Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, February 11, 2010

In the nineteenth century, it was a fort used by British forces. In the twentieth century, Soviet troops moved into the crumbling facilities. In December 2009, at this site in the Shinwar district of Afghanistan's Nangarhar Province, U.S. troops joined members of the Afghan National Army in preparing the way for the next round of foreign occupation. On its grounds, a new military base is expected to rise, one of hundreds of camps and outposts scattered across the country.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

iraqibukkake

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Our military spending is out of control and completely unsustainable.

Our military spending is out of control and completely unsustainable.

#1 | Posted by IraqiBukkake at 2010-02-11 03:52 PM

More of the same.

Maybe they are there to protect the opium?

You need 70,000 not 700! LOL

700 "bases"... guard-posts and checkpoints actually.... are nothing in a country like Afghanistan.

You gotta fight terror with equal or worse terror. That is the American way, and then decry it, that is the more American way, and then defend it, that is the most American way.

When I was in the Air Force a 'base' meant a place with ongoing operations, infrastructure and the assumption that troops were there to stay.

Seems the word has become a little more 'flexible.'

My wife went shopping at the Filipino grocery store in Taichung last week. She stashed her stuff in a locker at the train station, while she and a friend went off the do other things.

I guess that means we now have a 'base' in Taichung.

Our military spending is out of control and completely unsustainable.

#1 ~Iraqibukakke

Yup, the Pentagon System in firmly entrenched on both sides of the aisle.

Maybe they are there to protect the opium?

#3 ~dxlingr

During the Soviet invasion/occupation of Afghanistan the CIA protected Drug Lords in order to allow them to sell opium and buy weapons with the money.

"In most cases, the CIA's role involved various forms of complicity, tolerance or studied ignorance about the trade, not any direct culpability in the actual trafficking ... [t]he CIA did not handle heroin, but it did provide its drug-lord allies with transport, arms, and political protection. In sum, the CIA's role in the Southeast Asian heroin trade involved indirect complicity rather than direct culpability."

en.wikipedia.org

The Karzai government has strong ties with these Drug Lords and/or their descendants.

So, in a sense, you are correct.

Be Well.

"700 "bases"... guard-posts and checkpoints actually.... are nothing in a country like Afghanistan."

Ssshhhh - These guys want to have a circle joke over our imaginary occupation and exploitation of the poor Afghanis. It doesn't work if you point out the obvious fact that we don't control shit over there.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable