Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Saturday, March 06, 2010

A federal judge refused Friday to dismiss a civil lawsuit accusing former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld of responsibility for the alleged torture by U.S. forces of two Americans who worked for an Iraqi contracting firm. U.S. District Judge Wayne R. Andersen's ruling did not say the two contractors had proven any of their claims. But it did say they had alleged enough specific mistreatment to warrant hearing evidence of exactly what happened. Andersen said his decision "represents a recognition that federal officials may not strip citizens of well settled constitutional protections against mistreatment simply because they are located in a tumultuous foreign setting."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

reinheitsgebot

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

of course not..he has a 'r' after his name...

Anderson sure does.
Andersen, Wayne R.

Born 1945 in Chicago, IL

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on July 24, 1991, to a seat vacated by Stanley Roszkowski;

Reality and the victimhood right....

I hope he receives many years in prison for this.

I'm guessing that it will be a liberal nutfest when he's found not guilty.

Time to stock up on more ammo, just in case...where did I put that case of car antennas?

You don't go to prison in a civil suit, ever read a book?

imagnine, a nazi killer. on trial

some fathead: "because it is bread into their DNA...."

DNA Bread?? sounds yummy, clamhead!
The Republican Party: Braniacs.
Get a brain, moran.
Go USA!!

The day Rumsfeld or any of the Bush Regime get "Convicted" of any crimes is the exact same day that "Jesus" will make his fabled reapperance on earth!!!

one small step for mankind

Can Obama step in to end this prosecution?

Can Obama step in to end this prosecution? -- #11 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

Seems like separation of powers would keep that from happening. Do you want him to?

I'm guessing that it will be a liberal nutfest when he's found not guilty.
Time to stock up on more ammo, just in case...where did I put that case of car antennas?
#4 | Posted by daprof at 2010-03-06 04:29 PM

Try the hole in your ass?

Rumsfeld is guilty of many, many embarrassing elements to these atrocious invasions - torture has been established long ago. The fact that this was done unnecessarily also does not make any news. But that these were two Americans does and you can't stomach the idea that as a free people we possess rights that Rumsfeld violated.

Republican arrogance to the end.

Can Obama step in to end this prosecution?

Not to call anybody a dumbass or anything, but you realize this is CIVIL suit?

Not your fault, maybe it was bread into you.

"Do you want him to?"

No.

"Not to call anybody a dumbass or anything, but you realize this is CIVIL suit?"

Sue me. Prosecution is the wrong word, asshole.

Rummy had a "Torture Suit"???

Damn, he must've really been into it...

I mean I have a wet suit, but I don't get a chance to dive that often...

I don't blame them for not wanting to throw it out though; it's sure to become a piece of history someday...

I could just see it coming up on the Antiques Roadshow in 2050...

;~}

Funny that this should happen the same week the Smithsonian tossed OJ's suit.

While in custody, they were subjected to sleep deprivation, long hours of interrogation, blasting music, threats, hunger and a practice known as "walling" in which subjects are blindfolded and walked into walls, according to the suit.

They call that torture? well we will see where this case goes.....

They call that torture?

Yeah, cos that's what it was.

You'd call it torture too if you had to endure it.

Rummy the Dummy was one of the first big upper echelon proponents of legalising torture and Spud hopes this civil suit goes forward.

Be Well.

After reading the article, I'm left with a queasy feeling. Why would the U.S. arrest whistleblowers reporting wrongdoing (as they should have) in the first place?

If I was pulling shit inn the green zone, providing false ID's for insurgents, well I'd be asking for it!

Humm on closer examination of various related links, it does sound like these dudes were trying to help the US. I take back what I wrote!

After reading the article, I'm left with a queasy feeling. Why would the U.S. arrest whistleblowers reporting wrongdoing (as they should have) in the first place?
#19 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2010-03-07 03:21 PM

I've been wondering why the "magic bullet theory" was accepted - both give me uneasy thoughts regarding our government and their handlers. They experiment with codifying torture and modification of civil rights as if they have numbered our days long before BushCo.

Something certainly is not adding up, particularly the protection of Big Oil in light of obvious new sources and advances. Torture seems ridiculous in this modern world, but the military industry institutionalized it as common policy before we invaded Iraq. Democrats and Republicans both ignored the implications - pretending not to "read" constitutionally questionable practice such as The Patriot Acts, modification of the military field operations as well as privatization of key military components.

Why not release the JFK assassination data unless they are afraid of public retribution? The same with the torture tapes, anthrax attacks and events of 9/11 - faulty investigations and missing important data going so far as to torture whistle blowers..

#15 | Posted by Capt_Of_Uranus at 2010-03-07 04:20 AM
"Torture Suit"... Get it??? Wait, see I was referring to a "suit" he would wear while he was "torturing" people... And... Well... Okay, it was dumb...

Never mind...

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable