Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Sunday, January 17, 2010

As audience members streamed out of Pres. Obama's rally on behalf of AG Martha Coakley (D) here tonight, the consensus was that the fault for Coakley's now-floundering MA SEN bid lies with one person -- George W. Bush.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

cookfish

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

... then you know we have a lot of digging to do, but some work needs to be done and this president's in the process of doing it and we need to get Marcia Coakley to help him to do that."

Marcia, Marcia, Marcia! How funny is it that the stupid Kennedy offspring don't even know the name of daddy's wanna-be successor. LOL.

Pat needs to take Marcia for a drive...

Barankrupt Barry just did for Coakley what he did for Corzine - nail in the coffin. Thanks, Barry.

He took ownership of her loss or win by stumping for her.

I heard on the radio tonight that some of Coakley's staff (democrats) are planning on voting for Brown.

More Kennedy: "One thing the Democrats have done wrong? We haven't kept the focus on this disaster on the Republicans who brought it upon us. We've tried too hard to do that right thing, and that's to fix it, as opposed to spend more of our time and energy pointing the finger at who got us [here] in the first place."

Read this again, folks. It describes the Progressive Creed perfectly - we're spending too much time trying to fix things instead of spending our time constuctively - like blaming Bush! LOL. You can't make shit like this up.

My favorite today was when the little fuck-stain "president" kept making snide references to the fact Scott Brown drove a truck.

You just have to shake your head at how alienated lil' Barry Hussein is from the American Experience.

Patrick Kennedy is a drug addict.

so was rush limbaugh

Rush has never sought, nor been elected to, public office, either. (that I'm aware of)

Quackflush is still reliving last October hoping an aged dumbass and a total moron can somehow claim the White House.

"Quackflush"

Damn! That's pretty lame, Letus...even for you...hell, especially for you. Your hate is usually more pronounced, and with a tad more vitriol.

With Obama working 36-hour days, and with the support of all 57 states, we should be out of this mess in no time.

You just have to shake your head at how alienated lil' Barry Hussein is from the American Experience.

#7 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao at 2010-01-17 11:35 PM | Reply | Flag:

He came from nothing and got through an awesome college, so eat shit trust fund rancher.

He came from nothing and got through an awesome college,

Two Ivy League universities

(I know you knew that :-)

Here's what I posted Sunday at the end of a long and dying thread:

Given that Obama has recently been in Mass to campaign for Oakley... here are some thoughts/questions for anyone who wants to play.

1. Does his appearance mean she's in trouble?
2. Given his past "success" campaigning for candidates in VA and NJ, is BHO a help or hinderance?
3. Given BHO's active support and support from other Dem heavy hitters, if there's a Brown win, what does that mean... to healthcare, to the public's support of Dem initiatives, etc? In other words, is an Oakley defeat a reflection on BHO? Because if one says an Oakley win is a reflection of support for BHO and Dems, then the oppposite holds, no?
4. Does the fact that this race is too close to call give Dems/libs/BHO supporters any pause for concern? If not, why?

"He parked his Truck on Wall Street," said Obama referring to Scott Brown.

Who is Obama to rip people for helping Wall Street? He's given billions to Wall Street and shows no sign of slowing down the gravy train. Can anyone point to anything Obama has ever done to reign in Wall Street?

Who is Obama to rip people for helping Wall Street? He's given billions to Wall Street...

and accepted plenty in return.

Can anyone point to anything Obama has ever done to reign in Wall Street?

No President, regardless of party, ever wants to screw with Wallstreet when stocks are rising because they need the money and never when they are falling because the economy is in too fragile a state to screw with them.

White House To Make Major Regulatory Reform Push After Health Care: Goolsbee


www.huffingtonpost.com

Funny how it's the wingnuts who cry, "Socialism!", whenever reform of financial institutes is mentioned..... when it's the GNOP's ox being gored.

These are folks whose only lesson from the recent near Great Depression was that we should have more..... deregulation.

I think what this is showing is that it is not the "Democrat" aspect that kept Ted his seat, but the Kennedy name that did it.

UNBELIEVABLE.

White House To Make Major Regulatory Reform Push After Health Care

Translation: We will make it a priority, later! Now that's change you can believe in!

These are folks whose only lesson from the recent near Great Depression was that we should have more..... deregulation.

#21 | Posted by Corky

Corky, I really haven't seen a lot of people screaming against regulation on the DR--also, we had regulators in the past and they didn't do their jobs---last point, so you pass a bunch of regulations-- what is that going to mean in the next few years---nothing, the horse is out of the barn, he's munching on grass miles away, the ballgame is over, leverage and all the bad things done in the past years are ended, the consumer is finished.

#24 | Posted by JOE at 2010-01-18 02:58 PM | Reply | Flag: WAAAAAHHH!!

He came from nothing and got through an awesome college,

Another affirmative action boy.
Obama admits he was a poor student

TIMBCI

What generation did your family leave the South for NY?

If Coakley loses "Ted's" seat, who would you blame, AU?

Why?

Coakley, by every account, ran a lackluster campaign. We'll know by tomorrow night how it turned out. As the sign in the Clinton 'War Room' said in 1992, "It's the economy, stupid". Reagan found that out in his first midterm election. A special election isn't usually high turnout, which the Coakley would need to put this seat in the win column by any margin.

If Brown is elected and merely becomes another "NO!" GOP voice, it won't be a good thing for the GOP to be so glaringly obstructionist as one failed supermajority cloture vote after another splashes itself all over the nightly news, shining light on the gridlock at the moment the country needs the 'loyal opposition' to join in and help turn this country around.

Health Care will be off the radar in a few weeks one way or the other. Then, attention will shift dramatically to the economy. Swing voters will be hyperfocused on what's being done for the economy and who's working to make life better for average Americans, which should be 528 members of Congress, but sadly isn't. Saying "NO!" won't cut it anymore.

If the GOP doesn't appear to be for anything by the 2010 elections independents will vote them out regardless of the state of the economy. It's all about the economy. A year is a lifetime in politics.

Special elections are nuts. NY-23 proved that recently.

538 members of Congress ....

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable