"(5) The prophet Isaiah foretold that a conqueror named Cyrus would destroy seemingly impregnable Babylon and subdue Egypt along with most of the rest of the known world. This same man, said Isaiah, would decide to let the Jewish exiles in his territory go free without any payment of ransom (Isaiah 44:28; 45:1; and 45:13). Isaiah made this prophecy 150 years before Cyrus was born, 180 years before Cyrus performed any of these feats (and he did, eventually, perform them all), and 80 years before the Jews were taken into exile.
Except Cyrus didn't destroy Babylon, not even close, he made it more grand than ever. It remained the central hub of Mesopotamia throughout the rule of Cambyses, Barzia, Nebuchadrezzar III, Darius I, Xerxes, Artaxerxes I, Xerxes II, Darius II, Artaxerxes II, Artaxerxes III (Ochos), Arses, and Darius III. It remained for at least 200 years after the lord had commanded all her sons slain and walls raised. It is still visited by people, her bricks were/are used in the construction of other cities and buildings, the Marduk Gate has been completely restored in a German museum, no "dragons" ever took refuge there, and most importantly, Cyrus isn't mentioned in Isaiah 45. The Hebrew version says, "him". Cyrus wasn't used as the 'translation' until 1973! Most biblical scholars --for many well-documented reasons-- believe only 1-39 were written by Isaiah, 40-55 by a poet at the end of the Babylonian captivity, and 56-66 by a third party.
Some Prophesy!
"(6) Mighty Babylon, 196 miles square, was enclosed not only by a moat, but also by a double wall 330 feet high, each part 90 feet thick. It was said by unanimous popular opinion to be indestructible, yet two Bible prophets declared its doom. These prophets further claimed that the ruins would be avoided by travelers, that the city would never again be inhabited, and that its stones would not even be moved for use as building material (Isaiah 13:17-22 and Jeremiah 51:26, 43). Their description is, in fact, the well-documented history of the famous citadel.
That isn't so much a prophecy as a description of a place. Furthermore it is a very inaccurate description of both the city structures and its slow puttering out after Alexander the Great, a person the bible doesn't mention a single time.
So, how could anyone possibly make a prophesy about Babylon's demise and not mention Alexander? It is like predicting WWII and forgetting to mention the Americans.