Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, November 26, 2009

On Fox News, former press secretary Dana Perino suggested President Obama was playing politics by refusing to describe the massacre at Fort Hood as a terrorist attack. "We should call it what it is," she told Sean Hannity. "We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term. I hope they're not looking at this politically. I do think that we owe it to the American people to call it what it is."

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

johnny_hotsauce

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

The classic self retort.

Perino must be living on another planet. Of course, 9/11 was just a drill. Cheney will tell you that.

"We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term,"

No we had an inside job.

On twitter, she now says "I obviously meant... Bush 2nd term".

http://mediamatters.org/blog/
200911250035

Sure! Obviously!

Ah the lying sack of cute strikes again.

Bush revisionist history is in full spin mode.

Either stupid or pathological... take you pick... kind of sums up the unqualified hacks that his administration hired.

Given a few more years and 9/11 will have happened under JFK.

She doesn't know that appologies are not accepted on DR.

"We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term,"

Must ... resist ... temptation ... to exterminate ... planet.

Hey Zorg,

PLEASE turn off the Stupid Ray!!! We've had enough already.

Pfft!
By their reasoning--we didn't have any terrorist attacks BECAUSE my wife and I slept on a waterbed-and owned a Redbone Coonhound.

As soon as we changed beds-and our dog died......

Must ... resist ... temptation ... to exterminate ... planet.

#6 | Posted by Zorg_the_Vogon

Easy Zorg. Here are some soothing Vogon words for your people.

Zen the snarggle fart duplux sniggles the dingle-dorf, phewy, fat and furdle is the fingrum snort.

Some facts for the deniers: aWol/hallichainy not only allowed 911 to occur on their watch, but also, due to their incompetence in invading/occupying countries/peoples who did not attack the USA, have greatly increased terror attacks on Americans around the world AND increased the number of terrorists who WANT to kill Americans.

www.infoplease.com

So two guys were sitting in a bar drinking and one guys says, 'hey, let's go downtown and get some pussy'.

The other guys says, 'shit, I've got more pussy at home than I know what to do with'.

So they sit for a while and have another drink. And the other guy says, 'hey, let's go to your house'.

"On twitter, she now says "I obviously meant... Bush 2nd term"."

Then her point was dead wrong, wasn't it?

And Hannity should have corrected her.

11

A young and old bull stand on a hilltop overlooking a herd of heifers.

"Let's RUN down there and fk one of those heifers", said the young bull.

"Naw, let's WALK down there and fk em all", said the old bull.

It is truly amazing how fucking desperate Huffington and the lefties are when it comes to anything Bush or republican. Thought maybe the Michael Steele farce about "white people being afraid of him" would have taught the same idiots here a lessen about context, instead ofrelying on bias editing to make an argument. It is obvious Perino was referring to Bushs' second term and yet it was beyond the grasp of the so called smart libs here and on Huffington? Sadly Perino was right and the same idiots here and accross the Country will use anything to deflect this fact.

"It is obvious Perino was referring to Bushs' second term"

Then why should it be compared to Obama's first term?

"Perino was right"

Then why isn't the Pittsburgh incident -- where some guy afraid Obama was coming to get his guns so he shot & killed three policemen and wounded three others -- called "terrorism"?

"It is obvious Perino was referring to Bushs' second term"

Did you watch the video? It was nothing of the sort.

Should folks with Psalm 109:8 t-shirts, bumper stickers and teddy bears be considered religious fanatics and potential terrorists who should be monitored? I'd say yes.

#15...

More willful ignorance and conjecture danforth? According to the "link" provided by Huffington, Hannity was talking about the President and questioned his understanding national security. The topic was the Fort Hood shooting and Obama's refusal to call it what it was. Of course that is lost on an innocent gaffe, and as usual, it is seen as some repub or administation official trying to lie or get away with something. Or another sad sack accusing Perino and repubs of being stupid.

El Al (Isreal) has very strict security -- much stricter than the US. Yet despite the obvious target on them, there has been only one successful hijack of an El Al jet. That was back in 1968. I'd say that is a pretty good argument that increased security works, but the hand wringers will obviously dismiss it as a mere coincidence.

As a target for many decades, El Al employs stringent security procedures, both on the ground and on board its aircraft. These effective, though sometimes controversial, procedures have won El Al a reputation for security.[38] In 2008, the airline was named by Global Traveler magazine as the world's most secure airline.[39]
en.wikipedia.org

The only successful hijacking of an El Al plane was in 1968 when a flight from Rome was hijacked by members of the militant Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and forced to land in Algiers.
news.bbc.co.uk

And Hannity should have corrected her.

Hannity isn't big on correcting his conservative guests. Did you see the clip of his exchange with Palin when he asked her about Iran? She kept saying Iraq this and Iraq that, and he just listened intently but said nothing.

"Then why isn't the Pittsburgh incident -- where some guy afraid Obama was coming to get his guns so he shot & killed three policemen and wounded three others -- called "terrorism"?"

Did they have proven contacts with radical clerics? Did they visit mosques and have Islamic literature laying around? Did they yell something about allah before cowardly shooting inncoent people straight from a passage in the Koran? Laughable how you compare an islamic related, religious "terrorist" attack and whine about some apples and oranges incident not being called "terrorism". Of course the discussion was about the Fort Hood incident and Obama's chosen words or lack of them.

If this is Bush's economy still...

...then, by the same logic, ...

...Clinton owns the 911 attacks.

Right?

"Of course that is lost on an innocent gaffe"

And innocent gaffe?

You're actually suggesting that during a discussion of whether or not the Democrat should call something a "terrorist" attack, a claim that no terrorist attack happened during the Republican administration is "an innocent gaffe"?!?

It the heart of the matter.

"Did they have proven contacts with radical clerics?"

Other gun nuts? Probably.

"Did they visit mosques and have Islamic literature laying around?"

Like gun shows, with gun literature?

"Did they yell something about allah before cowardly shooting inncoent people"

Like 'Obama is coming for my guns'...?

"Hannity isn't big on correcting his conservative guests."

Seemingly because he doesn't know the difference. He probably believes what Perino said.

"More willful ignorance and conjecture danforth?"

What a putz. But leave it to Mr. Pee to defend a liar, and call someone pointing out the truth, ignorant.

"by the same logic"
#23 Bent Err

Umm, totally. NOT!

Then why isn't the Pittsburgh incident -- where some guy afraid Obama was coming to get his guns so he shot & killed three policemen and wounded three others -- called "terrorism"?

It may come to that someday:

It would be convenient to pretend that Richard Poplawski, who killed three Pittsburgh policemen on Saturday with an AK-47, was just a right-wing nutcase. A devotee of the white supremacist Web site Stormfront, Poplawski believed that the United States was controlled by a secret Jewish cabal that had a master plan to abrogate freedom of speech and use the U.S. military to police Americans.

It would be easy for us to cordon Poplawski off, pretend that his ugly and paranoid worldview had nothing to do with the Obama hatred spouted by the American right. But the truth is that Poplawski's hateful views cannot be separated from the increasingly extreme ideology and rhetoric that characterize the contemporary American conservative movement. As his friend, Edward Perkovic, told the Associated Press, Poplawski feared "the Obama gun ban that's on the way" and "didn't like our rights being infringed upon."

www.salon.com

On this Thanksgiving Day the thing that I am most thankful for is that we in America are not being led by the Criminal enterprise call the Bush Administration, what a bunch of Pathetic public servants, I WON'T CALL THEM ASSHOLES BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO RANKEL THE RIGHT TO BE CALLED WHAT THEY ARE......

"Mr Pee"

#27 Danforth

Haha!

where do these nut balls come from? is there a special breeding farm for them?

#27...What a putz. But leave it to Mr. Pee to defend a liar, and call someone pointing out the truth, ignorant.

So you brag about being on these boards of experts who discuss intellectual subjects and ideas. But now you think the former press secretary was trying to lie or defend Bush by saying no attack occurred? An educated, succesful women like Perino would really believe an atack never occured during the Bush term. Glad all that intelligence you brag about doesn't have a common sense button to turn on.

Leave it to danforth to pull the willful ignorance card when needed, and jump on the bandwagon of other fools, who think they have another stupid republican or stupid Bush moment.

black shirt

"But now you think the former press secretary was trying to lie or defend Bush by saying no attack occurred? "

Yes.

Maybe not intentionally lie, but definitely to defend Bush.

Watch the video.

"Leave it to danforth to pull the willful ignorance card"

You're the idiot who defended the liar, Mr. Pee. If the card fits....

Another Media Matters fishing expedition and the same Huffington fish bite. Then they cast their own lures and as usual they catch the same fools here and abroad. How long are you idiots going to take their bait and show your worth?

Wasn't that abortion doctor killed under Bush's watch during his second term? "Call it what it is, it doesn't matter than only one guy was killed, it's a terrorist attack with religious motives!"

#36 Mister Pee

Ms. Perino's job is to be a political spinster (redundant). BS is attached to everything she says. I'm not going to take her bait.

"Leave it to danforth to pull the willful ignorance card"

You're the idiot who defended the liar, Mr. Pee. If the card fits....
#36 | Posted by crispee_oc at 2009-11-26 11:18 AM | Reply

What idiot invokes Obama's "first term" when it was never mentioned in the video or had anything to do with her response? ( Then why should it be compared to Obama's first term?)

What idiot brings up another incident like "Pittsburgh" as though it had any bearing on the interview about the Fort Hood shooting?

What idiot ignores the context of the discussion and dismisses Perino's point that in her opinion it is dangerous for Obama not to call it what it is and she invoked the no terrorist attack because Bush "did" call it what it was. Sounds much more logical and factusal than she was lying or defending Bush. Unless of course you are an idiot like danforth and others who respond to another joke by Media Matters.

If this is Bush's economy still...
...then, by the same logic, ...
...Clinton owns the 911 attacks.
Right?

#23 | POSTED BY BENDOR AT 2009-11-26 10:40 AM

By that logic, it all belongs to reagan/bush41, or maybe even nixon/agnew....eh?

Tell me, who is responsible for the first WTC attack, in Feb of 93?

Tell me, who freed the American hostages in Iran, 20 mins after reagan took the oath of office?

The myriad of warnings all year long from many American agencies are documented pretty well, as are the steps Clinton took on the terrorist situation.

Which enemy did the contract ON American congress focus on?

Our own president, eh?

As now, the repugs choose to pretend that our own potus is their enemy.

Why is the blame game so important? Fuck. Get over it.

You guys remind me once when I was working on a dead Sprint switch that produced a huge telecom outage in Chicago. It even temporarily halted air traffic at O'Hare.

I was dialed into he switch from my home in Texas in the middle of the night frantically troubleshooting this piece of equipment. My boss calls me and says to get on a conference call with a lot of biggies from Sprint, the vendor, and others. I objected, but he said I had to.

So I got on the call. The only thing that was going on was finger pointing. VPs wanting to know who is to blame? Why wasn't this or that done? etc. Finally I piped in and said, "Who are we going to blame when the part we need missed the last flight out of DFW to Chicago because the engineer working on the problem had to sit in on a stupid conference call?"

The line went silent, then my boss quietly said, "Get back to the problem". I did, found the problem, and sure enough, the card I needed made the last flight out, but only by 15 minutes. The next day my boss's boss wanted to have me written up for insubordination, but my boss wouldn't.

Woke, you remind me of the VPs who are more interesting in assigning blame than getting the problems fixed. Almost every one of your posts is "This is the right's fault". Move on, dude

"What idiot invokes Obama's "first term" "

Um...Dana Perino, if she was only talking about Bush's "2nd term".

"What idiot brings up another incident like "Pittsburgh" as though it had any bearing"

Probably some same person wondering why the Pittsburgh incident isn't called terrorism, but the Ft. Hood incident is.

"What idiot ignores the context of the discussion and dismisses Perino's point "

You, when you ignored the context of whether or not to call it terrorism, and when you dismissed the fact Perino was contrasting that to her claim Bush didn't have a terrorist attack during his term.

"she invoked the no terrorist attack because Bush "did" call it what it was"

Isn't it a little early in the day to be sauced?

You Liberal idiots know exactly what she meant. The problem is, you are too stupid and bitter, and unaware of what's going on in this country to realize that your future is on the line too. We're all in this together, so wake up or drop dead.

"Why is the blame game so important?"

Because those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. For example, it's easy to pretend the rising unemployment numbers are the current President's fault. They're not.

"You Liberal idiots know exactly what she meant. "

So, when you watched the video, and she made that claim, did you immediately think she was only talking about Bush's second term?!? Really?!?

"What idiot brings up another incident like "Pittsburgh" as though it had any bearing"

Probably some same person wondering why the Pittsburgh incident isn't called terrorism, but the Ft. Hood incident is.

Probably.

Poplawski's neo-Nazi activism included posting Glenn Beck video, but media talk about dog pee

crooksandliars.com

she invoked the no terrorist attack because Bush "did" call it what it was"

Isn't it a little early in the day to be sauced?

#41 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-11-26 11:41 AM

Sauced? This from the clown who couldn't follow the discussion and called her a liar? Not to early for you to be an ignorant political hack, danforth?

So, when you watched the video, and she made that claim, did you immediately think she was only talking about Bush's second term?!? Really?!?

Maybe you chose to go the Media Matters route of editing and simply muted Hannity's question and only used Perino's response in your foolish accusations.

"This from the clown who couldn't follow the discussion"

I did follow the discussion. You're the one who has to pretend she didn't say what she actually said.

"Not to early for you to be an ignorant political hack"

This, from the guy who actually posted:
"she invoked the no terrorist attack because Bush "did" call it what it was"

I know it's early, but we already have The Most Idiotic Post Of The Day.

"Maybe you chose to go the Media Matters route of editing and simply muted Hannity's question "

WTF are you talking about? Hannity's question was: "Why won't they say what you just so simply said?

And her response included the statement: ""We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term"

What part of Hannity's question makes her answer correct?

"Why is the blame game so important?"
Because those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. For example, it's easy to pretend the rising unemployment numbers are the current President's fault. They're not.

#43 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2009-11-26 11:44 AM

Worth repeating, though I kinda doubt the "don't blame us just because we voted for them twice" crowd will get beyond their fear of complicity and admit they and their heroes were WRONG.

Even now, after the complete, total, abject failures of their heroes, they spend all their time PROJECTING failure on and denigrating Obama, instead of posting any new solutions to the problems their heroes created.....

The record is clear.

America has been following neoconservative policies for nearly 40 years....since nixon....

Even Clinton, who was a DINO, signed every piece of repug/neocon/
contractONAmericans legislation.....

Only Carter, sandwiched between the incompetent crook nixon and the "i don't recall" crook reagan, had a dem congress with his dem presidency....

That's 4 out of the last 40 years. Yet, the righties are sure it's all Carter's fault, eh?

It would be funny, if their ignorance and indoctrination wasn't so pathetic.

#48...

"I did follow the discussion. You're the one who has to pretend she didn't say what she actually said."

If you followed the discussion, you would have heard Hannity ask her why Obama couldn't say it like she did earlier. You would have understood her answer about making it political, and her answer which was pointing out Bush's term and the bottom line what "he" would have called it. More willful ignorance danforth, or are you really this big of an idiot that you couldn't put two plus two equals four together?

What's the difference what time period Perino was speaking of, it's still a LIE, eh?

aWol/hallichainy INCREASED terrorist acts against Americans and terrorists who want to injure Americans significantly during their time in office.....

see link in post #10

What's the difference what time period Perino was speaking of, it's still a LIE, eh?

aWol/hallichainy INCREASED terrorist acts against Americans and terrorists who want to injure Americans significantly during their time in office.....

see link in post #10

"her answer which was pointing out Bush's term and the bottom line what "he" would have called it."

What a steaming pile of apologetics. It would actually be funny if it weren't so pathetic. She fucked up, and admitted as much on Twitter. And then hacks like you show up to lie for her.

"are you really this big of an idiot that you couldn't put two plus two equals four together?"

This, from the moron who is defending someone who claimed America "did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term".

That seems to be the problem with some rightards these days: who you gonna believe...me, or the actual video of what she said???

Because those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. For example, it's easy to pretend the rising unemployment numbers are the current President's fault. They're not.

Learning from history is a "what" event. The blame game is a "who" thing. What happened is important. Putting a name on it isn't. If the guy who is to blame for the current situation was named Smith instead of Bush, couldn't we still learn from history?

And I guess you think I should have stayed on that conference call instead of fixing the switch, right?

The blame game is nothing more than saying, "Your side sucks and mine is the greatest" danforth. You are smart enought to that is what is happening here. If it was a learning from history thing, the details of the events would be related (they aren't) not the names.

"Even Clinton, who was a DINO, signed every piece of repug/neocon/
contractONAmericans legislation....."

Bullshit.

Of the eight main provisions of the Contract With America, exactly ZERO became law.

The problem is, you are too stupid and bitter...

Nice, danforth. In case you haven't learned this about me by now I love it when people call me names. It is a tacit admission they have no valid argument.

Fire away, dude.

WTF are you talking about? Hannity's question was: "Why won't they say what you just so simply said?

And her response included the statement: ""We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term"
#49 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-11-26 12:24 PM

Why do you have to lie? Why would you foolishly leave out what Perino said knowing anyone can see the video? You left out "I don't of all their investigations, I don't know all their thinking that goes into it..." Then she went into the Bush line implying what "He" would have called it. She and Hannity were talking about why Obama would "NOT" call it a terrorist attack you fucking tool.

#54...

I am not the fool advancing another Media Matters hit piece by taking words out of context. Like you seem to love to do every day here. Just like Media Matters Micahel Steele edited video claiming he said whites are afraid of him. It is all about context and common sense. Not surprised you confuse the two, or as Joe called it "willful ignorance"?

If her original remark had been "We didn't have a terror attack on our country during President Bush's second term" she'd have been laughed off the air, even on FOX News. Having painted herself into a corner she had to find the best way out and saying that was all she had left, making it even more ridiculous.

The right gets more brain dead by the day.

If her original remark had been "We didn't have a terror attack on our country during President Bush's second term" she'd have been laughed off the air, even on FOX News.

What difference does it make, when the discussion and her point that Bush would have called it what it was, and Obama won't? That was the topic and what she responded to.

The left seems to get more desperate everday Or should I say Media matters, Huffington....

Nice, danforth. In case you haven't learned this about me by now I love it when people call me names. It is a tacit admission they have no valid argument. Fire away, dude.
#57 | Posted by Goatman

Are you sauced, too?

"Then she went into the Bush line implying what "He" would have called it."

Even Perino isn't believing that bullshit.

Hey, I'll bet she knows how many states there are.

-- T. Righty

"Just like Media Matters Micahel Steele edited video claiming he said whites are afraid of him."

Watch the entire video, Mr Pee.

"MARTIN: But your candidates got to talk to them. One of the criticisms I've always had is Republicans -- white Republicans -- have been scared of black folks.

STEELE: You're absolutely right. I mean I've been in the room and they've been scared of me."

Please put that in the proper context, which proves your above claim valid.

Once again, the rtards are reduced to Who you gonna believe...me, or your lying eyes?!?

Are you sauced, too?

Nope. I'm on the rig.

Learning from history is a "what" event. The blame game is a "who" thing. What happened is important. Putting a name on it isn't."

I disagree. In my history classes, we learned a lot of the "what" has to do with the "who". Your learning may vary.

"And I guess you think I should have stayed on that conference call instead of fixing the switch, right?

Of course not, how stupid is that? You immediately go to work fixing the problem. But if there are others who can, at the same time, properly assess blame, you do that as well, don't you?!? What good is making the mistake if you don't learn from it?

"If it was a learning from history thing, the details of the events would be related (they aren't) not the names."

You're joking, right? When is history studied without the names of the participants, especially Presidents? Who talks about The Depression without mentioning Hoover and Roosevelt, or The Bay of Pigs without mentioning Kennedy? What's next...Watergate without Nixon? Vietnam without Johnson?

The blame game is nothing more than saying, "Your side sucks and mine is the greatest" danforth.

Sometimes "your side sucks" is enough. One doesn't have to believe the Dems are the greatest -- I certainly don't -- to know one side sucks.

And I'm going to guess they eventually discovered what, or who, was to "blame" regarding your tech glitch. It's an important part of the process.

"Nope. I'm on the rig."

Then reread the post to which you responded.

"the discussion and her point that Bush would have called it what it was, and Obama won't? "

Too funny, when Perino wouldn't even call 9/11 a terrorist attack.

This gets more surreal by the day.

"We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term,"

Really?

so September 9, 2001 wasn't part of Bush's Term? Did he resign for one day?

Bush in action:

www.youtube.com

and if you buy the BS about "Obviously" meaning his 2nd term. Are we forgetting that a few Christian Terrorist were caught, hunted for etc.

Eric Rudolph comes to mind.

"What difference does it make, when the discussion and her point that Bush would have called it what it was, and Obama won't? That was the topic and what she responded to."

Well I sucked it up and actually watched the video. Just more propaganda seeking anything to denigrate the president and his administration.

It's just too easy to say something stupid when you're just saying anything that comes to mind to support a topic's premise when the inherently dishonest purpose of that topic is just to provide a platform for propaganda.

Re #67

Apologies.

The first line should begin with a quote, as should the following:
"The blame game is nothing more than saying, "Your side sucks and mine is the greatest" danforth"

I meant to be quoting Goatman.

Sorry.

Then why in hell did we need the Patriot Act, the TSA, and Homeland Security?

"Bush in action:"

All due respect, I think that's just two words.

"Even Clinton, who was a DINO, signed every piece of repug/neocon/
contractONAmericans legislation....."
Bullshit.
Of the eight main provisions of the Contract With America, exactly ZERO became law.

#56 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2009-11-26 12:37 PM

I stand corrected, LOL...

The Fiscal Responsibility Act
An amendment to the Constitution that would require a balanced budget, unless sanctioned by a three-fifths vote in both houses of Congress (H.J.Res.1, passed by the US House Roll Call: 300-132, 1/26/95; rejected by the US Senate Roll Call: 65-35, 3/2/95, two-thirds required), and legislation (not an amendment) provide the president with a line-item veto (H.R.2, passed by the US House Roll Call: 294-134, 2/6/95; conferenced with S. 4 and enacted with substantial changes 4/9/96 [1]). The statute was ruled unconstitutional in Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417, 118 S.Ct. 2091, 141 L.Ed.2d 393 (1998).

The Taking Back Our Streets Act
An anti-crime package including stronger truth-in-sentencing, "good faith" exclusionary rule exemptions (H.R.666 Exclusionary Rule Reform Act, passed US House Roll Call 289-142 2/8/95), death penalty provisions (H.R.729 Effective Death Penalty Act, passed US House Roll Call 297-132 2/8/95; similar provisions enacted under S. 735 [2], 4/24/96), funding prison construction (H.R.667 Violent Criminal Incarceration Act, passed US House Roll Call 265-156 2/10/95, rc#117) and additional law enforcement (H.R.728 Local Government Law Enforcement Block Grants Act, passed US House Roll Call 238-192 2/14/95).

The Personal Responsibility Act
An act to cut spending for welfare programs by means of discouraging illegitimacy and teen pregnancy. This would be achieved by prohibiting welfare to mothers under 18 years of age, denying increased AFDC for additional children while on welfare, and enacting a two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility. H.R.4, the Family Self-Sufficiency Act, included provisions giving food vouchers to unwed mothers under 18 in lieu of cash AFDC benefits, denying cash AFDC benefits for additional children to people on AFDC, requiring recipients to participate in work programs after 2 years on AFDC, complete termination of AFDC payments after five years, and suspending driver and professional licenses of people who fail to pay child support. H.R.4, passed by the US House 234-199, 3/23/95, and passed by the US Senate 87-12, 9/19/95. The Act was vetoed by President Clinton, but the alternative Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act which offered many of the same policies was enacted 8/22/96.

The American Dream Restoration Act
An act to create a $500-per-child tax credit, begin repeal of the marriage tax penalty, and creation of American Dream Savings Accounts to provide middle-class tax relief. H.R.1215, passed 246-188, 4/5/95.

]The National Security Restoration Act
An act to prevent U.S. troops from serving under United Nations command unless the president determines it is necessary for the purposes of national security, to cut U.S. payments for UN peacekeeping operations, and to help establish guidelines for the voluntary integration of former Warsaw Pact nations into NATO. H.R.7, passed 241-181, 2/16/95.

The "Common Sense" Legal Reform Act
An act to institute "Loser pays" laws (H.R.988, passed 232-193, 3/7/95), limits on punitive damages and weakening of product-liability laws to prevent what the bill considered frivolous litigation (H.R.956, passed 265-161, 3/10/95; passed Senate 61-37, 5/11/95, vetoed by President Clinton [3]). Another tort reform bill, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was enacted in 1995 when Congress overrode a veto by Clinton.

The Job Creation and Wage Enhancement Act
A package of measures to act as small-business incentives: capital-gains cuts and indexation, neutral cost recovery, risk assessment/cost-benefit analysis, strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act and unfunded mandate reform to create jobs and raise worker wages. Although this was listed as a single bill in the Contract, its provisions ultimately made it to the House Floor as four bills:
H.R.5, requiring federal funding for state spending mandated by Congressional action and estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to cost more than $50m per year, was passed 360-74, 2/1/95. This bill was conferenced with S. 1 and enacted, 3/22/95[4].
H.R.450 required a moratorium on the implementation of Federal regulations until June 30, 1995, and was passed 276-146, 2/24/95. Companion Senate bill S. 219 passed by voice vote, 5/17/95, but the two bills never emerged from conference[5].
H.R.925 required Federal compensation to be paid to property owners when Federal Government actions reduced the value of the property by 20% or more, and was passed 277-148, 3/3/95.
H.R.926, passed 415-14 on 3/1/95, required Federal agencies to provide a cost-benefit analysis on any regulation costing $50m or more annually, to be signed off on by the Office of Management and Budget, and permitted small businesses to sue that agency if they believed the aforementioned analysis was performed inadequately or incorrectly.

The Citizen Legislature Act
An amendment to the Constitution that would have imposed 12-year term limits on members of the US Congress (i.e. six terms for Representatives, two terms for Senators). H.J.Res.73[6] rejected by the U.S. House 227-204 (a constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds majority, not a simple majority), 3/29/95; RC #277.

referenced wiki

Still, I stand with Michael Moore in calling Clinton a DINO. (Moore devotes an entire chapter of his book, Stupid White Men, detailing how Clinton favored many of the repug policies, not to mention allowing them to fk him over repeatedly throughout his tenure)....

On the other hand, the failure of the 1st repug congress in 40 yrs to implement their own policies in 12 years, half of which were with a repug potus, and for all intents and purposes a repug scotus, shows that they are unable to get out of their own way in governing the USA.

And I'm going to guess they eventually discovered what, or who, was to "blame" regarding your tech glitch. It's an important part of the process.

If what you say is true, how do learn from an event by saying "Reagan's fault" without details of why like woke always does?

I maintain my position -- the event details are more important than the name. I learn nothing from woke except he hates the right. How does saying "Bush's fault" without qualifying details help us learn from the past? And woke is typical of the majority of the respondants here, sadly. They want to assign blame, not talk about the events.

"Just like Media Matters Micahel Steele edited video claiming he said whites are afraid of him."

Watch the entire video, Mr Pee.

"MARTIN: But your candidates got to talk to them. One of the criticisms I've always had is Republicans -- white Republicans -- have been scared of black folks.

STEELE: You're absolutely right. I mean I've been in the room and they've been scared of me."

Please put that in the proper context, which proves your above claim valid.

Once again, the rtards are reduced to Who you gonna believe...me, or your lying eyes?!?

#65 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-11-26 01:00 PM |

This is the context you ignored and blindly accepted the Media Matters edited implication that Micahel Steeel said white people are afraid of blacks. Not surprised you ignored the direction of the discussion how the repubs can get more of the black vote. Martin talks about "candidates" being afraid of talking to him, and Steele affirms Martin quip. About being in the same room as these "candidates" and are afraid of talking to him as well.

rawstory.com
MARTIN: How do you -- granted, a popular president got 95% of the black vote -- you got any shot at getting black voters and if so what are the two issues that speaks to black voters for Republican have a shot at them?

STEELE: Education and the economy. Education and jobs. Education and small business.

MARTIN: But your candidates got to talk to them. One of the criticisms I've always had is Republicans -- white Republicans -- have been scared of black folks.

STEELE: You're absolutely right. I mean I've been in the room and they've been scared of me. I'm like, "I'm on your side" and so I can imagine going out there and talking to someone like you, you know, [you're like,] "I'll listen." And they're like "Well."...

MARTIN: Right.

Then reread the post to which you responded.

???

OK? I stand by it

"OK? I stand by it"

Then tell me...when, exactly, did I post -

"The problem is, you are too stupid and bitter..."

#80. YOu didn't. I misread. My bad and my apologies to you, danforth

77

I have repeatedly posted details of what has not worked among the neocon ideology......deregulation of banks, utilities, corps with no oversight, tax breaks for the richest 1% (141k who avg $2.4 million a year, busting unions, reforming welfare and bankruptcy on the poor but not for corporations, reagan foreclosing out the family farmers, nafta=free/not fair trade that left American workers out to dry with outsourcing their jobs, lying thru their teeth about non existant threats to spend 2 TRILLION and counting on unnecessary "preemptive" invasion/occupations of countries that didn't attack us, on and on and on....I have posted these "details" over and over here on DR......and it's always met by you asking why I'm focused on the past.....LOL.

Because you choose to IGNORE those mistakes and pretend I have not detailed them, when they have been, just shows how you choose to remain ignorant and will most likely, as your posts show, continue to vote against American working people (as well as your own) best interests....

Enjoy your thanksgiving...

oh, and the Anthrax attacks...

Amerithrax

I have repeatedly posted details of what has not worked among the neocon ideology..........I have posted these "details" over and over here on DR

#82 | Posted by woke at 2009-11-26 03:08 PM |

and oh, yeah, if you got nuthin new to say, stfu...eh?

#62 | Posted by woke at 2009-11-03 04:00 PM |

Good advice. Take it, hypocrite, eh? LOL

Still, I stand with Michael Moore i.

#76 | POSTED BY WOKE AT 2009-11-26 01:39 PM | REPLY | FLAG:

why am I not surprised that you and others stand with a college dropout who attacks the very system that has made him a millionaire several times over?

And so the rewriting of history begins.

And so the rewriting of history begins.

Posted by northguy3 at 2009-11-26 11:33 PM | Reply

Whaty do You expect out of these slimeballs of Bushco. It's par for the course for their ilk.

Larry

Not well publicized, but the Dc snipers were jihadists. Malvo confessed about thier plans for the money they hoped to get from the Government to stop the attacks. It involved setting up a Jihad camp for impressionable Yutes.

"the Media Matters edited implication that Micahel Steeel said white people are afraid of blacks."

Not all blacks...him.

Did you miss that part? He admitted it.

Malvo confessed about thier plans for the money they hoped to get from the Government to stop the attacks.

really,he denied it all the way to his execution

"About being in the same room as these "candidates" and are afraid of talking to him as well. "

Mr. Pee also likes to pretend all the Republican candidates weren't white.

Malvo confessed about thier plans for the money they hoped to get from the Government to stop the attacks.

really,he denied it all the way to his execution

#91 | Posted by brucedummyaz at 2009-11-26 11:59 PM | Reply | Flag: needs to get fact straight
******************************
************

Mr Bruce toiletdonkey:

Malvo was NOT executed, it was JAM who got the needle. Malvo was a yute when the crimes were committed, meaning the yute will be out soon if it is up to Libs.

Malvo was sentenced to six consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole.

I should have got that right,I'm a toilet donkey.They even killed in my state.It was a good year for serial killers in my state those years(I'm not joking)

Anyway tell me which state you live in and I'll start writing liberal congressfolks to make sure he gets out soon in your neighborhood.

My dad was MR toilet donkey,you can just call me toilet donkey

To:Brucesonoftoiletdonkeyaz

I live in the peoples republic of Ca, nice weather and pretty nice people-that is about all it has going for it.

Down in south america male donkeys roam free and are known to be mostly gay. They are filthy and hang out near public restrooms, wanting to commit filthy acts with men and sniff the toilets. These animals also eat things out of the urinals and munch out of the toilet. Very fruity and filthy.

I know you know this, but say it in your sleep-
periodthenspacecommathenspace.

wanting to commit filthy acts with men

you're making me horny

Actually,my dad (MrTD)lives in california.

So I just scrolled through this whole thread,

So what's your fucking point,again?

That's what I thought

"About being in the same room as these "candidates" and are afraid of talking to him as well. "

Mr. Pee also likes to pretend all the Republican candidates weren't white.

#92 | Posted by Danforth at 2009-11-27 12:33 AM

danforeskin,
Is that extra layer covering your eyes again? You asked for context proving the thread cooked up my media matters claiming "white republicans were afraid of blacks". As it turns out, the moderator and Steele were talking about "white candidates" being afraid to talk to them or use their venues helping get the black vote. Just like this stupid media matters story, you take their bait, again. Even worse, you purposely c/p pieces omitting context in some desperate attempt to defend the story? Pretty sad you feel the need to echo media matters hit pieces.

" my media matters claiming "white republicans were afraid of blacks""

Yes...YOUR claim, not theirs. Steele made the claim, you pretended he was saying ALL whites and ALL blacks, and got your panties in a wad.

"As it turns out, the moderator and Steele were talking about "white candidates" being afraid to talk to them"

That would be some whites, then...wouldn't it?

and if you buy the BS about "Obviously" meaning his 2nd term. Are we forgetting that a few Christian Terrorist were caught, hunted for etc.

Eric Rudolph comes to mind.

#70 | Posted by briwo

Rudolph was demented. Committed his bombings and murdered people in 1996 and caught in 2003. He plead to five consecutive life sentences to avoid the death penalty. He told the authorities he planted other bombs and would kill other people.

--

Rudolph himself has written "Many good people continue to send me money and books. Most of them have, of course, an agenda; mostly born-again Christians looking to save my soul. I suppose the assumption is made that because I'm in here I must be a 'sinner' in need of salvation, and they would be glad to sell me a ticket to heaven, hawking this salvation like peanuts at a ballgame. I do appreciate their charity, but I could really do without the condescension. They have been so nice I would hate to break it to them that I really prefer Nietzsche to the Bible."[27]

Anti-crime activist and TV host, John Walsh stated that he believed Rudolph to be a "psychopath" whilst his former sister in law, Debra Rudolph asserted that his motivation was based on white supremacist and anti-abortion beliefs.[28]

en.wikipedia.org

As for Perino--it's funny for people to attack her when you all know what she meant.

And it should have been no jihadist attacks on American soil since 9/11. Folks can argue over the anthrax--fair enough. It was still part of 9/11.

That was when America woke up and had to deal with the ideology that is at war with America.

And we have had incidences of single jihadist murders--the muslim in Seattle, the muslims DC snipers, and most recently--the Ft Hood murders. But that was under Obama.

So what do they do with the teachable moment?

That is the question to be answered.

Hasan should have been caught and stopped beforehand. Just like the 9/11 hijackers.

Hindsight is 20/20. Hopefully Obama, the FBI, the CIA and the military have learned something from Ft. Hood so it doesn't happen again.

#100 Murphy

There are lots of hateful crazies who murder people in our country. You're right about Perino's choice of words, though. "Jihadist" rather than "terrorist" would've made her statement actually true.

Did they have proven contacts with radical clerics?

The terrorist who shot the doctor in Kansas definitely did.

By the time FOX finishes rewriting history, the picture of Bush on the flight deck will be captioned "Glorious Leader after landing AF-1 on carrier after shooting down entire Iraqi air force, a trick he learned while shooting down entire North Vietnamese air force while rescuing John McCain in 1969."

The DC sniper were ISLAMIC JIHADISTS, and they committed thier TERROR during GWB's term

Some would argue that Bush's 8 years was one prolonged terrorist attack.

Perino, you're doing a heckuva job.

"As for Perino--it's funny for people to attack her when you all know what she meant."

Huh? What she meant was to contrast the good, protective Bush administration with the incompetent, unsafe Obama administration.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable