Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, February 05, 2010

While speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama mispronounced the word "Corpsman" as "corpse-man."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rightisright

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Uh, hey Barack, if you don't know, you should ask somebody . . .

Well? Where are they? All my little friends who beat "nucular" to death for eight years...where are you folks? Our Commander-In-Chief says, "Corpse-man" and you say NOTHING? Do you suppose he calls the Corps so loved by MacArthur at West Point the "corpse?" Is it the U.S. Marine "Corpse?" Harvard, huh? No double standard with our little leftist-socialist Obamabots, no siree...

"No double standard with our little leftist-socialist Obamabots, no siree..."

All this from a guy who never took Bush to task for newk-u-lar.

Ha, funny!

I wonder which of the 57 States he was speaking from?

Dan Quayle spelled potato "potatoe"...

And don't get me started GWB bloopers.

"All this from a guy who never took Bush to task for newk-u-lar."

Too petty, Danny. I never took JFK to task for "Cuber" either. I don't have anything to say about "corpseman" except to point out the blatant double standard practiced by you and your little friends.

First it was retards and now corpses? Is nothing sacred to this man? Obama should apologize to all the corpses he has offended.

How many times did Chimpy mangle Abu Ghraib here?
The impressive part is how he fucked it up so many different ways. Never, ever
misunderestimate Chimpy's ability to torture the spoken word.

www.youtube.com

Obama is lost without a teleprompter.
He's just another talking head.
He only fools the morons.
Most of them blog on DR.

Ya JEFFN, that 90 minute exchange with the GOP caucus where he quoted facts and figures - even from GOP members present who'd given him their proposals weeks before - without a teleprompter was telling ...

Dan Quayle spelled potato "potatoe"...

#6 | Posted by moder8 at 2010-02-05 06:11 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sorry, M-H8, but as dear as this is to your heart, it ain't accurate.

Quayle spelled potato correctly, but a judge had it spelled wrong on her card. To be polite, Quayle went along with her

Corpse-man. I don't care who the last 43 Presidents were, or who the 44th is, pronouncing this incorrectly shows a disconnect between the CiC and the people he is in charge of.

Hell, I was in the USMC and I mistakenly said it that way a couple of times. English is a weird language that is not pronounced the way it is spelled in too many cases, especially when the word comes from the French. Can you say faux pas?

Quayle spelled potato correctly, but a judge had it spelled wrong on her card. To be polite, Quayle went along with her

#12 | Posted by vernon at 2010-02-05 06:49 PM | Reply | Flag: Should stick to judging she-male beauty contests.

www.youtube.com

Ha, funny!

#4 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-02-05 06:02 PM

It doesn't take much, does it Grapefruit?

Obama is lost without a teleprompter.
He's just another talking head.
He only fools the morons.
Most of them blog on DR.

#10 | Posted by JeffnDenmark at 2010-02-05 06:28 PM

How's douchemark, pussy?

What a master of the English language, a great orator, if you will . Sometimes it is just better to understand what you saying.

All of you who pulled out the "but Bush" deflection are pathetic!!!! Really, Obama blows it in the pronunciation of one branches of the military he "commands" and that is the best you can come up w/? I never thought Bush was an idiot b/c he was not a great speaker but, you guys were calling the "o" the greatest orator of our time on the campaign. Then everytime he fucks up a word it's "but Bush" all the time.

Don't go nukuler on us

this is kind of funny. the transposistion of corpse man with awhat a corps man does.

and clearly this is Obama's pronunciation as he said it twice

well you better tell Au b/c mush pronounced nukular about a 1,000 times

mush? did i just type that! Bush said nukular.

"While speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama mispronounced the word "Corpsman" as "corpse-man."

Posted by rightisright at 05:44 PM"

WOW.

This is big.

The office of the Presidency has been completely shamed. Only question remaining: is this an impeachable offense?

Too bad drawing & quartering has been outlawed *sigh*

"I don't have anything to say about "corpseman" except to point out the blatant double standard practiced by you and your little friends. "

Old man, the double standard is yours.

You never made an issue of Bush's mis-statements, yet now you're all worried about pronunciation?

All I have to say is "Obama screwed up", and I'm being consistent, while showing up your hypocrisy.

Obama screwed up.

Come on, guys, this is funny.
It's not hard news, it's a side of fries.
Enjoy the fries.

He said the word wrong. Probably won't again.
Then again, maybe he will.

Bush pronounced "nuclear" wrong.
Whatever. So did Carter.

But golly, we do get all worked up when there's chum in the water.

Bush pronounced "nuclear" wrong.

Bush pronounces "nuclear" like I and almost everyone else I know does.

Its a regional aberration in pronunciation.

Pointing it out says far more about the critic than it does the speaker.

There's no such excuse for "Corpsman" spoken as "corpse-man".

The little fucking punk didn't know the word.

But that's not even the point.

Bush pronounces "nuclear" like I and almost everyone else I know does.

Bush didn't turn on the phony Texas accent until he got into politics. Neither of his brothers have it, not a hint. Just like W before entering politics, when he suddenly morphed from a cheerleader from Andover with a Yale accent into a swaggering cowboy.

One reading faux pax from Obama and Jak pops out of his box. Nucular" said a thousand times is acceptable for a President to continue? To borrow from you, "The little fucking punk didn't know the word". Made up quite a few other words the world snickered at too. There's a whole book of 'em. There's your joke of a President.

"Nucular" said a thousand times is acceptable

Yes its acceptable.

Because its a regional aberration in pronunciation.

Bush kept deliberately pronouncing it the way he did long after fucking liberal pussies like yourself jumped up and down and pissed yourselves with glee at yet another example of his "ignorance".

In the meantime, Chocolate Carter will never mispronounce "corpsman" again.

One reading faux pax

Its not a "reading faux pax".

He didn't know the fucking word.

Get over it.

Because its a regional aberration in pronunciation...

...that makes you sound like a backwater dumbfuck.

I don't give a fuck what it makes me sound like.

I knew how to pronounce the word "corpsman" by the 3rd grade.

But not nuclear? Go figure. Reading a speech I can understand a faux pax. Being President 8 years and still not being able to pronounce 'nuclear' after a 1000 times is something else. Most adults pronounce it correctly.

Bush kept deliberately pronouncing it the way he did long after fucking liberal pussies like yourself jumped up and down and pissed yourselves with glee at yet another example of his "ignorance".

There's a whole book of his ignorance called "Bushisms". He WANTS to be considered ignorant. Don't ruin it for him, Mao.

I don't give a fuck what it makes me sound like.

That is certainly your perogative, but it does not change the fact that a failure to speak the english language in an intelligent manner will rightfully be interpreted as a lack of intelligence.

Live by the teleprompter, die by the teleprompter

Live by the teleprompter, die by the teleprompter.

Teleprompter jokes are a sure sign of partisan hackery and a clear indicator that the originator lacks any substantive argument.

Its not a "reading faux pax".

He didn't know the fucking word.

Get over it.

It's "faux pas" Moron.

Get over it.

Be Well.

Teleprompter jokes are a sure sign...

Making absolute prounouncements are a sure sign of being too full of one's self. LOL

If you can't laugh at your own, you need to grow some thicker skin or get out of the game

Teleprompter jokes...

It's "faux pas" Moron.

Gotta love deth's double standards. Sometimes it's a joke to be laughed at, sometimes not. Sometimes it's a faux pas, sometimes not. How do you tell? By looking at the D or R after the name.

How can you stand to be so transparent, deth? Is hypocrisy more acceptable in Canadian circles than American ones? Or do you just enjoy laying your personality flaws out in the open for all to see?

double standards

You mean like Jak-off feigning concern cos Obama mispronounced "corpsman" after being a knee pad wearing cheerleader fer a guy who couldn't pronounce "nuclear" fer 8 years?

And then farking up himself?

Those kind of "double standards"?

Kinda like you jumping up and down and calling Spud a blind partisan hack and then only dissing lefties, in fact.

But of course yer too dense to see that or too stubborn and intellectually dishonest to admit it.

Teleprompter jokes about Obama, in light of the fact that every president since Reagan has used them, just make you look more pathetic than usual, btw.

No small feat.

^_^

Be Well.

Those kind of "double standards"?

There are all kinds of them. Though you vainly attempt to steer the spotlight away from your own, you are still very bad about them.

Even as you call me a troll, and "feed" me, you tell AU to stop feeding them. "Do as I say, not as I do", right, deth? I'll ask again: Does hypocrisy play out better in Canadian circles than American ones, or do you just like advertising your personality flaws?

Time for your next deflection. LOL

...and then only dissing lefties, in fact.

Those who don't selectively read my posts know this isn't true. I don't know if your masters filter my content here, or your avoidance of certain posts of mine is one of the biggest statisitical anamolies to every occur

Besides, lack of evidence is not proof of ono-existence. Any 101 logics prof will tell you that. Learn this.

ono-existence=
non-existence

GOAT, the day I see you railing on righties like you do lefties pigs on golden wings will fill the sky. LOL

Enough rancor for me tonight. Later y'all.

rlv.zcache.com

... every president since Reagan has used them, just make you look more pathetic than usual, btw.

I've noted that many times myself. I've even said many times that Obama's use of the teleprompters isn't an issue.

You really need to get permission from your masters to read more of my posts, not just the ones they allow you to.

GOAT, the day I see you railing on righties like you do lefties pigs on golden wings will fill the sky

I presume you and death don't consider timbci a rightie then? I rail heavily against him.

If he's not a righty, what is he -- other than an idiot, of course?

deth, feel free to jump in if your leftie masters allow you to admit that you were wrong in your #40 when you said: ...and then only dissing lefties, in fact.

TIMBCI is just plain crazy. That isn't a right/left issue...

TIMBCI is just plain crazy. That isn't a right/left issue..

Well, I guess when you and deth get to say who is rightwing and who is not, you will always be correct when you say that I don't diss the right.

But honestly, I don't see how you can say that timbci is not right wing.

Leftie masters?

One gets the impression THIS LIGHT and a siren will go off in the captain's cabin and you'd get thrown overboard if you ever said 'rightie masters' or called out the right wing nuts on their nonstop right wing noise machine parroting! LOL

...you'd get thrown overboard...

Actually many here have threatened to do just that (jokingly, of course) because they think I am so far left wing. LOL It's all a matter of perspective, isn't it?

Posting facts about actual known history is hardly being beholden to 'leftie masters'. It's just history of debt, deficits, unfunded trillion dollar programs, ill fought wars. History. Widely reported, widely known as fact by the 25% of Americans who arent' completely brainwashed by right wing noise.

On the other hand, the right wing here say the most wishful thinking ridiculous things imaginable. The incessant right wing parroting of the meme of the day or week on here is deafening. You know them: birthers, unfit for office, gonna destroy the country, secret Muslim terrorist, etc. - all preposition and wishful illusion with narry a fact. Ad nauseum.

That said, I can't imagine how only one side (the left) could be labeled as beholden to 'masters'. The right wing here forgot everything from January 20th backwards and yell the sky is falling with any number of ridiculous statements. Remind them and it's "you're living in the past!" - forgetting that when W was President all we heard about were Carter and Clinton. They don't have good memories at all. Blaming Bush for our current troubles is legit.

800,000 jobs were lost when W left. The past 3 have seen 11,000, 20,000. and 20,000. New filings are WAY down. We're making our way out of this mess. So, how is Obama destroying the country, especially addressing the deficits by calling for a commission, taking steps to trim it down, freezing salaries, etc.?

Koresh followers are a rung below the secessionist 'real America' Palin family - who ACTUALLY went to secessionist meetings for 4 years, but claim to never have heard the primary reason for the Alaskan Independence Party's stated reason for being.

Go figure .....

Actually many here have threatened to do just that (jokingly, of course) because they think I am so far left wing. LOL It's all a matter of perspective, isn't it?

If your health depends on it, guess you gotta do what you gotta do... Maybe you know they're not joking? LOL

Widely reported, widely known as fact EXCEPT by the 25% of Americans who aren't completely brainwashed by right wing noise.

800,000 jobs were lost "THE MONTH" W left office. A $1.3 Trillion deficit too. Trillions in unfunded liabilities that will leave deficits for years to come. Obama didn't create them.

I'm no knee jerk left wing lackie. I read a lot - always have I have a very good memory. I'm into facts when it comes to debate, not right wing noise bullshit talking points presented as 'fact'.

How can you trust a right wing who can't remember little more than a year ago? Who blame Obama for every ill in our nation? A right wing noise machine who make up their own 'facts' as they go? Who are so well represented here?

They don't deserve respect. They deserve to get beaten over the head with real facts and figures. The GOP need some pragmatic patriots among them. But, the GOP has a "NO MODERATES WANTED HERE" sign hanging for all to see. The Chuck Hagel's, Danforths, they're all gone. What we get in their place are lunatics who forget their peers brought this country to it's knees, yet scream someone else did it.

Maybe you know they're not joking? LOL

They are. I don't think I've ever worked with a finer group of people. They are for the most part a pretty intelligent group, the are compassionate, they all look out for one another. Outside of the Navy, I've never worked with people who I would actually call "family" until I went offshore.

Well, that's great. As you know, I've been on the road a lot in my life and those folks were my friends. We had each other's backs too. Hitting the road in a Prevost bus isn't much different than being on a rig. Ya, you're on the ground, but day to day life is in that bus with those people. So, I get it.

The incessant right wing parroting of the meme of the day or week on here is deafening.

It comes from both sides, au. How many times did we have to hear "McCain crashed 5 jets" when it was proven many times he didn't? Or all the things that Palin "said" that keep getting repeated even though proven not true.

I agree with you 100%. But I wouldn't limit it to the right.

McCain DID crash jets 5 times. That's a 'fact'. Palin calling only parts of America 'the REAL America' disparages us all.

BTW, I wasn't talking about your buddies on the rig. I was talking in general terms about the right wing here and in America who spout hateful, untrue things at other Americans. Obama is not a Muslim terrorist, he's not 'destroying the country'. In fact, we're better off now than a year ago. I think you know that.

Again, it's cool you work with people you like. Being a compassionate person who'll get my back and help others is my only measure of friendship.

Believe it or not, I have right wing friends who have FauxNews on 24/7. I inform them from time to time and correct false ideas they've 'heard' on Fox. They're big enough people to admit when they haven't heard all the facts on something.

Right now, the founder of WorldNetDaily (right wing online 'news' site) is speaking at the Tea Party convention on C-SPAN, going into a 'false messiah' piece of bullshit about Obama based on the Bible. I rest my case ... "Why doesn't he prove he's a U.S. Citizen?". Christ Almighty!! See what I mean?

Uh, oh. Now he's segueing into an "Obama's the anti-Christ" rant.

THIS is what right wing lunatics repeat ad nauseum. Not facts. Utter bullshit.

It comes from both sides, au. How many times did we have to hear "McCain crashed 5 jets" when it was proven many times he didn't?

FactCheck.org says 4 planes. Not calling him 'the anti-Christ' like this loon on TV is at the Tea Party convention. Where the 5th one came from who can say? Doesn't make his airmanship look good either way. That was the point.

"McCain did lose two Navy aircraft while piloting them. One crash was found to be be McCain's fault, the other due to an engine failure of undetermined cause.. A third was destroyed on the deck of the carrier USS Forrestal when a missile fired accidentally from another plane hit either the plane next to McCain's or, less likely, his own aircraft, triggering a disastrous fire that killed 134 sailors and nearly killed McCain. A fourth plane was lost when he was shot down over North Vietnam on a bombing mission over Hanoi."

McCain's mishaps in the cockpit
Three early crashes drew Navy scrutiny.

"The crash was one of three early in McCain's aviation career in which his flying skills and judgment were faulted or questioned by Navy officials."

articles.latimes.com

I've no desire to rehash the McCain thing, but the Navy cleared him of any wrongdoing in all of the jet incidents he was involved with. If the Navy is satisfied, I am. No blogger's opinion trumps the Navy's inquest. Case closed.

I was talking in general terms about the right wing here and in America who spout hateful, untrue things at other Americans.

But the hatred from the left doesn't trouble you as much? Personally, I don't like seeing it from either side.

No blogger's opinion trumps the Navy's inquest. Case closed.

McCain was the son of Navy Royalty and may well have gotten preferential treatment in those reports.

The military are not above whitewashing.

Case re-opened.

Be Well.

McCain was the son of Navy Royalty and may well have gotten preferential treatment in those reports.

With every story you can find a "but, but, but, this changes everything" anecdote. If your life is so shallow you must seek them out, go for it deth. Who am I to rob you of your simple minded pleasures?

Case re-opened.

Because you said so? You'd better let the Navy know. LOL

You really do need to get over yourself. You ain't near as relevant as you think you are.

But the hatred from the left doesn't trouble you as much?

What hatred? Calling out right wing noise as bullshit and countering it with facts?

Personally, I don't like seeing it from either side.

A 'fair and balanced' commentary about that would be a welcome change. Personally, I get frustrated by right wingers here who insist over and over something is X when facts say they're Y, but start up all over again. Wisgod and others are in constant personal attack mode here and say what couldn't be called anything but 'hateful' post after post. *crickets*

What hatred? Calling out right wing noise as bullshit and countering it with facts?

I didn't say that was hateful.

Are you saying that you have never seen any hate filled posts from anyone on the left? Honestly?

Personally, I get frustrated by right wingers here who insist over and over something is X when facts say they're Y, but start up all over again.

I don't really let it bother me when either the right or left does it. That's what partisan idiots do and it is to be expected.

Are you saying that you have never seen any hate filled posts from anyone on the left? Honestly?

No, I'm saying I've rarely, if ever, seen you call out on those from the right like you do those from the left. I don't consider someone from the left calling someone a 'dumbfuck' in disgust when a rightie argues for days something is X when it has been pointed out many times Y is actually fact being 'hateful'.

There are a couple lefties who are just bat shit crazy. But, by and large, most of the hateful personally aimed stuff comes from avowed righties. You know who they are ....

But, by and large, most of the hateful personally aimed stuff comes from avowed righties.

That's very subjective, so I won't argue the point, but personally I see no one more hateful than celery. He NEVER posts anything but hate. Likewise I don't see any lefties calling him out as you claim I don't call the right out.

It's as I keep saying over and over -- both sides are the same. Just a different letter. I accept that. Many don't. They think their side is spotless and pure and the other is pure evil. They are all the same in every emotional aspect, and most other aspects as well.

The Dems have a few bad apples but the right are rotten to the core. The world would be better off if rightwingers ceased to exist.

Celery is one of the bat shit crazy ones. Not much point in addressing them or debating a rant. I toyed with TIMBCI, but he engaged me a few nights ago about H-1B workers. Took awhile to figure out he's just plain nuts with the Koresh statements, etc. I haven't been around here for months 'til now.

You know who the most abusive posters are on this site. They aren't crazy. Just assholes who love being assholes most every chance they get. Some people think they're funny? How many times can you kick a kitten or call someone a dumbfuck and still get a laugh? Doesn't say much about their fans ....

I was a Navy Corpsman with the 6th Marines. We always said "corpse-man." An inside joke.

Quayle spelled potato correctly, but a judge had it spelled wrong on her card. To be polite, Quayle went along with her

#12 | Posted by vernon at 2010-02-05 06:49 PM

Oh thank god Vern was able to clear that up for us. It's been bothering me for decades.

Why are a bunch of Obamapussies deflecting to Bush? Are they actually this defensive over a harmless misspoken word?

#16 | Posted by jerrytarkanian at 2010-02-05 07:07 PM | Reply | Flag: Still Butthurt

Why are a bunch of Obamapussies deflecting to Bush?

When you got nothin' else. . . .

Still Butthurt

#76 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-02-06 09:32 AM |

Sorry.

I'll try and be a little gentler next time.

And don't get me started GWB bloopers.

#6 | Posted by moder8 at 2010-02

why not?
its all some of you can come up with..LOL

and so was this just a OOPS mistake..
well he said it THREE TIMES........so what doest that mean?

the point of course is not about bush per se but about a double standard that simply cant be denied.

DOEST...
when did I start talking like the amish?????

"the point of course is not about bush per se but about a double standard that simply cant be denied."

You're right. All the Rs who never made a peep about Bush butchering the language left and right are now up in arms about Obama.

They also hate teleprompters. Well, not these teleprompters:
www.blogcdn.com
static.open.salon.com
2.bp.blogspot.com
img148.imageshack.us
upload.wikimedia.org
www.pensitoreview.com

im not up in arms over anything like this..this is just more examples of obama cultist nonsense

MMMM MMMMM MMMMM

IM just glad I NEVER made a error like this.....

"Nuclear" is hard on folks with a drawl. My college roommate was never got a 'B' in his life, and he never could get it right either. President Carter struggled with the word, and he was stationed on a nuclear submarine. I'll assume he knew what the word meant anyhow.

But if you don't know how to pronounce the word "corpsman", then you've never heard the word. Ever. But whatever. Joe Biden tells crippled guys to stand up and take a bow, our Commander in Chief has never seen a navy enlisted man, and all I hear is that Bush couldn't talk right either. Not exactly a high hurdle, is it, for our resident Harvard-Law-Review oratorical genius.

"Not exactly a high hurdle, is it, for our resident Harvard-Law-Review oratorical genius."

No, it's not. The difference though, is --unlike Bush -- next time he says the word he'll pronounce it correctly.

Good for him.

He wasn't lying - there have been more corpses in these wars lately, however, some were women.

No, it's not. The difference though, is --unlike Bush -- next time he says the word he'll pronounce it correctly.

Posted by Danforth at 2010-02-06 12:55 PM | Reply

But, where's the funification in that?

He'll know how to pronounce it, but still be clueless as to what a Corpsman is. Form over function, just like everything else he does. Like criticizing Bush's deficit spending, then taking Bush's deficits, doubling them, and pushing them out for 15 years. Then you give a big speech, blaming everything on everyone else but yourself, while the pundits praise you for "courage".

Only in Washington. And only if you're a Democrat. A black one.

"He'll know how to pronounce it, but still be clueless as to what a Corpsman is."

So now you've decided resorting to a lie is the best tack? Telling.

"then taking Bush's deficits, doubling them"

Bush left a $1.3 trillion deficit. You've got a real problem with math if you're incapable of multiplying by two.

Bush's average deficits were $400 billion. Obama forecasts deficits of over a trillion dollars for the each of the next 15 years. And that assumes faster-than-ever-in-recorded-
history economic growth, starting now.

I wonder: at which point will even liberals concede that the deficits are Obama's. Will it ever happen? Prolly not. He walks on water, he gives boner-inspring speeches, and enjoys majorities in both chambers of Congress, but in the end he's just another black man, a victim of circumstance.

"Bush's average deficits were $400 billion."

Yeah...as long as you don't count Iraq, TARP, or the trillion dollars injected into the banking system a few days before TARP passed.

And how much lower would Obama's deficits be if he didn't also have to pay for the borrowing of Reagan, Bush, & Bush?

"Obama forecasts deficits of over a trillion dollars for the each of the next 15 years."

Gee...another lie. Great way to make your point, man.
www.reuters.com

"I wonder: at which point will even liberals concede that the deficits are Obama's"

These deficits are Obama's.

But I wonder at which point any member of The Party of Responsibility will take any responsibility for Bush taking a true surplus budget with surpluses as far as the eye could see, and handing off an economy in meltdown and endless projected deficits?

MODER8: "Dan Quayle spelled potato "potatoe"...
And don't get me started GWB bloopers."

Exactly, and they went on and on about these things in the media; now the shoe is on the other foot, and our turn to mock your prez.

MOCK!

Fair enough Danforth. So Obama's deficits average over $1 trillion a year. And our worst spending president ever who he blames for everything averaged $400 billion. Which would make Obama--let's see--two and a half times worse than Bush. And this despite a strong economy--he thinks--a sunsetting of Bush's tax cuts--so he says--and the winding down of Afghanistan and Iraq.

A lot of hope in the room. "Change you can believe in", but not any change we can see.

"Which would make Obama--let's see--two and a half times worse than Bush."

Well, sure, if we completely ignore the situations each was given, and the fact Bush didn't have to pay interest on Obama's debt.

"So Obama's deficits average over $1 trillion a year."

No, they don't. I guess addition and division aren't your strong suits either.

Posted it in the wrong place. Sorry.

$10.8 trillion divided by 11 isn't a trillion average. So sorry for my lying, or for thinking that you could have just done the rounding in your head.

So here goes: his deficits will average $981 billion a year, NOT a trillion. My apologies.

So as long as interest rates stay at historic lows, the economy rebounds at a greater pace than ever in history (two mutually exclusive things, but never mind), Bush's tax cuts expire without revision--he won't be at a trillion. Just a hair below.

Which means he's only 2.45 times worse than Bush. Not 2.5. Feeling hopeychangey yet? Anyone?

"$10.8 trillion divided by 11 isn't a trillion average."

What...so now Obama will have 3 terms?

Well, sure, if we completely ignore the situations each was given, and the fact Bush didn't have to pay interest on Obama's debt.

#96 | Posted by Danforth
* * * *

And Obama's successor will be paying interest on the $11 trillion--oops, sorry--$10.8 trillion in debt that Obama will be passing him. Will you apologize, then, for voting for this douchebag?

Prolly not. He's a Dem, remember?

You're like a greasy pig, Danforth. You post a link that shows Obama's projected deficits, tell me that I'm "lying" because $10.8 trillion isn't quite $11 trillion, then deny that they're Obama's numbers.

Whatever. You know what's funny? This guy is such a friggin disaster, that he's going to wipe out Social Security and Medicare and big government, all by himself. Conservatives will get just what we want, and it took electing this dumbass to do it.

These deficits won't happen. The spending will stop. And just like Clinton threw millions of welfare recipients under the bus, under Obama, it'll be the baby boomers, just starting to drain the Treasury dry. And if that's not justice, I don't know what is.

"Which means he's only 2.45 times worse than Bush."

Riiiiiiiiight. Because an average of $400 billion, plus a trillion dollar TARP bailout, plus the Iraq war, plus another trillion injected into the banking system a few days before TARP equals...

...$400 billion.

And that half-trillion or so annually to pay for the debts of Reagan, Bush & Bush?

Obama's Fault.

"tell me that I'm "lying" because $10.8 trillion isn't quite $11 trillion, then deny that they're Obama's numbers."

You said they were "more" than a trillion. You were wrong. And again, Obama is going to have 3 terms, up to his 11th year?

"then deny that they're Obama's numbers."

Bullshit. I never denied they were Obama's numbers. I just pointed out Dubya didn't also have to pay for the interest on Dubya'd deficits, which Obama will have to do.

#27 | POSTED BY JAK_SE_MAO
"Bush pronounces "nuclear" like I and almost everyone else I know does.

Then you and almost everyone else you know is mispronouncing it.

"Its a regional aberration in pronunciation."

No it isn't. You're making excuses.
A regional aberration can alter the SOUND of a vowel or consonant.
Like the dropping of a final "r" in Boston, or turning the name "Tom" into a three-syllable word in Tennessee.
What we're talking about is the actual (improper) switching of sounds.
And it is simply incorrect.
In the same way I don't AXE you to call in the CALVARY.

"Pointing it out says far more about the critic than it does the speaker."

Really? And just what was I pointing out? Just what was I criticizing? Re-read the post.

"But that's not even the point."

Okay, Jak, so what's the point?

"Will you apologize, then, for voting for this douchebag?"

What I will do is point out his successor has been given an even bigger uphill climb.

But go ahead and apologize for voting for Dubya twice, if that's what you're alluding to.

Don't forget to vote for him in 2012, Danny. Of course, by then "hope and change" will ring more than a little hollow. Maybe "Keep Hoping, Change Will Come Eventually!"

Americans are, ultimately, too smart and too noble to allow the nation to go bankrupt just because of what the Me Generation feels they're entitled to. So--enjoy it while you can. Eventually it'll stop, and we can consign the ObamaPelosiReidFrankPaulsonGei thner clan to that part of American history reserved for the slaveowners and segregationists and the euthanists--it may have seemed good ideas at the time, but it was time as a country to move on, and repent of past sins.

I do apologize for voting for Bush twice. I should have voted 3rd party in 2004 also. Obviously the Republicans didn't need my help to get elected in 2004. Shaping up that way again this year, funny enough.

The Iraq War was part of the $400 billion average. So was TARP.

But keep believin'! Maybe if we all sing together, like on that commercial. Think that'll help?

"Don't forget to vote for him in 2012, Danny"

Who are the Rs putting up, RiR?

Sarah Palin? If so, I'm voting for re-election.

Jack Danforth? If so, the Rs have my vote.

"The Iraq War was part of the $400 billion average. So was TARP."

Bullshit. The Iraq war was "off-budget", and TARP was nearly a trillion dollars...none of which was seemingly charged to Bush, who ALREADY was running that $400 billion deficit.

And interesting how you avoided that additional trillion Bush & Bernanke injected into the financial markets a few days before TARP passed.

That's Obama's fault, too, isn't it?

The Iraq War was "off budget", but still had to be paid for with deficit financing as the bills came due, and accrued to the deficit totals. Same with the TARP. You don't even know how federal budgeting works. I blame Air America for that--they did a series on this off-budgeting nonsense, and it was obvious they were stupid.

Here's an idea, though--just have Obama move EVERYTHING "off budget"! Yeah! He won't have any deficits at all, ever, only surpluses!

Godalmighty, libbies are dumb.

LMAO. Let me ask you, Danforth--has the money we've spent in Iraq shown up in deficit and debt figures yet? I mean, have the soldiers been paid? Equipment paid for? Or is there some bill somewhere, that will be put in the mail when the saintly Obama decides to put it "on budget"?

It's astounding how dumb liberals are when it comes to the simple things like budgeting and deficits, as if Bush can ring up trillions of dollars worth of spending, and just never pay for it. Not even BORROW for it.

"accrued to the deficit totals."

No, accrued in the debt totals. That's why the annual debt increase was higher than the claimed $400 billion deficit.

"You don't even know how federal budgeting works."

Obviously, it works for you in a way where you get to make up numbers, and then bash based on that.

And where did that extra trillion from a few days before TARP end up? Whose budget?

That's Obama's fault, too, isn't it?

#110 | Posted by Danforth
* * * *

Nope. All Bush.

But it was Obama's fault for promoting the guy responsible for oversight of Wall Street banks to run Treasury, and for RE-nominating Bernanke.

Probably not, though, right? In your world, even when Obama keeps the same guys on the payroll responsible for the train wreck, it was Bush's fault for hiring them in the first place. Or something.

No, that's Obama's fault.

But had Bernanke been replaced, or Geithner, and the markets tanked, you would have blamed Obama for making the the wrong choice.

Keep selling!

I remember that one around Dow 6500.

No, accrued in the debt totals. That's why the annual debt increase was higher than the claimed $400 billion deficit.
* * * *

Negative. When Congress passes the resolution to continue Iraq War funding, it gets put in that year's deficit figures.

Through 2008, Bush added $2.5 trillion in new debt in 8 years, just over $300 billion a year. Put another trillion in spending in Obama's budget on Bush, and that brings it to $425 billion a year. Obama will be more than doubling that, and all you can do is keep blaming his predecessor.

Which is fine. Whatever gets you through the night. Just seems that the rest of the country is moving on, if VA-NJ-MA is any indication.

I remember that one around Dow 6500.

#115 | Posted by Danforth
* * * *

You should remember it at 12,000 also.

Slippery pig. It was Geithner's and Bernanke's and Bush's fault, but now that Tax-Dodgin' Timmy and Bernanke are on Obama's payroll, only man left to point to is Bush.

"Negative. When Congress passes the resolution to continue Iraq War funding, it gets put in that year's deficit figures. "

Then how on earth does a $400 billion deficit add up to more than a $750 billion of additional debt in one year, from 2007 to 2008?

en.wikipedia.org

"You should remember it at 12,000 also."

I do.

And 8000
And 7500
And 7000
And 6600

I also remembering you saying near the beginning of 2009 you were going to short China. I'm glad I didn't listen. MCHFX was my big winner last year.

Ummm, I shorted China briefly, in October of last year, and made a little money. But whatever investments you make, you need to have trailing sell stops, to limit losses in case you're wrong. Which put me out of most of the markets at 12,500. Saved my career, actually.

I wonder if you have a brain in your head at all. Bush's average was just over $400 billion a year. Do you know what the word "average" even means? It means that some are more, some are less. Can't you even pull up the numbers yourself, and do a little quick division? Godalmighty.

With the budgeting, imagine you have a household budget. This much income, less mortgage, less notes, less insurance, less groceries. Then one month your wife falls and breaks her wrist, and she has to miss two weeks of work. You can either borrow the money to pay the doctor, or you can write a check. But it's getting paid for, now. That's the difference between budgeting for the Iraq War, or funding it through a continuing resolution--adding the borrowing as you go.

Air America is no more, and MSNBC last in the ratings, not because they're not entertaining, because they are. It's because they're dumb. They don't understand even the basics of how the government works, and by extension, I have to believe it's true of their listeners also. I keep hearing about how awful Bush's deficits were, and the same people don't even care that Obama's will be more than twice as high, AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE! This turd actually gets up in his state of the union address, says that Bush inherited surpluses for years to come, then decides to make Bush's deficits look tiny in comparison to his. Unbelievable.

I'm taking a hike. Literally. Gorgeous mountain day today.

"I wonder if you have a brain in your head at all. Bush's average was just over $400 billion a year. "

I can read.

Can you?

According to the debt link I provided, public debt increased over $750 billion in a year Bush presumably only had a $400 billion deficit. Where did that other $350 billion come from?

"That's the difference between budgeting for the Iraq War, or funding it through a continuing resolution--adding the borrowing as you go."

You're making it up. The "difference" is those things are "off-budget", and show up in the accumulated debt while letting math-challenged Rs stick to their bogus claims.

"Ummm, I shorted China briefly, in October of last year, and made a little money."

Well, getting out then was pretty foolish, wasn't it?

MCHFX was up over 70% last year.

Oops...my apologies, RIR.

Can I give myself a "stupid" flag for post #122?

#122 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2010-02-06 03:59 PM | REPLY | FLAG: STUPID, SELF-IMPOSED.

There. Just trying to help out when I can, lol.

Many thanks.

None needed. Just doing my part.
I'm sure you'd do the same for me.

I keep hearing about how awful Bush's deficits were, and the same people don't even care that Obama's will be more than twice as high,

Who says no one cares? Bush had a choice to not run deficits, Obama doesn't.

When your predecessor leaves $700 Billion a year in debt service, hundreds of billions a year more in unfunded liabilities that didn't exist prior to 2001, reduced revenues from 2 tax cuts, and a recession you're gonna run deficits.

Bush and the GOP Congress never once mentioned deficit reduction or addressed the national debt until the Dems took over. Obama's the first President since Clinton to address deficits and debt. The GOP are fighting the creation of a non-partisan debt commission. Wonder why....

The "Docs" do whatever they can. Obama has never been in the military, so how the fuck should he know? What a pussy. Freudian slip, or to see the reaction of the populace?

It has happened before:

www.youtube.com

"One, two, three, four. I love the Marine corpse"
--- Comander in Chief Obama ---

I read a lot - always have I have a very good memory. I'm into facts when it comes to debate, not right wing noise bullshit talking points presented as 'fact'.
#54 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

I'm sorry AU but that is not true.

As far as your memory goes. You told me the other night that there was an oil embargo in 1979. There was not.

As far as being "into facts" you stated as fact "Funny how economies never turn around during the administrations where recessions begin, only during the next ones."

There is nothing factual about that point at all.

Please keep trolling my posts. When I make the occasional mistake I'd give me a warm feeling to know you care. :-)

"It'd give me.."

(Please add that to your list of 2. Thank you)

I'm not the one who claimed to have a "very good memory"

Funny how people turn into trolls when they bring up your falsehoods aye?

Also you give yourself warm feeling? Well I guess someone has to.

"It'd give me.."

(Please add that to your list of 2. Thank you)

#132 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

I did, but your false statements on this site are more numerous than just 3 and you know it.

You should have a separate category for typos, but if not I'll understand. Thanks again! :-)

"All this from a guy who never took Bush to task for newk-u-lar."

Jimmy Carter's use of "nucular" preceded Dubya's by a couple of decades, which was even funnier in Jimmeh's case than it was in Chimpy's, because Jimmeh was a Naval nuclear engineer before he became a politician and then Prez-dent.

#135 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Oh the other falsehoods I spoke of have nothing to do with typos.

Off to a superbowl party.

Who dat? Who dat? Who dat say dey gonna beat dem Saints? Who dat? Who dat?

THE COLTS!!

He'll never mis-pronounce the word again. Just axe him.

TXLIBERTARIAN

Let me back up here. I don't have a problem being corrected on a misspoken phrase or wrong fact. Point it out and I'll happily fess up to it. But, the other day you obviously went looking for something wrong in my post (Wiki). Today, for your 2nd post of the day to be a comment on a 10 hour old comment of mine infers you have an agenda which doesn't really have to do with correcting facts. Hope I'm wrong. You seem like a good person. We may disagree on policies or politics. I'd rather not get personal with you or anyone for that matter

I apologize for getting snarky. I don't have a problem being wrong. Oil "Crisis" was what I meant to type, but with other things going in the room when blogging, sometimes ones attention can be scattered. Sure seemed like we were in a recession when Reagan took over, but I was a puppy adult, so maybe it just seemed that way with everyone talking about how bad things were, losing their homes to sky high interest rates, hyperinflation, etc. We weren't in an official recession. I stand corrected.

Enjoy the game. :-)

#128 | Posted by mictian101 at 2010-02-07 03:18 AM | Reply | Flag:

Along my train of thought as well. If he happens to also be a Haiti medic, it would be even more obvious.

Then you and almost everyone else you know is mispronouncing it.

I and almost everyone else I know is pronouncing it in a perfectly understandable and acceptable way.

Its a regional aberration in pronunciation.

No it isn't.

Yes it is.

A regional aberration can alter the SOUND of a vowel or consonant.

A regional aberrationcan also alter the pronunciation of a word---like "nuclear".

"Pointing it out says far more about the critic than it does the speaker."

The word is pronounced a certain way in vast swaths of the country.

One can't make the same case for pronouncing "corpsman" as "corpse-man".

The little fucking punk didn't know the word, and tried to pronounce it phonetically.

Get over it.

It's "faux pas" Moron.

Perhaps if you spent as much time attempting to understand the significance of using quotation marks to reproduce misspellings as you do clicking on various profiles on The Wiggles Facebook fan page you might not make such an ass of youself next time.

Strewth.

"The little fucking punk"
Posted by Jak_Se_Mao

You call our president that but how would you like if somebody called you or your son that?

You aren't a real man and I doubt you would do anything if anybody did call you that.

You call our president that

Because he is.

I doubt you would do anything if anybody did call you that.

I really would have enjoyed the opportunity to hear you call me that---and went through considerable effort to ensure that it did.

But you pussed out.

You get a half-point for the chickenshit, anonymous email---but it wasn't the same, Francis. :(

Jak that describes you more than him. He goes out in public knowing many racists and rightwing tools such as yourself would love to see harm happen to him. He knows the risks yet faces them head on while you hide out on a ranch in west TX day after day. Who is the coward? Oh I think the answer is plain to see.

"Its a regional aberration in pronunciation."

I've studied dialects for years, and paid part of my way through college teaching them. There is no "dialect" or "regionalism" which pronounces nuclear, newk-you-lar. It's an incorrect pronunciation, not a "regional aberration", no matter how you slice it or how many people get it wrong...Jimmy Carter and George Bush included.

Its a regional aberration in pronunciation.

So you have no problem then with Ebonics?

I've studied dialects for years, and paid part of my way through college teaching them.

I've spoken dialects for years, and paid most of my way through college shoeing horses---while earning my degrees.

Newk-you-lar is a pronunciation that is a regional aberration.

Unfortunately, it's not a deflection from the little punk-ass's inability to pronounce "corpsman".

Many, many people pronounce "nuclear" as Newk-you-lar.

Because its a regional aberration.

Nobody pronounces "corpsman" as
"corpse-man"---unless they're just a fucking dumbass that has no concept of the word.

Get over it, Swish.

So you have no problem then with Ebonics?

Whether or not I have a problem with Ebonics is beside the point.

Whether or not I have a problem with Ebonics is beside the point.

No it's not.

Ebonics is merely a regional aberration of poor pronunciations and poor English.

If you half believe the shit you're peddling you'll agree Ebonics is a legitimate dialect.

"Many, many people pronounce "nuclear" as Newk-you-lar.
Because its a regional aberration."

No...because they're wrong.

Get over it, Closet-Boy.

"I've spoken dialects for years"

#149 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao

I didn't know redneck was now considered a dialect?

Whether or not I have a problem with Ebonics is beside the point.

My guess is you gave this half ass answer to disguise the fact that you have a double standard on the topic.

I don't understand many dialects in America. I don't what the hell those hip hoppers or bee boppers, whatever they are called, are talking about. I mean when Obama talked about clinging to God an their guns, I thought he might have been talking about hip hoppers in the club

Ebonics is merely a regional aberration of poor pronunciations and poor English.

Yeah.

So what's your point?

If you half believe the shit you're peddling you'll agree Ebonics is a legitimate dialect.

I don't agree with that at all.

I'm talking about the regional aberration that results in a specific pronunciation of a single word---not an entire dialect.

Might be better for you to take a another tack.

This one ain't doin' much for you.

Even the stupidest of ebonics-speaking colored persons would be laughed out of the liquor store for referring to a "corpsman" as a "corpse-man".

Funny how you have such a difficult time simply addressing that fact.

I don't agree with that at all.

Of course you don't.

I'm talking about the regional aberration that results in a specific pronunciation of a single word---not an entire dialect.

Yeah, because if you've gotten so entrenched in your "regional aberration" that you pronounce nuclear as ridiculously as Bush did, that's surely the only word you butcher.

Try again dipshit.

Might be better for you to take a another tack.

This one ain't doin' much for you.

No, you're just so shamelessly partisan you think you're presenting something other than a double standard.

half ass answer

Its not a half-ass answer so much as it is a perfectly acceptable rejoinder to your attempt to conflate the entire phenomenon of "ebonics" with a simple, regional pronunciation of "nuclear".

Even the stupidest of ebonics-speaking colored persons would be laughed out of the liquor store for referring to a "corpsman" as a "corpse-man".

Actually, I'm guessing the cashier wouldn't know the difference and wouldn't care anyway. Try again.

Funny how you have such a difficult time simply addressing that fact.

I haven't addressed the point at all.

It was a stupid, elementary mistake.

If he made it continually, there'd be an issue.

However, I get the feeling it won't happen again which automatically puts Obama head and shoulders above Bush.

Maybe I'm just weird, but I don't view a lack of learning capacity in the POTUS as a beneficial trait.

Its not a half-ass answer so much as it is a perfectly acceptable rejoinder to your attempt to conflate the entire phenomenon of "ebonics" with a simple, regional pronunciation of "nuclear".

And you're missing the point that you seem to be OK with "regional aberrations" in language when it fits your purpose but not when it doesn't.

Poor English is poor English no matter what.

No, you're just so shamelessly partisan you think you're presenting something other than a double standard.

1. I haven't presented a "double standard", as I haven't offered any critique of "ebonics" to contrast with the fact that a particular pronunciation of the word "nuclear" is perfectly acceptable.

2. Asserting that accepting a wholesale rejection of the English language (ebonics) is the same thing as recognizing a regional aberration that results in a specific pronunciation of a single word (nuclear)-- is the sign of a guy who has completely run out of things to say.

1. I haven't presented a "double standard", as I haven't offered any critique of "ebonics" to contrast with the fact that a particular pronunciation of the word "nuclear" is perfectly acceptable.

Ebonics is merely a regional aberration of poor pronunciations and poor English.

Yeah.

So what's your point?

This isn't an implicit agreement with the statement that ebonics is a regional aberration of the English language?

2. Asserting that accepting a wholesale rejection of the English language (ebonics) is the same thing as recognizing a regional aberration that results in a specific pronunciation of a single word (nuclear)-- is the sign of a guy who has completely run out of things to say.

It's not a wholesale rejection of English.

It's lazy, slang-filled English.

I will grant you the obvious point of it being on a larger scale than a single word.

But again, would you really have us believe that nuclear is the only word that is mispronounced?

I doubt it.

It's just convenient to ignore the rest.

I haven't addressed the point at all.

I know you haven't.

So let me help you.

We have a punk-ass, dumb-shit little man-child of a "president" with a resume of navel-lint.

He read a word on his teleprompter, "corpsman", for which he had no previous context.

He mispronounced it (twice), and everybody heard it.

In short, he displayed his ignorance.

Subsequent discussions about the event were uncomfortable to His sycophants, so numerous deflection were made to "Bush".

Fin

Hope that was helpful.

It's not a wholesale rejection of English.

It's lazy, slang-filled English.

Which is a wholesale rejection of English.

"New-ku-lar" isn't slang.

Nor is it an entire dialect whose use can be used as a tit-for-tat in some lame-ass attempt to point out a "double standard" in critiquing the appropriate use of the English language---in the context of making an even more lame-ass delection from the fact that Obama called a "corpsman" a "corpse-man".

I haven't addressed the point at all.

I know you haven't.

So let me help you.

Nice cherry pick.

I don't need your help. I could shut off the more rational parts of my brain and be on your level.

For some reason I don't find that appealing...

We have a punk-ass, dumb-shit little man-child of a "president" with a resume of navel-lint.

LOL and you're in the position to judge him this way because...

Subsequent discussions about the event were uncomfortable to His sycophants, so numerous deflection were made to "Bush".

I'm not a particular fan of Obama.

I hated Bush.

If Obama continues to repeat his mistake (or even wear it on his sleeve...), then he'll be in Bush territory.

Until then this is little minded politics from people grasping at Obama's dingleberries for something to bitch about.

It's lazy, slang-filled English.

Yes it is.

"Corpse-man", however, isn't.

Its a complete fucking ignorance of the word "corpsman".

Nobody says "corpse-man".

"Even the stupidest of ebonics-speaking colored persons"

#157 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao at 2010-02-08 01:16 AM

Are you 50 or older?

Which is a wholesale rejection of English.

Not quite.

Just a lack of concern for proper English.

"New-ku-lar" isn't slang.

No, just poor English.

Certainly not something to be proud of.

Nor is it an entire dialect whose use can be used as a tit-for-tat in some lame-ass attempt to point out a "double standard" in critiquing the appropriate use of the English language

I'm merely pointing out your selective concern for the proper use of the English language.

---in the context of making an even more lame-ass delection from the fact that Obama called a "corpsman" a "corpse-man".

I'm not deflecting from the fact he did.

He fucking said it. Like I've said, and you've ignored, I doubt he'll say it again which is the important point.

Nobody younger than 40 says colored person anymore.

If Obama continues to repeat his mistake...

He won't, because he fucked up and made an ass of himself---and was undoubtedly informed of this very quickly.

Nobody says "corpse-man".

On the other hand, pronouncing "nuclear" as "New-ku-lar" is a perfectly common thing---unless you're socked away in some little urbanized, blue-state shithole and really needing a catalyst to affirm your intellect in a nation of utter cretins.

He won't, because he fucked up and made an ass of himself---and was undoubtedly informed of this very quickly.

And this is some sort of fault in your eyes?

I'd rather a POTUS who learns from his mistakes than one who wears them on his sleeve and repeats them.

On the other hand, pronouncing "nuclear" as "New-ku-lar" is a perfectly common thing

So it's not just a "regional aberration"?

---unless you're socked away in some little urbanized, blue-state shithole and really needing a catalyst to affirm your intellect in a nation of utter cretins.

Man you have some real inferiority issues.

Using proper English is hardly an attempt to affirm one's intellect.

You use better English than many on this blog, are you simply trying to affirm your intellect or are you just using proper English?

And this is some sort of fault in your eyes?

Its a fault to pronounce "corpsman" as "corpse-man".

So it's not just a "regional aberration"?

Its a perfectly common thing in the regions where it's prevelant.

If there's some region where "corpsman" is pronounced as "corpse-man", you let me know.

Man you have some real inferiority issues.

Not at all.

Using proper English is hardly an attempt to affirm one's intellect.

Of course it is.

You use better English than many on this blog

This is a left-leaning blog.

are you simply trying to affirm your intellect or are you just using proper English?

I use proper English to affirm my intellect.

Its a fault to pronounce "corpsman" as "corpse-man".

OMG you didn't put an apostrophe in "It's."

Clearly you're a "punk-ass, dumb-shit little man-child" DR poster.

Or a partisan hack.

Take your pick.

Its a perfectly common thing in the regions where it's prevelant.

So is learning from one's mistakes.

Evidently that's not a common thing in Crawford?

(BTW no apostrophe again...)

I use proper English to affirm my intellect.

Inferiority issues.

Definitely.

If your posts had more content you wouldn't have to worry about impressing those pesky libs with your command of the English language.

If your posts had more content

You feel free to debunk the content of my posts, Cupcake.

Or talk about inferiority issues.

Or just log back in and be the edgy, hyper-secular guy and change the subject to the "Talibaptists".

You're a big boy.

You feel free to debunk the content of my posts, Cupcake.

You can't "debunk" opinions.

Or talk about inferiority issues.

I have no problem leaving it be if it's a sore topic for you.

Or just log back in and be the edgy, hyper-secular guy and change the subject to the "Talibaptists".

?

LOL do you think I have another DR account other than this one?

You can't "debunk" opinions.

Nobody's sugesting that you do.

I have no problem leaving it be if it's a sore topic for you.

Other than in your imagination, it's not a topic at all, "sore" or otherwise.

do you think I have another DR account other than this one?

There's no "think" to it.

Nobody's sugesting that you do.

Considering that's all you've got, your suggestion to "feel free to debunk the content of my posts, Cupcake" is rather hollow.

There's no "think" to it.

LOL

What other name do you think I post under?

Dammnit.

You're not going to say what other names you think I post under?

Or just log back in and be the edgy, hyper-secular guy and change the subject to the "Talibaptists".

?

LOL do you think I have another DR account other than this one?

#176 | Posted by jpw

It's Jacque's new favorite word. He calls everybody "edgy" these days. Just wait a few weeks and he'll be back to calling you a Hegelian.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable