Yes, that is a very simple belief system.
It is.
Unfortunately, it is also simply stupid and this case proves it as your belief system has you implicity trusting the people who run Sudan, who have repeatedly been proven to be lying scumbags themselves.
The problem is that your sweet country has generally molested countries with dictatorships so we can also see a pattern.
As for the Sudanese junta, dude, they had two twenty year civil wars in the space of 50 years. If places like that are not brutal then that's the exception.
And no where are we getting this info from the Khartoum l33t - this is of Eric M.
Blaming "outside agitators" is what every murderous dictator who ever lived does when something goes wrong.
See above in America's file under "Preferred Victim:"
Dictatorships.
They are brutal, but if you single out dictatorships and change them from above (invasion, sanctions) what replaces them is weak and can be transitory. Dictatorships must be fought organically, internally and from below.
That this pattern still flies right over your stinky little head is illustrative of why your country has been ruled by military dictators for over half its history.
Getting personal? I could go into how the dictatorships of 1958, 1977 and 2007 had various American acquiesence and fingerprints on them. Or I could ask you to trot along to your precious NYTimes and do a search for the words "Pakistan", "General" and "Reds". Fear of the third, led to cheerleading the second on their takeover of the first.
You fall for the same lies over and over.
We don't. But apparently the New York Times does.
