Tyger says, "tadowe, you are a joke!"
You're new, aren't you? Since Pooh isn't here to give you an elbow in the ribs, I'll repeat: I enjoy being attacked, personally by those who don't reason their insults. You lose automatically, in debate, by doing so.
That's my stance, and you can debate or dehumanize as yours ... it's your decision whether you want to act out as a mensch, or a nazi wannabe.
"the "evidence" you cite is a joke"
See? The "evidence", as I explained is only circumstantial, easily explained, and it is readily available for individuals to see in popular media; print to video. Yet, the teaching unions actively (even militantly) ignore the "evidence" and actively refuse to discuss it, except by mocking it and those who ask about it. Although not a school per se, this site is a prime example of how those who wish to examine the "evidence" are treated; this contretemps specifically.
"teachers are not scared to give students the best scientific informantion possible, they are scared of STUPID people like you taking over the education system and forcing them to teach things they know are not true!!"
Some individual teachers allow the circumstantial evidence against general theory to be discussed, of course. However, this is about the collective of teachers, and who en mass mock such evidence, instead of use it engage interest and understanding.
Those teachers who act individually to explain why such evidence is merely specious and should not be used to form illogical and incorrect beliefs should be the icons of expertise for other teachers to follow. Instead, they are usually thought of as being "really" a rightwinger, Christian, conservative ... or shudder ... a Repug ... to the union of teachers.
I think I've reduced the argument to its basic level: The consensus of science *believes* that religious belief is a danger to their status and power and refuse to allow any circumstantial evidence to even be discussed; except to mock it into obscurity. That majority, the collective of science, inculcates that same intransigent belief, and modus operandi into teachers by the very act of mocking what they call specious evidence. This has become the "rule" to such a degree and with such zealousness in attack, that some individuals and groups are starting to wonder, "Doth the bitch of science consensus protest too much ...?"
I'm not a believer, either in religion or any consensus-of-science, and which is anti-scientific in being a collective of belief and faith in near religously worshipped theory. This quasi-religious consensus-of-science is a danger to the scientific method, because the circumstantial evidence remains UNEXPLAINED to students, and becoming its own consensus-against-science.
Teachers and "science" should practice the scientific method, observe ALL the evidence, derive theory, test theory and continue to gather ALL the evidence, as such. That isn't happening with teacher-union-indoctrination, and their emphasis on denying, not examining, ALL the evidence.
Go find Pooh and help him with the bees, honey.
