The ends justify the means.

Ed reminds me of the angry uncle that is miserable at any given moment. He's also an idiot.

I think arranging for a whole lot of Rtard 'accidents' would be better. They don't have to be fatal, just enough to keep 'em from voting for a couple of decades.

Mass. has a history of playing games with the absentee ballots. I'm sure SEIU, ACORN and the Black Panthers will be out in full force on Tuesday.

Since they thought they had this one in the bag they may be too late.

Most liberals agree with him. Why should Democracy stand in the way of Obamanomics? The Messiah needs help! To the rescue!

SCHULTZ: I tell you what, if I lived in Massachusetts I'd try to vote 10 times. I don't know if they'd let me or not, but I'd try to. Yeah, that's right. I'd cheat to keep these bastards out. I would. Cause that's exactly what they are.

I think arranging for a whole lot of Rtard 'accidents' would be better. They don't have to be fatal, just enough to keep 'em from voting for a couple of decades.
#2 | Posted by axe at 2010-01-16 09:44 PM

As Mr. Obama prepares to come here on Sunday to campaign for the party's beleaguered Senate candidate, Martha Coakley, Democrats across the country are starting to wonder aloud if they misjudged the electorate over the last year, with profound ramifications for the midterm elections this year and, potentially, for Mr. Obama's presidency.

I'm sure SEIU.....will be out in full force on Tuesday.

Shit, dawg.

SEIU is campaigning for Scott Brown in Mass.

SEIU is campaigning for Scott Brown in Mass.

Ain't that some shit?

#7 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao

WOW. I don't know what to say.

This little punk-ass joke of a "president" is a historical first....the first instance of a man who inherently despises the country he's been elected to lead.

You're seeing the reaction to it from sea to shining sea being manifested in what's happening in Mass.

Obama was elected because of his packaging, not because of his leftist ideology.

That's becoming painfully evident.

I reckon America's still America.

Even in Massachusetts.

I love it.

Ed Shultz speaks in hyperbole and the righties try to pretend he means reality by it. It speaks more to their desperation and hostility than it does about his intent. FAct is, he never really wanted anyone to break any law or to vote illegally or more than once and most of the opposition to his viewpoint will readily admit that but there will always be that small minority who try to pretend that he meant his statement literally...well...there's nothing you can do about the very dumb and even less you can do about the very dishonest.

You say so.

Ed Shultz speaks in hyperbole and the righties try to pretend he means reality by it.

LOL.

Jesus, you're a trip.

"FAct is, he never really wanted anyone to break any law or to vote illegally..."

Link?

(all we have is what he broadcasted)

There was no need for such an exhortation on Cape Cod as state Sen. Scott Brown, the Republican nominee, was enveloped by a couple hundred, sign-waving supporters as he attempted to walk into a local pub where another hundred voters waited for an afternoon rally.

"People's seat, people's seat!" the Hyannis crowd chanted, aping the retort Brown gave at a debate Monday when asked about "the Kennedy seat."

With three days until Bay State voters go to the polls to decide whether Democrats will retain their filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, the momentum plainly is with the GOP.

He's drawing crowds rarely seen by Republicans in this state and seems to have more organic support than Coakley, an impression underscored by the imperfect measurement of yard signs spotted for the Republican (many) and the Democrat (none) along the South Shore and on the Cape.

Brown's message of taking on the state's entrenched Democratic majoritywhat he repeatedly calls "the machine"and addressing a larger discontent among voters here toward Washington has given Republicans an opportunity to win their first Massachusetts Senate contest in nearly 40 years.

Anybody paying attention to this race needs to take note of the "right now".

The human shitstains that comprise the leadership of both the left wing blogosphere and the mainstream media editorial staffs haven't yet decided how to spin this. There's no narrative as of right now.

That's why you're hearing so little from the bottom-feeders here on the Drudge Retort.

They haven't been told what to "think" yet.

This is one of those rare moments of purity---the calm before the storm that'll hit Monday morning.

As you can see above, "Danni" tried to give her two cents, albeit with comical results.

I'm just really curious as to what the citizen leftist has to say regarding the developments in the Bay State. The American people are obviously dying to drag their balls across the face of Obama and his agenda---and bid it adieu.

Even in Massachusetts.

Even for Teddy Kennedy's senate seat.

That's got to be a stinging reality check.

#2 | POSTED BY AXE AT 2010-01-16 09:44 PM | REPLY | FLAG: Pathetic, Yet Predictable

Ed Shultz speaks in hyperbole and the righties try to pretend he means reality by it. It speaks more to their desperation and hostility than it does about his intent.

#11 | Posted by danni at 2010-01-16 10:05 PM | Reply | Flag:

Danni, copy and print this post of yours. Tape it up where you can see it, and read it the next time you join in on a Rush Limbaugh rant.

Ed shouldn't have said it. Just like Rush shouldn't say it. No matter your political leanings the system needs to remain sacred.

#11 DANNI Ed Shultz speaks in hyperbole and the righties try to pretend he means reality by it. It speaks more to their desperation and hostility than it does about his intent. FAct is, he never really wanted anyone to break any law or to vote illegally or more than once and most of the opposition to his viewpoint will readily admit that but there will always be that small minority who try to pretend that he meant his statement literally...well...there's nothing you can do about the very dumb and even less you can do about the very dishonest.

Had to chuckle, DANNI. Replace "Ed Schultz" with "Rush" and "righties" with "lefties" and you have the essence of my point made countless times on here regarding how the left runs with a Limbaugh media tweak.

As I'm sure you'd agree, Schultz is making a point by being absurd. Context, voice inflection, etc... all are critical when trying to capture what a speaker really intends.

Dear right-wingers who are offended by Ed Schultz's remark: Do you realize how many times a day that Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and other right-wing radio hosts make that kind of comment about Democrats?

Schultz has made no secret of the fact that he learned his craft from Limbaugh. When he goes off on wild rants like this comment about voting 10 times to keep the bastards out, he's giving you a dose of your own medicine. And as Oohrah suggests, it's a tweak that's not completely serious.

If you don't like that, why do you like Limbaugh so much?

"Dear right-wingers...why do you like Limbaugh so much?"

The real problem is the black and white world folks here try to pigeon-hole everyone into. I'd be considered a "right-winger" in this forum but I don't give a shit what Limbaugh says. Or Schultz. Listen to them all (or not) and then make your own decision.

Same w/ Robertson's comments about Haiti. I'd be considered a "christian" in this forum but I don't give a shit what Robertson says.

Yes, DR faithful, even right-wing, christian neanderthals can exercise independent thought (much like yourselves?), once in a while.

Maybe even more...

I have to admit is is funny seeing Danni dismiss Schultz's statement in that way and at the same time she will SWEAR that Diebolt stole the election in Ohio for Bush in 2004. Why? Because a Diebolt executive told Bush that he could "count on him."

Danni has some great polarized glasses, they show only wrongness from republicans and only righteousness from dems. LOL!

In reality, you know Acorn and prez cone will be at the "projects" to get the occupants to the polls. Don't worry 'bout ID, we got that covered. Remember, don't get back on the bus 'til you voted at least five times. Only register with the acorn poll worker...he will be easy to pick out.

The liberals will cheat in Massachusetts. The only question is whether it will be necessary (she might win anyway), or enough (to give it to her despite the fact that she lacks the votes). We'll see. But if the same political establishment that helped Kennedy, Studds, and Frank avoid jail is responsible for overseeing this election, an honest accounting won't be coming from them, that's for sure.

What's the difference? If she wins you'll whine like a little bitch anyways.

I think she is going to win. Any state stupid enough to re-elect Kennedy and Frank time after time after time is stupid enough to repeat the mistake.

Suits me. If Massachusetts ever grew a brain, I would have to revise my thinking on the subject. Until then, God is still in His heaven, and the Bay State is majority retard.

Just an observation between the Rush/Big Ed comparison:

The dems have never had to crawl to Ed, hat in hand, to beg forgiveness for having stated conflicting positions.

In stark contrast, repubs who publicly cross swords with the Rushbo do go crawling, hat in hand, to the fat man to seek absolution when they have voiced contrary opinions.

It is the republican suplicants who show Rush to be the spokesman and defacto leader of their party.

This is nothing like the AJC's resident right winger who proposed going to MA to cheat I suppose?

I think arranging for a whole lot of Rtard 'accidents' would be better.
#2 | Posted by axe

Another big fucking talker with balls the size if his network connection.

"With the 60th "filibuster-proof" Senate seat now hanging precariously in the balance, I'm sure you'll be delighted to hear that the winner will now be whoever Diebold declares it to be. The near-entirety of the state will vote next Tuesday on paper ballots to be counted by Diebold op-scan systems. The same ones used dubiously in the New Hampshire Primary in 2008, and the same ones notoriously hacked --- resulting in a flipped mock election --- in HBO's Emmy-nominated Hacking Democracy."

I'm sure you'll be delighted to hear that the winner will now be whoever Diebold declares it to be

Oh Jesus Fucking Christ, here we go....

"Oh Jesus Fucking Christ, here we go...."

Easy way to never hear that again....get rid of Diebold's proven easily hacked machines. Test after test prove these machines can easily be hacked to put out false results....so don't blame me for bringing it up...blame the people who still choose to use machines that don't produce believable results.

well...there's nothing you can do about the very dumb and even less you can do about the very dishonest.

#11 | Posted by danni
Reflected in every post by Danni about Rush.

Do you realize how many times a day that Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and other right-wing radio hosts make that kind of comment about Democrats?

Link? When has Rush Limbaugh ever advocated voter fraud?

And even if Rush did - who cares? Is Rush now the gold standard in broadcasting? You fucking idiots sit here day in and day out calling Rush a piece of human garbage - but you'll use him as an example to defend Ed Schultz?

Easy way to never hear that again....get rid of Diebold's proven easily hacked machines. Test after test prove these machines can easily be hacked to put out false results....so don't blame me for bringing it up...blame the people who still choose to use machines that don't produce believable results.

#32 | Posted by danni
In Mass do you think that is Repubs or Dems that have made the choice of which machines to use?

Is Rush now the gold standard in broadcasting? You fucking idiots sit here day in and day out calling Rush a piece of human garbage

He can be both. Larry Flynt is a pervert piece of shit, but also one of the greatest defenders of the First Amendment in our lifetimes. I will say Rush Limbaugh is one of the most talented broadcasters since Murrow, but his message sucks.

You fucking idiots sit here day in and day out calling Rush a piece of human garbage - but you'll use him as an example to defend Ed Schultz?

one man's garbage is another man's treasure.

And here, they are defending Ed Schultz's message by comparing him to Rush's alleged message (for which they have no link). Thus, Rush's "talent as a broadcaster" does not come into play.

Rush is so good that Ed is a Rush-clone in just about every way a person can be: his inflections, his voice, this pauses, where he "hits" words- it is all Rush's delivery and rightly so as Ed is one of the few successful left talkers because of it.

Although I did hear Michael Savage play with the idea of running for office, you don't have the California Repub. establishment pushing for that venture.

On the flip-side of the coin, the North Dakota Dem. establishment was actively pursuing a Schultz run for Senate a little over a week ago. The leftist media loved the story regardless of the outcome.

If conservative talk radio/TV pushed for the stealing of elections, I would be the first to change the channel. But, joking about that shit -- even if their ratings were in the toilet -- I just don't see a reputable news source stooping that low.

#7 | Posted by Jak_Se_Mao

UNFREACKINBELIEVABLE!!

See something new every day..

As for ED--off the cliff with that comment..

He really didn't mean it--snark*