, which is supposed to be Palestinian territory, is only the latest indication Israel has ZERO interest in peace. I'm not for funding their wars.

I'm looking forward to the day when people realize we can't afford to waste money on any type of foreign aid.

There is something to be said for 'soft power'. Feed people, save a relative's life, etc. and you've gained allies that aren't looking to engage in acts against the U.S.

Fighting for the Olive Trees

Below is a reportage from a Ta'ayush activist about Beit Jala. An action took place there yesterday in an attempt to save an olive grove from destruction in order to make space for the annexation wall that Israel is building through the West Bank.

Beit Jala 3/3/2010

Already when driving on route 60, we saw the intimidating bulldozers riding on the side of the road on their way to another day of "putting facts on the ground" as chiefs of the Israeli government call it. As we arrived in Beit Jalla, a heart-breaking scene came into view a huge pile of sawed trees and olive and lemon branches spread all across the yard of the house next to the wall's path. A yard it cannot really be called anymore the grass is turned over, two children's swings were uprooted and put aside, and the only thing left standing is a brick oven, with mounds of dirt and mud all around it. 10 olive trees were cut down here already yesterday. A red X on the front floor of the house marks the path of the wall to pass here, which will seize the whole yard area and cut the only access driveway to it. It's hard to imagine how life would look like in this place in a week or two.

We were 45 protesters 25 Palestinians, 15 international activists and 4 Israelis. We descended to the works path trying to stop the bulldozers. A group of twenty soldiers prevented us from doing so, and began pushing us up the hill without showing a closed military area order as they are required. While the bulldozer's claws were uprooting trees one after the other, we explained to the officers that their actions violate numerous international laws, as well as the fact that they may not tell us to move without the order. We were pushed up the hill a few more meters to where we sat on the ground demanding to see a printed order before we move any further. At 08:53 they brought the papers and the officers declared the area will become a "closed military zone" within 7 minutes. One of them held two stun grenades with a nasty grin on his face. We reminded them again that constructing the wall on West Bank lands is a crime according to international law, as well as the settlers-only road which it "protects" and that they still may put down their guns/ and join us. A bearded IDF captain told us that the only law he follows is the biblical law. Rabbai Arik Ascherman referred him to to read the chapter in the book of Deuteronomy which refers to uprooting of fruit trees.

At 09:00 precisely they started pushing and dragging us up the hill again. 2 Israelis and one international activist were detained for a few minutes and were released shortly thereafter. Two Arab TV network reporters stationed on the upper road to report the events. Two young women from Beit Jalla were prominent among the protesters. As one of the officers told on of them them "Min fadlak, ruch min hon" (Please go away from here), she replied wisely "Min fadlak, ruch leIsrail" (Please, go back to Israel), with her finger pointing north-west.

When we left, the bulldozers were still working with all their might.

"I'm looking forward to the day when people realize we can't afford to waste money on any type of foreign aid."

I understand that our giveaways in foreign aid add up to something like 1.5% of our budget. I think that at that amount, we can't afford not to use money on foreign aid. Politics are global, folks. We can't evade that reality. There are lots of reasons to spread money about. Some of them are even good.

And 1Lib, thanks for the serious, considered response. Some of my questions were, of course, rhetorical. But you gave me some stuff to think about. Thanks for that.

"Actually, it has been quite successful. Israel is the most open and democratic society in that region of the World."

Not much of an accomplishment. Like being the "normal one" on a reality TV show or the the smartest one on the short bus.

They have somewhat of a caste system at work over there than kind of undermines their cred as an open democracy.

Dear Lieberman:
Fuck you, enjoy your senate seat until you get voted out in 2012.

If he didn't get voted out in 2008, I'm not sure why anyone thinks he'll get voted out in 2012. Unless there's been some huge change in CT constituency.

Jimmy Carter... He is an anti-Semite...the Arabs and the Jews fought. The Jews won. They took land.
#61 | Posted by 1libertarian

Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, who both during and after his presidency worked relentlessly to bring peace to the ME is an anti-semite.

No, you are a laughable putz, plain for all to see.

The Arabs and Jews fought. That war was in 1967, Einstein. From 1948 to 1967, the Palestinians were victims of a Holocaust inflicted on them. Go read a book, you uneducated moron.

The Arabs and Jews fought. That war was in 1967, Einstein. From 1948 to 1967, the Palestinians were victims of a Holocaust inflicted on them. Go read a book, you uneducated moron.

#81 | Posted by Newyawker

Go read a dictionary and look up the word "Holocaust", then get back to us when you're a little more educated, moron!

retire those war mongering assholes, NOW!

If he didn't get voted out in 2008, I'm not sure why anyone thinks he'll get voted out in 2012. Unless there's been some huge change in CT constituency.

#80 | Posted by pragmatist

He was reelected in 2006. Since then he's acted like a Republican, going so far as to campaign for John McCain. Here's a Quinnipiac poll. Lieberman would not be reelected if up for reelection this year:

Blumenthal (D) 58%
Lieberman (I) 30%

www.quinnipiac.edu

Lieberman is safe for now as no one really knows what is going to happen in November. If the DNC holds the Congress, he will move more center. If the RNC does, he will continue on his path.

Interesting, AU. Good catch on my mistake (2008--d'oh).

Of course, I find polls often to be just bullshit. : )

#86 | Posted by pragmatist

Like they say, 'the only polls that count are election day'.

No one points out that while Israel has a right to exist, it was way way WAY out of line in building new housing projects on west bank soil. No one has yet responded (I think) to my suggestion that Israeli lands be given back to Palestine and that the United States give Mississippi to Israel. It's far more fertile than the Mideast desert and the natives have a great deal less intelligence with which to put up armed resistance. herm

No one has yet responded (I think) to my suggestion that Israeli lands be given back to Palestine and that the United States give Mississippi to Israel.
#88 | Posted by herm

Just to be clear herm,is it true you aborted your own daughter?

rwd

Jewlaid was funny. No, no, I'm not playing anti-Semitic; it's just a funny play on the usual clich we see so often on this site.

Here's my question... Er, two.

1. Why does the "anti-Semitic" (check your spelling, Afk) have to come up every time someone criticizes Israel? It's absurd. (And righties, pay attention--you rightly call out some people who bring up racism too often in the face of criticism of President Obama. We should apply that same check every time an Israel conversation comes up. Is the critic really being anti-Semitic? And that's an odd word to begin with, but I'll leave the etymology aside for now.)

2. Why is it sooo hard to have an honest conversation about Israel in America? Why is the kneejerk reaction so often--and on both sides of the aisle--blind acceptance or support? Is it really 'cause they're the only Democratic ally we have in the region? Really? Well, shit, for a gov't that uses similar styles of reprisals that the German gov't used against rebellious/resistant Jews in the shtetls, pre- and during the Jewish Holocaust, um, really, what kind of democracy is that? Really something to celebrate? Okay, I'm sure I'm ignoring some very important issues, but Israel is hardly perfect. I so often feel that the Israel conversation, like some other topics in US politics, is too loaded for serious, balanced conversations. But then again, what am I doing on DR looking for serious, balanced conversations? : )

(And yes, I know, I'm missing a lot and I'm pushing some buttons. But really, it's too easy to shout "anti-Semite" and shut down the conversation. And no, I don't have a developed anti-Zionist stance, just questions about why we're so tightly tied to Israel, and so unwilling to call 'em out when they do something we disagree with or that we deem against security purposes. And yes, why do we hold them to different standards than we hold other countries in the region or the world?)

#51 | Posted by pragmatist

That is because people are religious first and American second.

The religious xtians and jews in this country hold allegiance to isreal first and America second.

I could care less what happens to isreal or any other middle east country. Cut off the coin and stop pandering.

Sure "Uncle Joe" we will lower our voices on Israel. Done Deal. No Sweat. Long Live Israel!

BUT WE WILL raise OUR VOICES ABOUT PALESTINE!!

LONG LIVE PALESTINE !! HELP AND PRAYERS FOR THE ENSLAVED, TRAPPED AND VISCIOUSLY MAULED AND ATTACKED PALESTINIANS IN GAZA.

PRAISE FOR THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE IN THEIR STRUGGLE AGAINST ZIONIST FASCISM !!

MORE AID FOR PALESTINE !! PALESTINIANS NEED NEW HOUSING, TOO !! PALESTINIAN PEOPLE NEED SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS, THE RIGHT TO BE LEFT ALONE ON THE ROADS AND IN THE CITIES AND THE RIGHT TO RETURN !!

FINANCIAL COMPENSATION FROM ZIONIST FASCIST ISRAEL TO THE FAMILIES OF ITS VICTIMS FROM 1948 TO THE PRESENT DAY !! (BY THE WAY, THAT AMOUNTS TO just everything you got, Mr. Netanyahu)

TWO STATE SOLUTION: ISRAEL CAN HAVE WHATEVER THEY CAN TAKE FROM LEBANON, SYRIA, JORDAN AND EGYPT...THEY CAN LEAVE PALESTINE TO ITS RIGHTFULL OWNERS !!

LONG LIVE HAMAS, HEZBOLLA AND THE PALESTINE AUTHORITY.

There, now the focus is taken away from Israel, Uncle Joe, are you happy now?

For an interesting perspective on anti-Semitism our own state Department has dedicated significant resources to the subject.

www.state.gov

What we all need in this world of misinformation is a serious dose of cynicism. When any event happens, the real question should be "who really benefits?" rather than the obvious "who did it and who was hurt by it". The motive is overlooked.

Israel has been a documented master in the use of false flags that would point the finger towards others while portraying themselves as the victim. Netanyahu made a huge faux pas when he said that 9-11 was good for Israel, but our media let it slide with a small blurb below the fold on an inside page. Any other national leader saying that would have been chastised for weeks.

They've perfected the use of anti-Semitism as a tool to provide immunity from criticism or investigation. Even the Holocaust can't be investigated although there are documented articles that the Zionists were in collusion with Hitler and played a part in the numbers of Jews killed. What historical event in history has a "hands off" policy to investigators?

This compromising of our intelligence and inability to aggressively protect our interests at the expense of Israel is potentially very dangerous to every American. The dual citizenship and allegiance of key leaders is another huge risk. If a nuclear suitcase bomb ever went off in the USA where tens of thousands or more Americans were killed, where would the fingers immediately be pointed? Who would benefit again?

We have threats and they potentially could come from radical Muslims and Israel. They could also come from others when there are huge financial gains to be made from tragedy by being short the market.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable