Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Monday, January 18, 2010

For the first time, Chinese investment in U.S. companies has eclipsed U.S. purchases of Chinese entities, a trend analysts say is fueled partly by depressed American assets. In 2009, Chinese buyers snapped up $3.9 billion of U.S. assets, nearly four times the level in 2008, says Dealogic, a data-tracking firm. By comparison, U.S. buyers plowed $3 billion into Chinese entities last year, down 80% from 2008. It's too early to tell whether this pattern will hold. Chinese buyers represented only 3% of the $118.7 billion in U.S. foreign investment last year. Yet China ranked as the ninth-largest foreign investor in the U.S., and among the minority that increased its stake amid a sputtering global mergers-and-acquisitions market.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

nanc

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Shit Yeah! Everything here in the U S of A is at fire sale prices!

Everything MUST GO!

NO REASONABLE OFFER REFUSED!

Take our jobs!

Take our assets!

Take our money!

Just send us poison laced cheap shit in return!

EVERYTHING MUST GO!

* paid for by America, Inc. serving the hardwerking CEO's for over 40 years!

It's too early to tell whether this pattern will hold.

It will accelerate.

www.drudge.com

We've all taken our eyes off the prize. Is it too late to get it all back?

Is it too late to get it all back?

Ask the groups that pander to the fringe like the far left wackos and the teabaggers.... they control the message.

But, 726 - there aren't ENOUGH teabaggers to make a difference - at least that's what the maelstrom media has lead everyone to believe - are we huge or not?

This may not really be that bad. I remember the "JAPAN IS BUYING AMERICA" panic of the 80's that was merely that: panic. We survived and are not speaking Japanese today.

You gotta love these teabagging fools!!!! They don't seem to remember that it was constipated conservatives who gave away the store, sent all the jobs to China and India and bankrupted the USA.

Sucking scrotum must cause memory loss.

They don't seem to remember that it was constipated conservatives who gave away the store, sent all the jobs to China and India and bankrupted the USA.

did they come over and kick your dog too?

They're also invading the U.S. thanks to H-1B visas. For instance, over the past several years they've laid off Americans and replaced them with lower paid H-1B workers in the Financial District in NYC (as I posted on the Krugman thread).

It's not limited to NYC or one industry. For instance, Microsoft claims they can't find IT people? Cigna moves their IT dept offshore? There are thousands of Americans who could (and did) do the jobs at many corporations, but they don't want to pay the salaries, so they laid them off and hired Indians and Chinese.

We need to fix this H-1B system. It's led to too much 'insourcing'. Outsourcing is bad enough.

"did they come over and kick your dog too?"

No, just their constituents' asses.

China has been buying our assets and land for at least 15 years that I know of...

so anybody know who the other 8 ahead of China are?

You gotta love these teabagging fools!!!! They don't seem to remember that it was constipated conservatives who gave away the store, sent all the jobs to China and India and bankrupted the USA.

Sucking scrotum must cause memory loss.

#8 | Posted by axe

I guess YOU would know but not remember.

The store was given away by high labor costs (both grey collar and white collar), strict polution laws, and high taxes. Every one of thoes things are a component of the cost of a product. Uou tyell me who was responsible for thoes and we can hang the guilty bastards.

maybe the Chinese can get the unemployment rate below 10% come up with something besides a shovel or green job.

I've been doing my part, buying two new Chinese names a month.

there aren't ENOUGH teabaggers to make a difference - at least that's what the maelstrom media has lead everyone to believe - are we huge or not?

#6 | Posted by nanc

Huge? No. Hugely ignorant?...

I haven't seen much press that gives the impression that the TP is insignificant. Personally, I would call them the obnoxiously loud obstructionist minority, similar to the so-called "moral majority", which everyone knows was never a majority.

Most of us know, right or wrong and often instead of doing the proper fix, the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

And so it begins ...

[China takes over the world]

I haven't seen much press that gives the impression that the TP is insignificant. Personally, I would call them the obnoxiously loud obstructionist minority, similar to the so-called "moral majority", which everyone knows was never a majority.

Most of us know, right or wrong and often instead of doing the proper fix, the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

#17 | Posted by Whatsleft

In American history, change has never come from the top but it comes from the common citizen---that's what you're seeing today and that's why there is real hope for the first time in a long time. Also, if the "moral majority" was never a majority, it must socratically mean the "obstructionist minority" is the majority.

The good news is the Chinese are starting to build factories in the U.S.--lithium ion battery plant in Michigan---as our incomes related to purchasing power become more competitive globally (and we're close) and the dollar weakens we'll see manufacturing rebound---and I believe it's starting to happen.

who sayz commienizm iz a path tuh failure?

as our incomes related to purchasing power become more competitive globally (and we're close) and the dollar weakens we'll see manufacturing rebound---and I believe it's starting to happen.

You're dreaming. There are still a lot of third world shit holes where labor is much cheaper than it is here.

I'd imagine in a couple of years Haiti is going to look like a wonderful place to the Chinese, to build a factory. Right off of our coast, without our restrictions.

You gotta love these teabagging fools!!!! They don't seem to remember that it was constipated conservatives who gave away the store, sent all the jobs to China and India and bankrupted the USA.
--AXE

I hope your joking............"Trade with China will not only extend our nation's unprecedented economic growth, it offers us a chance to help shape the future of the world's most prosperous nation and to reaffirm our own global leadership for peace and prosperity." Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton got China into the WTO. Signed Oct. 10, 2000

"Contrary to the predictions of its supporters, China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) has failed to reduce its trade surplus with the United States or increase overall U.S. employment. The rise in the U.S. trade deficit with China between 1997 and 2006 has displaced production that could have supported 2,166,000 U.S. jobs. Most of these jobs (1.8 million) have been lost since China entered the WTO in 2001"

Contrary to the predictions of its supporters, China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) has failed to reduce its trade surplus with the United States or increase overall U.S. employment. The rise in the U.S. trade deficit with China between 1997 and 2006 has displaced production that could have supported 2,166,000 U.S. jobs. Most of these jobs (1.8 million) have been lost since China entered the WTO in 2001"

It's supporters were either fools or liars.

Or both.

Get used to it.

All BHO's fault.

RIIIIIGGGGHHHHHT

We've all taken our eyes off the prize. Is it too late to get it all back?

I'd say yes.

We sold them the dollars. It's too late to close the store.

Audit the FED.

But, 726 - there aren't ENOUGH teabaggers to make a difference - at least that's what the maelstrom media has lead everyone to believe - are we huge or not?

#6 | Posted by nanc at 2010-01-18 04:33 PM | Reply | Flag:

Your waistlines sure are huge. You tea-baggers sure are a bunch of fat fucks. I wonder what the average cholesterol level is at your Sore Loser pity-party.

You think Nanc is fat??

LMBO

#28 - you would throw rocks at every woman you know if you ever got a gander at me!

Women like this, cs?

LMBO

#29 | Posted by Lisa

So, is it funny that someone is fat, or is it hilarious that some thinks someone is fat? Or is it "laugh your butt off" funny that a fellow libtard paints all people who have a differing opinion than him/it with the "fat" brush?
This, after attacking me for supposedly "attacking" poor old irrelevant Ebert? I gotta give you credit, Lisa, when you set out to destroy friendships, you go whole hog.

Or like this?

DAmn...is that you, Nanc? Yer purty hot! I'd hit ya!

~{:^)

and in the best of ways....

What are you talking about A1??

I was laughing because Commonsense has never seen Nanc and yet made that judgement against her. So typical of using appearances as a weapon when he doesn't even know what she looks like!!!

I have seen her...which is why I was laughing!

I'm sorry if you feel that our friendship can be destroyed because I disagree with your comment about Ebert.

That makes me very sad.

On that note. I think I'm going to log off.

No - none of those ugly girls are me! I was just refuting uncommonlybadsense's statement. One should not overgeneralize in such matters.

The Lakota is second from the right, innah....

That's a lot of cougar in one place....

You know how strong a friendship is when you can have a friendly disagreement and still come out with a healthy amount of respect for each other. Agree to disagree so to speak. I know this to be true from experience. Take it off the board and settle in private.

That makes me very sad.

On that note. I think I'm going to log off.

Yeah, I felt that way the other day.

That's a lot of cougar in one place....

Yeeeeeoooowww!

Gee, Mao. I don't recall hearing from you when Bush was running structural deficits for eight years before his admin. destroyed the economy.

Maybe you can link me to a post
I missed.

I have never denied being a cougar.

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrffft!

Mao-
re: Scroll up on this this thread and tell me how much fucking sense your post makes, Boyd.


At the time, dude. That's kinda an important point.

At the time, Mao, I don't recall a peep out of you.

Now that all you cling to from the Bush years is torture and your odd denial of climate science, I just don't recall any substantive criticism of this from you.

But please feel free to link me to your assault on Bush's conduct in this area (at the time).

Most Republicans had perfectly good rationales (according to them) 'while' the GOP was spending money like drunken sailors and running up the largest debt in world history. This from the party of 'fiscal responsibility' and 'balanced budgets'. Today, it's ALL someone else's fault, of course.

Gooodnight blog....I'm gonna go hold my breath!

Go see the 5th post of the thread.

www.drudge.com

Punk.

Boy is your face red.

I'm gonna go hold my breath!

Then by all means, disregard #49.

Fiscal cons might stay home, too.

Posted by Jak_Se_Mao at 2006-05-15 11:44 AM | Reply | Flag:

Wow. That's it? Pretty convincing, Mao. That's your best????

LOL

Later blog.

Point being, I criticized The Bush countless times for his fiscal transgressions.

That's a post from 4 years ago that proves it.

And frankly, your sorry little ass isn't worth the additional research required to drag my balls across your face anymore than I already have.

Sleep tight.

Wow. That's it?

Yeah, Boyd.

That's it.

I have never denied being a cougar.

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrffft!

#43 | Posted by nanc

I can't bear to think of you that way, Nanc...

That's it.

#53 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao at 2010-01-19 12:47 AM | Reply | Flag:

Yes, we understand that that was the extent of it; a passing comment that some people might be upset with Bush due to his profligacy.

Very powerful.

Really must go.

Adios.

And frankly, your sorry little ass isn't worth the additional research required to drag my balls across your face anymore than I already have.

Sleep tight.

Posted by Jak_Se_Mao

ah, he loves yu...how sweet

Yes, we understand that that was the extent of it

Except I think you skipped a post or two above.

Its the extent of what I'm going to google and reproduce.

Because its all I need.

Really must go.

I don't blame you.

Gee, Mao. I don't recall hearing from you when Bush was running structural deficits for eight years before his admin. destroyed the economy.

Maybe you can link me to a post I missed.

www.drudge.com

Boyd?

Stop pounding Boyd/BetelG so hard, Jak...he's enjoying it too much....

Just from memory, the largest sources of foreign investment are from Europe, notably the UK. Japan is up there too.

Also, I once knew a land broker/ manager in Tennessee who said the Swiss and Germans were the largest foreign owners of American farm land.

His typical deal was to sell a farm (representing the American farmer) to some Swiss investor. The farmer would then lease back the land and continue to work it.

The farmer gets to keep his job and income, but can cash out on a huge asset.

#14 Sniper> The store was given away by high labor costs (both grey collar and white collar), strict polution laws, and high taxes.

I knew a fellow that was a mid-level manager in a manufacturing firm which was struggling (this was about 10-12 years ago). He got a very good offer from a similar company working in Mexico and jumped ship. I saw him several months later and he was telling me how much more profitable the Mexican firm was, citing their much lower wages and no required pollution controls as the top two reasons. His former U.S. employer had to spend big bucks treating a lot of liquids before discharging anything into the local river (and rightly so). At the Mexican plant, they spent money on a nice pump to dump all their untreated liquids straight into a local stream. Several years later he told me that all the wells within several miles of the Mexican plant were polluted and drinkable water had to be shipped in.

#20 Matsop> and the dollar weakens we'll see manufacturing rebound---and I believe it's starting to happen.

From what I've seen, I would disagree. When gas prices climbed in 2008, some sales reps for U.S. manufacturing firms told me over lunch that their sales were going up. The higher cost to ship goods across the Pacific was causing American sellers to shift more towards U.S. manufacturers. As gas prices fell, purchasers tended to shift back to Pacific rim manufacturers.

I would love to see American manufacturing rebound on a large scale, but I personally don't think it will happen anytime in the near future. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong, though. ;~)

what would the chinese do with east st.louis? it would be a great revelation to bring in a team of chinese engineers and get their take onthe town and her potential.

sell them Detroit

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable