Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, February 15, 2010

Utah's House of Representatives adopted a resolution that declares carbon dioxide is "essentially harmless" to human beings, condemns "climate alarmists" and disputing any scientific basis for global warming.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

JeffnDenmark

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

I'm sure you won't find this being reported by MSM.

Miseryboy and JeffnD. Once again we are only one Afkabibble away from the DR Clueless Trifecta!!

Or is that one Afkabibble short of a DR Tinfoil Tri-Cornered-Hat?

HeadupyourAXE,
You're a moron...
24ahead.com

AXE is just mad because his religion (Global warming) is being proven to be a false god.
His shallow ego can't handle it.

Considering snow is the only thing keeping Utah solvent, you'd think they'd be a little more interested.

let, if it was a problem they would be.

I guess you don't realize that copper is very important to that state also.

I guess the pro co2s can spend a couple of hours locked up in a room pumped full of co2 and confirm their theory? They should still "essentially" be alive.

YESSS!!!

Confucius say body releases a toxic chemical.
Confucius shoots self in head to save planet.

Thank you confucius


Let me get this straight:

Carbon dioxide (CO2, the air we expell) is considered
by Utah's legislature to be "essentially harmless"?

FF for Utah!

1. Cranial
2. Rectal
3. Inversion

Be Well.

You know. Most people are all for having the cleanest planet possible. But, IMHO, when a combination of far left kooks, 3rd rate politicians, and just plain old criminals were allowed to hi-jack the issue from actual scientists, the whole topic lost credibility. And as if that were not enough, Americans are supposed to swallow the fact that all solutions being proposed have the net result of 1) bankrupting America, 2)exempting other nations there by giving them economic advantages, and 3)allowing an outside agent (the U.N.) to determine U.S. law. The smartest thing the President could do is come right out and say to the world that we'll decide what we think the valid science is and how we're going to deal with it. For that matter, maybe he ought to tell the U.N. that we're going use the money that we usually spend on the U.N. and all of it's "projects" to investigate and deall with the issue. I wonder how big of a deal they would think it was then?

How come its always Politicians speaking
definitively on matters better left up
to Scientists?

Oh yeah, that whole
corrupt politician thang...

I guess the pro co2s can spend a couple of hours locked up in a room pumped full of co2 and confirm their theory? They should still "essentially" be alive.

Put as many trees in the room as there are on the earth and they will be fine.

This "evil dirty pollutant" is none of those. The biomass of the plant world exceeds that of animals by many times, and to the plant world CO2 is as necessary as O2 is to animals like us. When we exhale, plants grow.

Anyone, EPA included, who call CO2 a pollutant is an ignoramus, or a politician looking for more power.

Too bad the EPA trumps the Utah state government. Their powers are literally unlimited. Look it up.

We should trust the scientists to figure this out, but only the phony lib scientists at East Anglia University have the answers. Because if the data doesn't fit their hockey stick they will make up new data that will.

But, IMHO, when a combination of far left kooks, 3rd rate politicians, and just plain old criminals were allowed to hi-jack the issue from actual scientists, the whole topic lost credibility.
Sounds a lot like what's wrong with health care in our country...

Americans are supposed to swallow the fact that all solutions being proposed have the net result of 1) bankrupting America
Haven't we already achieved that with our staggering debt and deficit?

Put as many trees in the room as there are on the earth and they will be fine.

Yea right, and this by one of the the same fools that would tell you there is no problem with cutting down the forests. A real deep thinker, that one.

Cutting down forests to make room for an expanding population is actually double-fucking us.

#19 | Posted by kanrei
K likes the double up .l.. ..l.

Well that does it for me then. The remenants of Joseph Smith have spoken.

Did I mention these are the same folks peddling snake oil?

I'm no scientist, BUT I wouldn't take this as the truth from a bunch of people who think an angle came to Joseph in the night and handed him the
book(s) of Mormon...

Hell it wasn't that fucking long ago that they refused to let blacks in their university...

And ketchup is a vegetable.

i wonder if the government handed out millions upon millions of dollars in grants to dispute climate change(global warming)what the findings would be?

Ask Exxon Mobile.

It is, ultimately, who you get your propaganda from, SEMTEX. and you spout their "findings" every day.

i'm still afraid the end of mankind will be from the ozone hole,remember that one.

re: i'm still afraid the end of mankind will be from the ozone hole,remember that one.

#26 | Posted by semtex111 at 2010-02-15 06:20 PM | Reply | Flag:

Yeah, um, that was remedied through actual action regulating CFC's, you fucking retard (Satire!)

"folks peddling snake oil"

That's Al Gore and the global warming hoaxers.

Refrigerants also known as the Dupont name Freon have been removed from the market place by force with the argument that they destroy the ozone layer.
The offending ingredient is supposedly chlorine. The only problem with that is you don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that there are other sources of chlorine on earth. Some are produced by man and the rest is produced by nature.
The most common produced by man is the chlorine used by municipal water supplies to treat water. The second most common use is laundry bleach and pool Chlorine as well as manufacturing too many uses to name.
Nature releases Chlorine all the time by volcanos and the oceans.
So just do the math if the earth produces millions of tons of Chlorine and refrigerants a few thousand then nature must be producing the bulk of it.
The other half of the scam is if Chlorine is so damn bad then why are we using it still for all uses except refrigerants. The truth is that the patents on many of the refrigerants have expired and in order to stop other manufactures from making it we must get the government to force manufactures to stop making it.
The old refrigerants were developed to be perfect never breaking down or changing chemistry, except when exposed to water the refrigerants will immediately decompose.

r12 is still produced and sold in mexico.if not all the cars in the third world would have no a.c.

If they could find a way to stop water vapor from forming the atmosphere would heat up and the earth would produce enough Co2 to kill all life. I think? Then and only then will they prove their case/cause. Or were they right in the 70's about the new ice age? I give up......

So let them breathe 10% CO2.

And soon.

Hey the state legislature of Utah has decided, that's good enough for me. The only thing I know for sure is that these folks who made this decision know no more than I do about it and that this is a political statement, nothing more, nothing less.

A few years back I got my wife a live plant, since then we have added several live plants in our bed room and living room. The air quality in our house is better than the air quality outside. Plants are great for people.

Sorry I know random story.

97% of climatologists worldwide agree global warming is happening and man is a significant contributor. These are the guys who study the climate; some are government paid, some are corporate, some are independent. Some are in the US, some are not. How can you deny the scientific community's support of this fact? Oh yeah. You're insane. Facts have no place in your reality.

"97% of climatologists worldwide agree global warming is happening and man is a significant contributor"

Bullshit! It's is a slight majority if even that.
The MSM only let's the GW proponents have air time.

The wheels are coming off this GW charade.

The charlitan Al Gore should be striped of his NPP and the hundreds of millions he made from this croc should be giving back to the US Taxpayers

Remember 4th grade Science class..CO2 is plant food, not a "poison gas."
Why not plant a few million trees and be done with it?

Facts have no place in your reality.

#34 | Posted by Sycophant

I'll bet when you were young, you'd swear the elephants at the Ringling Brothers Circus walked around on their hind legs too.

Take an "m" out of Mormon and you get moron.

Take an "m" out of Mormon and you get moron.

Posted by nutcase at 2010-02-15 08:50 PM

Or, you can take an "m" out of Morman and get "ormon"

"I guess you don't realize that copper is very important to that state also.

#7 | Posted by Sniper "

You're correct.

Take the "L" out of lover and it's over.

#29...Damn with home schooled explosive experts like you around, who needs Cal Tech or MIT?

Too bad the EPA trumps the Utah state government. Their powers are literally unlimited. Look it up.

#15 | Posted by Dinsey

where'd ya come up with that? . . . regardless, the Fed's derive their powers from the States . . NOT visa-versa

the constitution is a good read, try it sometime

ITS ALL JUST BASIC BIOLOGY I: PHOTOSYNTHESIS: HUMANS BREATHE IN OXYGEN (O2) GIVEN OFF BY VEGETATION AND BREATHE OUT CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) THAT IS TAKEN IN BY VEGETATION, ALLOWING US -- PLANTS, ANIMALS AND HUMANS -- ALL TO LIVE!

JUST ONE BIG HAPPY CIRCLE!

IF EITHER HUMANS STOP BREATHING OUT CO2 OR VEGETATION STOPS GIVING OFF O2 AFTER TAKING IN CO2, WE ARE ALL DEAD.

HOW, THEN CAN EITHER O2 OR CO2 BE A DEADLY POLLUTANT! ACTUALLY THE MORE CO2 GIVEN OFF BY HUMANS, THE MORE TREES, PLANTS, AND SOURCES OF FOOD FOR HUMANS AND ANIMALS LIVE!

NOW IF WE COULD JUST GET THE SUPREME COURT AND OUR EPA OFFICIALS TO TAKE A BASIC COURSE IN BIOLOGY...

So is Utah going to secede from the Union??

Will they ignore some EPA laws and regulations that Obama is going to send out...??

So is Utah going to secede from the Union??

Will they ignore some EPA laws and regulations that Obama is going to send out...??

#44 | Posted by MURPHY

I'll type slooower . . .

a) States FORMED the Union . . .
the Union BELONGS to the States, so it wouldn't be necessary for a State to secede . .

b) Fed power ONLY trump State laws where enumerated by the US Constitution (
that power that was granted by the States)

c) Bush's "Real ID Act 2005" is being ignored by the States

d) Fed "weed" laws are currently being ignored by many states

e) several states have laws on the books voiding ALL Fed firearms laws
(for arms manufactured/sold "in State", to State Citizens) . . .
"commerce clause" NOT applicable, nor enforcable

dozens more states have this same legislation pending - Oh, Pa, Tn, NH, SC, Va, Mi, In, Tx, Mt, Mn, etc - etc

Utah's reolution is a shot accros the Fed's bow - - tho it doesn't carry the force of a law . . . the law is intended to be the next step if the Feds don't back off


hope that helps . . .

semtex111

It's CFC's not pool chlorine. Different molecules, different properties, they contain some of the same atoms. By your argument, you should be able to clean a pool with table salt because after all, sodium chloride contains chlorine.

CFC's are a catalyst, that means that a very tiny amount can be used over and over and destroy a much larger amount.

CO2 Toxicity

d) Fed "weed" laws are currently being ignored by many states

Because the feds have been given the red light by Obama's justice dept

Here's one of the purposefully ignorant, anti-American creeps!

They pretend that CO2 is ***DANGEROUS***!!!

Meanwhile, the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere remains at approx. 0.034 percent of the ENTIRE atmosphere!

Got that, you chicken little crap sheis pieces? CO2 is NOT A DANGEROUS GREENHOUSE GAS, you lying pieces of partisan excrement!

CO2 Toxicity

H2O Toxicity

chemistry.about.com

Specious dipshit.

"CFC's are a catalyst, that means that a very tiny amount can be used over and over and destroy a much larger amount."

Platinum is a catalyst, and should be OUTLAWED!!!

If you don't agree, then you are a hater of the Earth and the hope for the future of this fair orb, circling our beneficent sun ...

... go str8 to h-e-l-l you crazy rightwing nut!!!

Jak and Retardowe need to breathe a 5% CO2 atmosphere soon.

www.biotopics.co.uk

That's cute Tadowe,

I say: CO2 toxicity

With a link about what concentration of CO2 is toxic and you go ape sh*t. Same to you Jak Se Mao.

Good night kids! Sleep tight!

Zat bleats, "Baaaa!"

Oh? Is that right? How will you get the CO2 to 5%, dimwit?

I'm sure you'll steam that amount when you have to admit that plasma cosmology is the answer to your "black hole" consensus ...

You are just too dim to realize that your "consensus" is shit ...

With a link about what concentration of CO2 is toxic

That's the point.

Anything is "toxic".

It takes someone salivating over the ideological ramifications of banning a substance as inert and innocuous as CO2 to post LD levels of that substance and piss themselves because it represents the evil threshold of "toxicity".

"Anyone, EPA included, who call CO2 a pollutant is an ignoramus, or a politician looking for more power."

That's a fairly ignorant thing to promulgate; anything is a pollutant when the ratios are off. I think it's safer to say that anyone who's willing to make such generalist statements doesn't understand the hard science (or just plain turns their nose up at it). That of course makes sense, then, why you don't get the possibility of global warming.

Asserting ideology in spite of the facts is basically nah-nah-nah boo-boo politics.

"Take that, phony lib scientists!" I guess most scientists are phony lib hacks in it for the money. I'll believe the politicians instead, they're so trustworthy and about as non-partisan as they come.

While I don't see CO2 any more hazardous than Nitrogen or Oxygen, I really thing that it isn't up to the politicians to declare anything.

I would have thought the Indiana precedent of attempting to legislation PI www.straightdope.com

News alert zat!!!!!!!!

The normal concentration of oxygen in fresh air is 20.9%. An atmosphere is hazardous if the concentration of oxygen drops below 19.5% or goes above 23.5%.

Too much of anything is BADDDDDDDDDDDD, including your constant BS about global warming.

#59 | Posted by Sniper at 2010-02-16 10:44 AM | Reply | Flag: Didn't pass the written test for mixed gas diving.

Not real bright, are you snappy?

By the way, snappy, the Lakewood Washington cops don't chamber a "pip squeek(sic)" 9mm either, shit-for-brains.

Snappy has a book written about him: www.madisonpubliclibrary.org

Now run along and breathe a nice 10% mixture of CO2, fuckwit, and get back to us.

zat, I guess you have never been in a confined space. If you wern't such a ??? you would know that high levels of oxygen are explosive. Now, go down in a manhole with high levels of oxygen and make a spark. By the way, take a few global warming guys with you.

What is the level of co2 here on planet earth? What would have to happen to get it up to 2%, let alone 10%?

Go play with your mouse gun 9mm.

World declares Mormonism "essentially useless".

Yea right, and this by one of the the same fools that would tell you there is no problem with cutting down the forests.

I never said that. Show me where I did.

Hurry, the libtards are losing this too, their global warming myth being exposed..

hurry.......... what to do..

review Obama's handbook, Libtardism 101 "just blame bush for everything"

lol

In the heat of the debate, the representative Mike Noel said environmentalists were part of a vast conspiracy to destroy the American way of life and control world population through forced sterilisation and abortion.

ahhh yes... the Vast Conspiracy Theory!

Them damn eco-terrorist are trying to destroy the American Way of Life like being wasteful and totally dependent on Foreign Oil?

yah those evil evil peoples!

Utonians are so retarded! CO2 CAN kill!

By the way, I don't believe the problem is the toxicity of CO2 anyway! Not sure we would ever reach toxic levels though it can happen naturally [A natural disaster linked to CO2 intoxication occurred during the limnic eruptions in the CO2-rich lakes of Monoun and Nyos in the Okun range of North-West Cameroon: the gas was brutally expelled from the mountain lakes and leaked into the surrounding valleys, killing most animal forms. During the Lake Nyos tragedy of 1988, 1700 villagers and 3500 livestock died.] but it that we need to be aware of our Carbon Footprint as CO2 is a GREENHOUSE gas. Regardless, of what the retards like tadpole say reducing our carbon footprint becoming more energy efficient is a noble goal.

But...There are other effects of high levels of CO2 for example:

NOAA states in their May 2008 "State of the science fact sheet for ocean acidification" that:
"The oceans have absorbed about 50% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) released from the burning of fossil fuels, resulting in chemical reactions that lower ocean pH. This has caused an increase in hydrogen ion (acidity) of about 30% since the start of the industrial age through a process known as "ocean acidification." A growing number of studies have demonstrated adverse impacts on marine organisms, including:

* The rate at which reef-building corals produce their skeletons decreases.
* The ability of marine algae and free-swimming zooplankton to maintain protective shells is reduced.
* The survival of larval marine species, including commercial fish and shellfish, is reduced."

Bottom line: Not only is it smart economically but it should be a National Security Priority.

Make MORE Green Jobs Obama!

Go Green!

btw- Where is my Chevy Volt?

Oh Sorry Utah Rethugs...I may have used to many big words!

Oh Sorry Utah Rethugs...I may have used to many big words!

My God!

If you are going to mock the vocabulary of your adversaries at least spell such a simple word like too correctly.

A word you should familiarize yourself with is "Phonics".

And all this great 'science' comes from studing a few tree rings and some ice cores. You all act like we have this great histarical record of temps, rainfall, co2 levels and all that shit. Our real records on much of that is less than 50 years for some and 25 years for most data. Many temp records are tainted by being next to heat sources and in the middle of huge concrete jungles.

Dinsey, aspirin is a great and effective nsaid painkiller and anti-inflammatory. But, take too much and you're nothing more than a hairy sack of decaying meat.

A certain balanced level of CO₂ is necessary for life on the planet. However, when excess CO₂ builds up in the atmosphere because we are producing more than nature can handle and cleanse, we get a buildup of the greenhouse effect, in which heat from the sun pierces the upper atmosphere to strike the Earth and the portion that is reflected from the Earth's surface can't re-pierce the built-up CO₂ layer and remains in our atmosphere, warming the planet.

We know this to be true and scientists have demonstrated it experimentally thousands of times. In addition, we have the geological record, in particular samples of air bubbles in cored drilled in the Antarctic that let us test the air going back between 300,000 and 600,000 years. There have been previous build-ups in CO₂ which have coincided with warm periods in the Earth's past.

However, natural rises and falls of CO₂ levels happen over geological timespans - taking many thousands, even millions of years, to significantly affect our climate. There are only two causes of sudden significant changes happening in timespans of mere centuries, decades, years, and even shorter.

One is catastrophic natural disasters, which fall into two sub-categories; 1) meteorite or comet collisions with the Earth's surface, or 2) massive super-volcano eruptions resulting in widespread production of flow basalt. We have seen neither of these sufficient to cause the dramatic rises in CO₂ in the atmosphere of the kind we are now seeing in all of recorded history.

The only other mechanism that can change the levels of CO₂ in the atmosphere as quickly and dramatically as we have been experiencing over the past few decades, and which is growing larger year after year, is the introduction of excess CO₂ into the atmosphere by the human use of fossil fuels.

It never amazes me how little study of the actual mechanisms of climatology the climate-change deniers bother to do - making them credulously susceptible to the nonsense that people like Senator Inhofe and the pseudo-scientific representatives of the polluting industries and those zealots of the unregulated laissez-faire free-market who fear that the truth on global climate change might lead to more regulations and set back their efforts to replace democracy with a market-based corporatocracy.

It seems with every issue where science and either conservative politics or religion are at odds, the opponents of science gather all of the 'evidence' for their opinions from ideological sources with obvious agendas, never from actually learning the science they are deriding in their ignorance.

Study the science, not the pundits of either side.

As Robert A. Heinlein wrote through the voice of his character, Lazarus Long:

"What are the facts? Again and again and again--what are the facts? Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget that 'the stars foretell,' avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind the unguessable 'verdict of history,'--what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"

Finally, people with common sense. You see, the only people that have any kind of problem with CO2 are the marxists, they have had their heads jammed so far up their own asses that they naturally think that the whole world is partaking in their flatulosphere, then when one of them has to unhook their nose from their rectum to get some insight of the outer world, they then see that all is RIGHT with the world.

My God!

#70 | Posted by JeffJ

argh! you got me JeffJ... I done been arrested by the grammar police... and ridiculed by Chairpoodles...all in one day...oh dear! I guess that means everything I said is wrong then.

CO2 is good for you!

Breathe deep the gathering gloom!

Breathe deep the gathering gloom,
Watch lights fade from every room.
Bedsitter people look back and lament,
Another day's useless energy spent.
Impassioned lovers wrestle as one,
Lonely man cries for love and has none.
New mother picks up and suckles her son,
Senior citizens wish they were young.
Cold hearted orb that rules the night,
Removes the colours from our sight.
Red is grey and yellow white,
But we decide which is right.
And which is an illusion???

enjoy your moment!

Get the facts!"

#73 | Posted by BlueSun

Facts and the Republican party... Ne'er the twain shall meet!

Breathe deep the gathering gloom,
Watch lights fade from every room.
Bedsitter people look back and lament,
Another day's useless energy spent.
Impassioned lovers wrestle as one,
Lonely man cries for love and has none.
New mother picks up and suckles her son,
Senior citizens wish they were young.
Cold hearted orb that rules the night,
Removes the colours from our sight.
Red is grey and yellow white,
But we decide which is right.
And which is an illusion???

enjoy your moment!

#75 | Posted by donnerboy

Your poem certainly makes up for misspelling the word "to"...

...who is the author?

#77 | Posted by BENDOR at 2010-02-16 09:15 PM | Reply | Flag: Never heard of the Moody Blues.

episteme.arstechnica.com

It's the Moody Blues from A Question of Balance. Listened to that one a lot in the '70s

oo bad the EPA trumps the Utah state government. Their powers are literally unlimited. Look it up.

#15 | Posted by Dinsey

But would they want to face down the Utah National Guard?

I think not. Utah will win this one - along with any other state that follows their lead.

There is only ONE thing the Feds fear...

...and that's our awakening State governments.

In fact, the Fed only exists at the pleasure of the individual States...

...the only real powers of the Fed being those specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

All other powers reside with the individual States or in the People as individuals.

The original Constitutional model of governance will be restored...

...and it is already starting to happen.

CO2 is "harmlessly essential."

Without it, all life on this planet would disappear, excepting chemo-synthetic bacteria found in rocks and around deep ocean vents, and some higher organisms that feed on them.

The Moody Blues - The Day Begins

www.youtube.com

The survivors won't disassemble oil to make plastics, they will assemble energy to make whatever they want.

CO2 - I breath it all the time and I don't get hot.

Veus has lots of CO@, go there.
Without CO2 there would be no trees or flowersand hey
The earth is not warming because of CO2
It is warming because of Ozone depletion, co2 has nothing to do with it.

It is time for the destruction of the planet.
Resistance is futile.

CO2 - I breath it all the time and I don't get hot.

#84 | Posted by richardrhine

water is essential to life...yet water can kill you.

go figure!

Your poem certainly makes up for misspelling the word "to"...

...who is the author?

#77 | Posted by BENDOR

thx I thought everyone had heard the Moody Blues.. I forget how young some are...

Or is that one Afkabibble short of a DR Tinfoil Tri-Cornered-Hat?

#3 | Posted by axe

/Geting a real kick out of this thread.

Utah House declares CO2 to be "essentially harmless"?

* head-desk *

In a related story the Hitchhikers Guide to the galxy has recently upgraded it's assessment of the entire planet and changed it from "Harmless" to "Mostly Harmless"

Way to go, Earth!

Here's the deal with Spud and AGW.

It's real.

We may well be past a point of no return.

The solutions being offered to date seem more like Wall Street-based derivative scams than actual solutions.

Decreasing global population, increasing bio-mass, converting over to clean, alternative, renewable forms of energy production and off of oil-based manufacturing.

The above are the only real solutions and nobody is working on the first two and the third is going too slowly at present.

Anybody who denies the science behind the enhanced greenhouse effect by this point is a fool who has fallen for a massive hoax perpetuated by the globe's largest polluters.

The Utah house of Reps is "Essentially Retarded"

There's more, of course, but that's the gist.

Be Well.

The more I read from these retards on the right about their perception of science and chemistry, the more I am convinced that that we are all screwed no matter what intelligent men try to do. There is just too many imbeciles in the way of real progress. As it stands, at least half the country can't understand even the basic concept that burning anything produces heat and toxic gasses. Take a look at how many people die or get sick from breathing carbon monoxide every day. Many more people die each year from smoke inhalation then burning in house fires.

Americans have become so dumbed down by morons like the Mormons that complete wood heads like tadowe are now calling real learned men un-American (as he goes into a swearing fit), as if education is now unpatriotic. It would be funny if it wasn't so God-damned asinine.

Ringmaster,

There is just too many imbeciles in the way of real progress.

Real progress?

For the sake of argument let's assume these statistical, predictive climate computer models are indeed nearly perfectly accurate. If we could achieve a global Kyoto Utopia the warming that we'd experience by 2100 would be slowed until.....I hope you are sitting down....2105!

Wow! Trillions of dollars pissed away to slow the rate of warming by a miniscule amount and that's assuming the accuracy of these supposedly vaunted computer models.

Decreasing global population, increasing bio-mass, converting over to clean, alternative, renewable forms of energy production and off of oil-based manufacturing.

Not only is all of that an impossibility currently, but it's also going to drastically reduce the standard of living for the entire globe.

Has ALL of the recent relevations regarding the statistical and data faults in this theory given you no pause 'wotsoever'?

The more I read from these retards on the right about their perception of science and chemistry...

Why aren't you as bothered by the ignorance from the left? Is leftie ignorance somehow superior to rightie ignorance?

There is just too many imbeciles ...

Classic

Hint, ringo -- third person plural next time.

Fuck off goaty. I don't take English lessons from roughnecks who never graduated high school.

Funny, I had a cousin who was a stickler for English and grammar and could win a spelling bee, but he couldn't pass a GED and died a drug addict at the age of 45 chopping wood for a living. He reminds me of the kidboy.

I also had a neighbor who fancied himself a writer that was always trying to correct my grammar. He never sold anything I can remember. He died of gangrene a few years back because he was too smart to see a real doctor.

FYI...I make a living selling articles and advertisements but I'm dyslexic, missing fingers and don't give a damn about spelling or the queen's English. Guess who is laughing all the way to the bank?

Fuck off goaty. I don't take English lessons from roughnecks who never graduated high school.

Well, if you are going to call someone an imbecile, you need to take them from somebody -- doesn't matter who.

BTW, I'm not a roughneck. I'm an ET. Learn the offshore lingo before you attempt to speak it.

Guess who is laughing all the way to the bank?

You still go to a bank? You ought to try this new-fangled electronic banking. Great stuff! That aside, is your salary really that comical?

BTW, I'm not a roughneck. I'm an ET. Learn the offshore lingo before you attempt to speak it.

#96 | Posted by goatman

You rig-dudes have a "lingo"?

Please tell me it is more coherent than the lingo that truckers still use on "CB's".

For the longest time my 'protected' password sign-on for a variety of applications was "1004" as in: "10-4, good buddy!"

You rig-dudes have a "lingo"?

I guess like any industry, there are terms that are unique. Roughneck is one of them. Roughnecks make up about 1/5 of the crew. They are the ones who actually handle the pipe. Dope out here isn't something you smoke. (it's what they put between pieces of pipe to keep them from galling) Neither is a joint (that is a piece of pipe, rising, or casing). Many more, but you get the idea.

Not only is all of that an impossibility currently, but it's also going to drastically reduce the standard of living for the entire globe.

It is all possible and interestingly the standard of living for the entire globe is already dropping.

It is all possible and interestingly the standard of living for the entire globe is already dropping.

#100 | Posted by MONEYWAR at 2010-02-17 12:07 PM

BTW, I'm not a roughneck. I'm an ET. Learn the offshore lingo before you attempt to speak it.

Yea, right and a janitor is a sanitation engineer.

ringbastard,
I owe you an apology. There is actually somebody here that gets sand kicked in their face more than you. His name is woke.
You're still a dumbass, and you are still a speed bag. Remember that.

i'm glad that the utah house finally resolved this issue once and for all.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable