Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, March 07, 2010

A review by the UK Met Office of 110 climate studies published since 2007 says that it is becoming clearer human activities are causing climate change. "What this study shows is that the evidence has strengthened for human influence on climate and we know that because we've looked at evidence across the climate system and what this shows very clearly is a consistent picture of a warming world," said review author Dr. Peter Stott. Evidence is stronger now than when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change carried out its last assessment three years ago, the review finds.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Doc_Sarvis

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Seriously, Jeff, why don't you focus your comments on subjects about which you clearly possess knowledge -- y'know, rodeo clowning, neighborhood predator watch reports, restraining orders, antidepressants, and caterpillar ranching?

"That's a pretty bizarre statement given the recent observations that Sahara is greening."

Man made "greening?" Are you shittin' me? Must be a result of all these new "green" jobs that have been created over the last year. Personally, I've been fighting green mold in my basement and don't care to have all this greening taking place. Man made greening is gonna turn out to be a big pain in the butt. I bet those nomads in the Sahara are already pissed about it, although it'll probably be a big hit in Ireland.

A review from the UK Met Office says it is becoming clearer that human activities are causing climate change.

By that logic, before humans, dinosaurs were responsible for climate change. Oh my gosh! We're heading towards extinction!

"Oh my gosh! We're heading towards extinction!"

Nawww...that guy with the long beard carrying that sign around the streets is just Zatoitchy. He's all upset because his scientific, peer-reviewed swimming pool is too cold to enjoy in March.

#6 | Posted by JeffnDenmark at 2010-03-07 09:44 AM

Enjoy your vacation, DumbnDenmark. Hahahaha.

Actually National Geographic would have you believe that the Sahara greening is due to man made global warming.

Sahara Desert Greening Due to Climate Change?
news.nationalgeographic.com

Im just having some cheap entertainment at the expense of the moronic DR assclown squad.

Thanks for participating Nullandvoid.

#9 | Posted by JeffnDenmark | Flag: Self-Concept Never Recovered After Restraining Order Issued

Fearmonger's Interactive Map

The far right's aversion to science has become legendary, they appear proud to be dumb. Smoking don't cause cancer, asbestos can't harm you, evolution is a lie and climate change is a hoax, sure dipshit. They should really go back to their own time zone, the dark ages.

Nobody's listening anymore. The sky is falling crowd have played with the "evidence" for so long, then they have dumbassess like VMA and Doc put on the pompoms and tell the other side they're stupid, and they wonder why nobody believes them.

Tell ya what douchebags: start living a lifestyle that assumes that you're part of the manmade global warming problem, and that would be a start. Otherwise, shut your piehole.

BTW. I don't recall "smoking doesn't harm you" to be a right-wing issue. Wasn't Al Gore and a slew of Dems making millions off of tobacco farms? And now those same statists want to ban smoking everywhere?

Your memory is faulty, as usual. But relax--you've got a planet to save! To the rescue!

"Seriously, Jeff, why don't you focus your comments on subjects about which you clearly possess knowledge" - Doc_Sarvis

"#9 | Posted by JeffnDenmark | Flag: Self-Concept Never Recovered After Restraining Order Issued" - Doc_Sarvis

I see Doc is focusing his comments on what he clearly has knowledge of.

Of the 110 studies "reviewed", how many referenced the 2007 IPCC Report on Climate Change as a primary source?

Garbage in, garbage out.

"start living a lifestyle that assumes that you're part of the manmade global warming problem, and that would be a start."

Gotta agree with you here, RIR.

I watch liberals in NYC talk one way and live another. Then they get pissed at me for pointing it out and claim that it doesn't make any difference what one person does. Which makes me blow my top. No group is free from its own hypocrisy to one degree or another.

"Your memory is faulty, as usual. But relax--you've got a planet to save! To the rescue!"

As righties science issues are proven to be false, they develop memory loss!
In the 90's Limbaugh and the right fought smoking bans!

LIMBAUGH: "It has not been proven that nicotine is addictive, the same with cigarettes causing emphysema [and other diseases]." (Radio show, 4/29/94)

In some ways the whole fake 'climategate' brouhaha helped strengthen the science surrounding mmgw. Everyone involved has redoubled their efforts to lay out all the evidence. And the result has been that the reality of mmgw is that much more scientifically obvious and irrefutable. (Which of course won't prevent deniers from sticking their heads ever deeper into the sand.)

As righties science issues are proven to be false, they develop memory loss!

Mendaciamnesia.

If man alters the climate by spewing Co2, I think we can all agree we need to correct this. We all want the climate not to change. I mean the climate has changed a few times but this time it is do to our badbad ways. So lets use these new found powers of ours to change the climate to be perfect for everyone. We can do it if we just try!

Industrialization aside, how can mankind expect less CO2 after the massive deforestation of old growth forests around the world?

"Industrialization aside, how can mankind expect less CO2 after the massive deforestation of old growth forests around the world"?

oops, now we have to count the absorption rates of this newly discovered lush rain forest......darn.

blogs.discovery.com

You climatedicks never give up. No matter how many of your studies are found in fault, you just won't quit.

7,000 hectares is a drop in the ocean compared to the old growth forests felled in the last 200 years.

1 Hectare = 2.47 Acres

Here, for example, are maps of the U.S. old growth forests over time:

mvh.sr.unh.edu

18,000 acres won't even cover a county's worth of lost old growth forest in the U.S.

WTF is so great with OLD growth? There are more trees in the US today than there were in the past.

There are more trees in the US today than there were in the past.

Is that a fact? Uh, no.

Nobody's listening anymore.

When did you change you name to nobody RiR?

Gotta agree with you here, RIR.

I watch liberals in NYC talk one way and live another. Then they get pissed at me for pointing it out and claim that it doesn't make any difference what one person does. Which makes me blow my top. No group is free from its own hypocrisy to one degree or another.

Our life style is dictated by coprorations. They are the ones who should be responsible for the crappy choices in automobiles, trucks and appliances that waste energy and pollute the environment. People have few choices beyond don't buy a Hummer and get rid of energy wasting light bulbs. Still the right complains about that. Go figure.

At any rate, ray and RiR would wrather deny the problem then admit their falacies and actually try and do something positive.

WTF is so great with OLD growth? There are more trees in the US today than there were in the past.

When in the past? After the the hippies and environmentalists took action or before?

I swear, sniper is getting dumber every day. It must be dememtia setting in, that and too much military brainwashing.

WTF is so great with OLD growth?

Old growth forests act as a carbon sink which are helpful in reducing harmful carbon emissions from the atmosphere.

See, it's not just that mankind is spewing thousands of tons of carbon into the atmosphere annually. That's just one side of the equation.

On the other side of the equation there's the loss of biodiversity including old growth forests.

The notion, mostly floated by developers and forestry companies with an agendized axe to grind, that old growth is carbon neutral has proven to be a lie, btw.

Be Well.

At any rate, ray and RiR would wrather deny the problem then admit their falacies and actually try and do something positive.
#28 | POSTED BY RINGMASTER

Positive? Like education? Once the fraud was exposed, the only positive thing you can do now is take up another interest. Our economy is going into the crapper and you worry about something that MAY happen in a hundred years or more years from now.

Of the 110 studies "reviewed", how many referenced the 2007 IPCC Report on Climate Change as a primary source?

Zero. The 110 studies were all completed after the IPCC report and covered new research. They weren't rehashing other studies.

i see no reason to change your lifestyle if your carbon footprint is just 20% the size of big al gore's,the climate guru.

The only way to prove that man-made global warming on earth is happening is to compare with a similar nerby world such as Mars and see if that world is warming and Mars is warming without any help from humans or Martians.

While it is true that planting new trees helps absorb CO2, cutting down old growth reduces the natural carbon sink far more then new growth adds for at least 50 years or more. When the cut wood decays, is burned, or is turned into other products, there is a net increase in CO2 both in the form of direct gasses and indirect CO2 from processing machinery. I realize it is difficult for people like sniper to understand, but he is a lost cause anyway. It is now up the the younger people to understand the truth and the science. Worthless old folks without a clue is what caused the problems in the first place.

Mar's climate is driven primarily by dust and albedo, not solar variation. Also the evidence isn't conclusive on whether global warming is actually happening on mars. There are many papers on solar variation and earth's climate and they concluded that the correlation between sun and climate ended in the 1970's when the modern global warming trend began.

Lefties claim to believe in science until science quiys agreeing with their global warming agenda. Climategate proved that. But libs are attached to their agenda as firmly as a baby is to a pair of mammary glands.

re: There are more trees in the US today than there were in the past.

#26 | Posted by Sniper at 2010-03-07 05:10 PM | Reply | Flag:

I think I did hear Limbaugh say that on the radio.

Is that your source?

FWTHOM-
re: "The only way to prove that man-made global warming on earth is happening is to compare with a similar nerby world such as Mars.."

Tell you what, douchebag ignoramus, move to a "similar nerby world such as Mars" and send us a report.

Fucking Wigger Thom is a tired, sad, unemployable joke.

"Mar's climate"

Not a real mental genius are ya, chump?

The ice caps on Mars have been shrinking just like on earth. Hey libs, what do they have in common?

don't be too hard on FWTHOM, you should be kind to the retarded, and besides he is just following talking points from the radio, he can't read the science involved (being mentally only 4 yrs old)

While it is true that planting new trees helps absorb CO2, cutting down old growth reduces the natural carbon sink far more then new growth adds for at least 50 years or more. When the cut wood decays, is burned, or is turned into other products, there is a net increase in CO2 both in the form of direct gasses and indirect CO2 from processing machinery. I realize it is difficult for people like sniper to understand, but he is a lost cause anyway. It is now up the the younger people to understand the truth and the science. Worthless old folks without a clue is what caused the problems in the first place.

#35 | Posted by RingMaster

Sounds like this came from a spotted-owl nutball!

Old growth forests act as a carbon sink which are helpful in reducing harmful carbon emissions from the atmosphere.

#30 | Posted by dethspud

I guess no other plant takes in co2. You go potato brain.

Where does it go when that really old tree sucks it up? Where does it go when that really old tree dies from old age?

Where does it go when that really old tree sucks it up? Where does it go when that really old tree dies from old age?

It goes into the formation of cellulose silly boy. When the tree dies it released that carbon back into the air and soil. It was pretty much a closed loop until man began burning 40 billion barrels of oil a day and cutting down the forest much faster then they could ever grow back. Shit happens.

Like I always say, republicans just can't do the math.

Sounds like this came from a spotted-owl nutball!

Sounds like sabbatai found himself in the old folks group and now he's bitching about it by calling free thinkers names.

The ice caps on Mars have been shrinking just like on earth. Hey libs, what do they have in common?

If you are so smart why ask the libs, ya retard?

Sounds like this came from a spotted-owl nutball!

Sounds like sabbatai found himself in the old folks group and now he's bitching about it by calling free thinkers names.

#46 | Posted by RingMaster at 2010-03-08 01:43 PM | Reply | Flag:

The ice caps on Mars have been shrinking just like on earth. Hey libs, what do they have in common?

If you are so smart why ask the libs, ya retard?

#47 | Posted by RingMaster at 2010-03-08 02:38 PM | Reply | Flag:

Please tell me you did this on purpose...

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable