Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, January 26, 2010

After a Canadian fisheries official was hit by a pie thrown by a PETA activist yesterday, a liberal Member of Parliament called it a terrorist attack. "When someone actually coaches or conducts criminal behavior to impose a political agenda on each and every other citizen of Canada, that does seem to me to meet the test of a terrorist organization," said Gerry Byrne. The pie was thrown to protest Canada's seal hunt. "Shame on you, Gail Shea," the pie-thrower yelled after the incident.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

rcade

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Make mine apple

1. Does this MP think that throwing a shoe at Bush was a terrorist act?

2. Well, maybe there is a point to this, after all, it is PETA we're talking about.

Anyone who says pieing someone is terrorism should be pied.

Well at least she didn't club her.

At least she didn't pull the pie out of her pants.

"The Undewear Pie-er" just doesn't sound terrorizing.

Pies of mass destruction!

Weapon of mass digestion

Maimed by meringue.

What about this?
The conservative young filmmaker who tarnished the reputation of a liberal activist group with his undercover videos has been arrested for allegedly trying to bug Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu's office in New Orleans.

Federal investigators allege that James O'Keefe was among a group of four men who created a ruse to enter Landrieu's downtown office for the supposed purpose of repairing the lawmaker's telephones. O'Keefe and another man, Stan Dai, are accused of aiding the plot, while two others, Joseph Basel and Robert Flanagan, are accused of pretending to be telephone company employees, according to federal court records (PDF) unsealed today.

All four, including O'Keefe, were arrested Monday and charged by federal prosecutors with entering federal property under false pretenses and with the intent of committing a felony. If convicted, Flanagan, Basel, O'Keefe and Dai face up to 10 years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

Maimed by meringue.

Aural joke -- hope it makes it through:

Q: What do a lemon pie and my hand have in common?
A: They both have "my ring" on it.

Gotta say it just right.

Bad joke, but I hope oorah adds it to his repetoire

And for the record, tofu is a WMD.

When pies are outlawed, only outlaws will have pies.

Good, I'm glad pie-throwing is called 'terrorism' now.

I have suggestions for some other things that need to be classified;

Titty twisting. Tongue Lashing. Yodeling. Indian Burns, noogies and wet willies. wedgie, atomic wedgie, atomic wedgie with nuts.

slapping someone in the face with a cold tuna. that is terroism plus it's a damn shame to do that to a nice tuna.

Farting, Flirting, fingering, fiddlin', diddlin' and piddlin'.

Dirty Sanchez, Snowballs and Donkey Punches.

Good, I'm glad pie-throwing is called 'terrorism' now.

#13 | Posted by Lipzoidial

"Waterboard the chick".

and Donkey Punches

What have you got against Robot Chicken?

Seriously, that is fucked up.

Robot Chicken = the funniest show ever.

Super Donkey Punch

terrorist = anyone who disobeys the state.

I must be missing something. Did the pie have anthrax in it?

Flirting, fingering, fiddlin', diddlin' are NOT terrorism!

They're FUN! Lots and lots of sexy fun......

I once let my wife pie my face for her birthday. She says it was the best birthday present she ever received.

I once let my wife pie my face for her birthday. She says it was the best birthday present she ever received.

I think you posted this in the wrong thread. See here:

www.drudge.com

You can have my pie why you pry it forn my cold dead fingers.

Crisis

Oops, that should be "from".

Crisis

Okay, it's not terrorism, but that pie throwing bitch needs to be slapped.

Crisis

That video is a fake, and you dumbshits fell for it.

Did you see any mullets? Did you see any flannel? How about strippers? Yeah, I didn't think so.

Come on guys, you're better than that.

Last time we addressed the topic RCADE stated that throwing ANYTHING in this day an age should be a criminal offense. This was after someone threw tomatoes at Palin during her book tour at the Mall of America.

Do people REALLY BELIEVE that throwing a soft tofu or cream pie is a criminal offense?

Canada finally does something that makes the news, and it's this?

Those bland-ass coattail riding bitches just can't catch a break.

Do people REALLY BELIEVE that throwing a soft tofu or cream pie is a criminal offense?

#27 | Posted by Monstman at 2010-01-27 09:45 AM | Reply

What if I threw a cup of piss on you, or wiped boogers on you?

Of course it's a criminal offense. Whether they call it assault, harrassment, destruction of property (clothing gets ruined, chick's hair-do is ruined, etc), etc matters not.

BTW, you're a stooge, and should be thankful I gave you the time of day.

Dude, it's Canada. They are just happy someone remembers they are a country.

OF COURSE it is a crime whether or not you can actually find a legitimate charge...

right...

I can see legal issues are not your forte either.

Perhaps it is better to be a stooge than a DUPE LIKE YOU!

#31 | Posted by Monstman at 2010-01-27 10:55 AM | Reply |

I have no idea what you're trying to convey in that post, and I don't believe you do either.

It's a crime, and for a good reason, dickbag.

I wonder is she was upset enough...

...to waterboard the culprit?

Naive theories never stand the true test of reality.

Proof?

Just look at ALL of Obmama's campaign promises. All naive - and none of them have happened.

Former prime minister Jean Chretien was hit in the face with a pie by a protester in Prince Edward Island in 2000. His attacker initially was given jail time but eventually received a conditional sentence.

A woman who missed Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach with a pie at the annual Calgary Stampede breakfast in 2007, and hit a security official instead, was sentenced to 30 days in jail.

So was a woman who threw a pie at Calgary Mayor Dave Bronconnier in the summer of 2007.

In 2003, a protester who hit then-Alberta premier Ralph Klein in the face with a pie at the Stampede breakfast was convicted of assault and ordered to serve a 30-day intermittent jail sentence.

Basically if you throw a pie in the face of a politician in Canada you'll prolly get charged and then have the sentence suspended. Unless you do it in Alberta in which case you'll go to jail.

Alberta is to Canada as Texas is to the US.

Calling pie tossing terrorism is quite simply the dumbest thing Spud has heard of in a bit.

It's analogous to tossing kids who sext onto the sexual offenders registry.

It diminishes and waters down the definition to the point of absurdity.

Wot's next? Making whoopie cushions illegal? Calling a flaming bag of dog shiat on someone's doorstep a "weapon of mass destruction"?

That all noted, the annual seal kill in Canada is really a cull and it is justifiable particularly in light of the collapsed fish stocks on the east coast.

Be Well.

/As ya do
stage left.

#33 | Posted by BENDOR at 2010-01-27 11:22 AM
***"Just look at ALL of Obmama's campaign promises. All naive - and none of them have happened"

You obviously don't read much huh???

Of more than 500 political promises made during Obama's campaign, 399 of them are rated as: "kept", "compromise" or "in the works", while 104 are: "broken", "stalled" or "not yet rated"...

That comes to a whopping 80% rated positively. And, Obama achieved this monumental task within one year of taking office whilst the Republican Congress and Party used partisan obstructionism as their political agenda 70% of the time...

Pretty fricking amazing, huh???

Now, go back to Rush, O'Reilly and Beck so you can enlighten us with some more "Faux-Facts"...

www.politifact.com

What is REALLY amazing is what his assinine comments have ANYTHING AT ALL to do with the thred topic.

Someone throwing a pie in Canada equals Obama failed in his mind!

Same crowd that thinks throwing a pie is a criminal offense and should get you a terrorism charge.

That comes to a whopping 80% rated positively. And, Obama achieved this monumental task within one year of taking office whilst the Republican Congress and Party used partisan obstructionism as their political agenda 70% of the time...

#35 | Posted by Capt_Of_Uranus at 2010-01-27 01:01 PM

"In the works," which is the vast majority of your 80%, isn't positive. We don't know what will happen with those. He may make bad compromises (health bill drug measures, anyone?), or give them up in the interest of political gain. It takes a special kind of Obamatard to try and pretend he's on track to keeping 80% of his promises when the results simply aren't in yet.

#37 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-01-27 03:04 PM

"In the works" is positive, as we are talking about "campaign promises kept". If those promises "in the works" suddenly became "stalled" or "broken" then under the measure of "campaign promises kept" they would fall into the negative category. But, as promised, Obama IS working to keep them, so he is keeping his promises... 80% of them actually...

LET 1000 PIES FLY!

If those promises "in the works" suddenly became "stalled" or "broken" then under the measure of "campaign promises kept" they would fall into the negative category.

#38 | Posted by Capt_Of_Uranus at 2010-01-27 03:20 PM

And if he makes a bull shit compromise, it falls into the positive, right? Keep the faith!

#40 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-01-27 03:41 PM ***"And if he makes a bull shit compromise, it falls into the positive, right? Keep the faith!"

While I agree that making "compromises" with Republicans is "bullshit" (as you put it), in Washington it's called "Bi-partisanship" and a necessary part of the US legislative system...

And, keep up the work on the Republican political agenda: Partisan Obstructionism; "if you can't beat 'em just stop the game by any means necessary"...

While I agree that making "compromises" with Republicans is "bullshit" (as you put it), in Washington it's called "Bi-partisanship" and a necessary part of the US legislative system...

And, keep up the work on the Republican political agenda: Partisan Obstructionism; "if you can't beat 'em just stop the game by any means necessary"...

#41 | Posted by Capt_Of_Uranus at 2010-01-27 04:09 PM

I was thinking more along the lines of making all kinds of compromises with Big Pharma on the health bill and Wall Street in our economic measures, but whatever, don't let reality dampen your mood!

#42 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-01-27 04:36 PM
***"I was thinking more along the lines of making all kinds of compromises with Big Pharma on the health bill and Wall Street in our economic measures, but whatever, don't let reality dampen your mood!"

When you have the Republicans lockstep in their partisan obstructionist agenda, more and more "compromise" is necessary to make any kind of progress. And, while the Republicans are acting as "litter carriers" for Big Pharma, Wall Street, etc., we can be assured that more of these compromises will be necessary to make any sort of headway to fixing the problems left us by our last administration...

However, Obama is "compromising" with Senate Republicans, they just happen to represent: Big Pharma, Wall Street, etc...

But, don't let reality change your mind; Faux-Facts are so much easier to digest and regurgitate...

Are you serious? Did you not look at the break down of votes on the drug import measure in the Senate version of the health bill? Democrats killed it, with the Obama admin stating its own opposition to the measure. Enough republicans voted for (over half of them), it just needed a few more Democratic votes.

And Republicans didn't make Obama nominate a Wall Street whore like Geithner to oversee the Treasury and bailouts.

LOL, wow!

#44 | Posted by LIVE_OR_DIE at 2010-01-27 05:19 PM
***"Are you serious?"

Yes...

***"Did you not look at the break down of votes on the drug import measure in the Senate version of the health bill? Democrats killed it, with the Obama admin stating its own opposition to the measure. Enough republicans voted for (over half of them), it just needed a few more Democratic votes."

Because, had the Dems not killed it Big Pharma would have bailed, leaving the hope for any kind of reform crippled...

***"And Republicans didn't make Obama nominate a Wall Street whore like Geithner to oversee the Treasury and bailouts."

When dealing in a whore house it's nice to have a whore by your side... ;~}

And, while I don't necessarily endorse either bailout, (Nov2008 or Feb2009), I think that it is too early to gauge their efficacy...

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable