Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, March 15, 2010

On Friday, Dylan Ratigan's MSNBC show broke down exactly how Lehman Brothers used an arcane accounting gimmick to conceal its poor financial health, which destroyed the company and nearly took the U.S. economy along with it in 2007. "Complexity is how Wall Street steals, effectively," Ratigan said. He called it "one of the greatest crimes ever perpetrated against a group of people; this crime an accounting fraud perpetrated by bank CEOs against the American taxpayer and enabled by the U.S. government."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

AuntieSocial

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

There is no accountability.

Responsibility is for suckers.

They should go to jail. Unfortunately, their peers are crooks too.

I posted on this at the Monday nooner. This is control fraud, the least punished crime in the USA, which nets crooks more money than all petty theft combined.

Bernanke and Geithner were either knowledgable and complacent, or proactive collaborators of fraud which has destroyed millions of lives. Geithner once told Sanders during Senate hearings, "Stop right there, I have never been a regulator". To believe that you would have to believe that Geithner, as head of the NY Federal Reserve, has never read the Fed's charter or monthly and quarterly reports. I suppose that makes him the perfect denier in chief.

Laws are for the plebs.

Dylan Ratigan is great, and it was a shame that CNBC lost him to MSNBC. I loved him on Fast Money, and he's a terrific investigative journalist, with a strong trader's nose for BS.

Ernst & Young knowingly signed off on this. Let's see if anything happens to them.

No one has clean hands.

Self preservation requires silence.

Crooks of a feather, steal together.

Here you go:

In May 2008, a Lehman Senior Vice President, Matthew Lee, wrote a letter to management alleging accounting improprieties;82 in the course of investigating the allegations, Ernst & Young was advised by Lee on June 12, 2008 that Lehman used $50 billion of Repo 105 transactions to temporarily move assets off balance sheet and quarter end.

The next day on June 13, 2008 Ernst & Young met with the Lehman Board Audit Committee but did not advise it about Lee's assertions, despite an express direction from the Committee to advise on all allegations raised by Lee. Ernst & Young took virtually no action to investigate the Repo 105 allegations. Ernst & Young took no steps to question or challenge the non disclosure by Lehman of its use of $50 billion of temporary, off balance sheet transactions. Colorable claims exist that Ernst & Young did not meet professional standards, both in investigating Lee's allegations and in connection with its audit and review of Lehman's financial statements."

Looks like Uncle Ernie could go the way of Arthur Anderson. The only thing that would prevent it would be the WH can't take any more unemployment right now and if you undid Ernst & Young you would be looking at hundreds of thousands potentially heading to the unemployment rolls.

What's even better is Ernst was one of the firms picked to audit the bailout. Think we should be looking a little further into that after what we just learned?

So, the private financial sector is just as corrupt as the government financial sector.

Oh well.

Sooooooooooo.... Why arn't they doing jail time?

Why arn't (sic) they doing jail time?

We have a thing called "due process" in this country.

House of cards, built on a sandy foundation, headed by crooks and moral degenerates. It'll all come crashing down soon enough. A little wind and it's done for.

Part of due process is leveling charges.
Where are the charges, when is the arraignment?

We have to enforce the law or there is no law.

Anything based on elliot shitzers observations is worthless. he did such agood job with the replacement CEO at AIG, that AIG had to pay ALL his legal fees.

Anyone who would interview elliot gets low marks in my book as well. Barrons and WSJ have much better write ups.

As for LEH, Fuld and erin callan either don't answer questions, or say they forget! BOTH are open for heavy civil lawsuits. Fuld earned 500 million in 10 yrs stealing from shareholders.


Sooooooooooo.... Why arn't they doing jail time?

#11 | Posted by Sniper at 2010-03-15 05:05 PM

Exactly.


Why arn't (sic) they doing jail time?

We have a thing called "due process" in this country.

#12 | Posted by taxman at 2010-03-15 05:12 PM

I guess in that case the question should be 'why aren't they being charged and arrested?'

That's a good. valid question darth. I heard michael lewis on bloomberg today, and he said it was time for congress to call in the the head cds traders at goldman, aig, etc...and ask them wtf were they thinking!

As for leh, GS had a positive view (sell side analysis) on LEH going into the weekend they defaulted. What were they thinking?

Those bastards....

In cases like this I find myself wondering if that's really such a good thing... *sigh*

#19 Crud! That was supposed to be a reply to #12! Those other 5 comments sure popped up quick.

They should go to jail. Unfortunately, their peers are crooks too.

----------

for once the stopped watch comes up right.

it's called bribery and racketeering.

No need to kill the entire accounting firm for this. Let E&Y continue under new management while the old management plays tennis down at the minimum security federal prison for the next 30 years.

That is about the best we poor taxpayers can hope for on this.

But remember: "Character doesn't matter"---and if you think Dodd's proposed finanace reform bill is going to improve anything, you have another "thunk" coming,

OMG--they are complete crooks!

Where are the charges?

They went BK--and Obama forced Bank of America to buy them out.

And of course we are the ones who are screwed.

Can't the gov't or the Treasury go after these guys? How about the accounting firm?

They went after Enron and Anderson for basically the same thing.

Why arn't (sic) they doing jail time?

We have a thing called "due process" in this country.

And the more money you have, the more "process" you can afford.

Madoff wouldn't even be in jail if he hadn't admitted what he did.

Economists have jobs only by serving the economic regime in power as court eunuchs.

Goods and services have at least two values. The first is their use value, the value of a commodity or service in real on-the-ground terms, such as useful value of a tool, or shelter or food, or worth as a service, such as transport.

The second is their transactional value: how much money banking and "investment" can make controlling the money involved in the transactions surrounding those goods or services, or financing the creation of new ones through loans, marketing and institutionalized capital control.

The consequences, even in creating unneeded services and products for the sheer sake of growth, even pointless are enormously profitable.

There is no arguing that there is no greater method of creating economic growth than capitalism. Even Marx had no qualm with that. But growth is like crack cocaine for bankers and economists, both of which see the world purely in terms if wealth accumulation and production. For we who do the producing (or once did the producing back when workers were still considered a necessary evil) the truth is that American capitalism is like a wine press. It squeezes the masses for the money representing their productivity, in a process otherwise known as the virtual economy. A few people in the virtual economy become multi-millionaires. The rest of us pay the freight financially, socially and ecologically.

It will get worse. Consider Obama's ramped up mountaintop removal program for coal energy. Corporate coal and Wall Street bankers are overjoyed at the prospect of adding to the 143 already-leveled mountains and their attending toxic water zones. The frog of capitalism will be poked in a big way for another jump.

Excerpted from Joe Bageant @ Counterpunch

Excerpted from Joe Bageant @ Counterpunch

That's excellent, but where's the link?

But growth is like crack cocaine for bankers and economists, both of which see the world purely in terms if wealth accumulation and production. For we who do the producing (or once did the producing back when workers were still considered a necessary evil) the truth is that American capitalism is like a wine press. It squeezes the masses for the money representing their productivity, in a process otherwise known as the virtual economy.

Nulli loves shit like that. But it's not growth per se that bankers love, it's credit growth. Every dollar in circulation is a debt receipt. Growth in this context has to expand because credit has to expand. It is not real wealth based on savings and production.

The bankers are running the largest Ponzi Scheme in history. A Ponzi Scheme that is coming to an end over the course of the years immediately ahead.

Ray is a fraud. Ray loves to say how bad thinga are going to be but when pressed for specifics he doesn't have a clue.

I'm beginning to believe that only massive demonstrations ala 1960s and 70s will ever get our Congress and President to get off their butts and hold these fxckers accountable. They are all in bed with the thieves and until they sense the coming of more pressure from the public than from the financial sector and the lobby that represents them, they will do nothing.

Nutcase

The second is their transactional value: how much money banking and "investment" can make controlling the money involved in the transactions surrounding those goods or services, or financing the creation of new ones through loans, marketing and institutionalized capital control.

So the financiers who make (note: I didn't say earn) the billions in bonuses through wheeling and dealing are effectively middlemen leeching off the goods and services that serve as the real economy.

I've been attempting to determine the impact (or is it distortion?) by the financial services sector on GDP.

across the board, 90% tax on anything over 1m income - it's mostly stolen money anyway...

"The bankers are running the largest Ponzi Scheme in history. A Ponzi Scheme that is coming to an end over the course of the years immediately ahead."

So, cancel your insurance, quit your job, don't pay your mortgage or car payments, nothing matters.
If, however, you feel compelled to keep your insurance, keep your job, pay your mortgage, etc. then it sort of hints that you don't believe your own bull shit.

We have a thing called "due process" in this country.

#12 | Posted by taxman

My ass!!!! Have they been arested and charged? How long ago did this happen?

The board and all the company officers should be sitting in jail right now. There must to be punishment for what they did, not the golden chute they have been getting.

Bring back the guillotine.
These criminals deserve no less.

it is just 50 billion here or 50 billion there...pretty soon we are talking about real money!

I'm with you on the big knife slu. Keep it dull so you have to drop it several times.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable