Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, December 04, 2009

An Italian jury has found American student Amanda Knox and her Italian boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito guilty in the stabbing death of British exchange student Meredith Kercher. Knox was sentenced to 26 years in prison and Sollecito was sentenced to 25 years.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

MURPHY

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

No DNA and the guy who admitted to the crime didn't know her.

Until two months later after talks with the prosecutor--he knew all about her and placed inside the apartment when he sliced up the victim.

When abroad--don't do anything to get into trouble.

No sex no drugs--or you could be accused of murder.

This girl was railroaded.

Any pictures of the girls kissing?

sick chicken--the victim was killed--awful.

Still can't make heads or tails of this one.

Either Amanda Knox is guilty of killing or at least participating in perhaps even instigating the murder of her British room-mate or she's been railroaded by cops too embarassed to admit they picked up the wrong people in their initial sweep.

Be Well.

But... but... but... she's hot.

But... but... but... she's hot.

Posted by moder8 at 2009-12-04 07:31 PM | Reply Flag: RACIST AND SEXIST ALL IN ONE

#4 | Posted by The_Chapel at 2009-12-04 07:32 PM | Reply | Flag: Hate Filled Moron Who Would Not Be Missed In The Least If He Never Posted Again.

Well she's not that hot. I wouldn't fuck her. At least not with my dick. Maybe with Tiger Woods dick but not mine...

She'll get elected senator in Italy.

This girl was railroaded.

#1 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-12-04 07:05 PM

Oh well muffy.

Don't fuck up in a foreign country.

Any pics of the girls kissing?

Its like the old Aesop's fable...Knox is judged guilty mostly on account of who she associated with!

From everything I have heard about this case, there wasn't any evidence and especially no DNA linking her to the crime scene.

She was guilty as hell and frankly is lucky she only received 26 years.

Should have fire squaded her.

Something stinks about this one. Where's the proof that She killed anyone??

Larry

Beware the company you keep. Looks won't always carry you through the evil deeds.

I'm sure the cops were very careful in this case. She was not in America, the land where everything goes if you are rich or beautiful.

Why was Murphy's first comment deleted? Did I miss something?

Did I miss something?

Blog god put story on front page.

Murphy already had story on back page.

First comment on this thread from Murphy was a subtle reminder to the blog-god that Murphy got there first on another thread.

When the two threads were merged her *Ahem* comment to Rogers was removed as being redundant post fix.

The story as you can see above has now been attributed to Murphy by Rcade cos he's yer typical fair and balanced lefty.

^_^

Be Well.

Who the hell is Amanda Knox? Is she one of Tiger's girlfriends?

Any pics of the girls kissing?

#11 | Posted by chickenrancher

Really intelligent post, CHICKEN CHOKER!

www.amazon.com

Stay the fuck out of Italy; The place is nuts.

I smell revenge for the shitty deeds done by thye CIA in Italy. I don't believe She is guilty of anything other than being an American.

Larry

Come on Larry. The jury wants to go home. Not every story is a conspiracy. What do you want to bet she'll be out in 3 anyway?

Hey RingMaster put Yourself in Her shoes and You didn't do it. What would You say then??

She looks like a killer to me.

#1 | Posted by MURPHY

Wrong. There was DNA, the defense claimed the DNA sample was too small, not that there wasn't any DNA.

Hey RingMaster put Yourself in Her shoes and You didn't do it.

She was found guilty Larry. You could say the same thing about any convicted murder. Perhaps you have a little fantasy thing going about breaking her out of jail?

A tough case, but a lot of circumstance (sp) evidence and certainly some direct physical evidence. The true motive may never be learned, however.

This case reminds me a lot of the Darlie Routier case from 1997 in Rowlett, Texas.

Sucks to be her.

^_^

Be Well.

#18 | Posted by dethspud

lol

For clear disclosure--Rcade put up the tread about 5 minutes Before me.

That is why I posted 'Dang'.

He often combines duplicate threads and gives the thread to the humble postee.

The part that stinks to high skies is that the guy who admitted to killing her denied knowing or seeing Knox or her boyfriend any where.

Then three months later after talking with the prosecutor--he changes his story to implicate both.

The DNA was in the bathroom--of course they are roommates and DNA would be found--wouldn't it.

There was no blood on her, no spray and no murder weapon identified as the correct murder weapon.

The guy who admitted killing her had his shoe prints in blood all over the apt., finger prints of his were everywhere.

The prosecution claimed that Knox went around and wiped her prints from the apt--carefully mind you--so as not to wipe the finger prints of the real killer.

Murphy pay for her to get an appeal and let her move in with you.

Amanda seems to have cracked under police pressure which led inconsistencies in an unverifiable final story. But the forensic evidence against her and her boyfriend is nonexistent. The prosecutors version of events seems as contrived as Amanda's. Where does he get off claiming she slashed the rape victims throat, after holding her to be raped? Its totally absurd. For one thing if there really was a three way conspiracy as the Prosecutor alledges, one of the three would have put all the pieces in their place with a full accounting before facing a 25-30 year lockup. Its impossible to keep a three way conspiracy completely under wraps, without Government involvement, support and threats. The police have all those tools and not a clue except for the rapist, who most likely acted alone.

No one of the three has betrayed the others.

Jackass you are such a putz...

"There was no blood on her, no spray and no murder weapon identified as the correct murder weapon.

The guy who admitted killing her had his shoe prints in blood all over the apt., finger prints of his were everywhere.

The prosecution claimed that Knox went around and wiped her prints from the apt--carefully mind you--so as not to wipe the finger prints of the real killer.

#31 | Posted by MURPHY"

Murphy, the only reason why you are calling for her innocence is because she was tried in Italy. If it was in the US you would be calling for a red hot poker to be jammed up her snatch before she was drawn and quartered as a death sentence. Just like any god fearin' christian republicans would.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable