NASA Scientists Go on Attack After Climate Data Error Exposed
Menu
Front Page News Weblog Comments Flagged Comments User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Author Info
ChevyChase
Chevy Chase
Private E-mailNo Home Page
Joined 2009/10/22Visited 2011/07/05
Status: user
MORE STORIES
( comments) ...
Special Features
Daily Nooner
Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.
Zat? Would you paste some of that fake NASA Data here below this line?
------------------------------ ----------
Posted by ChevyChase at 2010-01-14 04:10 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Adding interest to the game was a suspicion that temperatures had generally increased since the late 19th century at least in eastern North America and western Europe, the only parts of the world where reliable measurements went back so far.(2) In the 1930s, the press began to call attention to numerous anecdotes of above-normal temperatures. The head of the U.S. Weather Bureau's Division of Climate and Crop Weather responded in 1934. "With 'Grand-Dad' insisting that the winters were colder and the snows deeper when he was a lad," he said, "...it was decided to make a rather exhaustive study of the question." Averaging results from many stations in the eastern United States and some scattered locations elsewhere around the world, the weather services found that "Grand-Dad" was right: average temperatures had risen several degrees Fahrenheit (F) since 1865 in most regions. www.aip.org
NASA was established by the National Aeronautics and Space Act on July 29, 1958.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by Zatoichi at 2010-01-14 04:16 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Good timing.
Posted by mysterytoy at 2010-01-14 04:18 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
It may have been the press reports of warming that stimulated an English engineer, Guy Stewart Callendar, to take up climate study as an amateur enthusiast. He undertook a thorough and systematic effort to look for historical changes in the average global temperature. One 19th-century German had made an attempt at this in seeking a connection with sunspot cycles. Otherwise, if anyone else had thought about it, they had probably been discouraged by the scattered and irregular character of the weather records, plus the common assumption that the average climate scarcely changed over the span of a century. But meteorologists around the world had meticulously compiled weather records, and Callendar drew upon that massive international effort. After countless hours of sorting out data and penciling sums, he announced that the temperature had definitely risen between 1890 and 1935, all around the world, by close to half a degree Celsius (0.5C, equal to 0.9F).(4) Callendar's statistics gave him confidence to push ahead with another and more audacious claim. Reviving an old theory that human emissions of carbon dioxide gas (CO2) from burning fuel could cause a "greenhouse effect," Callendar said this was the cause of the warming. www.aip.org
The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and Its Influence on Temperature ~Callendar, G.S., 1938 wiki.nsdl.org
www.eklipse.net
Posted by Zatoichi at 2010-01-14 04:20 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Zat you better hurry up and sell your carbon credits.
Posted by mysterytoy at 2010-01-14 04:29 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
"Carbon trading fraud in Belgium "up to 90% of the whole market volume was caused by fraudulent activities"
wattsupwiththat.com
Posted by KBM at 2010-01-14 04:59 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
This thing is going to turn out to be a bigger fucking hoax than Hogzilla.
Posted by wisgod at 2010-01-14 05:06 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
This thing is going to turn out to be a bigger fucking hoax than Hogzilla. #7 | Posted by wisgod at 2010-01-14 05:06 PM
Climate change data is all falsified and there are few non-partisan evaluation taken with any amount of credibility. I don't believe NASA would ever act on factual data or present any data contrary to their handlers interests.
Look at when NASA was allegedly established - at the height of military and government compartmentalization. That trend has shaped them to this day.
Posted by redlightrobot at 2010-01-14 05:18 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Only deniers have falsified data. So, NASA is suddenly a military beast out to destroy us. What about NOAA, the British Met, etc?
Posted by Derek_Wildstar at 2010-01-14 06:55 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusive
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry. Change.org Petitions|Start a Petition ยป
Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable