If I lived in California, I'd move anyways, so this doesn't concern me. I do, however, wish they'd decriminalize it nationwide.

As long as it is treated like alcohol or any other prescribed drug, I am ALL for it.

Make me a sergeant and give me the booze;

Make me a sergeant and give me the booze;

There needs to be a poll on this - "how much weed is too much weed?"

There needs to be a poll on this - "how much weed is too much weed?"

#3 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2010-01-21 09:50 PM | Reply | Flag:

ZH - You can never be too smart or have too much weed, eh!

There needs to be a poll on this - "how much weed is too much weed?"

#3 | Posted by ZombieHunter

If you do a J once a year, it's too much. Stick to Mothers Milk.

This calls for a bong hit. Salut`

If you do a J once a year, it's too much. Stick to Mothers Milk.

#5 | Posted by wisgod at 2010-01-21 10:01 PM | Reply | Flag:

Why would you want to smoke a Red Hot Chili Peppers album?

Why would you want to smoke a Red Hot Chili Peppers album?

Why not smoke and listen to it instead?

Sounds like CA wants to hand the industry over to the pharmaceuticals who can provide a measurable amount of the drug.

BUSINESS AS USUAL.

who can provide a measurable amount of the drug

Heh, then it will just be a bureaucrat pinching your sack.

Unlimited buds are good for the patient and good for the State coffers. But, seeing the guidelines on legal docs helped me understand EXACTLY what i could legally have/transport. It also helped define co-ops and collectives. IMO the guidelines were sufficient for medication and care giving. I wonder how this ruling effects the California Senate Bill 420....crossing out some of the verbiage, I assume.

This part of an AP article that really popped out at me:

The high court says only voters can change amendments that they've added to California's constitution through the initiative process. The ruling by Chief Justice Ron George left in place the portion of the new law that protects patients possessing a state-issue medical marijuana identification card from arrest. - Paul Elias, Assoc. Press

Heh, then it will just be a bureaucrat pinching your sack.

#10 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2010-01-21 10:26 PM | Reply | Flag:

I only let my girlfriend do that! Ba-dum-bum!!

#11

CA Senate Bill 420?! Really??? I did not know that and now I'm ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!

Weed is better in times of no money than money is in times of no weed.

~~ FFFB

#10 | Posted by ZombieHunter

yeah, that was pretty funny.

#14 | Posted by chickenrancher at 2010-01-22 12:09 PM | Reply | Flag

I really miss those guys, especially Fat Freddie.

And his cat

I have no problem with pot being legal. On the other hand, when I read Nullifidian I think that maybe pot isn't as harmless as people say.

Did any of you see the "Thansgiving" episode?

Too Funny

Do they call them "episodes"?

Or the Disneyland one?

Too Funny

I am starting to feel old.

WHY DO I STILL LIVE IN ASHEVILLE NC! The second I finish college I'm moving to California. THE SAME FREAKING DAY....

GOD BLESS YOU GUYS. God bless the people of the great state of Califunia.

Sweet! Humboldt County already allows you to carry 3 pounds. I think 3 pounds is about right. Three pounds a day that is!

j/k

#23 | Posted by donnerboy

My question is:

Is that actually 3 pounds per day
or
3 pounds per day pro-rated over a calendar year
or
3 pounds per day pro-rated over a fiscal year?

WHo cares GOD bless them

Chicken.. I can be in possession of 3 processed pounds. Tomorrow I could have a different 3 pounds! (no one said it had to be the exact same 3 pounds). This is for transportation or storage purposes.

I can also be growing up to 99 plants. So I can have another 3 pounds on the vine (which really means I can actually have more if I stagger the crops slightly)!

Isn't that sweet?

Humboldt County is awesome like that!

The mexicans are pissed at humboldt county because you are taking their jobs.

If I lived in California, I'd move anyways, so this doesn't concern me. I do, however, wish they'd decriminalize it nationwide.

#1 | Posted by American1st at 2010-01-21 09:21 PM

Is it possible that part of the rationale for not decriminalizing it is that, if someone is involved in an accident it can't be acurrately determined if they were or were not under the influence at the time of the accident?

Is it possible that part of the rationale for not decriminalizing it is that, if someone is involved in an accident it can't be acurrately determined if they were or were not under the influence at the time of the accident?

#27 | Posted by Washboard at 2010-01-22 08:07 PM | Reply | Flag:

Depends on the type of testing. Testing different bodily fluids tell you different things. Oral (saliva) testing is good from shortly after consumption to about 72 hours. In urine testing, it shows up a few days to up to 90 days later, depending on metabolism and other factors.

Oral method is used for "post-incident" (ie accident) testing, urine generally for pre-employment.

IMHO decrim is slow in arriving because of the "all drugs are bad" mentality rather than inability to accurately detect.

Decrim won't happen till corporations are run out of the legislature.

To much vested interest in keeping it illegal from fabric producers to the private prision industry.

Sir Mike don't give up on NC just yet. We already have partial decrim and medical MJ laws have been proposed on several occasions. We may not be at the forefront but we are not far behind. On the other hand some medical MJ states have pretty strict standards for people who are prescribed MJ to get any other scripts, as someone with MS who is helped by both regular scripts and MJ I don't want to see them trying to limit one because of the other with it illegal they don't try.

To much vested interest in keeping it illegal from fabric producers to the private prision industry.

True, and to think some of the most high times I've had were in the Garment District in downtown Los Angeles.

To get an ID card from the Dept. of Health would be sick, sans the extra $150/year (that's after the $100 yearly Dr. fee). Then, those county-issued cards will become collectors items - hopefully soon. WTF is up with those marihuana stamps circa 1937?

Did anyone else have a black light bulb appear over their head when they read this, followed by the desire to overturn all their sofa cushions in the search for stale Bugles and/or Doritoes?

Heh, then it will just be a bureaucrat pinching your sack.#10 | Posted by ZombieHunter at 2010-01-21 10:26 PM | Reply

Are you working on the next Barney Frank campaign?

"Barney Frank:
Just Another Bureaucrat Who Wants To Pinch Your Sack"

California Senate Bill 420

That one still kills Spud!

The FFFB quote that CR put up above is close but not quite correct.

"Dope will get you through times of money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

Is the original quote.

On Topic?

Another victory fer the forces of rationality.

In Cali of all places.

Huzzah!

Calls fer a celebration!

* DB *

Be Well.

cool.

that being said, there are so many shady fuckers in the medical marijuana game. they need to be cleaned out.

that being said, there are so many shady fuckers in the medical marijuana game. they need to be cleaned out.

How do you propose to smoke out the shady fuckers?

ok dat funny Zombie! FF!

In Cali of all places.

Huzzah!

Calls fer a celebration!

* DB *

Yah Tatorhead

Of course in Cali!

We been workin on this for a long long time.

Me? I call it my own personal stimulus package.

But, I am not the real genius...our District Attorney is.

and because your quote is so true... sometimes I feel like I AM my own bank. And even when the old bank goes dry I don't mind so much. There is always the weed.

There is always the weed.

Posted by donnerboy

when I first used it when I was 16 ~ I had a dream journal which I still have. I noticed greater dream lucidity at first from using weed, then less & less...