Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, March 07, 2010

Joe Conason: When ranting on about [Charles] Rangel ... Republicans surely won't mention that he's not alone in questionable fundraising for a vanity academic institution that bears his name. ... [T]he most troubling example is none other than Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who now holds Lott's former post. If the term 'Senate Ethics Committee' weren't an oxymoron, he would be enduring an intense investigation, too. McConnell is a graduate of the Univ. of Louisville, a place of higher learning that he is seeking to transform into a display case for his limitless narcissism (as well as that of his wife, former Bush Labor Secretary Elaine Chao). Lots of nice things at the university are named after him, but above all there is the McConnell Center for Political Leadership, a special program much like the Rangel Center at CCNY.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

ichiro

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

We need the Rule of 12.

Since the Dem's are in charge, I'd argue that they should remove the beam from their own eyes before pointing it out in others.

But then, go after the bastard.

so the left wont mind 'cleaning the swamp' if gop is part

BUT WAIT A MIN

pelosi and dems on tv ALL SAID that rangel didnt hurt national security or issues....

but I guess mitch did??????

another democrat switch in the middle of the river, perhaps???

Hag, agreed. Anyone corrupt regardless of party should be tossed.

Ignoring McConnell doesn't justify Rangel.

Anyone corrupt regardless of party should be tossed.

Fuck yes. Toss Rangel.

But don't "probe" McConnell, that's what he wants. : )

The MCConnel Park and Riverwalk are nice if you like communist/socialist porkbarrel makework programs....

LOL, this is a crock! WRITTEN BY A NY LIBERAL WRITER AND AN OLD SUPPORTER OF BILL & HILLARY AND LIBERAL DEMS. To but anyone in old Charlie's league is a real stretch in my opinion.

Rangel wasn't investigated for fundraising was he?

He was cheating on his taxes--still being investigated and which he blames on his wife.

And for taking corporate trips--blaming that on his staff.

They all take monies from everywhere.

Dodd took so much he's not running for re-election.

Chuckie was the winner with his fundraising from Wall Street--no expose' on that...

Byrd--good grief--everything in WVA is named after him.

Delahunt just got done blowing 500k of his campaign war chest--because he knew he can't run again with the Amy Bishop story out there.

Corruption needs to vigilantly sought after and turned out from the congress.

There should be a law to forbid or prohibit any congress person from having anything put in their name while serving congress.

They should also prohibit congress members from creating and accepting any funds for outside centers, think tank, associations, etc.

Even when they are given cover by universities, unions or whatever.

To be reelected is to be corrupt.

LOL, this is a crock! WRITTEN BY A NY LIBERAL WRITER AND AN OLD SUPPORTER OF BILL & HILLARY AND LIBERAL DEMS. To but anyone in old Charlie's league is a real stretch in my opinion.

#7 | Posted by rwebst at 2010-03-07 10:32 AM | Reply | Flag:

Yes, Mitch must be a Saint.....and I'm sure you don't listen to what Flush Rimjob, Sean HaNUTTY and Glenda Beck say about Obama....afterall, they're views are tainted, no?

Conason: Probe Mitch McConnell

The Pope's Pear

Well, since it doesn't involve military secrets, it's OK! That's what Nancy said about Charlie's serial scandals. "Most ethical", my ass...

Rule 12. Defenses and Objections

Or Rule of 12 -- Whist?

Or 12 years?

Or 12 gauge?

I've repeated over and over....two term limits...one in office and one in prison. Though lately I've proposed one in office and two in prison.

This is typical liberal attack strategy. Don't debate him on the issues because you can't win there, so go ahead and smear his character.

Don't debate him on the issues because you can't win there, so go ahead and smear his character.

Bitch has policies to debate? No! isn't a policy.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable