Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, March 05, 2010

Huffington Post: The backlash is growing against Liz Cheney after she demonized Department of Justice attorneys as terrorist sympathizers for their past legal work defending Gitmo detainees -- and now it's coming from within deeply conservative legal circles. On Friday, the conservative blog Power Line put up a post titled, "An Attack That Goes Too Far." Author Paul Mirengoff, called Cheney's effort to brand DoJ officials the "Al Qaeda 7," "vicious" and "unfounded."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Corky

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

The slimy bitch doesn't fall far from the traitor tree, eh?

" The Huffington Post has a story about conservative reaction (or at least the reaction of a handful of conservatives) to the video. The story says I declared that what Cheney did is comparable if not potentially worse than the notorious anti-communist crusades launched by Sen. Joseph McCarthy. It then quotes some of the things I told Huffington Post reporter Sam Stein.

The quotes themselves are accurate, but I think the characterization of what I said is somewhat misleading. "

www.powerlineblog.com

The quotes are accurate but the characterization is misleading?

roflmfao!!

The quotes are plenty damning enough and make the point about his McCarthyite bitch.

Somebody is just trying to change their tune after the blowback they got.

about his = about this

Haha. Fuck the Cheneys.

Yeah!

But with KBM's dick.....

"Author Paul Mirengoff, called Cheney's effort to brand DoJ officials the "Al Qaeda 7," "vicious" and "unfounded"

ouch . . . that comment by Paul is pretty vicious
&and . . . probably "unfounded" . . .

unless it's goin' into his next book

The spawn of a miserable evil son of a bitch is also an evil bitch?

Who'da thunk?

It's amazing how the left always fall back on the republicans to confirm their feelings when convenient. Now, if the republicans descent they are the party of no and gnopers and whatever silly names you come up with. But, when the republicans agree w/ you they are to be touted as the authority.

is it Liz or Les?

called the effort "unfortunate."

That's what Dick said about producing his daughter, except for the draft dodging she allowed.

The bottom line is simple, the American people now see and are paying for the failed marxist brain fucked ideology that has infested the fucks in Washington, Cheney's daughter hits the nails on the head, what you are seeing is the finally flatulent gasp of marxism while a clueless chowl sits in the white house trying to jam saul alinsky's brian fucked thinking down the throats of America. The real Americans are starting to stand up like Christie in New Jersey and letting the dirty , nasty little secret out of the bag, marxism , socialism has bankrupt America, time to get rid of those complicit in this coup against Americans and the U.S. Constitution. What to do with them? send them back to mexico and afreeka!!

RIGHTNUT....You Racist Pricks never disappoint, be thankful that you have a site where you can spread your crap, I tried on the Fox Nation site but they never print what I have to say.....Welcome to the Freedom page, ask you Fucking idiots friends at FOX to open their website to everyone "Remember free speech".....

is it Liz or Les?

I think mary is the fairy.

Celisary, I should know better but, does Liz have free speach? The people at fox will not let you post b/c you are a fucking idiot!!!! She has the right to say whatever she wants just like you have the right to type whatever silly shit you type on this site daily! It's just that Rcade does not have the time to delete all the crazy ass shit you put out on the web. Plus, according to coco,redneck you are probably paid b/c no one can be as batshit crazy as you are w/out some type of compensation!

Now, if the republicans descent

They'd have to ascend first.

that's it north? Really? Or did you hit publish too quick?

From the guy Paul about the Mccarthy statements--

PAUL adds: The Huffington Post has a story about conservative reaction (or at least the reaction of a handful of conservatives) to the video. The story says I declared that what Cheney did is comparable if not potentially worse than the notorious anti-communist crusades launched by Sen. Joseph McCarthy. It then quotes some of the things I told Huffington Post reporter Sam Stein.

The quotes themselves are accurate, but I think the characterization of what I said is somewhat misleading. In response to Stein's questions asking me to compare the video to "McCarthyism," I said the implication that the DOJ lawyers share al Qaeda's values is almost certainly false. I also said that some of McCarthy's assertions were true and others were false (or unfounded, I'm not sure which word I used).

That, if I recall correctly, was the extent of my willingness to compare the video to "McCarthyism." I don't think I said or implied that the video is comparable to or worse than the totality of what goes by the name of McCarthyism or to the "crusades" launched by Sen. McCarthy.

So he feels he was taken out of context.

As for Liz--it is fair game to question the DOJ attorneys and their effects on national security issues for this country.

It is stunning that these guys are the ones tapped by Holder (who got the FALN 16 pardoned under Clinton) to now work in the DOJ.

It sure sounds alot like mccarthyism to me.

I did however find this, and laughed all the way through it.

www.bing.com

I find nothing funny about Rachel.

She on the other hand laughs at herself all the time--constant giggling.

And now the attorneys are known--transparency you know..

Murphy,

the point is who cares about the names?

Or don't you believe that all have the right to an attorney. Should we only give them shitty attorneys? and the people who can pay for them get the good attorneys, oh wait, that's almost the way it is now with our overworked public defenders office.

Or maybe we should just not have trials at all, after all if you're innocent you're not gonna get arrested, right?

I'm sorry you didn't find Rachel amusing. I found the whole skit terribly funny, since she only exagerated what had been said. Matter of fact I almost spit my drink on my screen when she mentioned dick cheney and bush.

Lighten up, the world is not black and white, it's got all shades of grey.

John Adams, a known traitor, defended the accused in the Boston Massacre trial.

en.wikipedia.org

Why? Because he was a post-Enlightenment patriot who understood what the US should be - a beacon of law and civilization in a world previously ruled by kings and angry mobs.

Her sister should introduce her to a nice
woman so she could settle down and release
some of that pent up libidinal energy.

Did Dick Cheney have a lesbian daughter as God's punishment for him not going to Viet Nam?

But it isn't McCarhyism to call someone a nazi.

Haha. Fuck the Cheneys.

#6 | Posted by LetUsPrey at 2010-03-05 04:08 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Yeah!

But with KBM's dick.....

#7 | Posted by Corky

You guys realy know how to present your side of an arguement. It sure changed the way I look at them.

Murphy you have been taken out of context again, poor you. Naturally you don't like Rachel Maddow - she intelligent and funny.

As for Liz Cheney - my theory is that her mother would have gone on and said the same things but now she is such a hideous old bitch that she can't face the cameras any more.

"Keep America Safe - from Cheneys"

The slimy bitch doesn't fall far from the traitor tree, eh?

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2010-03-05

so I guess I can use your reasoning to say that the botoxtwat pelosi is kin to any other leftists dingbat?

ALL THIS IS ..is an attempt to cover up holder using fuckin scumsucking lawyers who defended terrorists to now judge them and get away with it AND I REPEAT...arent some of them from his own law firm...why dont we also follow the FUCKIN MONEY????
or is THAT to much to ask of this administraion of goddamn lying hypocrites?

But it isn't McCarhyism to call someone a nazi.

#28 | Posted by Diablo

No. He was trying to expose the commies here in the US after WWII.

@27 You guys realy know how to present your side of an arguement. It sure changed the way I look at them.

...nobody but you has ever seen KBM's dick, then.

@30
He was trying to expose the commies here in the US after WWII.

...and we all know how badly they needed exposing.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable