Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Saturday, February 13, 2010

Gary Nodler, a Republican state senator in Missouri and a candidate for Congress, said that if the military allows gay soldiers to serve openly, it would offend the Muslim nations of Iraq and Afghanistan where America is fighting two wars. Nodler said that changing "Don't ask, don't tell" would offend the terrorists in such a way that could put soldiers and America at risk of further terrorist attacks.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

BetelG

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Well, we certainly shouldn't let women serve, or advocate for secular democracy, or ...

Offend the terrorists? What kind of namby pamby military do we have anyway?

Sometimes I wonder if the military never wants to win anything, they just want to keep fighting.

FTA: Nodler's argument: The Muslim nations of Iraq and Afghanistan, where America is fighting two wars, are opposed to homosexuality. Changing "Don't ask, don't tell" would offend the terrorists in such a way that could put soldiers and America at risk of further terrorist attacks.

Justus, who is the Senate's only openly gay member, sat on the front row during Nodler's speech and nodded politely, a wry smile on her face.

Nodler the terrorist coddler sed wot?!

WTF?!

When did the Rethuglycoonts turn into such massive, gaping pussies?

The Muslims in those countries are already plenty pissed that they've been invaded and occupied and bombed repeatedly but repealing the odious DADT is somehow gonna push them over the edge?

* facepalm *

S'rsly, if this wimped out Rethug is too afraid of a bunch of back-assward guys in caves to think clearly he should just give up his office and go hide under his bed with a flashlight and a baseball bat till the wars are over.

So much FAIL in the GOP these days.

Be Well.

/Yes, back, ty fer noticing.
//Entering the DR as ya do
stage left.

So much FAIL in the GOP these days

Yet they have managed to rack up three high profile wins. November is looking good.

Sun Tzu recommended annoying the enemy as a tactic.

what??
really?

hahahah

what a terrible excuse by this homophobe.

Actually, Moslem sensibilities are something to consider. Remember Osama said the reason the towers and Pentagon were attacked was because of the presence of infidels on Arabian soil (i.e. US troops)?
Bush quietly moved them out of Saudi Arabia afterwards while claiming victory.

Wow.
Have to say, this guy completely turned me around.
I used to be totally in favor of gays serving openly in the military.

But now that I read this, well.....I mean, I don't want us to OFFEND anyone.
They might start shooting or something.

Thank God for good men like Nodler, with their keen insight.

From now on, we need our armed forces to be comprised completely of strict Muslim males.
No gays, no women, no Jews, no infidels of any kind.
Come to think of it, we better not have any Americans in our military either...don't want to offend anyone.

Noodler should stfu.

Best argument there is. Muslims can suck it.

He's talking like a democrat.

Worried about offending the enemy--yup...

This guy makes an excellent point and since the POTUS is sensitive to the muslim world this certainly would be a reason for our president to keep the current policy in place---we have to be politically sensitive to the muslims we serve with.

Matsop:

Please tell me you're not serious.

Please.

If suicide bombers don't offend the Muslims then I really don't care what else might offend them.

"He's talking like a democrat."

Actually, he's talking like a Republican - thinking that religion and social policy have something to do with each other.

Matsop:

Please tell me you're not serious.

Please.

#13 | Posted by MaryTylerWhore

Oooooh, you think I'm trying to take my tongue out of my cheek----maybe, a little facetiousness----maybe playing to the political correctness crowd?

Everybody offends Muslims.
Christians offend Muslims,
Buddist offend Muslims,
Hindus offend Muslims,
Women's rights activist offend Muslims,
frankly any-non-Muslims offend Muslims period

because the intent is that until YOU submit
Muslims find YOU offensive
regardless of sexual orientation.

If suicide bombers don't offend the Muslims then I really don't care what else might offend them.

good point

could be true Che

If I know a soldier on the other side is gay, I would find another gay on my side and send him across the lines and compromise the bugger.

Gays don't observe the chain of command or any flag when they have the chance to... you know. LOL

oh my God, lets not offend anybody, especially when we usually just kill them.

Soak your bullets in bacon grease. That would offend them.

Yeah, I'm concerned about our troops offending Muslims.Fuck Muslims.

Maybe the so called values Repubs should be offended at the Muslms because of the horrible they treat women. Then some Muslim cleric could release a statement even more ridiculous than the one released by the ignorant republican.

And so on and so on, meanwhile we continue to fiddle as the Earth slides towards irrevocable destruction.

Fuck Muslims.

Fuck Radio-Boy.

There! I put a fatwa on you! Ha!

if that were true... but anyway... that's WE have separation of church and state... because you really can't "win" (much less make progress) with any religion.

i mean, haven't they, he, "we", been saying that WE can't end DADT because it offends Christians? i think we have.

that's WE = thats why WE

Christians = so-called Christians

#25 | POSTED BY ICHIRO
"WE can't end DADT because it offends Christians?"

Ichiro, I think that's exactly what this guy's saying....he's just trying to find a way to say it without saying it.

Since when did we become the nation of touchy feely don't hurt anyone's feelings. We're worried about Muslim's feelings halfway around the world before the feelings of the gays that want to serve.

WHAT THE F*CK?!

Would someone, somewhere just finally say "TO HELL WITH EVEYRONE'S GODDAMN FEELINGS? GET OVER YOURSELF." we gotta get some sh*t done, people!

F*ck,Sh*t?fraid of hurting someone's feelings?why don't you just say it?

Yet they have managed to rack up three high profile wins. November is looking good.

#4 | Posted by Bigpun at 2010-02-13 04:03 AM | Reply | Flag:

Two Governorships? Seriously?

I notice how the repubs keep pretending that NY-23 wasn't there fault.

He's talking like a democrat.

Worried about offending the enemy--yup...

#11 | Posted by MURPHY at 2010-02-13 08:41 PM | Reply | Flag:

....or perhaps he's just talking like the Republican that he is.

Since when did we become the nation of touchy feely don't hurt anyone's feelings.

Day before yesterday, I think it was....

.... mommy was....

.... backdoor gal......

... but then ......

... so was daddy.....

..... who i came out of....

... i got no idea....

Skidmark

republicans OFFEND AMERICA!!!!!!

I don't care what muslims feel or think. I just like when they blow themselves up.

There! I put a fatwa on you! Ha!

#24 | Posted by Tosser at 2010-02-14 01:29 AM

Get in line. After I interviewed Ayaan Hirsi Ali, her security team advised me they were getting threats naming me.

Would you prefer it if I stated: "Fuck all religions"

Cause I believe strongly in that as well.

You have to remember, the way Muslims feel about Christians is the same way Christians view Muslims,and it is the way I view all religions.

When did the Rethuglycoonts turn into such massive, gaping pussies?

#3 | POSTED BY DETHSPUD

9/11. Haven't you noticed? It's bomb and torture everything that could potentially be a threat. Hell with the Bill of Rights, financing any of it, or human decency. "I want my country back!" "A black man in office! He must be a secret muslim! I'm scared!"

Republicans just talk tough. Really they are only tough when it comes to taking the life, liberty and property of others.

The new Republican credo: Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you and why should you have to pay for it.

Would you prefer it if I stated: "Fuck all religions"

Yes, I would. It's more egalitarian.

her security team advised me they were getting threats naming me.

Yeah right....

the way Muslims feel about Christians

Btw, I have no animosity towards Christians in general.

I only feel loathing for American Jeebus-Freaks (pretend Christians) like the ones who often pop up here.

#24 | Posted by Tosser at 2010-02-14 01:29 AM

MARYTYLERWHORE

I hereby issue a fatwa against fatwas.

Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2010-02-14 12:48 AM

I declared a Fatwa against Fatwas. You're too late. So there! LOL

You gotta be shittin me. The middle east is full of towel head fudge packers.

#37 | Posted by Sniper

What does it matter? Most of their women look like guys anyway.

Most of their women look like guys anyway.

To them, most of you guys would look like women.

Most of their women look like guys anyway.

To them, most of you guys would look like women.

#45 | Posted by Tosser

Yeah, I hear a large % of them have a visual acuity problem.

Most of their women look like guys anyway.

They could go a long way towards correcting that by shaving their mustaches

Intelligence within the american right would offend its base...like a set of balls on a democrat would offend its own base.

Offend the terrorists??? Are they serious?!!

mon, that's right. We don't want to offend the people that want to kill all of us. Ain't that a great thought?

The GOP has proven it can't win a fucking war anyway so who cares what they say? But this comment is symptomatic of flawed logic both parties now follow. For some reason, we think that fighting a war means winning the hearts and minds of enemy civilians. If our reasons to be at war were great enough, we would give a shit what enemy civilians think. We had plenty of reason to go to war with Afgahnistan but the Bushies even fucked that up with their hearts and minds nonsense.

If we were only fighting wars for the right reasons and with realistic goals for their outcome, the opinions of enemy civilians regarding gays serving in our military would not matter.

If we were only fighting wars for the right reasons and with realistic goals for their outcome, the opinions of enemy civilians regarding gays serving in our military would not matter.

#51 | Posted by sully

What does one have to do with the other?

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable