Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, January 20, 2010

America's family court system is badly broken, writes Gina Kaysen Fernandes for Momlogic. The parent with the most money often wins custody of the children. This article details several cases where the children made outcries about emotional and sexual abuse that were dismissed by the courts. Instead, the judges decided to punish the parent trying to protect the children. "There's no hearing, no evidence, no notice -- they can take your child away from you," said Michael Lesher, coauthor of From Madness To Mutiny: Why Mothers Are Running from the Family Courts -- and What Can Be Done about It.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

hope4hope

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Disturbing stuff...

This is insane!

At the begining of the article it states her husband is rich.

Can't help but wonder....

It doesn't just happen to mothers. Fathers have gone through similar things for years.

I'm sorry,but "mom Logic",I'm a squeeky clean soccar mom,I live for my kids.

The fuckers rich.
I suck my dad's penis.

I know shit goes on,but this sure sounds a little off to me.

I know,mom good,dad bad

Given that the vast majority of pedophiles (some 90 percent) are men,

Nice touch,Hope,
How 'bout a percentage of how many are the fathers.

I've witnessed it and all I could say afterwards was that the judge must have been paid off. In the case I know of fortunately that judge moved to a different type of court (where she can probably get bigger bribes) and was replaced by a Haitian American judge who was outraged by her rulings and completely reveresed them. I was glad about that but the first judge is still in the court system deciding the future for people and finding for the highest bidder.

#3

Really?

Children have been placed with mothers when there is a lot of documentation that the mother is forcing her daughters to perform sexual acts with her, the father only having 2 hours supervised visitation a month?
I know that there are men who have been accused of improper acts with their children and visitation was minimal, the mother getting full custody...when no proof was documented. And that is inexcusable.

This shouldn't turn into a discussion pitting fathers against mothers.

It should be a discussion about having documentation of sexual abuse and children being placed with that abusing parent and fighting to protect those children!

Think shes a lied a bit???. Mine did, on me. And I didn't see my kid for 30 years..... I didn't do any thing wrong but the courts beleive her............ Guility until proven innocent......

You see the problem is stated right in the thread's postscript:

Given that the vast majority of pedophiles (some 90 percent) are men, it is logical that articles about sexual abuse in the family courts will most often feature abusive fathers and protective mothers.

A mother can walk into a court room and declare the father is a pedophile and the "logical" conclusion is, he's guilty until it gets proven otherwise.

After my daughter's mom walked out on us, she tried blackmailing me, by threatening to report me as an abuser. I had to move quickly and make things legal, before she was able to act on her threats.

I can't speak for every state or territory, but in many of them this woman's tale wouldn't hold up under superficial scrutiny in regards to truth.

We'll start with her "consulting" therapists about alleged sexual abuse of children. Like they have a choice by law, under extreme legal penalty and forfeiture of license.

The very unfortunate fact in such situations is that fathers lie, mothers lie, and children lie. Everyone else is faced with dealing with that.

Left something out---Too early in the morning, I guess---

There are laws in many states that MANDATE a medical or mental health professional to report allegations of sexual and other abuse against children, elders, and others.

The penalties for NOT responding are severe. Given it is so EASY to respond it's hard to see the incentive for any therapist NOT to do it, especially given the possible personal repercussions, legaly and economically, if they don't.

Allegations of abuse are a weapon used by all parties in intensely emotional legal situations to get what they want. The result is a disservice to those moms, dads, and especially kids who have really been hurt.

In cases of abuse, guilty before being proven innocent is a way to protect a child. And money does buy a judge. There needs to be a panel instead of a single judge.

"And money does buy a judge...."

I suppose I should state that its always possible for a particular person to be corrupt. Having said that, the idea its anything but a rarity in such matters is ludicrous.

To make your conspiracy theory work, thousands would have to be in on it, including defense counsels.

Beyond that, I'm curious why you don't think a panel couldn't also be bought if a judge could be? Frankly, that would probably require a lot less money.

I know first hand that in Florida the fairness of a civil/family hearing depends a lot on the judge that is assigned to the case.

Florida law mandates that a general master makes the initial decision for the immediate residential custody status of the minor child(ren) and calculates child support. In cases where the child's best interests are not being met...the court may appoint a Guardian Ad Litem.

Florida law also mandates that the parties mediate to try to resolve their differences prior to going to trial. This is a step in the right direction but considering the fact that couples separate because they don't get along...initial mediation sessions don't produce much more that a framework for the attorneys to know what their dealing with. Mediation is private and the discussion is not admissible in court; only the agreement is.

If in the disclosure process allegations of abuse arise the court may order psychological evaluation of the parents and children.

A decent psyche eval from a reputable doctor can run around $5,000 to $10,000 dollars.

In cases with allegations of abuse the burden of proof is on the accuser. Some judges I've gone in front of take these allegations seriously and, as the law demands, require the plaintiff to substantiate their claims of abuse ie. ER records, family doctor reports, documentation from teachers, psyche eval reports, etc.

If a spouse/parent fails to report spouse abuse/child abuse they will find they have no credence in front of a judge in the future.

As soon as an instance of physical/sexual abuse occurs it is imperative the adult victim or the child's parent report it. I cannot stress enough that if these acts go unreported then the wronged parties have little recourse in a court of law.

"A decent psych eval (psychological evaluation) from a reputable doctor can run $5,000 to $10,000 dollars...."

Nah. Just wrong.

I believe that there are just as many women abusers as there are men the only difference being that boys aren't as free giving up information that they find embarrassing.

If I know family court and I do, it sounds like some woman did not get her way.

Was this allegation made during the divorice for leverage or was it made during the marriage?

Yeah, something smells funny about her story.

It might be all true - then again, the judge certainly didn't think so.

HOLY SHIT!!!

DID WE DO IT???

I looked at all the posts and I think we may have another thread where most can agree, and I saw NO politicizing (yet).

Although rare, it is sometimes seen......Like a jack-a-lope.

The court is probably staffed by a Republican majority. Why should they care about this kid? It's not their kid.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable