Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, February 12, 2010

At a time of deepening political disaffection and intensified distress about the economy, President Obama enjoys an edge over Republicans in the battle for public support, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

Corky

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

The GNOP can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but.....

"But Mr. Obama is seen as making more of an effort to do that: 62 percent said Mr. Obama was trying to work with Congressional Republicans, while the same percentage said that Republicans were not trying to work with Mr. Obama.

"Obama is certainly trying," said Bonnie Ewasiuk, 60, of Woodbridge, Va. "I'm a Republican so I don't like to go against the party, but Obama has reached out and had meetings and I don't think the Republicans are going to be responsive. All you see from them is negativity."

More than half of respondents said that Mr. Obama had not spent enough time trying to fix the economy, and nearly half said he had spent too much time trying to pass a health care bill.

He scored better on other measures, particularly in comparison with Republicans; 60 percent said the president understood their problems, compared with 42 percent who said the same thing about Congressional Democrats and 35 percent for Congressional Republicans."

Still no love for this thread?

I knew I should have used smaller words.....

HEY EVERYONE! Get over here and fluff corky's thread before the mother-fucker has a coronary

OK, OK...

"Mr. Obama and his party have an opportunity to deflect the anger and anxiety"

Party of no vs. the party of deflection...

*yawn*

"Poll: Obama Still Looks Better than GNOP to Americans"

Of course. I just wish that really meant something more than the statement implies on its own.

#4 Worked on you, mah bitch.

#6 | Posted by Hagbard_Celine

I told you you should have voted for Hil, lol.

And the fact that 56 percent of respondents think that Mr. Obama does not have a plan to create jobs is a distressing bit of news for a White House that in recent weeks had made an intensive effort to present Mr. Obama as concerned with the economy.

No leadership, and poor communication skills. We all knew Obama had none of the leadership qualities, but everyone assumed this guy could effectively communicate his policies to Americans. He can't, even though he's on TV more than any president ever was. Worse, he gets shills like Corkateer, Sarvicide, and UnAmerican Unit to represent his message, which totally fucks things up, and even further alienates intelligent people.
Grade: Fail

Grade: Fail

And since he is held in higher esteem than your ilk, there must be a grade called Whaleshit Failed.

Obama is fucking up badly, and he's totally ruining Corky's tired shill act. Or does Corky have a current poll from June showing how much America loves Barankrupt?

You need only look at this thread poll, Cockfisher.

As a professional Corporate Pimp and Gingrich/Bush Cabana Boy, even you should be able to read at least the numbers, if not the text.

Cookie at home...

s2.hubimg.com

Most indicators say the economy is slowly recovering, both wars are progressing, the nation seems quite safe, he's invited Republicans to discuss health care with him and the Dems and try to get something done, the banks have paid back TARP, etc., etc.
I think he is doing a pretty good job but getting little credit and the other side owns enough media to create the illusion that he isn't succeeding to their viewers and listeners.
If you asked Paulson or Bush in Nov. 2008 if we'd be doing this well I wonder what they would have said?

Obama is fucking up badly

how's that mavericky teabaggy thing werkin' out fer ya?

bad, remember that statement this fall.

Saying that President Obama has the "edge" over the GOP is damning with the faintest of praise.

I told you you should have voted for Hil, lol.

#8 | Posted by Corky

Since I'm not a registered Dem, I couldn't do that.

When she ran for senate, that was a different story.

When putting $787 ($850) Billion into the economy you would think there would be some movement in the country. He has asked the Repubs to come to a meeting to discuss the EXISTING Health Care Bill and how parts can be passed into law, the SAME Bill that 65% + Americans have said was to detailed, to costly, and to intrusive.

At that rate, he would need to spend something like $3.7 Trillion, just on job creation attempts to get the Unemployment rate back to 8.3% THIS(?) year

Except for that he will, when the Repubs stop most of this crap, be reelected as he will be neutralized just as Clinton was in 1994! Point of fact!

" NYT Shows Obama's Favorability, Approval Plummeting, Yet Stresses 'Edge Over G.O.P. With Public' "

"Give the New York Times points for nerve, anyway. Chief political reporter Adam Nagourney managed to take the paper's new poll, full of bad news for President Obama and Democrats, and to change the subject, twisting the findings to suggest that Republicans were the party in trouble, in Friday's front page story: "Obama Fares Better in Poll Than G.O.P." The online headline is similar: "Obama Has Edge Over G.O.P. With Public."

Nagourney, with co-writer Megan Thee-Brenan, entirely passed over several interesting tidbits from the poll (you can read a .PDF version here) which reflected badly on the prospects of Obama and the Democrats."

newsbusters.org

Give the poster an "A" for effort.

When the Nov. elections are over, Obama's mischief will end and his sorry rearend might be saved inspite of himself. However, I don't think so--- unlike big Willie who had a structural economy in place that was still functioning.

Nagourney, with co-writer Megan Thee-Brenan, entirely passed over several interesting tidbits from the poll (you can read a .PDF version here) which reflected badly on the prospects of Obama and the Democrats."

newsbusters.org

Give the poster an "A" for effort.

#19 | Posted by KBM

Nagourney? Sigourney? Isn't this the guy that did a poll on Aliens (immigrants) and it was so biased in how it was strutured that you couldn't draw any appropriate conclusions----does anybody in their right minds read the NYT anymore.

Sure glad those tax breaks for the richest 1% (141,000 who avg. $7.4 million a year) created all those jobs over the last decade, otherwise Obama would have inherited a recession second only to the big depression.

Oh, wait.....

Nevermind....

Why hasn't Obama been able to fix the economy and create jobs for all Americans?

He's had a whole year and the Republicans had only.....the last 40 of deregulation, no oversight, outsourcing, trickle down/voodoo, off shore tax breaks, tax cuts for the richest 1% and corps and two invasions/occupations costing 2 trillion never placed in any budget....Oh, wait....nevermind....

Hilarious and pathetic.....

But WHO has the edge over OBAMA?

For "investors," read Wall Street gamblers banks, hedge funds and other players. Scenting blood in the water, they have been busily placing enormous bets on whether the Greeks would go belly up or be helped out by the Germans. They do this through the medium of "credit default swaps", a form of insurance against default by Greek or any other bonds. Typically, this kind of so-called insurance protection will be offered by a pension fund or some similar institution looking to earn a nice income from premium payments.

The buys of the protection will be hedge funds looking to make fast money if the insured bonds lose value and the seller has to pay out. Sitting between them is Goldman, JP Morgan, Bank of America or some other big bank who broker the trade between buyers and sellers. Since this market lacks any transparency the banks have effortlessly crushed congressional initiatives for reform in this area -- these spreads and consequent profits are huge.

Once everyone has made their CDS bets, the buyers will start beating down the value of the insured bonds in this case the Greeks. The air has been thick with reports of imminent Greek default, the Greeks' financial irresponsibility, etc etc. As the value of the bonds decreased, the CDS sellers had to pay out money to the buyers, "posting margin." This is what Goldman Sachs did to AIG in 2008, thus ensuring the latter firm's ruin.

With Greece "in play" the flow has ebbed back and forth. As the fate of Greece see-saws, both sellers and buys have been making money, as of course have the banks in the middle. None of this has much to do with the underlying condition of the Greek economy. There was no particular reason why Greece should have become a crisis just now, except that it was their turn. Joseph Stiglitz, one of the very few economists worth listening to, has been pointing out that the Greek economy is not in immediate crisis and that this has been a speculative attack, but most business commentators are not paid to report things that way. Instead, the Greeks have been admonished to pull their socks up, cut government spending by firing thousands of public employees (thus exacerbating the recession) and pay their debts.

In the hunt for the rich pickings, competition among major powers on Wall Street has been fierce. Someone told Der Spiegel that Goldman-Sachs had nefariously helped Greece cover up the true depth of its debt situation through creative use of cross currency swaps, which involved "the Greek government issuing debt in yen and U.S. dollars which were than swapped for debt in euros over a specified period of time. After a period of years the currencies will be traded back to the original currency." Though this would seem like a good deal for the Greeks in the short term, in the long term it will cost them dearly.

The report was clearly inimical to the interests of Goldman. Asked if true, a former U.S. Treasury official told me that the story, "more smoke than fire," had been leaked by a Goldman competitor, "Lazard, JP Morgan, Deutsche -- take your pick," adding that "the velociraptors are ripping chunks of flesh out of each other in a fight to the death." Such wholesome plain speaking is not of course current in the White House, where Obama prefers the term "savvy businessmen," at least when referring to JP Morgan and Goldman CEOs Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein.

Excerpted from Alexander Cockburn @ Counterpunch

Masters of the Universe and Crooks all rolled into one. Destroying companies and countries for their own entetainment and enrichment and then get bailed out instead of going to jail when they fall short.

Posted by nutcase at 2010-02-12 05:42 PM | Reply

Cockburn = What happens when lighting a fart on fire goes terribly wrong.

;)

Can we title that O'bama Teabags OldMensachs?

Nothing changes...

1) there were 2% more Dems than GOP in the study
2) it was a specific person (Obama) against a political party - not a specific person - and even with the 2% more DEMS he was barely ahead...which actually means he is WAY behind.
3) 25% of the poll had a high school education or less
4) Apx. the same amount earn less than 25K
5) about the same amount said they did not vote in the last election.

So...This group was slanted toward the socialist direction of Obama...and he can barely carry them!

Can you say "one term president" ? THANK GOD!

Keep drinking the fool-ade you leftist morons. Who here did'nt expect these type of stories? nothing like the leftwing media doing damage control for the dunce and thief.

I have a bridge in nu yak to sell yous, very sheap.

Wow, the left thinks these old marxist plays still work.
Some of you should read what's on the internet, before buying these liberal rag lies.

Did you know shape-shifting lizard-people run the world? It's all over the internet.

What I'd like to see is a poll asking people who they like better, the GOP or the Taliban.

Did you know shape-shifting lizard-people run the world?

It's true. I know. I am one.

But we are ruled by the mice

But we are ruled by the mice

#30 | Posted by goatman

Whatever you do...don't panic! And don't forget your towel.

But we are ruled by the mice

#30 | Posted by goatman

No!!! We are ruled by shape-shifting lizard-people!!!

The internet says so, no matter what educated 'journalists' who work for entities with 'defamation' and 'libel' lawsuits hanging over their heads report - necessitating at least '2 source' verification. The MSM lie about everything. The internet, on the other hand, is never wrong.

Interesting the Internet is never wrong...

NY times in their death throws...how unfortunate

for all the lies they put forth: "General Betray

Us" ring a bell.

What goes around comes around...death ultimately comes...just ask Stalin and Hitler...and then their

is no escape from....??

Incredible! the NYT can really ssuuck butt...i'd bet it must hurt..."whatever gets you through the night"
come to mind.

Only the NYT's Editorial Page expresses political opinion, or have you so quickly forgotten how they shilled the Iraq War?

What is it with the right wing's animosity against journalists with, uh, journalism degrees who actually report '2 sourced' news stories? Name a successful libel suit against them over an issue that could be considered politically slanted.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable