Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, December 11, 2009

Fox News' Bill O'Reilly lashed out at Law & Order executive producer Dick Wolf Thursday night, upset over how he was recently characterized on the long-running NBC drama. O'Reilly, described by a defense attorney on the show as "a cancer spreading ignorance and hate" because of his views on immigrants, responded by calling Wolf a "despicable human being" whose show is "out of control."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

dave

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Sweet irony, how sweet it is.

If O'Reilly thinks you're a despicable human being, you're probably doing something right.

"Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly, all of 'em, they are like a cancer spreading ignorance and hate...They've convinced folks that immigrants are the problem, not corporations that fail to pay a living wage or a broken health care system..."

I thought this was fictional TV. Using real life names instead of a generic name with the same message is cowardly and does not belong on the show. O'Reilly is correct. Larroquette is a drug addict and Ice tea is a no talent ass-clown. I don't see their "real life" actions coming through on the show.

All the L&O series have jumped the shark anyway - gone the way of Three's Company - same show every time.

Eff it, I'll do it live!!!!!!!!!

All the L&O series have jumped the shark anyway

Like most shows, it was good in the beginning but yeah it's generic now. If you have cable you could watch law and order 24/7 and see maybe 1 good episode a day. If you're lucky.

Eff it, I'll do it live!!!!!!!!!

THERE'S NO WORDS ON IT!

didn't even know they were still making that piece of shit show. was good in the beginning, now it's like watching a crime drama version of 8 is enough.

Anything for ratings.

How pathetic

now it's like watching a crime drama version of 8 is enough

Why is every show a shitty crime drama or a shitty hospital drama?

I thought this was fictional TV. Using real life names instead of a generic name with the same message is cowardly and does not belong on the show.

TV shows use real public figures all the time. One line from a TV show should not be enough for him to declare that Dick Wolf is a "despicable human being." Bill O'Reilly can dish it out, but he can't take it.

Who are we - persons that were born here - to
prevent anyone from living in the United States?

"When a country controls its own borders, that
country is acting in a xenophobic manner."
- MLK Jr.

Be Well.

Lib TV shows will go the same way as lib newspapers and lib radio shows. Even libs are tired of this stupid stuff.

Man the whiny righties are putting a real overload on the waahmbulaces tonight, ain't they? L & O should do an episode on a pervert with a loofah fetish, or a hillbilly heroin addict with a penchance for Dominican boys. Or a religious cult talk jock who got away with rape and murder back in the 90's.

did the big fat idiot just call someone a liar?

"Anything for ratings.

How pathetic"

I thought you LIKED O'Reilly, ChickenPlucker?

Bill O'Reilly is a big, fat, drunken pussy. Fuck off, Bill, and get back to your whining about the so-called "War on Christmas" and remembering where you put your loofa.

The rightards are pissing themselves again. Another good day!!

Oreilly, Olbermann, a 90 minute debate with questions from members of the audience, to be aired on MSNBC and Fox.

A RATINGS MONSTER!!!!!!!

Bill O'Reilly does use his air-time to challenge anyone who lies about him or his show. I don't know if he really feels that outraged or it's just part of the show for him. I don't think he is far right wing or even a real conservative but instead he is a right of center populist. His political views are nothing like Beck's or Limbaugh's or even Hannity's. I more often accuse him of having a hidden liberal side than condemn him of being a right wing ideologue.

.......Wolf is right.......

....Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, they are a cancer on America......

.....their venom, appealing to the intellectually challenged.....is the same type of propoganda that fueled Nazi Germany.......

.....they make millions stoking a rage among the simpletons (war on x-mas, government takeovers, gay marriage).....the facts don't matter...only the amount of umbrage........

.....they are doing more damage to America than any terrorist ever did......

O'Reilly v. Olberman CAGE DEATH MATCH.

"A RATINGS MONSTER!!!!!!!"

Wolf is right, Bill O is a scumbag..

'Lib TV shows will go the same way as lib newspapers and lib radio shows. Even libs are tired of this stupid stuff.'

#12 | Posted by fwthom

Lib THIS! Lib THAT! Lib EVERYTHING!

Lib Lib Lib Lib LIB LIB LIB!!!

O'reilly once again spewing bullshit over someone bruising his ego! What a BIG baby. He is not cut out to be a Public figure.

His comments about the show seem VERY FALSE considering this so-called extreme left liberal producer HIRED former GOP Senator and Presidential candidate FRED THOMPSON to do HOW MANY EPISODES of Law & Order?!?

You are dangerously close to crossing the BL2 posting threshold.

You are dangerously close to crossing the BL2 posting threshold.

What happens then? It sounds rather ominous.

"didn't even know they were still making that piece of shit show."
#7 | Posted by somoco

Right there with you som. I also did not know O'Reilly still had a show.

What happens then? It sounds rather ominous.

I guess caps lock gets stuck on, regardless of which library computer you are using. I'm not quite sure I don't want to find out.

"candidate FRED THOMPSON to do HOW MANY EPISODES of Law & Order?!?"

At least one too many? Best line from Freddy the Freeloader was about the war on terror - "people in Washington need to have a war on something to get elected". Paraphrase, but I've never forgotten that. Ironical.

Anything for ratings.

How pathetic

#8 | Posted by chickenrancher

Funny shit.

How many people would even know about the line on L&O without O'Reilly bringing it up?

Did he have anything to say about Murphy Brown?

What a fucking pussy. They have to have a fictional character on tv series criticize him. What channel is Law and Order on anyway. I though that show got cancelled 10 years ago when the Dirty Dancing dad died.

Heaven forbid anyone have an opposing viewpont to the leftwing liberal Ideology. They think they are above criticism and won't tolerate any of it. Just like Islam. It is McCarthyism at it's worst.

Prior to being a Senator and presidential candidate, Fred Thompson was a pretty good and talented actor. I think he was hired for his abilities, not his politics. Even Wolf can get it right once in a while!

Personnally, I think O'Reilly's comments added viewers to the show.

O' should be happy someone is barfing his name.

Any publicity is good when you O'.

Who cares? I don't watch or listen to any of that shite.

A waste of time and energy.

Law and Order - Sexual Victims Unit, starring Andrea Mackris and Bill O'Reilly.

Law and Order - Sexual Victims Unit, starring Andrea Mackris and Bill O'Reilly.

Is Papa Bear the guest rapist?

www.youtube.com

Oh Billy Billy Billy go to 0:58 but the whole clip is awesome.

That O'Reilly clip shows just how fake and over-rehearsed 24/7 cable infotainment is. How many takes and rehearsals do Glen Beck and Sean Hannity need to get their snide acts in shape or does it just come naturally to them? At least O'Reilly still has some connection to humanity left, unlike those two despicable assholes.

Nancy Grace, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Bill O'Reilly, Glen Beck... these are the meatheads that facilitate the destruction of America, for a fee of course. Their job is to get you to take your eyes off the perpetrators.

"(NBC) also has the lowest ratings"

Not when compared to Fox.

You have to laugh at the screen shot from FOX Propaganda Channel saying that NBC is Propaganda Central in the USA and that it has the lowest ratings.

One is that old right wing trick of projecting their own sins onto their opponents. The other is that old right wing problem with reality - if NBC has low ratings, what does that make FOX News Channel's ratings. Subterranean?

"(NBC) also has the lowest ratings"

Not when compared to Fox.

Well, due consideration should be taken when you consider the fact that one opinion is broadcast for free, whereas the other opinion has to be bought. I'd rather pay a dollar for a half-truth than be lied to for free....

O'Reilly is right.

As usual the libs can't tell the difference between illegal immigration and legal immigration.

Just like they can't tell the difference between global warming and man made global warming.

It's an inconvenient difference.

"Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly, all of 'em, they are like a cancer spreading ignorance and hate...They've convinced folks that immigrants are the problem, not corporations that fail to pay a living wage or a broken health care system..."

--- Obama ---

Why is every show a shitty crime drama or a shitty hospital drama?

Because it's already paid for dumbass!

I don't know who said it long ago but someone said "NEVER GET INTO AN ARGUMENT WITH SOMEONE WHO BUYS HIS INK BY THE BARREL! Unfortunately Bill is over-matched here. This show has gotten their story lines from the daily newspaper and so apparently doesn't have to worry about being original or fair. Sic em, Bill.

O'Reilly rages?

Yes, yes he does.

Wot's his outrage du jour?

L&O: SVU?

And that "far leftist" Dick Wolf?

Cos a character on that show lumped O'Reilly in with Beckie and Slimeball as being a "cancer" that preys on mouth-breathing, low-info asswipes in an attempt to justify his legal defense of a man accused of murdering the children of immigrants?

LOL.

Coupla things here.

First, O'Reilly, Beck, Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Savage et al are a cancer.

Founts of misinformation, disinformation, corporate think tanked propaganda, divisiveness, and anger.

Second, L&O is a fictional show, yes, but one who's plots are often "ripped from the headlines" as they say.

That they occasionally rip on real people should not come as any kind of surprise to anyone by this point.

Finally, BillO knows all of this and is merely cynically trying to boost his ratings here by making himself the story in a sort of weird attention whore with a martyr complex/reverse name dropping way.

Be Well.

/Wot MSM declines to cover is generally more significant than wot they do cover most days.

I see they got the message to use the arts to spread the messiah's words......from the National Endowment of the Arts and the zero's office.

Besides, lets be honest, dr left, you consider anyone on the right to be 'cancer'!!!!FACT

Good for SVU. I'm glad they took a swipe at the defacto leaders of the republican party.

What a BIG baby. He is not cut out to be a Public figure.

#23 | Posted by Monstman at 2009-12-11 09:34 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

You got that right.

Saw Bill interview Molly Ivins before she passed away. Al Franken had released his book with Oriley pic on the cover, Oriley was visibly upset during the interview.... evidently Oriley, Molly and Franken were at an event together just prior to this interview. Molly told Oriley "I thought you were going to loose it and hit Franken"

I love this little fit of rage...

www.youtube.com

o'liely vs l&o; who is more irrevelant?

O'Really? would make a great target for some rotten tomatoes or a cream pie right in the kisser!

Are they picking on those poor republicans again? I feel so sorry for Billy Boy.

We all know that Limbaugh and Beck are mindless and irresponsible right-wingers. They wear it on their sleeves. What bugs me about O'Reilly is that he feigns impartiality. He tries to come accross as I'm just a regular Joe, a middle-of-the-roader, just the facts mam type of guy; BUT he's not!!

Bill O'Reilly is a classic right wing conservative.

I think I will just take a list of the sponsors of the L&O series and we can decide whether to support them or not. After all - this is exactly the type of stuff that is killing all the major networks - we will just stop watching and buying the products that advertise there.

After that I will stop watching....I used to be a loyal fan but there have been show after show that either went after Bushes policies or showed all the crazy's to be conservative - when the crime statistics show that the more liberal a state is...the higher the crime rate.

Blowhard Bill needs to grow a pair. Why is the Republican party full of such, puling, whining, pussies?

Any honest liberal will admit that O'Reilly owned Dick Wolf with those prior clips from his show, and that the characterization of O'Reilly on the show was false. I don't know why I come here looking for honest liberals though.

Whining, like the Messaih Briwo?

Bill O'Reilly is a lout. If you admire him, you admire a lout.

Rossiter explains with great clarity why the kind of liberalism being displayed by Barack Obama can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Rossiter. "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity - as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population - as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which overregulates and overtaxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state - as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

* creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
* satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
* augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
* rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism - and its associated madness - can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

"The roots of liberalism and associated madness...."

Sounds pretty bad, until you realize that liberalism by-and-large defends values and practices thought conservative until the death of Barry Goldwater and the ascension of George W. Bush.

Name one value....Well, sure....How about innocent until proven guilty? The amount of energy I've seen what used to be conservatism expend denying the validity of that idea is enormous.

The confusion modern day "conservatism" engages in is perhaps best exemplified by it's attitude towards Libertarians.

I'd say Libertarians embody Dr. Rossiter's values in a fairly pure state. So why do "conservatives" see them as being liberals? Why do they hate them as much as they do?

Google up the CSPAN book fair of several years ago that had Molly Ivins, Senator Al Franken, and bully o'lielly on it. It is truly hilarious to watch bully when he doesn't control the set, setting, mic switch, etc. It truly shows how pathetic bullys like bully are when they are called out.
I thought he was going to stab himself in his thigh with the pencil he was holding as Senator Al Franken detailed his lies in regard to winning a Peabody,......er Polk Award.

Good Stuff

Didn't see you post about the same book fair lfthand....nice clip!

Obligatory

Hahaha I love that clip... and the remix is a beast!

"I dunno I dunno I dunno FUCK!"

Have to replace West Wing [let's mock/put down conservatives] somewhere; guess this is the new venue.

.......Wolf is right.......

....Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, they are a cancer on America......

.....their venom, appealing to the intellectually challenged.....is the same type of propoganda that fueled Nazi Germany.......

.....they make millions stoking a rage among the simpletons (war on x-mas, government takeovers, gay marriage).....the facts don't matter...only the amount of umbrage........

.....they are doing more damage to America than any terrorist ever did......

#20 | Posted by skizziks at 2009-12-11 09:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

Take a little break from your Period-Collecting hobby and try actually watching an O'Reilly show sometime, Sleepy. What a hack and a generalization-monger.

"Well, due consideration should be taken when you consider the fact that one opinion is broadcast for free, whereas the other opinion has to be bought. "

O'Reilly didn't make that distinction. He just lied outright. Fox always want to bag against the "mainstream media", until they talk about ratings. Then they pretend the MSM doesn't exist, or, in this case, only exist in their own world. It's a lie to claim "(NBC) has the lowest ratings", especially when they beat Fox's ratings.

#69 By your own standard you told a lie, lardass.

Spongebob Squarepants beats o'lielly's "infotainment" show every day, eh?

>>>
O'Reilly claims his ratings increase every other week, which is just a flat out lie. So I have decided to post the actual ratings to show you O'Reilly is lying about his big ratings increases. I will post the total viewers for O'Reilly, Hannity, and Beck.

NOTE: Notice that since I started publishing the daily (total viewer) ratings for the O'Reilly Factor, not once has O'Reilly claimed to get 5 million viewers a night, or more than 5 million.

www.oreilly-sucks.com

#71 - what the heck is this "source" you are using?

Mr. Fair

If you watch and believe in bully o'lielly, why would you be concerned with "sources"???

The source I listed has a link. Are you unable to click on it?

If you could debate the facts presented, you would, eh?

Something else for you to ponder, Mr. Fair.....

www.fair.org

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable