Bin Laden is back!! He seems to come back whenever the govt needs him to divert attention.

Bin Laden is back!! He seems to come back whenever the govt needs him to divert attention.

#1 | Posted by jackass

Damn that Obama!

Don't act like Bush didn't trot him out whenever he needed to scare the public or divert attention from his fuckups.

Bin Laden is dead. But his voice lives on as necessary.

so if there were no more palestinians, then they wouldn't have anything to fight for? Is that one way to look at what he's saying?

"There was no way to confirm the voice on the audio message was actually that of bin Laden, but it resembled previous recordings attributed to him.

The U.S. says it can't immediately authenticate the message but White House adviser David Axelrod told CNN's "State of the Union" that whatever the source, the message "contains the same hollow justification for the mass slaughter of innocents."

Whatever the source eh? It resembled previous recordings. BS.

You sheeple are being jerked around again.

I thought the little o was going to have OSB in jail by now. I understand there is an open court date for him in NYC.

I thought Bin Laden caused the Quake in Haiti?

Wish He'd crawl out from under his rock and show his face..... if he is even still alive. The American people are not buying this bullsh*t!

"America will never dream of security unless we will have it in reality in Palestine," he added. "God willing, our raids on you will continue as long as your support for the Israelis continues."

If anyone really believes that, I have a nice piece of land for sale just East of Miami at a bargain for you.
These fuckers have been attacking the U.S. before we even WERE the U.S. and long before there was an Israel. Just study some history. Look around, you'll see they are attacking countries who DON'T support Israel. They won't stop attacking us until they are utterly defeated, regardless of how much we apologize, appease, withdraw etc.

"Don't you remember that Chimpy was going to smoke him out and capture him dead or alive..."

WHICH "Chimpy?" The small-eared one or the large-eared one?

WHICH "Chimpy?" The small-eared one or the large-eared one?

The one that needed a team of surgeons to repair his asshole.

"He seems to come back whenever the govt needs him to divert attention."

"Bin Laden is dead. But his voice lives on as necessary."

Other than this being a fashionable line of BS to throw around, is there any reason to continue to say stuff like this? How much attention is Bin Laden really getting? With what news outlet was this a major story? Where are these people who forget issues they were interested in because Bin Laden came out of his cave to say "Ooga-Booga"?

I don't see any convergence at all between this ongoing narrative and reality.

Don't you remember that Chimpy was going to smoke him out and capture him dead or alive before he got sidetracked by Gannon's cock?

#11 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

I didn't know that chimpy could talk but I do remember Bush saying that. It would have happened if the politicians would let the military do their job without all their stupid rules.

Politicans need to tell the military what their mission is and then step back and watch.

These fuckers have been attacking the U.S. before we even WERE the U.S. and long before there was an Israel. Just study some history. Look around, you'll see they are attacking countries who DON'T support Israel. They won't stop attacking us until they are utterly defeated, regardless of how much we apologize, appease, withdraw etc.

#12 | Posted by jestgettinalong at 2010-01-24 12:07 PM | Reply | Flag FAILS History 101

I'm not sure that being enslaved and being brought to the Colonies, and then subsequently fighting the British in the Revolutionary War constitutes Muslims attacking us before we were a country.

But I guess putting them in chains and owning them as property would piss them off enough to do something about it.

didn't know that chimpy could talk but I do remember Bush saying that. It would have happened if the politicians would let the military do their job without all their stupid rules.
Politicans need to tell the military what their mission is and then step back and watch.

Shows you how full of shit you are. They did (and still do) have a military force over their that wasn't (isn't) bound by rules. They were gonna prove that private industry could win a war. That is what Blackwater was all about.
Guess what? You lost the hearts and minds of the people.. not to mention any semblance of moral imperative. Oh yeah.. and lets talk about the well behaved US military following the rules at Abu Grabass and all the good that came from that... I seriously doubt that is an isolated incidence.

The US is not a victim of rules of engagement.. that is not why we can't win this war.

Face the facts the US has not participated in a "victorious war" since WWII... of course we weren't the only ones fighting that one either.

hos, the muslims have been atacking white europeans since 700AD. It started long before the crusades. Just how many of the slaves that were brought over here were muslims? DAMN few, they were capatured by black africans and brought here by the european slave traders. You should try learning a little history before you began spewing.

#19 | Posted by Sniper at 2010-01-24 01:31 PM | Reply | Flag:

Sniper, I don't dispute that Mulsims have attacked in Europe. I do dispute that they attacked the Colonies before we became the US. Don't remember ever reading about that, but that statement was in the post I replied to.

"I do dispute that they attacked the Colonies before we became the US. Don't remember ever reading about that, but that statement was in the post I replied to."

Not before. Prety much immediately after we becamse the US, they starting after our shipping and used their religion to justify any number of wrongs against us up to and including enslavement. From the Wiki page for 1st Barbary War:

"In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). Upon inquiring "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once. [2] [3]

Jefferson reported the conversation to Secretary of State John Jay, who submitted the Ambassador's comments and offer to Congress. Jefferson argued that paying tribute would encourage more attacks. Although John Adams agreed with Jefferson, he believed that circumstances forced the U.S. to pay tribute until an adequate navy could be built."

One on hand, unbelievably slow to take credit. On the other hand, it is a miraculous feat for the dead.

I thought Bin Laden was a spanish politician?

It's about Israel? Better check out SITE.

#21 | Posted by Sully at 2010-01-24 02:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

Correct. The same war that made Marine Lt. Presley O'Bannon famous and gave today's officers their ceremonial sword. And he wasn't born until 1776.

My reply to jestgettinalong called him on the inaccuracy and illogical nature of his statement, which is that "These fuckers have been attacking the U.S. before we even WERE the U.S."

Why would Bin Laden go out of his way to admit a failed attempt? GEEZ!!

Bin Laden is dead. The official position of the U.S. government should be that 'he's dead unless he legitimately proves otherwise'.

"Bin Laden is dead. The official position of the U.S. government should be that 'he's dead unless he legitimately proves otherwise'."

He might be dead but there is no proof that he is and therefore no more reason to believe he's dead than there is to believe he's alive.

As long as he can inspire his followers, it's as good as if he was alive.

I personally want to give the Bear Jew a crack at him.

"As long as he can inspire his followers, it's as good as if he was alive."

that's exactly the plan...lol

He might be dead but there is no proof that he is and therefore no more reason to believe he's dead than there is to believe he's alive.

Posted by Sully

no, just reasonable doubt & heresay from top government folks now & then over the years & government leaders, too:>)

& then all 'em fake bins before...lol

Poor Obama going to have to eat this one, too, if he wants to be still relevant to his main power bases

"As long as he can inspire his followers, it's as good as if he was alive."

yeah Like Jesus and Elvis... only one inspires reckless murder in his name the other one doesn't.

Well, in December 2001, the shoe bomber, was convicted by a U.S. federal court and he is currently serving a life sentence without parole in a super maximum security prison in the United States. Guess the Bush administration considered the second attack on the U.S. should be handled as a civil action. Which I don't understand either why NOW too some folks are so up in arms that there is going to be a trial for Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees. Bush ET AL set the legal precedent.

Bush ET AL set the legal precedent.

#32 | Posted by Wiseronenow

meanwhile my favorite 911 smoking gun is still Sec Mineta's testimony on Cheney's orders during 911 wargames

Mineta's testimony, of course, being a former Japanese prisoner of war because he was a a terrorist back in internment days, clearly show which 2 bipolar races run our corporation ~ I mean ~ country's best interest best & so obviously have our best interests @ heart, too!

#26 | Posted by Sully

A legitimate stance that Osama is dead could be useful. I think it would be better to put the burden of proof upon Al Qaeda, to prove he is alive. Any proof Al Qaeda may attempt to provide as evidence that Osama still breaths could be useful in ferreting Al Qaeda out. I think it has become counterproductive to continue to give Osama the legitimacy of a belief that he is alive, unless they can prove it.

#34 | Posted by Whatsleft

Well said.

The burden of proof should also be put upon the source of this tape. What legitimizes it? Who releases it to the MSM and calls it a valid source? We never know, do we, in the past the videos of OBL were released by a covert Israeli agency, who claimed to be connected. So go figure.

NPIDH. No pix - it didn't happen.

Al Qaeda...hmmmm

Sunday, January 03, 2010
BBC: Al Qaeda NEVER Existed!

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

The BBC had revealed that Al Qaeda is a creation of US propaganda, in fact, a term never used by Bin Laden until after 911. The implications of the BBC documentary are enormous. It means that the US government of George W. Bush is guilty of the crimes of mass murder, high treason with respect to 911 and war crimes with respect to the mass murder of Iraqi civilians who had nothing whatsoever to do with 911. The specific crimes are violations of U.S. Codes, Title 18, Section 2441 which prescribes the penalty of death for violations thereof!

who to believe? BBC or ?

Who to believe, what bani says the BBC says or the majority of the world that prefers fact to fantasy?

FTFY

They won't stop attacking us until they are utterly defeated, regardless of how much we apologize, appease, withdraw etc.

I think letting him escape, forgetting we are at war with him and, instead, invading a country he had nothing to do with would be a great idea to Accomplish the Mission. Maybe even inviting him to set up franchises there, sort of asking him to "bring it on", if you will, could prove effective and cheap. $40 billion, tops, experts suggest.

And, of course, escorting his bankers home after a devastating terrorist attack always is a good path to victory. Maybe even selling them a big chunk of a news outlet to rally the gullible into ignoring him.

Who to believe, what bani says the BBC says or the majority of the world that prefers fact to fantasy?

#38 | Posted by ZombieHunter

Majority of the world perhaps believes that way because people like you chose to sellout to the powers that be because that's what you do for a living isn't it ~ Mr.Zombie?:>)

Hannity Says Bin Laden Sounds Like Democrats - Twice
Reported by Ellen - September 8, 2007 -

Perhaps at a loss as to how to spin the new video of Osama Bin Laden in favor of President Bush, Sean Hannity decided he'd use it to attack his fellow Americans. The self-styled "Great American" proved just what kind of patriot and freedom lover he truly is by twice likening Democrats to Osama Bin Laden. Is there any partisanship more despicable? Take action! With video.

"And, of course, escorting his bankers home after a devastating terrorist attack always is a good path to victory."

Never mind all the evidence suggesting complicity at some level...

9/11: All In One Chunk

BIN LADEN

63. Did the CIA monitor Bin Laden in 1998 with the help of 15 Afghan agents, paid $1,000/ month?

64. Where are these agents? Was Johnny "Mike" Spann one? Was John Walker Lindh one?

65. Is an Afghan agent a member of the ISI? Is an Afghan agent working for Bin Laden?

66. When was the first time Tenet mentioned the Al-Qaeda group to any member of the Senate?

67. Why did the Pentagon release a new video version or translation of the Bin Laden Home video?

68. Why it was released only 8 hours after translation by the German magazine MONITOR on December ?

69. Why were the four translators prior US-Government workers?

70. When was the Bin Laden Home Video found and who found it?

71. Who found the video if Northern Alliance and US troops had not yet arrived in Kandahar or Jahalabad?

72. Does the timestamp on the Bin Laden video indicate that it was found two weeks after it was produced?

73. Why was the public not informed who found the video and when?

74. Why according to MONITOR magazine, were the most controversial statements translated incorrectly?

75. Why was the video released?

76. Who gave the final decision to release it?

77. Why is the Bin Laden video of June 2001 in which he praised the attack, available on the Internet?

78. What about Bin Laden's statements on Al-Jazeera in June 2001 about the bombing of USS Cole, which are similar to the statements on the November 2001 home video?

79. Why did Bin Laden state in Umman Magazine in Sept. 2001, that he was not involved in the WTC?

80. Is Bin Laden still on the payroll of the CIA or ISI?

81. Did the Bin Laden Group Inc. help build ToraBora with the CIA?

82. What was the purpose of the meeting with General Pervez Musharraf in May 2001?

83. Why was a statement released that Al-Khalifa bin Laden, who is not the mother of Bin Laden, had a telephone call with Bin Laden on September 9, rather than Alia Ghanem, his mother? Why did Alia Ghanem say she did not believe he planned the attack?

I thought the little o was going to have OSB in jail by now. I understand there is an open court date for him in NYC.

#9 | Posted by Sniper at 2010-01-24 11:52 AM | Reply | Flag:

Will the piss still be streaming down your leg should they bring him to trial?

bin laden: the ghost of the dessert

thanks for turning an ass into a legend.

"...and more attacks against the U.S. would be forthcoming." Bin Mossad

So here's a solution?:>)

1/25/any year

Gates Pledges "Steady Growth in the Pentagon's Budgets"

Defense Secretary Robert Gates hosted a meeting with the nation's top defense company executives Wednesday, stressing the need for a closer partnership with them and pledging to work with the White House to secure steady growth in the Pentagon's budgets over time, according to his spokesman.

This is like some "Terrorist Form Letter."

Dear (Country attacked)

I, (name of attacker) do hereby claim responsibility for the (date of attack) terrorist attack on (name of target.) I do also affirm that there will be (number) more attacks to come on your (organization) until you (demand).

Thank you for your time.

Whoops, why is Costa Rica so happy then?

The Happiest People

NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: January 6, 2010
SAN JOS, Costa Rica

The New York Times

Hmmm. You think it's a coincidence? Costa Rica is one of the very few countries to have abolished its army, and it's also arguably the happiest nation on earth.

ff # 45

He also took credit for the Colts
victory over the Jets Sunday

Will the piss still be streaming down your leg should they bring him to trial?

More than ever!

-Sniper

The requirement to build the next lie to cover the previous ad nauseum is getting quite old. Here's the latest BS to justify as Yemen link: