Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Tuesday, November 24, 2009

f you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

homerj

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Repeatedly throughout the e-mails that have been made public, proponents of global-warming theories refer to data that has been hidden or destroyed. Only e-mails from Mr. Jones' institution have been made public, and with his obvious approach to deleting sensitive files, it's difficult to determine exactly how much more information has been lost that could be damaging to the global-warming theocracy and its doomsday forecasts.

We don't condone e-mail theft by hackers, though these e-mails were covered by Britain's Freedom of Information Act and should have been released. The content of these e-mails raises extremely serious questions that could end the academic careers of many prominent professors. Academics who have purposely hidden data, destroyed information and doctored their results have committed scientific fraud. We can only hope respected academic institutions such as Pennsylvania State University, the University of Arizona and the University of Massachusetts at Amherst conduct proper investigative inquiries.

Most important, however, these revelations of fudged science should have a cooling effect on global-warming hysteria and the panicked policies that are being pushed forward to address the unproven theory.

There are at least three threads on this story now, lets see a little front page action Rcade...

Read the article and sorry to say, it doesn't support your headline. Nice to see a rightie like Bolt quoting himself as an expert. I guess it beats arguing with real scientists.

"Some journalists are digging even deeper into the sources of Soon and Baliunas's funding. Their Climate Research paper includes acknowledgements to NOAA, NASA and the US Air Force, as well as to the American Petroleum Institute. Yet NOAA flatly deny having ever funded the authors for such work, while the other two bodies admit to funding them, but for work on solar variability not proxy climate records, the topic that has caused such a storm."
From the article.

So Bolt bases his story on lies, but rghties take it as Gospel. Not surprising at all....

The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and Its Influence on Temperature

Callendar, G.S., 1938.

wiki.nsdl.org

"Beginning in 1938 and continuing throughout his life, the British engineer and scientist Guy Stewart Callendar (1898-1964) identified important links between the burning of fossil fuels and global warming. He compiled weather data from stations around the world that clearly indicated a climate warming trend of 0.5 C in the early decades of the twentieth century. He investigated the carbon cycle , including natural and anthropogenic sources and sinks, and the role of glaciers in the Earth's heat budget. His estimate of 290 ppm for the nineteenth-century background concentration of CO2 is still valid, and he documented an increase of ten percent between 1900 and 1935,which closely matched the amount of fuel burned. Based on new understanding of the infrared spectrum and calculations of the absorption and emission of radiation by trace gases in the atmosphere, Callendar established the CO2 theory of climate change in its recognizably modern form, reviving it from its earlier, physically unrealistic and moribund status. In 1939 Callendar wrote about the ongoing changes in the atmosphere and their likely effects:

As man is now changing the composition of the atmosphere at a rate which must be very exceptional on the geological time scale, it is natural to seek for the probable effects of such a change. From the best laboratory observations it appears that the principal result of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxidewould be a gradual increase in the mean temperature of the colder regions of the earth.

Callendar's landmark studies revived the anthropogenic carbon dioxide theory of climate change. In 1938 he identified links among fuel combustion, rising CO2 levels, increased sky radiation, and the observed rise in world temperatures from 200 stations. "By fuel combustion man has added about 150,000 million tons of carbon dioxide to the air during the past half century." Callendar estimated from the best available data that approximately three quarters of this had remained in the atmosphere. He used the radiation absorption coefficients of carbon dioxide and water vapor to show the effect of carbon dioxide on "sky radiation," From this he estimated the increase in mean temperature due to the artificial production of carbon dioxide to be at the rate of 0.003C per year at the present time. The temperature observations at 200 meteorological stations were used to show that world temperatures have actually increased at an average rate of 0.005C. per year during the past half century. Callendar grouped temperature data in England on a town by town basis based on population growth rates. In that way he effectively eliminated the urban heat island effect, which might have skewed his data. Interestingly, Callendar used his home weather station to record an unbroken data set from 1942 to 1964. Today, the theory that global climate change can be attributed to an enhanced greenhouse effect due to elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources, primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels is called the "Callendar Effect." "

Gosh, Mr Wizard, I wonder what his email address was?

ROFL

morons

"Callendar's landmark studies revived the anthropogenic carbon dioxide theory of climate change."

Yup, revived, in 1938. Because it was first published in 1896.

" On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground "

Arrhenius, Svante, 1896

wiki.nsdl.org

"In 1896, Svante August Arrhenius (1859-1927) published a landmark paper that examined the effect of different levels of atmospheric CO2 (carbonic acid) concentration on the temperature of the planet. His energy budget model, the first of its kind, took into account solar and terrestrial radiation, including the fourth-power relationship between temperature and radiation, and contained estimates of the absorption of terrestrial radiation by water vapor and carbon dioxide based upon the work of John Tyndall, Samuel P. Langley, Knut nsgstrm, and others.

Arrhenius used his model to calculate the change of temperature that would follow if the quantity of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was two-thirds, double, or even triple its present value. He reported that a doubling of CO2 would raise global temperatures by about 3 to 3.5 C while a reduction of CO2 by one-third would lower temperatures by roughly the same amount. These values happen to be within the range of current estimates even though Arrhenius ignored the possible effects of changes of horizontal advection and cloud cover and worked with very limited spectroscopic data. For example, the infrared atmospheric window between 8 and 12 microns and the strong carbon dioxide and water vapor absorption bands beyond 12 microns were unknown at the time.

His calculations, made for every tenth parallel of latitude and for every season, showed that ice age conditions could be sustained between 40 and 50 North latitude if the carbon dioxide in the air should sink to about half of its present value. On the other hand, the temperature of the Arctic regions would rise dramatically if the CO2 concentration was double or triple its present value. In general, he wrote, "if the quantity of carbonic acid increases in geometric progression, the augmentation of the temperature will increase nearly in arithmetic progression."

This was in essence a geological model, and the onset of ice ages and interglacials were his primary concern. Ultimately, crustal processess, not the biosphere, controlled CO2 levels and he considered volcanoes, not coal burning, to be the "chief source of carbonic acid for the atmosphere." Over the course of a millennium, however, humans could have a major influence, since he estimated that burning the world's annual production of coal, approximately 500 million tons, produced about one-thousandth of the total atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide. "

Must be a conspiracy.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

morons

#5 | Posted by Zatoichi

You can lead a horse to water
but ya still can't make him drink.
You can lead a fool to knowledge...

...Awww, you know the rest.

Be Well.

These emails are going to have to be extremely significant with regards to "fraud" in order for this to have any impact on the issue.

In fact, until one or more of these scientists come forward to explain this then it will go nowhere.

Learning about what these emails say doesn't necessarily hurt the GW movement and if it reveals the truth about what some of these specific scientists have represented then so be it.

I'm glad that this is finally on the front page, but I don't understand why they didn't put the one with 50 comments on it already.

#9 | Posted by everlong

No, it's still on the back page.

No, it's still on the back page.

#10 | Posted by STIRSUMUP

Holy shit. I thought I was on the front page. Well, the biggest story of the week remains relegated to the back. What a surprise.

#11 | Posted by everlong

Only certain stories and posters make the front page. food chain sucks

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable