Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, February 24, 2010

"We are extremely saddened by the tragic loss of innocent lives," said General Stanley McChrystal, who spoke to President Hamid Karzai Sunday evening to express his sorrow and regret over the incident.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

LIVE_OR_DIE

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

What a lying POS. So his apology makes it ok? WTF are we doing there? Systematically committing genocide.

Why don't we use some Porkulous $$$$ to buy them uniforms. This way we'll know who the fuck to shoot when they hide behind children and women in burkas.

What a lying POS. So his apology makes it ok? WTF are we doing there? Systematically committing genocide.

Oh wow.

Before last week, all Paks and Afghans were "ragheads" according to you.

Now suddenly we have some fake concern? LOL

McChrystal should get a discount from Hallmark by this point.

Be Well.

If the civilians finally realize that the cowardly Taliban are using them as human shields and propaganda, those same civilians can take care of the Talibam problem for us.

"Why don't we use some Porkulous $$$$ to buy them uniforms. This way we'll know who the fuck to shoot when they hide behind children and women in burkas."

Wouldn't make any difference. Civilian deaths caused by IED's, suicide bombers in hotels and busy markets, and just plain ol' executions performed by the esteemed "freedom fighters" are accepted by our compassionate little "progressive" friends. The FACT is that our own forces suffer higher casualties by being forced to fight "kinder, gentler" wars. It's unfortunate that civilians suffer in wartime situations but there is a HUGE difference between incidental casualties and those caused by PURPOSEFUL actions. However we never see THOSE blasted and condemned all over the media and by our little friends, do we?
How many of our little friends have screamed about the deaths in Southeast Asia AFTER the U.S. evacuated? Oh, but Jane Fonda and HER little friends had no problem with all that stuff going on in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos.
The more we fight "kinder, gentler wars the more and more these wars will drag on and the more and more civilian casualties will mount.

When will the Afghan suicide bombers start making apologies for innocent civilian deaths. No one's holding up THEIR numbers, which are much higher.


What a lying POS. So his apology makes it ok? WTF are we doing there? Systematically committing genocide.

#1 | Posted by dxlingr

dxlingr,

do you know why NATO is there and you are just trolling? Or do you really not have a clue?

Nevermind, if you knew more, you'd just be confused.

It's probably better to be a silly ignorant war protester.

I think everyone needs to keep in mind that fact that we invaded them. Fair enough we did it to route out the Taliban (somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction to 911 but that is what that is at this point).

However, we did NOT declare war on the Afghanis as a whole (nor them on us). So keeping that in mind, yes we need to avoid civilian casualties whenever possible and apologize (at the very least) when this sort of thing happens.

Lets reverse this a tad. There is a group here in the US that HATES some other country (for whatever reason, shouldn't need to look too far), they plan some attacks and pull off at least one. That country now rolls its military into downtown yourtown to route out the nare-do-wells without declaring war on the US as a whole, they just want the members of that group. Now, in the process, they send a missile through your front door by mistake, what would you want your government to do about that? What would you want your government to do 7 years later when they are still here and still killing your neighbors (albeit by mistake)?

Naturally a better solution would be to get out now before more blood is shed. The problem with the "War on Terror" concept that W got us into is the simple fact that no matter how many of these guys you kill there are a million more standing behind them ready to take up the fight. It will be never ending and it is unwinable.

This whole situation is a little reminiscent of Hitler invading Russia in the winter. Napoleon failed, what made Hitler think he could win? Well the Brits and Russians failed in Afghanistan over a 200 year period, what makes us think we can win? As always, history should be looked at a little closer before jumping in with both feet.

For the now, it seems we are stuck with this situation and this is simply a side effect, unfortunately a necessary one. The only real solution here is to pack up our toys and move back to our sandbox.


I'm reminded of General Patton's apology for civillian
losses in Germany. General MacArthur's contrition towards
Japanese non-combatant victims was heart-warming as well.

Be Well.

While the human toll is tragic, it's the farm animals that will suffer most from lack of buggering.

"What a lying POS. So his apology makes it ok? WTF are we doing there? Systematically committing genocide.

#1 | Posted by dxlingr at 2010-02-23 08:09 PM | Reply | Flag: Obviously doesn't know what "systematic" or "genocide" mean.

I wonder how much arm twisting it took from Obama to make him do it?

"Fair enough we did it to route out the Taliban (somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction to 911 but that is what that is at this point)."

The Taliban aided Al Queda in attacking us several times over the course of many years before we did anything. How is that knee-jerk? If anything, our refusal to act sooner cost us thousands of innocent lives.

we could have acted on 9-11 on 9-10.

"we could have acted on 9-11 on 9-10."

We could have acted after the African Embassy bombings, Khobar Towers, or the the USS Cole among others. On 9/11, I was shocked at the way the attack was carried out but I was not shocked that we were being attacked by these people. You were probably still playing with dolls at the time but anyone who was up on current events knew about Al Queda and their goals well before 9/11.

"The FACT is that our own forces suffer higher casualties by being forced to fight "kinder, gentler" wars."

Sadly, that is an accurate statement. It is more important how we look in the world rather than results. Of course that same world we are trying not to offend, equate enhanced interrogation with beheadings. Does KSM ring a bell?

Hey Sully, Saudi Arabia has a lot of individuals who give massive aid to both the Taliban and Al Queda. Should we not go in and get after them directly after 9/11 as well? What about Yemen? What about all the other spots on the map?

Hey Sully, Saudi Arabia has a lot of individuals who give massive aid to both the Taliban and Al Queda. Should we not go in and get after them directly after 9/11 as well? What about Yemen? What about all the other spots on the map?

#18 | Posted by ExpsRedemption at 2010-02-24 02:13 PM | Rep

Maybe Sully will be kind in his response and explain the difference between an individual and a government. Me on the other hand? I'll just laugh at how fucking stupid you are.

"Hey Sully, Saudi Arabia has a lot of individuals who give massive aid to both the Taliban and Al Queda. Should we not go in and get after them directly after 9/11 as well? What about Yemen? What about all the other spots on the map?"

Any government that is helping Al Queda in their efforts to kill Americans is engaging in an act of war against us whether we need 3,000 people to be killed before we recognize as much or not.

As has been pointed out, there is a huge difference between a government helping Al Queda and people of a given nationality helping Al Queda. But I would say the Saudi government has a responsibility to take reasonable steps to prevent their citizens from funding terror.

I will say that your question betrays an extreme ignorance as to the extent of the Al Queda/Taliban relationship. These people were living together, training together, sharing resources and fighting side by side in the same foxholes against the Northern Alliance. For all intents and purposes, Al Queda was Afghanistan's version of the Foreign Legion. If you think such a relationship exists between any other government and Al Queda, you're wrong.

McChrystal: Oops, my bad....

How much arm twisting? Hell, Obama had mounted him from behind and was kissing his neck!

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable