Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Are there enough votes in the House to pass the Senate's health-care bill? As of today, it's clear there aren't. House Democratic leaders have brushed aside White House calls to bring the bill forward by March 18, when President Barack Obama heads to Asia. Nevertheless, analysts close to the Democratic leadership tell me they're confident the leadership will find some way to squeeze out the 216 votes needed for a majority.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has indeed shown mastery at amassing majorities. But it's hard to see how she'll do so on this one. The arithmetic as I see it doesn't add up.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

MURPHY

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Barone does a good job here with the analysis.

He also sites the number of districts won by Obama and McCain which plays into how the Dems will do in November if this thing passes.

-------

Mrs. Pelosi, whom I have known for almost 30 years, may turn out to be even shrewder than I think. But she may be facing a moment as flummoxing as the one when Democratic Speaker Thomas Foley lost the vote on the rule to consider the crime and gun control bill in August 1994, or when Republican Speaker Dennis Hastert saw the Mark Foley scandal explode on the last day of the session in September 2006. Both were moments when highly competent and dedicated House speakers saw their majorities shattered beyond repair.

That moment, if it comes, will occur some time between now and the Easter recess. The Democrats' struggle to get 216 votes is high stakes poker.

This comes down to Stupak and his disciples.

They refuse to vote for the Senate bill unless they change the Abortion funding.

The problem with trying to pass this in another bill and get it thru the Senate is just as impossible.

They don't have 60 votes in the Senate to pass that anti abortion funding language in a bill.

AND they can't do that kind of bill thru reconciliation--(51 votes) per the rules.

And they have to take out the NE and LA and FL bribes--the house won't vote for that.

And if they change the Senate bill--they have to run it thru the Senate again.

Oh what a tangled web...

She's windbag.

I love the way Drudge always finds those super close-ups of that evil bitch.

Can Pelosi get the votes? No. Health reform has been completely fat fingered.

I hope you're right.

If it does pass, the adults are going to have to spend their time repealing this horseshit instead of doing other, more important things.

Only a week left to do this--by the 18th anyway.

Recall the end game has been the end game since August of 2009...

Its bullshit to have to put up with this sustained assault from our own government.

Only a week left to do this--by the 18th anyway.

I shudder to think about it

What part of "take you 'health care' bill and shove it up your fucking Marxist ass" is so difficult to understand?

What part of "take you 'health care' bill and shove it up your fucking Marxist ass" is so difficult to understand?

Even Hillary figured that out in less time back when she was co-president and came up with her version.

Get it all out, JAK. Don't hold back now. Tell us how you really feel.

If you want to help make a difference send email to Stupak and his guys to make a Stand..

conservativeusa.org

The 17 potential members of Stupak's bloc

Carney (PA-10)
Cao (LA-02)
Costello (IL-12)
Dahlkemper (PA-03)
Donnelly (IN-02)
Doyle (PA-14)
Driehaus (OH-01)
Ellsworth (IN-08)
Hill (IN-09)
Kanjorski (PA-12)
Kildee (MI-05)
Kirkpatrick (AZ-01)
Lipinski (IL-03)
Mollohan (WV-01)
Oberstar (MN-08)
Rahall (WV-03)
Stupak (MI-01)

and when any of them say they are not supporting obamacare or have doubts...
anyone who believes one word out of thier mouth is a fool.

a visit from rhom..(hopefully NOT in the shower)

a call from barry

a THREAT from a union..

and they will FOLD like cheap suits...EXCEPT for the ones that PELOSI WILL ALLOW TO VOTE NO.....

They don't need the votes to pass. Slaughter says it's already passed!

When Democrats can't win, they change the rules!

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Now Nancy dismisses the 18th deadline to vote.

And she says they will pass the bill -- the recon bill with no one knowing what is in it--UNTIL AFTER IT PASSES.

So no one will be bothered by the 'controversy' of the bill.

#16 | Posted by Sabbatai

They can't change the rules.

The Senate Parliamentarian says NO..

Obama has to sign the Senate version of the HC bill BEFORE the house or senate can pass a reconciliation bill to correct the manure in the Senate version..

voices.washingtonpost.com

2001:

"Republicans not only used reconciliation when they were in power, but actually took the extreme step of firing the Senate parliamentarian who objected to their use of the procedure."

For a 'friendlier one'. Then, they threatened to fire the replacement too when he didn't rule in their favor.

Reid can fire this guy too.

Making both sides the same--changing the rules to meet their agenda.

Wouldn't you agree AU??

And there would be an apaleptic fit by the American People if the Dems try to go with the Slaughter process and over rule the rules.

The townhall meetings are already going to be rambucsious and loud as it is over the HC bill.

Pelosi won't let them leave until they vote.

Obama is putting off his spring break a couple of days.

Next week should be interesting..

IF the slaughter solution is used...
dems will have raped yet another section and article of the constitutional

I write this for those of you on the left who USED to tell us how that document was being mistreated before obama but for SOME REASON dont give a fuck about that anymore.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable