blah blah blah

best comment ever, Murphy :)

What was the point of this thread? What is your agenda?

The question was posed: Is the health care bill DOA or does it have legs?

They both agreed it isn't dead. Frank says he thinks they'll be a good bill; Paul says that there will be a bill, but incremental government control isn't the answer.

Both agreed on the waste in perpetual wars.
Both agreed that everyone should have health care, but both also agreed that the govt cannot guarantee it.

They disagreed strongly on the Community Reinvestment Act.

So what's the big deal?

blah blah blah

#1 | Posted by MURPHY

best comment ever, Murphy :)

#2 | Posted by sitdown

sounds like all her comments to me

I despise Barney Frank. I personally think less of the people of Massachusetts for letting Frank represent.

The divisiveness needs to end.

How does our Nation restore our honor?

Frank hides behind the scraps he left behind for his constituents.

The divisiveness needs to end.

How does our Nation restore our honor?

#5 | Posted by wurster

Now that's funny.

I don't know if you are a tea-bagger of not, but the comment is very tea-bagger-ish. It's funny to me that people only turn to noble purposes as a second choice (i.e. after other attempts, by hook or by crook, have failed).

Barney Frank Agreed with Ron Paul?

Well, ...it is a Blue Moon after all.

Be Well.

You, they both spark up!

Ron Paul is one of the few Republicans that I admire.

Don't agree with all his ideas, but I get the feeling that he is honest.

I like having Barney Frank as from and center of finance services reform. Nothing like the Dems having an incompetent boob that doesn't know how to use a bloomberg terminal to think he knows how to reform Wall Street. A Grad intern at GS has more credibility. Hell Chelsea Clinton has more credibility. For as little experience she had as an analyst at Avenue Capital, she has more real world experience than Barney Frank.