Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, March 12, 2010

A place to discuss the stories that aren't making news, ask questions, complain bitterly about this site and its members, or just screw around. The only rule: Be nice or be funny.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

REPENT SINNERS!!!!!

the end is nigh.

We created god in our own image and likeness!

TGIF

Today's Inspiration message comes from Rabelais, a 14th Century monk.

##############################
####

What, said Grangousier, my little rogue, hast thou been at the pot, that thou dost rhyme already? Yes, yes, my lord the king, answered Gargantua, I can rhyme gallantly, and rhyme till I become hoarse with rheum. Hark, what our privy says to the skiters:

Shittard,
Squirtard,
Crackard,
Turdous,
Thy bung
Hath flung
Some dung
On us:
Filthard,
Cackard,
Stinkard,
St. Antony's fire seize on thy toane (bone?),
If thy
Dirty
Dounby
Thou do not wipe, ere thou be gone.

Will you have any more of it? Yes, yes, answered Grangousier. Then, said Gargantua,

A Roundelay.

In shitting yes'day I did know
The sess I to my arse did owe:
The smell was such came from that slunk,
That I was with it all bestunk:
O had but then some brave Signor
Brought her to me I waited for,
In shitting!

I would have cleft her watergap,
And join'd it close to my flipflap,
Whilst she had with her fingers guarded
My foul nockandrow, all bemerded
In shitting.

Once House Dems vote for the Senate Bill, it's over, there will be no reconciliation. What a bunch of suckers. If pro-life Dems are conviced to vote with a promise of a senate reconciliation, they will burn in hell for all eternity for voting funds for abortion.

Bwahahahahaha!

Even if there is a reconcialiation, if pro lifer vote for the senate bill they will still burn in hell!

Mexico invades Tejas

www.mysanantonio.com

This whole Stupac thing is insane. There is NO language in the Senate bill allowing federal funding of abortion. IT IS AGAINST FEDERAL LAW to fund abortion with government money. This is not changing.

Stupac and his imaginary friends are trying to insert new law that prohibits people from spending THEIR OWN money for insurance that might cover reproductive rights.

Pure bullshit from the git-go!!!

Money is fungible.

Health Care? Who the fuck cares? I'll dig the fuckin' hole. I don't give a fuck. What is it, the first hole I dug? Not the first time I dug a hole. I'll fuckin' dig a hole. Where are the shovels? -Tommy DeVito

Question for you Liberals:

Let's say you could have UNIVERSAL SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE, but the trade off would be REPREALING ROE V WADE so each state decides the matter. Would you still want that type of health reform? It is an exageration, I know, but this is what your party is dealing with now, health reform vs abortion and how much you want of each.

Fungible my ass. Does that mean that anyone receiving unemployment, social security, food stamps or earned income tax credit should be prevented from using their own money for insurance?

Total goat drivel!!!

What about people on a government payroll? Should they be permitted to spend their own money on insurance?

This is beyond bullshit.

The health care reform issue has NOTHING to do with abortion. It is only about two things:

1. The insurance industry wants to keep raping the American Public without any hint of regulation.

2. The Republicans want to prevent the Democrats from getting a win at anything, even if it means screwing their own constituents.

I will be changing my handle. I can't tell you the new name yet or else some asshole might try to steal it from me. This is probably my last message as 2586. I will be sending Rogers an e-mail telling him to execute the change right notw.

Logging off.

Apple has replaced Sony as the technology innovator and every time Jobs walks on stage in his trademark jeans and black T-shirt to announce a new product, it's a media event.

Sadly, when Apple entered the telecommunications market in 2007 with the iPhone, it made a deal with the devil, AT&T, that not only hamstrung its potential market dominance, but illuminated the deeper crisis besetting the nation's communications infrastructure. iPhone users know the AT&T wireless network is a dysfunctional mess, their calls either not connecting or failing in mid-call. So flawed is AT&T wireless that it was forced to stop selling iPhones in December to limit network usage.

The problem at the heart of this mounting crisis lies with AT&T and the other telecommunications companies. Their collective failure is one of the gravest untold stories of recent American history; it is a story of systemic lies and deceptions that has been perpetuated on the American people and has gone on for decades. Today, we are paying more for not only slower broadband Internet and wireless systems but also for less meaningful choice than any advanced country in the world. A further decline the country's position in telecommunications delivery will contribute to the continuing erosion of nation's productivity and the stifling of its creativity.

According to a phone company sponsored Brookings report, America would gain $500 billion annually from the full deployment of high-speed broadband. Unfortunately, this means that America lost about $7.5 trillion in economic growth since the 1990s due to its troubled communications infrastructure.
An estimated $320 billion has already been collected from America's phone customers by AT&T and Verizon to pay for the rewiring of America. This policy continues today in the form of phone rate hikes currently happening throughout America. These monies were collected to upgrade the old copper wire phone system with high-speed fiber optics.

Remember back in 1993 when Al Gore announced "the information superhighway"? Almost every home, office, school, library and hospital was supposed to be knit together through superfast broadband connections. Now, nearly two decades later, where is the information superhighway, what is the status of fiber deployment?

The Information Superhighway remains a fantasy, a con man's come on. AT&T controls telecommunications in 22 states and yet, as of year-end 2010, it has deployed fiber to only 2.1 million households, less than 2% of our households. They took the money and ran. Where have we seen this before?

Excerpted from DAVID ROSEN and BRUCE KUSHNICK @ Counterpunch

We have enslaved the rest of the animal creation, and have treated our distant cousins in fur and feathers so badly that beyond doubt, if they were able to formulate a religion, they would depict the Devil in human form.
William Ralph Inge

"2. "The Republicans want to prevent the Democrats from getting a win at anything, even if it means screwing THEIR own constituents."

Your right AXE. That's what the Democrats are going to do if this monstrosity passes.

385,

WOW, am I chagrined!!! Now you can run back over to your little clusterfox blog and tell them all about how you beat up on the big bad liberals today.

Good for you!! What a MAN!!! Give yourself an extra cracker today. You earned it Polly.

...beat up on the big bad liberals...

Doesn't take much. A wet noodle or a car antennae should work.

or a car antennae should work.

Hey now! Nothing lethal.

Axe: You should have a keen feeling of embarrassment if you're for O's cure all. Glad you admit it.

As to my little clusterfox blog...I'm a CNN type of person. So go back and wallow with rabid crowd at MSNBC.(I might watch that cable channel tonight and increase the viewership 100%)

I am for opening Medicare to everyone over 55 and public option for the rest. Nothing in the current bill has me very excited but it is a start. The old 'camel's nose in the tent' type of thing.

Get it passed now and work on fixing the bad bits as soon as possible.

There is NO language in the Senate bill allowing federal funding of abortion. IT IS AGAINST FEDERAL LAW to fund abortion with government money. This is not changing.

Stupac and his imaginary friends are trying to insert new law that prohibits people from spending THEIR OWN money for insurance that might cover reproductive rights.

Pure bullshit from the git-go!!!

#7 | Posted by axe at 2010-03-12 12:23 PM | Reply

you are showing true ignorance of the situation. while there is no language allowing, as in the house issue, there is also no language that prohibits it and there are millions that will be going to planned parenthood and the like.
what the fuck do you think planned parenthood does.
let me tell you..its more than give out BC pills and while they might not have 'stirrups' there onsite, they see to it that plenty of women abort babies and they will see to it and part of my tax money goes to pay for it.
goddamn...read something about it for a change

I'm suprised 385 can spell CNN. He strikes me as a true-blue Glenbeckistanian, judging from his parrot-like posts.

BABBLER,

You need to get the nice library lady to help you with your meds.

You are posting LIES AND BULLSHIT as usual. There has been a FEDERAL LAW for years that prohibits ANY money for abortion. PERIOD.

NO FUNDING AT ALL is proposed for any of the crap you imagined or pulled out of your ass.

Go back to your cardboard box in the alley and dry out, for G_d's sake.

no sir....you are spreading the lie from the liar in chief and his twat accomplice....I will defer any language towards harry reid for the moment..

this is precisely WHY the house put in the language they did you simpleton.

and HERE are more reasons why the lying ass and his fellow democratic socialists are RAPING the constitution and bankrupting the country but on the postitive side they are throwing the election in november

try and keep up

www.redstate.com

www.thefoxnation.com

news.yahoo.com

and here is a lady congresswoman who may help to RAPE the constitution...I believe its article 1 section 7 ...and yet another reason why this bunch of democratic socialist MUST BE STOPPED from taking over the GDP from health care.

www.thefoxnation.com

Babbler,

You really haven't gotten over the fact the your hero Bush was such a complete failure, have you. Now we have a BLACK man in the white house and you are totally around the bend. The change in your posting after the election were unbelievable.

Go back to your cardboard box in the alley and have a good cry. Stay there for 3 years and stick your head out and see if anything has changed. Repeat as necessary.

your continued attacks and bullshit juvinile spewing is all the proof anyone reading these exchanges needs to read to see that you 'got nuttin' and so therefore, this is all you can do.
get back to homeroom sonny boy....

ONE MORE TIME AND SLOWER..

the house put in the language for this reason....if its not specifically denied, then its possible is the way that even dems have said is the proceedure.

WHAT? are you under the delussion that these bliue dogs are iin cahoots with the gop???

please.....

and DONT FORGET>>ITS NOT THE gop that has kept pelosi from calling a vote....and forcing her to RAPE the constitution and pass a bill WITHOUT A VOTE ON IT at this stage....
IF gop were doing it...there would be one of the LARGE threads at the top and libs here would be convulsing with anger.

JeffJ asks, Over the last few months I've noticed that you have VERY little patience for criticisms directed toward you. What caused the change?

When Rex made that post calling me a bitch, I decided that I had given a small number of people way too much license here to abuse me.

Over the years I gave him a dozen chances, and he repaid me with that. So I said, and I'm quoting here, fuck that shit.

I don't expect people to agree with me all the time, or even any of the time. My political views are the polar opposite of some people here.

But if it gets to the point where I'm being called a bunch of names and a user has no respect for the community or me personally, what's the point of them being here? People who feel that strongly should join another site or start a new site to tell people how much I suck. I will post a link here, so anyone who agrees with them will know about it. I put a front page link up to Rex's PWZ when it was launched.

#31, Rc-de has adopted Tad's posting style. G-d help us all!

AND AXE

lets add this to the arsenal..

moneynews.com

Thanks for the answer. I think it makes sense, for whatever that is worth.

Kanrei,

I am sitting on a dump only because I wanted one.

At the time I posted it I needed to take a dump, so I thought the symbolic measure of being given a dump was funny. To me.

I thought my two dumps were actually funny, but they offended someone I guess.

ALL RIGHT

MARGARTITA TIME IN TEXAS

hasta la pasta....

I've gotten a 2 week vacation once. All were posts directed to redneck and boob in a span of 10 minutes.

I thoroughly enjoyed making them.

yes, it was worth it.

I mostly agree, but the incident (the spat between Rcade and myself) that Eberly is alluding to occurred on the nooner thread which is the appropriate place to 'complain bitterly about this site'. That is precisely why I was so surprised when Rcade threated to kick me off the site.

I overreacted to your "menstrual" dig. I could have responded to you with more tact myself. I don't fault you for getting mad about that disagreement. I'm glad we hugged it out.

"I've gotten a 2 week vacation once. All were posts directed to redneck and boob in a span of 10 minutes.

I thoroughly enjoyed making them.

yes, it was worth it."

Exactly, Eberly. What's the big fucking deal about getting a vacation? Some of these whiners think it's the end of the world. They need to get a life.

XXX XXX XXX

smooch
smooch
smooch...

I took one when Wisgod did. It was actually relaxing to not post here or fight or troll or anything. I didn't even look at news. It was wonderful.

While we're on the subject, I shortened Chair's time in the timeout chair today. Normally I make people work harder for a third dump. His third was, by his own standards, far too tame.

So he might be rolling back into dodge.

I don't think name calling is called for regardless who is being called names.

What's the point of it?


XXX XXX XXX

smooch
smooch
smooch...

#41 | Posted by afkabl2

You beat me to it! :-)

I think Rcade should add a new layer to his moderation. If a post gets flagged and in the course of reviewing he finds himself laughing uproariously, that should be enough to keep it from being dumped, even if it truly is offensive.

What's the big fucking deal about getting a vacation

Someimes it's a good thing for Chair. It gives him an opportunity to re-charge his batteries and think up some new insults.

101 can get his third dump before he even knows about his first if you get him going.

#44 | Posted by Lisa

Shut the F-up, you ________.

*kidding*

What's the big fucking deal about getting a vacation? Some of these whiners think it's the end of the world.

when I got notified I was being tossed, I went back and looked at what I wrote and tried to look at it objectively.

I couldn't disagree with the decision.

they were terrible.

it was fair.

101 can get his third dump before he even knows about his first if you get him going.

One of his favorite punching bags, Cocosamville, is gone. He'll have to work at it a bit harder now.

actually jeff I was hoping that the great looking NURSE just to my left would read that and think it was for her

OH baby.,...she looks great in that "SMOCK"!!!!

#47

LOL

Hi Jeff!!

.,...she looks great in that "SMOCK"!!!!

Don't KNOCK her SMOCK or I'll clean your CLOCK!

#48 | Posted by eberly

Yeah, sometimes you've got to be smart about it.

I remember when Fatso (I think his name was actually Ratso) got 14 dumps. He typed a bunch of 1-line offensive comments but put them out as individual posts. If he'd have typed them all into 1 post he only would have gotten 1 dump.

When I decided I felt like getting a dump, I tried to get some bang for the buck.

I couldn't disagree with the decision.

they were terrible.

it was fair.

#48 | Posted by eberly at

I have wanted to ring rcades pencil neck once over a ban but since I ALWAYS look for the positive side, I discovered another site during that time that I still enjoy and NO its not 'cross dressing teachers'...thats a WHOLE NOTHER thang....

You had a dump, Jeff? LOL

kanrie

NOT KNOCKING it
wish I could knock that off.,.,..wink wink ....

what if I told her that I think I am getting a tempt and see if she can 'check me out'....

Blazon of the Ugly Tit
by Clement Marot (1535)
"Tit that is nothing but skin,
Scrawny flag limply flapping
Big tit, long tit
Squashed tit, tit like a bun
Tit with a pointy nipple
Like the sharp end of a funnel,
You jounce about at every move
Without any need for a shake...
Tit, we might say that he who fondles you
Knows he has a finger in the pie.
Toasted tit, hanging tit
Wrinkled tit, tit that gives
Mud instead of milk,
The devil wants you in his
Infernal family, to nurse his daughter.
Tit to be thrown over one shoulder
Like those broad shawls of olden times
If you are spotted, lots of men feel like
Grasping you with gloves on
So as not to soil themselves, and to use
you,
Tit to slap the big ugly nose of she
Wo has you dangle below the armpit."

If a post gets flagged and in the course of reviewing he finds himself laughing uproariously, that should be enough to keep it from being dumped, even if it truly is offensive.

That has always been the policy.

I did Lisa. I went out of my way to be really offensive. I knew what I was doing and it was a well-deserved dump.

AFK,
It is a Calvin and Hobbes quote.

dontknockmysmock.com

This is the comic strip EVER written IMHO. Not Calvin and Hobbes, but this one strip of their's.

That has always been the policy.

Cool.

Well why would you do that??

I thought it was absolutely hilarious that Cocosamville actually believed Chair when he told him that "Rcade emailed me and said he was going to fuck you up when he finds you." How stupid do you have to be to think Chair was being serious.

I too like the word smock and its close enough to SMUCK....

speaking of smuck...how's it going rcade...

OH oh...another good one
someone stop me

Ill be here all week
tip good

Good question?

I don't have a real good reason, I just wanted a dump.

LOL Jeff

Too much testosterone!!

I too like the word smock and its close enough to SMUCK....

SCHMUCK, not Smuck. And don't say "schmuck" either, it hurts my eyes to see you type it.

UH OH!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was wondering when THIS GUY would get his name in this issue

thehill.com

I mean where else would barney be if there were a bunch of TICKLING of men going on???

lol relax GAY GESTAPO...I mean it as a joke...

kanrie

ah yes..the Spelling nazi at it again....

PSSYT KANRIER

she's chewing gum and just BLEW a big bubble and did it my way
SURELY she's telling me that she wants to blow me..
RIGHT????
and then she SMACKED real hard..I mean come on...cant misread those signs can I????
come on you know women...

Moth-er Smocker.

Hey now, schmuck vs smuck is not spelling, it is pronunciation. The "SCH" is vital to saying it right.

come on you know women...

I do? They are making my personaility into pill form to help birth control as they have found it fool-proof: nobody fucks people who act like me =D

Why should it matter what spelling to use? It's the thought that counts.

Why should it matter what spelling to use?

You are right.

Hiine fnjQHif Hhhiw, sjh hihwn wqhqi9eh he!

Since spelling doesn't matter, I hope that was clear =P

How stupid do you have to be to think Chair was being serious.

I don't know how much of it can be explained by his stupidity.

I think it is more a factor that he is wrapped so tight and takes everything including himself way too serious.

Like nulli said, Some of these whiners think it's the end of the world. They need to get a life.

amen.

"Hiine fnjQHif Hhhiw, sjh hihwn wqhqi9eh he!"

Oddly, I understood that.

I think it is more a factor that he is wrapped so tight and takes everything including himself way too serious.

101 takes NOTHING here seriously. EVER. He is a total and complete troll. My rolemodel in that regard.

Hiine fnjQHif Hhhiw, sjh hihwn wqhqi9eh he!

Since spelling doesn't matter, I hope that was clear =P

#76 | Posted by kanrei at 2010

are you clever or what???

take it easy or any way you can get it...

going to "move in".....hopefully she cant kick me "THERE".....

"ahem...
ahem..uh excuse me beautifull
uh didnt we go to different schoold together?"
"whats under that SMOCK?"

AFK,
Just walk up to her and say this:

Hey baby, You rock that smock. We should go fock before 5 o Clock and let me take you around the block. You can ride my co....

101 takes NOTHING here seriously.

I was referring to redneck. Did you see his last posts complaining how he "pours his heart into his posts" and how is trying to make the world a better place?

that guy needs a life.

well I was wrong on this one.

leaving now as I 'limp' to the door...

DONT YOU just hate this time
no football and baseball in spring training and before hoops playoffs and march madness....

I guess there is always CURLING

HEY BABY
...wanna 'curl' with me

KAN..what do you mean YOU DONT KNOW WOMEN,...sounds like a surefire line to me...

I mock your smock talk.

Well, I gawk at your mock smock.

I think the mock smock talk rocks.

That would explain the funny walk.

well its not sexy alliteration but its not bad..

and KANRIER...never mind on the nurse...breast arent NEARLY big enough to meet my 'standards'....

on 2nd thought

WHAT STANDARDS>>...

I chaulk up mock smock talk to a misplaced sock.

???

quite a reach there letus...but good try...

but get to the point..
the point is talking her OUT of the smock....

YO KAN
I know what I will do..
I will get up and walk around her a couple of times and stretch out these rippling muscles and maybe draw some attention to my crotch and butt..
that HAS to get her attention..or maybe thrown out..

Don't balk at removing her smock, but don't be shocked if those breasts are mock.

"and maybe draw some attention to my crotch and butt.."

Just walk upwind.

AH a good one to leave on..

hey baby....if I told you that you have a great body would you hold it against me?

ah 95

good one...

or the crabs might fall out...

or the crabs might fall out...

#97 | Posted by afkabl2 at 2010-03-12 04:09 PM

*facepalm*

Read this announcement concerning my new handle:

www.drudge.com

FKA 2586

How about "Shaboobie"?

So the Tadpole is no more... and it was religious thread that took him out! How ironic. Can't say I will really miss him...been using my built-in killfiles for a while on his hate filled rants.

Lisa...to answer your #44 question...

I used to never never use insults in my online discussions...that is until I got slammed a few times here. Then I thought...oh so that is how they want to talk... all trash mouthed and everything...

so I have lately been joking about how some "rethugs' just naturally talk that way as if it some kind of ritualistic tribal greeting...

They call you fuckstain or whatever then proceed into their arguments (sometimes there is no argument just the tribal greeting).

So I have taken to responding to those posters like Elcid 101chair and others the way I thought they liked it.

I do try and never be the first to use the Tribal Greeting myself.

I have never felt the need to personally insult anyone unless they first went after me...and even then I try to keep the high ground as long as possible.

I agree that when you both enter the SWAMP you are no longer discussing Facts but are then discussing each others Morality.

Good luck with that!

I applaud Rcade for taking a firm stand...right or wrong it is his blog.

Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!
Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.

I got your tribal greeting right HEAH!

It's quite funny to witness the collusion of mainstream media with with the political agenda of leftist shit unfold right before our eyes.

I was one of 12 people halfway watching a "20/20" piece tonight---ostensibly about the trials and tribulations of raising schizo-psychotic kids.

It was interesting subject matter, but the earnest-sounding "journalist" and his editors couldn't help but insert little jabs at the perceived inability of the evil insurance companies to meet whatever "need" that happened to arise during the filming.

The agenda in the "reporting" was so transparent, I was embarassed for the producers.

The "objective" arbiters of truth were using their airtime, camoflagued as a legitimate human interest story, to do an infomercial to help their young, black President get his piece of shit, despised bill passed by appealing to the emotion of their viewers.

Orwellian stuff.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable