Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, January 28, 2010

Hackers infiltrated the Web sites of more than 20 House members overnight, replacing their usual pages with attacks on President Barack Obama. The home page for the Republicans on the House Oversight Committee this morning reads: "F -- OBAMA!! Red Eye CREW !!!!! O RESTO E HACKER !!! by HADES; m4V3RiCk; T4ph0d4 -- FROM BRASIL."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

YAV

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

republicans.oversight.house.go
v

cached image shows the message, but the site appears unresponsive this morning.

There are right wing hackers?

Didn't think old people could hack.

Hahah jk ;)

was it the pimp dude again??


I didn't do it.
Nobody saw me do it.
You can't prove anything.

.. Each of the pages is managed by GovTrends, an Alexandria-based provider of web services. House servers host sites for members of Congress, but all members are free to use outside vendors to manage and upgrade their pages. This practice appears to have allowed third parties access to the Web sites outside of congressional firewalls.

Jeff Ventura, a spokesman for the House chief administrative officer, said that the working theory is that the penetration happened during an upgrade that GovTrends was making to its own system. He said his office is working with the company to figure out how the breach occurred.

"We're discussing our options," Ventura said.

Problems have arisen with the same vendor in the past. In August, something similar happened to 18 House members who worked with GovTrends. Officials at the time said staffers on the Hill had not set challenging enough passwords to thwart the attackers. Many of the same offices appear to have been hit again.

GovTrends employees did not return multiple phone or email messages seeking comment.

The successful attacks comes despite the addition of security safeguards in recent years, said a Democratic leadership aide, and it's expected that a review will be ordered by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).

This attack could increase the pressure by House officers to block GovTrends as a contractor or reconsider policies about using outside technology vendors, security experts say. The House administration manages and hosts about 60 percent of all sites, but members are reimbursed if they want to use outside firms.
..
The apparent attacks, first reported by Hotline's Erin McPike, come days after four men were arrested for attempting to tamper with the phone lines in Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu's New Orleans office. But investigators say the two events are not linked. In October, a highly sensitive House ethics committee document became public after a staffer inadvertently made it accessible on a file sharing network. ..

Sounds like Breitbart has all sorts of operatives. Inside job.

Obvious provocateur job. To solve the problem we must rush to:
1. Cyber-security internet takeover.
2. China-style internet censorship.
3. Top secret ACTA Treaty

Hegelian Dialectic or if you're really dense, for kids

I soooooooo can't wait for electronic medical records.

I soooooooo can't wait for electronic medical records.
#7 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD at 2010-01-28 02:49 PM

Uhm, you do realize that BushCo attempted to privatize the handling of Americans medical records in CHINA every fucking year in office?

Your personal financial data is sold before you leave the mortgage lenders cubical.

"Americans medical records"

Oh, please provide more info. I would so like to know how he was planning on scanning all those files at me doctors and email them to China?

It's a wee bit different that "Dick Hardin" just purchased a home as that is a matter of public record and "Redlightrobot had a gerbel surgically removed" which is not part of the pubic record (oops, i guess it is now)...

;P

"Uhm, you do realize that BushCo attempted to privatize the handling of Americans medical records in CHINA every fucking year in office?"

Besides, you are in agreement that EMR is a dangerous path....

The noble and forthright Liberals won't be in power forever... Maybe...

EMR is a lot safer than paper. Plus it provides physicians and MCOs with data that will aid in all sorts of medical treatments and imporvements. It's already being done and your paranoia won't stop it.

Windoze lusers, i bet.

switch to a *nix... like MAC OS X. (then hire new managers -- and less, too.
(being a Mac admin is like repairing Maytags.)

"switch to a *nix... "

Damn straight.

"Americans medical records"

Oh, please provide more info. I would so like to know how he was planning on scanning all those files at me doctors and email them to China?
It's a wee bit different that "Dick Hardin" just purchased a home as that is a matter of public record and "Redlightrobot had a gerbel surgically removed" which is not part of the pubic record (oops, i guess it is now)...
;P
#9 | Posted by SHEEPLESHEPERD at 2010-01-28 03:02 PM

Ooops, I meant Social Security, not medical records - some people from CATO in Hong Kong are the leading proponents alleging to "help young people plan their retirement". The plan was begun with new HIPPA requirements that were never meant to be followed, such as using SS# as a personal identification, but that was part of the scam to enable a third-party in China to do the "data management" for his specialized re-classification called "progressive indexing". I'm not sure where it's printed - I was working for Providence Health Systems at the time and pieced two and three together for myself.

Bush privatizing Social Security in China, lessie what Der Googles provides:

Bush's Social Security Sleight of Hand

..Duffy said privatization costs were included in the midyear budget update that the Office of Management and Budget released last July 30, so it was logical for them to be in the 2007 budget proposals. But I sure didn't see this coming -- and I wonder how many people outside of the White House did.

Nevertheless, it's here. Unlike Bush's generalized privatization talk of last year, we're now talking detailed numbers. On page 321 of the budget proposal, you see the privatization costs: $24.182 billion in fiscal 2010, $57.429 billion in fiscal 2011 and another $630.533 billion for the five years after that, for a seven-year total of $712.144 billion.

In the first year of private accounts, people would be allowed to divert up to 4 percent of their wages covered by Social Security into what Bush called "voluntary private accounts." The maximum contribution to such accounts would start at $1,100 annually and rise by $100 a year through 2016.

It's not clear how big a reduction in the basic benefit Social Security recipients would have to take in return for being able to set up these accounts, or precisely how the accounts would work.
..
Bush's 2001 Social Security commission had members of both parties, but they had to agree in advance to support private accounts. Their report, which had some interesting ideas, went essentially nowhere.

- no China mentioned.:[

Interestingly McCain, Bush and Obama are both in favor of privatizing Social Security, relying on the very same people:
Pro-Privatization Bush Aide Nominated to Social Security Board

For much of 2005, a battered Democratic Party sought to regain its footing by doing battle with President George W. Bush over his attempt to carve private investment accounts out of Social Security.

The effort was widely viewed as a rousing success, stopping the initiative in its tracks and weakening a newly re-elected president, but the brains behind the Bush Social Security plan have not been vanquished.

Far from it: Chuck Blahous was nominated to the Social Security Board of Trustees last week by President Barack Obama.

White House aides say Blahous's nomination comes courtesy of the Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who gets to recommend an appointee to one of two public trustee slots on the Social Security Board. The public trustee positions were created in 1983 to represent the differing views of the two parties. If the president nominates someone the other party opposes, the minority tends to respond by putting a hold on all nominees to the board. Other entities, such as the Federal Election Commission, has the same structure.

"As with all bipartisan commissions that require Senate confirmation, the opposition gets to recommend who represents them on the commission. That's the intent of the law creating the bipartisan commission and that's what makes it bipartisan," a White House official said.

But Obama sent Blahous's name up to the Senate, with nary a mention of his work championing what Democrats derisively called Social Security privatization.

The nomination identifies Blahous as a former deputy director of the Bush National Economic Council and as the executive director of the bipartisan President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security. That commission was tasked to draft the policy recommendations for maintaining Social Security solvency, in part through partial privatization.

- again, no China mentioned. I don't have access to the Lexis-Nexis.:[

However, here's what John Kerry had to say in 2004:
Kerry: Bush would break promise on Social Security

.. Campaign officials argued that the president has long discussed plans to help shore up Social Security, partly through allowing some funds to be transferred to personal savings accounts.

Bush "has never used the word privatization," a campaign official said, accusing Kerry of trying to "scare seniors."
..
At a rally Sunday outside Miami, Kerry ripped into Bush's plans for personal savings accounts.

"The Congressional Budget Office, which is bipartisan, said that the president's plan will mean a 25 to 45 percent cut in benefits. It blows a $2 trillion hole in Social Security," Kerry said.

"I will never privatize Social Security," the Massachusetts senator said. "I'll never cut the benefits, and I won't raise the retirement age."
..
But they focused most of their comments on the program that Bush has previously announced, arguing it would hurt seniors and place a burden on all taxpayers.

It was not clear whether Bush's comment as quoted in the Times Magazine signaled a plan different from what he has described publicly.

In the third and final presidential debate last week, Bush said allowing workers to put some of their payroll taxes into personal savings accounts could allow them "to get better rates of return than the rates of return being given in the current Social Security trust.

"And the compounding rate of interest effect will make it more likely that the Social Security system is solvent for our children and our grandchildren."

In a written statement, Kerry said such a move "might be a good surprise for the wealthy and well-connected, but it's a disaster for America's middle class.
..
"Even the president's own economic advisers say his plan will blow a $2 trillion hole in Social Security. And guess who will pay for it? You will," Kerry's statement said.

"America's seniors are already facing higher prescription drug costs, record high Medicare premiums, and higher gas costs.
..
In response to Kerry's statement, White House spokesman Trent Duffy said in a news release, "The president is the only candidate to talk about the need to strengthen, preserve and modernize Social Security.

"His plan would make sure that for retirees and near-retirees there are no changes in benefits, while recognizing that we need to give younger workers a better system so that Social Security will be there for them." ..

- no China mentioned, but BushCo are quoting from CATO in Hong Kong.

just sit back and continue watching obama, the tool, implode. never trust a man who can't look straight ahead. no wonder he doesnt know where hes going. the demise of the democratic party is simply deelicious!! so arrogant, so all-knowing, so elite, the dems days are numbered.

This is going on in Venezuela too.

" never trust a man who can't look straight ahead. "

How the fuck is he supposed to read his teleprompters if he's looking straight ahead? Wow, what illogic....

All modern Presidents read carefully prepared remarks from teleprompters and/or printed pages.

That the right is making an issue out of it is silly.

Gee, here's Bush. What's to his left and right? Uh...

upload.wikimedia.org
www.foxnews.com
www.state.gov

"Hegelian Dialectic"

Pretty sure that's a first on the DR.

They must have been right wingers. The left wing crazies would have just blown the place up.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable