Of course, no corporate run hospital cuts costs resulting in deaths.

We can sue corporations, lettuce. Think the government will let us sue them for every infected hangnail? Nope.

Hey Diarreah,

Exactly WHO has proposed anything like the UK health system for the US?

We are only trying to reform the system we already have, not replace it with something completely different.

But all you pantspissing fudgepackers can do is LIE LIKE REPUBLICANS.

If a Rtard ever spoke the truth, the world would stop spinning on its axis and the forking sun would explode!!!

"We can sue corporations, lettuce"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

"We can sue corporations, lettuce."

But I thought y'all wanted tort reform to prevent law suits???

and of course tort reform is targeted to frivilous suits ..like the ones that edwards made a fortune on..

AH but to the chase....I disagree with this post..I mean next thing you will tell us is that govt officials in places like CANADA who has this shit will get to the US because of better care.. I mean..THAT would never happen..would it???????

OOPS

"#2 | Posted by Diablo at 2010-02-24 12:18 PM | Reply | Flag: THINKS "THE VERDICT" WAS A DOCUMENTARY

Don't the Brits know that they could just sell a few hundred billion dollars worth of bonds to the Chinese, and save everybody? After all, that's Barack's plan.

That's the problem. We elected Obama to be president of the United States, and that's not enough. He needs to be president of the universe.

Don't the Brits know that they could just sell a few hundred billion dollars worth of bonds to the Chinese, and save everybody? After all, that's Barack's plan.
That's the problem. We elected Obama to be president of the United States, and that's not enough. He needs to be president of the universe.
#8 | Posted by rightisright at 2010-02-24 12:29 PM

Is that why universal health care is being fought by the "healthcare" and "insurance" industry? Because they have our best interests in mind - like when they had elderly American citizens arrested for purchasing their medications in Canada, passing laws prohibiting them doing so again and inevitably raising the costs for those very medications?!

Universal health care with 100% government regulation is the most cost-effective model that provides the most medical benefit for the entire nation. Anything less equates to corporate interests trumping our national interests.

Universal health care with 100% government regulation is the most cost-effective model that provides the most medical benefit for the entire nation.
* * * *

Nope. You can have cost containment, more access, or more benefits. You get to choose only one. Up till now, we've chosen more benefits. If you think you can throw open the hospitals to another 30 million uninsured, AND lower costs, AND increase benefits--then you must be a liberal.

if you THINK, you must be a liberal. If all you can do is parrot the talking heads on Clusterfox, you must be a Rtard. If all you can do is parrot AfkaBibble, you must be a Teabagger.