NYTimes version

Sarah Palin said she would consider a run for president in 2012 "if I believe that that is the right thing to do for our country and for the Palin family," according to a television interview broadcast Sunday morning.

Translation-She'll run if it means she can increase her profitability.

What an unbelievable narcissist.

Goatbrain says he's never heard of such talk, except from the left.

So, either Sarah's a lefty or the story is bullshit.

Or maybe goatbrain's just an idiot.

Will she quit in October 2012?

Or maybe goatbrain's just an idiot.

I am. I have said so many times. Maybe if you had an smidgen more brainpower you would have grasped the obvious long before now

I don't think Obama could beat Detective Stabler in an election right now

There is a precedent. In 2004 there were about six people in this country who couldn't beat George Bush, and the Democrats managed to prop up one of them. My dog would have been a better candidate than Kerry, and I'd happily put him up against Palin too.

Yer dog's fleas could put up a better candidate than the moosefart.

A Palin/Beck ticket in 2012?

One can only hope.

But the truth is, Palin is being played for a fool by her own party. Right now she's raising money and beating the drum. That makes her a useful tool . . . not a candidate that will get GOP approval in 2012.

Have you ever asked yourself why you don't see the heavy hitters in the GOP out there doing the rah-rah-rah thing for Sarah Palin.

As I've said in the past, Democrats are not Sarah Palin's biggest enemy. It's her own party that will kick her down the road when they're through with her. When it's crunch time, you can bet the GOP will send in the A-Team to take over in the 2012 primary.

#9 | Posted by Twinpac

Absolutely. There's no way the corporate types who actually run the GOP machine are going to let her have a turn at the switch. But they'll use her as long as she's useful, and she's evidently either willing to be used by them as long as it's profitable at her end of the bargain or too much of a thicko to know she's being used.

The WP's Jonathan Capehart reacting to what he heard in Nashville:

Sure, Palin brought the Tea Partiers in Nashville to their feet with belittling put-downs of President Obama....And as with any Palin speech, there was plenty of sarcasm....But after having more than a year to learn the ins and outs of national and foreign policy, to fill in the considerable gaps in knowledge that were on display on the campaign trail, you'd think Palin would do more than lean on platitudes and talking points.

"The government that governs the least governs the best,"said the best-selling author and Fox News analyst who quit being governor after just 2 and a half years on the job. "The constitution provides the best road map towards a more perfect union," she noted. And she told the gathered that she wanted Washington to "adopt a pro-market agenda" that "lowers taxes for small business," "support[s] competition and innovation" and "reward[s] hard work."

To win the war on terror, Palin said, "We need a commander in chief, not a professor of law standing at the lectern." She slammed Obama's "misguided thinking that is seen throughout the administration's foreign policy decisions." Palin didn't like that the president "spent a year reaching out to hostile regimes; writing personal letters to dangerous dictators and apologizing for America." Then she said to mounting applause, "It's time for more than just tough talk. Gah, just like you, probably just so tired of hearing the talk, talk, talk. Tired of hearing the talk."

But it was her response to a query during the question-and-answer session that I found worrisome. She was asked what would her top three priorities be if conservatives take over leadership of the House and the Senate. Getting spending under control was one. A restatement of her energy mantra was another. And then there was this:

"And then, I think, kinda tougher to, kinda tougher to put our arms around, but, allowing America's spirit to rise again by not being afraid [applause] not being afraid to kinda go back to some of our roots as a God-fearing nation [applause] where we're not afraid to say, especially in times of potential trouble in the future here, we're not afraid to say, "You know, we don't have all the answers as fallible men and women so it would be wise of us to start seeking some divine intervention again in this country," so that we can be safe and secure and prosperous again."

#11

Platitude Palin, lol.

I'd like to see her do the speech again, but wearing a shock collar like in the SB ad.

We could pass the controller around....

I would like to see her ONLY wearing the collar.

I don't care if you like her or hater her, if you don't think she is smoking hot you need to get your eyes checked.

I view a Palin speech the same way I view the COuntry music channel:

A guilty pleasure to watch...provided it is on mute.

Palins speeches are not impressive to me and country music is an embarrassment to american society.

On Chief-of-Staff Rahm Emanuel, she said his comments calling liberal groups "f-ing retards" was "indecent and insensitive" and cause for his dismissal.

But the former governor went to great and sometimes awkward lengths to insist that when conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh used the same exact term to describe the same exact group, it was simply in the role of political humorist.

"They are kooks, so I agree with Rush Limbaugh," she said, when read a quote of Limbaugh calling liberal groups "retards." "Rush Limbaugh was using satire ... . I didn't hear Rush Limbaugh calling a group of people whom he did not agree with 'f-ing retards,' and we did know that Rahm Emanuel, as has been reported, did say that. There is a big difference there."

Looks like another "We aren't scared of her, we want her to run" Liberal threads.

We aren't scared of her, and do want her to run.

That was as close to political insight as pissy wissy has ever stood.

Want her to run?
Can't wait!
Check out her numbers: they suck.
But she can still do well (and maybe even better) in primaries.
That's all we ask: Run, Sistah Sarah, run!

I think she represents the pinnacle of GNOP intellectualism.

That was as close to political insight as pissy wissy has ever stood.

#17 | Posted by oldwhiskeysour

It was sarcasm, you old fuck.

And she was smart to bring her palm-prompter with her....

Palin as the GOP candidate may be the only thing that would get me to vote for Obama.

Palin said, "We need a commander in chief, not a professor of law standing at the lectern."

What a fucking idiot.

We aren't scared of her, and do want her to run.

The Democrats should really re-consider their position. I seem to remember the Dems saying they wanted Reagan to win the nomination. Thye thought he would be easy to beat. The Dems ended up eating their words

Reagan could act.

This idiot can't even talk.

Palin 'Would Be Willing' to Take On Obama in 2012

Not past August of course, but she is in for 1/2 of it all the way!

She would make a fine GOP candidate. The GOP should nominate her.

Please oh please oh please oh please oh please.

easy fellas...if she runs then the repubs could lose so many seats that the dems couldn't blame anything on them anymore.

this blog would shut down due to lack of participation if that happened.

Please oh please oh please oh please oh please.

Posted by rcade at 2010-02-08 05:37 PM | Reply

I don't think my constitution could take a year of that sort of campaign/soap opera.

I can just see some MSNBC reporter now looking for the first dude's old comdoms in the Wasilla city dump to prove Sarah! a bad christian or some shit.

Uh... spare us....

The first republican who tells her how stupid she is making all of you look will probably win the nomination.

What do you can HAND NOTES during a political speech?

TELEPROMPTER FOR RETARDS!

Well, given her track record if she were to win in '012, (which she doesn't have any real chance of doing), the Democrats would be back in The White House in '014...

Of course we want Palin to win. Half the GOP hate her already. Plus if she won, every knows she'd only serve 1/3 of her term before quitting.

For the Record: It's called the Palin-Prompter.

As Palin tests the water for a possible run in 2012, please keep in mind the tactics of the marxists. She will be called all the usual name calling titles of the marxists, " hate merchant ", " homophobe ", " tea bagger " " obama-care obstructionist ", " warhawk ", " does'nt know anything about foreign policy ", " fails to bow down to despot leaders ", " does'nt know anything about economics ". But remember these are the talking mentally challenged heads that gave us this current cluster fuck, who's trying to destroy the U.S.A., the marxist shit from the 60s, drugged out, brain fucked, never amounted to anything, and wants a free ride. There is nothing wrong with hating marxism, they are parasites with absolutely no value to society, who bleed the hard workers dry. These leftists are enemies of the U.S. and have nothing but ill will toward anyone that is a threat to their brain fucked ideals, stay awake America, keep your eye on the ball, the left has to start slinging shit now, to try and slither back into office in November. Keep a vigilante eye on your polling areas, a.c.o.r.n. bastardized the past general election, America can not afford for these clowns to sham the upcoming elections, keep an eye on the absentee ballots, acorn will have them on viagra and like rabbits, multiply on the way to certification. Remember, you can not trust them.

And, listening to her speak; christ, could you imagine this woman in a real debate with real candidates???

Going all mavricky and relying on others not wanting to be seen as dismissive misogynists will only take a girl so far...

#35 | Posted by rightnut at 2010-02-08 06:16 PM

Exactly, just like the Republicans have been doing to Obama, before, during and after the election...

The only difference is that all of those things are true in her case...

Really, read your post and think about it...

The woman is a f'n twit, and would make us the laughing stock of the world, just like Ronnie did...

Could you imagine Palin interacting with foreign leaders? Ugh...

Meanwhile...Palin burns bridges to Texas Conservatives

Just one day after being the key note address at the first-ever Tea Party convention at the Gaylord Opryland Hotel in Nashville. Sarah Palin stumps for the Ultimate New World Order RINO Texas Governor "Slick Rick" Perry...

Perry, a Bilderberg Attendee, a supporter of the NAFTA Superhighway as well as the North American Union reportly paid Palin's political action committee "SarahPac" $100,000 for her endorsement and single campaign appearance in Houston on Sunday...

Forget about Palin taking on Obama
She may be too stupid to know it yet...but this may be the beginning of the end for the political career of Sarah Palin

Well then

Let me be the first Republican here to say WE DON'T WANT HER...She's available to the "High Bidder"

It would be a return to Bush....She is the Republican Obama

RIGHTNUT #35 seems to know pretty well what is happening on the political scene, too bad that lefties will never admit their minds have secretly been chipped, and like zombies the neurons transmitting thought partterns to the brain keeps their mind in a willing stuper that is receptive only to whatever the controlling heads are broadcasting, at any given time.

Mind control of the masses is something they will never admit can be implemented and used upon themselves they will say, no such thing...

The chips which controls their thought patterns have been finely tuned as receptors to receive O'Loudmouth's Nazi propagandized retroflex.
They are ignorant of such technology and will never realize they are nothing but ignorant pawns serving the dark side, so sad, and so sick...

The IQ scale uses the following terms for the lowest IQ's:

0-20: Idiot
21-49: Imbecile
50-69: Moron
70-89: Borderline deficiency

The 1st 3 are household words, so leave them be, but I think the 4th category should be replaced with "Palin", thereby ensuring her rightful place in American History.

Btw - The 5th level should also be renamed "Palin Supporter".

There is nothing wrong with hating marxism, they are parasites with absolutely no value to society, who bleed the hard workers dry. These leftists are enemies of the U.S....

#35 | Posted by rightnut

SURE THERE IS! You are a great example of it. You are an ignorant hater. Classic example of a NUT who lets anger blind them to the truth.

Said truth being there are many individuals who do not care for Palin, on the right, in the middle and on the left of the political spectrum.

You are guilty RIGHTNUT of committing red baiting by labeling everyone who has a beef with Palin as a Marxist.

Most of the people who oppose Moose Mama are NOT marxists or anywhere near that extreme towards the left.

Interesting though how you bandy the term hater to label people while coming across as the worst king of hater yourself.

Don't be a hater and go get yourself a MOOSE BURGER.

"Btw - The 5th level should also be renamed "Palin Supporter"."

But that's already the 3rd level.

The folks who fell for the "hope and change" lie gotta be in there somewhere. The ones who are still falling for it are below that, of course.

My left Redwing boot full of dog shit is willing to take on Obama in 2012.

"My left Redwing boot full of dog shit is willing to take on Obama in 2012."

And it'll probably edge out Palin in the primary.

And it'll probably edge out Palin in the primary.

#46 | Posted by Danforth

No doubt. You lefties should be jumping for joy that the MSM is concentrating on her and not the embarresment that is the president.

"...You know, we don't have all the answers as fallible men and women so it would be wise of us to start seeking some divine intervention again in this country," so that we can be safe and secure and prosperous again." - Sarah Palin

Does this possibly explain that combination of flags of the US and Israel that she wears?

Or does she just mean herself as the definition of "divine intervention"?

"Palin 'Willing' to Take on Obama in 2012"

Be careful what you wish for, honey.

You took on Katie Couric year before last, and look how that turned out.

#46 | Posted by Danforth at 2010-02-08 08:27 PM

FF, Dan

I finally have something in common with the Tea-Baggers.....we both want to see Sara 'The Quitter From Wasilla' Palin run for President.

Please nominate her.

Please nominate her.

Having an idiot run against him is about the hope Obama has of getting re-elected. I understand why the left wants her to run so badly

And the pathetic obsession continues....

A new thread on Palin everyday? This is one is talking about an issue 2 1/2 years away lol. I guess its hard to talk about the abject failure of the Dems to govern despite huge majorities and the presidency. Instead let's get everyone hating again and since Bush is no longer around, Palin fills the bill nicely.

Sad really.

first she has to "take on"
writing a cogent sentence
upon the palm of her hand...

I finally have something in common with the Tea-Baggers.....we both want to see Sara 'The Quitter From Wasilla' Palin run for President.

Please nominate her.

#51 | Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2010-02-08 09:27 PM

There'll be a large number of folks lining up to run against Obama, even in his own party---I have a feeling the clintons are gearing up and Hillary will give it another try.

"There'll be a large number of folks lining up to run against Obama, even in his own party---I have a feeling the clintons are gearing up and Hillary will give it another try."

Yeah, I predict Hillary will turn on Obama by August.

And frankly, I'll vote for her if she runs. Check my old posts out - I said all along she had the network and the experience to get things done, and Barry didn't.

Please nominate her.

Having an idiot run against him is about the hope Obama has of getting re-elected. I understand why the left wants her to run so badly

#52 | Posted by goatman at 2010-02-08 09:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

Um...sure.

Well, we both agree she's an idiot.

Nominate her now, so she can begin her journey!

A person who isn't a partisan hack would prefer that both parties put up decent candidates, so that we have a real choice. Seems you're only interested in which letter (D or R) wins.

#55 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-02-08 10:55 PM | Reply | Flag:

SURE!!, because NOBODY from the right wanted Hillary to win the nomination because they felt it be easy to defeat her.

Save your sanctimonious bullshit, 'ya lying jackass.

...and yes, you're right, given the current attitudes in the RNC, I only want to see a 'D' win. Call me crazy!!

Nominate her now, so she can begin her journey!

So it is like someone else said earlier: You are more interested in getting someone with a D after their name in the White House instead of both parties putting up their best candidates so that we Americans have a real choice.

How fucking selfish of you to put your party over the welfare of your country. It's not surprising, though. That's the mainstay of you partisan jackasses.

Nominate her now, so she can begin her journey!

So it is like someone else said earlier: You are more interested in getting someone with a D after their name in the White House instead of both parties putting up their best candidates so that we Americans have a real choice.

How fucking selfish of you to put your party over the welfare of your country. It's not surprising, though. That's the mainstay of you partisan jackasses.

LIVE_OR_DIE

I want both parties to put up decent people as candidates. I'm tired of snarky, self righteous idiots who have no intention of doing anything but serving a narrow agenda or representing a narrow swath of their constituents.

You are more interested in getting someone with a D after their name in the White House instead of both parties putting up their best candidates so that we Americans have a real choice.

The 2000 version of John McCain would have made a much better President than what we got, but the Republican Party looked the other way and said nothing while Bush's image consultants spread malicious rumors to defeat McCain in South Carolina and push Bush to frontrunner status.

I doubt I'd get an argument from 3 out of 10 Republicans the GOP had the best candidate they could have in 2000. Unless they slept through 2001-2009 like Rip Van Winkle.

Let me rephrase: The most qualified, intelligent, pragmatic candidate.

The Evangelicals who'd gained too much power in and over the GOP pretty much decided the GOP didn't have room for non-idealogues who talked a good talk about faith based issues.

I finally have something in common with the Tea-Baggers.....we both want to see Sara 'The Quitter From Wasilla' Palin run for President.

Please nominate her.

#51 | Posted by COMMONSENSE

I seem to remember reading that Democrats wanted Reagan to win the Repub nomination because they thought they could easily beat him. It seems that strategy did not work out too well

As William Kristol of PNAC fame once said about the failure of the Bush administration . . .

"We just needed someone smarter."

Too bad for them that they chose to package, market and sell 10 lbs. of sausage in a 5 lb. casing a/k/a George W. Bush.

If history has taught the GOP anything at all, Sarah Palin isn't going to be their candidate. Right now she's a usefull tool. She beats the drums and she keeps the adrenaline pumped . . . but she's far too unintelligent and self-absorbed to be the next "puppet" of choice for the GOP.

Right now she's declared herself as a potential candidate in 2012. Nobody in their right mind declares this far in advance, for all the obvious reasons. So I'm going to assume that the GOP is allowing her to act as little more than cannon fodder for the GOP while they continue to search for someone more polished and smarter than George Bush, but totally lacking in moral fiber.

Mitt Romney comes to mind but it's too early to tell. I just know that Sarah Palin doesn't fit the bill for what the neo-cons have in mind for a serious run against Barack Obama.

I seem to remember reading that Democrats wanted Reagan to win the Repub nomination because they thought they could easily beat him. It seems that strategy did not work out too well

#65 | Posted by Bigpun at 2010-02-09 01:11 AM | Reply | Flag:

I was 8 at the time. I'll take your word for it.

Are you comparing Palin to Reagan?

So it is like someone else said earlier: You are more interested in getting someone with a D after their name in the White House instead of both parties putting up their best candidates so that we Americans have a real choice.

How fucking selfish of you to put your party over the welfare of your country. It's not surprising, though. That's the mainstay of you partisan jackasses.

#60 | Posted by goatman at 2010-02-09 12:05 AM | Reply | Flag:

I don't think I ever tried to hide that fact that I don't want a 'R' in the WH. If you're just now figuring that out, then you haven't been paying attention.

Please, stop acting as if you're even remotely partisan. You only insult yourself with that nonsense.

I was 8 at the time. I'll take your word for it.

Are you comparing Palin to Reagan?

#67 | Posted by COMMONSENSE

No I am comparing the arrogance of Democrats then and now

Arrogance is going to war when your allies are opposed, won't help pay, won't send troops, Iraq becomes FUBAR because of arrogance (no post invasion planning), and then refusing to change course until 3000 deaths later when the opposition party wins control of Congress in the 2006 elections and you're forced to 'change course' and 'Surge' in 2007.

That's my example from the right. What's the worst Democrat arrogance example you'd like to offer, BIGPUN?

I don't think I ever tried to hide that fact that I don't want a 'R' in the WH

That wasn't my (not so subtle) point. My point is that partisan idiots like you are party over country. "Put my party in, no matter how bad the candidate or how qualified his opponent!"

The RNC may just hand Obama a second term on a gold platter...

Funny how this shit works.. the DNC did it for the last two-term retard.

In the wake of the Nashville Teabagger confab, an observer reports from Austin:

With regard to Mrs Palin. This was my first time hearing her speak in person and that was somewhat enlightening. She is definitely one of those politicians with charisma. She has it, whatever it is, and people respond accordingly. It was a dramatic contrast to seeing her on television....[S]he was much more sure-footed in front of an adoring crowd.

Consider the ramifications for the body politic. The people who like Mrs Palin see her at her best...The people who loathe Sarah Palin, of course, aren't watching her stump at conservative rallies. So not only do they continue to think she's a loon, they can't understand why a third of the country thinks she's a reasonable person. This is how polarisation happens.

For the time being, the bifurcated public personality is working for Mrs Palin....

Palin plans to cheer lead the Rapture into town.
She will be known as President Armageddon. The
ultimate self fulfilling prophecy. Who would have
predicted that the anti-Christ would show up in a skirt and heels? How stealth!

Will she quit in October 2012?

#4 | Posted by JimmyWallback

Why aren't you paying attention to your own party!??!

This is just stupid!

There are now 2 DemocraT governors that are going to quit before they are run out of office.

When are you going to realize that most of YOUR party is much much worse for America than Palin

I don't like her, but I can't just sit back and watch you being stupid without saying anything.

SURE!!, because NOBODY from the right wanted Hillary to win the nomination because they felt it be easy to defeat her.

Save your sanctimonious bullshit, 'ya lying jackass.

#59 | Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2010-02-09 12:02 AM

...and yes, you're right, given the current attitudes in the RNC, I only want to see a 'D' win. Call me crazy!!
#59 | Posted by COMMONSENSE at 2010-02-09 12:02 AM

Palin plans to cheer lead the Rapture into town.
She will be known as President Armageddon. The
ultimate self fulfilling prophecy. Who would have
predicted that the anti-Christ would show up in a skirt and heels? How stealth!

#74 | Posted by tiger150

Do you say stupid shit like this so that you can take the attention off of your party fucking up? Or, do you say stupid shit like this to help yourself ignore the fact that Obama is there to take us down to the level of a 3rd world country?

Which is it?

You hiding it or you ignoring it?

I want both parties to put up decent people as candidates.
#62 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2010-02-09 12:07 AM

I'm tired of snarky, self righteous idiots who have no intention of doing anything but serving a narrow agenda or representing a narrow swath of their constituents.
#62 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2010-02-09 12:07 AM

I'm merely throwing your beloved governor's own beliefs back at you. These beliefs will shape
her policies as the next President. I have conceded that her election is a forgone conclusion.
Be careful what you ask for. The devil you know...

I'm merely throwing your beloved governor's own beliefs back at you.

#79 | Posted by tiger150 at 2010-02-09 10:09 AM

I'm merely throwing your beloved governor's own beliefs back at you. These beliefs will shape
her policies as the next President. I have conceded that her election is a forgone conclusion.
Be careful what you ask for. The devil you know...

#79 | Posted by tiger150

This is the biggest load of bullshit!

You want to examine your savior's beliefs and if they are good for America?

Do you really want to go there? It seems that Stalin has already done that and see how many people died!

People living in glass houses should not throw stones.

It seems that Stalin has already done that and see how many people died!

Wow, Slow Eddie really likes to bring the crazy.

No wonder he's such a fan of Scary.

On Topic?

Scary is willing to take on Obama in 2012?

LOL.

Bring it on.

Be Well.

"It seems that Stalin has already done that and see how many people died!"

Psssssst...Eddie just jumped the shark (again).

And if you give me weed, whites and wine
And you show me a sign
And I'll be willin' to be movin'

And I've been kicked by the wind, robbed by the sleet
Had my head stove in but I'm still on my feet
And I'm still willin'

Wow, Slow Eddie really likes to bring the crazy.

No wonder he's such a fan of Scary.

#82 | Posted by dethspud

I'm a fan of Palin and admire her for wanting to save America as it is and not let it die. her ability to attract like-minded Conservatives and to get them to start agreeing on the right things and become a force for change is a good thing.

I don't think she will win a run for the Presidency in 2012. She really screwed up too much in 2008. Could she run the country? Yes, but there are better candidates.

But YOU ARE a fan of Obama and think he's running the country well.

Do you realize how fucking scary that is?

NEWS FLASH!!!! Obama IS POTUS!!!

What's even more amazing is that Joe Biden is VPOTUS!!!

Have you lost your mind?

"It seems that Stalin has already done that and see how many people died!"

Psssssst...Eddie just jumped the shark (again).

#83 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc, LOL!! You do this everyday!

I was responding to Tiger's "jumping of the shark"! post.

It's there and you don't see it.

Doc, why do you walk into a room and hand your ass over to be kicked? You do this every day!!!

Sorry... but she is just as inexperienced and ignorant a Obmama is.

For the eternally slow... ignorant does not equal dumb.

Granted... I think she would surround herself with the right people to assist her and would have done a much better job than Obama... I still say we need someone who's actually ran a business for more than a year or two. We need someone who undertands the importance of a strong Military... specifically, somone who has served in some capacity.

Bottom line... she should have remained in the Governor's seat for a full term. Then I would vote for her. She's not ready yet.

Does that mean she's only half baked?

Bottom line... she should have remained in the Governor's seat for a full term. Then I would vote for her. She's not ready yet.

#87 | Posted by Dont_TreadonMe

Even if she runs, she won't get past the Primaries.

Her job is to stir up the Republican Party and start giving ownership of the party back to the "Constitutional" Republicans. The neocons are running the Party now.

They are doing this with Palin as the "leader" so that they don't leave the party and form several smaller parties.

why do you walk into a room and hand your ass over to be kicked?
#86 | Posted by Eddie

Oh, I see! a knock-knock joke! Okay, I'll play.

*Ahem* - I don't know, Eddie. Why do you walk into a room and hand your ass over to be kicked?

why do you walk into a room and hand your ass over to be kicked?
#86 | Posted by Eddie

Oh, I see! a knock-knock joke! Okay, I'll play.
*Ahem* - I don't know, Eddie. Why do you walk into a room and hand your ass over to be kicked?
#90 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Because I can't help it! Bwahahahahahahaha! Get it? Because I can't help it! Hahahahahahaha! Oh, please, someone call a doctor, my sides are splitting!!!!!!!
~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

Doc,

river in Egypt

Doc, river in Egypt
#92 | Posted by Eddie

Nile! Do I get a prize?
Wow, I really like this game.
Okay, my turn:

Largest volcano on Mars, starting...now!

Here's a clue, Eddie: It is not -- repeat not -- the Venus Mons.

no one stops a thread cold like Doc...

Doc, you're an idiot. You should just pretend you didn't read the thread. But you respond "And remove all doubt", so to speak.

This game IS fun, but in this game of battling wits, I prefer armed opponents.

Largest volcano on Mars, starting...now!

Another easy one: Olympus Mons. It's probably the largest in the Solar System as well.

Sorry, Eddie. Wrong answer. It's Olympus Mons.

#96 | Posted by goatman

Doc was deflecting and you took the bait :)

Least dense planet? (Specific gravity < 0, IOW, it would float in water)

Least dense planet? (Specific gravity < 0, IOW, it would float in water) #99 | Posted by goatman

Can't be the one where Eddie hangs out; things seem awfully dense there. So....Saturn.

Palin is like Cryptonite to the Left. She is gathering support very quickly among "independents" and will then direct them to vote for a Republican.

2012 is not important right now. It's Nov of this year that they are working on. It's going to be a bloodbath.

Next question: How many rocks out from the Sun does Eddie live?

Palin is like Cryptonite to the Left.
#102 | Posted by Eddie

And like Crypt-O-Nite to the Riiiight

Doc,

LOL. You lose in such a clownish way, but it's painful to watch.

Next question: How many rocks out from the Sun does Eddie live?

#103 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

The same number of feet in diameter of Doc's head.

What a clown!

Doc,

you really shouldn't act like an idiot when someone comes in and proves that your obession is REALLY an obsession.

See a doctor.

Perhaps it they changed it to the "Dumber Than Dirt Party", she'd have a shot.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2010-02-07 03:49 PM | Reply

That trade mark is already being used by the party with a fucking donkey as its symbol!

Next question: How many rocks out from the Sun does Eddie live?
#103 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

The same number of feet in diameter of Doc's head.
#106 | Posted by Eddie

So sort of Mercury-ish?
What a bozo, Eddie.
No wonder you get hot every time you think of Sistah Sarah.

She [Sistah Sarah, she what makes Eddie's loins as damp as a worn-out Handi Wipe at a Turkish hamam in August] is gathering support very quickly among "independents" and will then direct them to vote for a Republican.
#102 | Posted by Eddie

In your Kook-Aid fueled fantasies, does Sistah Sarah need a magic wand or does she just warble a magic spell?

Doc was deflecting and you took the bait :)

He used the right bait. I love astronomy trivia

#99 I can't believe I said "0" instead of "1". It was the last post before a greatly anticipated steak lunch, and I was starving. Yea, that's my excuse.

Yea, that's my excuse.
#112 | Posted by goatman

At least you have a legitimate excuse. Eddie, as per usual, finds himself in the embarrassing position of remaining silent, making up something ridiculous, or admitting ignorance and/or stupidity.

Doc was deflecting and you took the bait :)

He used the right bait. I love astronomy trivia

Posted by goatman at 2010-02-09 12:10 PM | Reply

Doc is a master baiter?

In your Kook-Aid fueled fantasies, does Sistah Sarah need a magic wand or does she just warble a magic spell?

#110 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

What are you talking about? What I said is real! It's a reality! It's happening!!

You want to play it down because you've taken stock in this mishap in Nov '08.

The people voted against GW Bush and the only way they thgouht they could do it was to vote Democrat.

Now, voters are far more educated and will vote that way in the coming elections.

This is what happened after Nixon/Carter and history is repeating itself with Bush/Obama.

I don't think my constitution could take a year of that sort of campaign/soap opera.

My checkbook could. I'd finally be able to afford that penis enlargement I've had on layaway.

At least you have a legitimate excuse. Eddie, as per usual, finds himself in the embarrassing position of remaining silent, making up something ridiculous, or admitting ignorance and/or stupidity.

#113 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

LOL!!!

Really? Like today?

Palin is not gathering a groundswell of independent Conservative voters that will be easily directed come November?

Yes, this is ridiculous!

The question is, how many of these "Constitutional" Conservatives voted for McCain in the last election. My guess is, not enough. Who did they vote for?

I don't think my constitution could take a year of that sort of campaign/soap opera.

My checkbook could. I'd finally be able to afford that penis enlargement I've had on layaway.

#116 | Posted by rcade

WTF! RCade got a funny flag!

LOL!

At least you have a legitimate excuse. Eddie, as per usual, finds himself in the embarrassing position of remaining silent, making up something ridiculous, or admitting ignorance and/or stupidity.
#113 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Really? Like today?
#117 | Posted by Eddie

Like every day, Eddie.

Like every day, Eddie.

#119 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc,

you're ignoring the facts.

Sorry, but you lost back when you deflected.

Yea, that's my excuse.
#112 | Posted by goatman

At least you have a legitimate excuse. Eddie, as per usual, finds himself in the embarrassing position of remaining silent, making up something ridiculous, or admitting ignorance and/or stupidity.

#113 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

You mean like your embarrassing and ridiculous obesession with Palin?

... That you seem to commit every day?

LOL!!!!!

Then when the facts are placed in front of you, you start joking around like a clown.

Is this the example you're looking for?

You mean like your embarrassing and ridiculous obesession with Palin?
...
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
#121 | Posted by Eddie

I'm a fan of Palin and admire her for wanting to save America as it is and not let it die.
#85 | Posted by Eddie

Palin is not gathering a groundswell of independent Conservative voters that will be easily directed come November?
#117 | Posted by Eddie

She [Sistah Sarah, she what makes Eddie's loins as damp as a worn-out Handi Wipe at a Turkish hamam in August] is gathering support very quickly among "independents" and will then direct them to vote for a Republican.
#102 | Posted by Eddie

Eddie, we all know you're a sad little tool in the GOPiggie bag of tricks. You really don't have to blare it out on a trumpet. Stick to your instrument of choice: the kazoo.

LOL!

Eddie, we all know you're a sad little tool in the GOPiggie bag of tricks. You really don't have to blare it out on a trumpet. Stick to your instrument of choice: the kazoo.

LOL!

#122 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Nice consession....

It was nice kicking your ass again today.

You're beginning to bore me, Doc.

Your flailing is funny, but beating up drunks is not fun forever.

Another big whoops moment for Palin in attempting to quote Buchanan.

Definitely a way for Barry O to get re-elected, ya betcha.

One day I hope I might actually get to vote FOR a candidate instead of choosing the lesser of two weasels.

You're beginning to bore me, Doc.
#124 | Posted by Eddie

Awwwwwwww, Eddie. That's what you say every time you get your ass handed to you on a platter.

Seriously, though, have you ever thought of upping the ante just a bit by not putting your ass on that platter all by your lonesome?

its so typically dem to call the people they fear most "entertainers" and "dumber than dirt". and yet the fear and hate mongering rages on.
palin stands a damn good chance. of course, hillary will be taking him down from the inside. she also stands a damn good chance.
maybe when "the one" is done playing president, he can finally, at 50+, get his first real job and the experience that comes with it.
look left, look right, look left, look right. stick that nose up in the air. great job!

"I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country," Palin said,..."

Same reason she used when she quit the governorship in Alaska.

She won't be the on the ticket in 12'. So all you libs can stop masturbating about it.

"So all you libs can stop masturbating about it."

BPH:

All we libs have done is form a circle. Your side's the one with the jerk.

No I am comparing the arrogance of Democrats then and now

#69 | Posted by Bigpun at 2010-02-09 03:21 AM | Reply | Flag:

BTW, many a repub wanted a 'darkie' to get the nomination thinking he would never be president/////TA-DA!!!!

Please let the vapid twat run..PUHLEAZE

And I will be "willing" to let her. There's a lack of good comedy TV these days.

More misleading crap from you lousy progressive dipshits! She said she wouldn't rule out running. Never mentioned Berry in this. You are assuming that comrade Obama can fool the Dems again that he is not a marxist. Me thinks he will not be the nominee. NO WORDS WERE SAID ABOUT WHOM SHE WOULD RUN AGAINST!

THE PROPAGANDISTS OF THE MARXISTS ARE LIKE RUST; THEY NEVER SLEEP!

Simply Mind Boggling Choices!

WOW! No wonder America is so Strong & Free with such a vastness of Choices for Govt Leadership...in this case either Obama or Palin....plus theres the added certainty & satisfaction knowing that either one or the other will have to win!

I think she should run.

She exemplifies GOP and neo-conservative values such as more war, more tax cuts for the rich, more for Israel, more spending, more outsourcing, more free trade, more money stolen from Social Security surplus to support the CEO class in a manner that it has become accustomed, AND less for most Americans.

first she has to "take on"
writing a cogent sentence
upon the palm of her hand...

Posted by earthmuse at 2010-02-08 10:03 PM | Reply

Oh, the irony is truly to die for!