Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Wednesday, November 18, 2009

For the Denver-based American Right to Life, when it comes to abortion, Palin is as impure as any godless feminist. "[H]er words and actions prove that she is officially pro-choice and stands against the God-given right to life of the unborn," they write in a new report. ARTL members plan to educate reporters about Palin's many alleged failings as a true believer, particularly her March nomination of a former Planned Parenthood board member to the Alaska Supreme Court and her refusal to call for a ban on the morning-after pill.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

skizziks

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Another Palin thread? I distinctly heard her tell me in last night's wetdream: "I vahnt to be alone."
~Joe Schmoe
~JestMoseyingAlong
~Etc.

......the search for idealogical purity is an indicator of a party that has lost it's balance.....

.....there were the McCarthy purges in America, the Chinese purge of the Cultural Revolution, and Stalin's many purge of Russian Communists.......

.....the Republican purges will be great comedic theater and provide wonderful entertainment ....

.......no one will be immune from being charged, because being charged, is in itself, enough to be found guilty......

BACHMANN IN 2012!

although you probably should keep yammering on about mz sarah! FOOLS!

although you probably should keep yammering on about mz sarah! FOOLS!

#3 | Posted by nanc at 2009-11-17 12:21 PM | Reply | Flag:

Palin must not be gaaawd fearing enough for n.a.n.c.

"BACHMANN IN 2012!"

Definitely. A Bachmann/Bobby Hindu ticket would be great.

No, she just doesn't resonate "president", same as the guy in office.

BACHMANN IN 2012!
......#3 | Posted by nanc

.....the resemblance between you two is uncanny......

Didn't Palin and Bachmann form the original Airheads 'R Us franchise?

They couldn't conjure up a lucid moment between them.


"BACHMANN IN 2012!"

#5 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-17 12:31 PM | Reply

God I only hope so.

You cannot make up that kind of crazy.

Sarah and the palinistas aren't right at all.
As my grandma used to say, they are touched in the head.

theliberalstore.com

www.bartcop.com

.....good links Doc.....

If Bachmann and Palin run on the same ticket, where does that leave Carrie Prejean? And will Coulter or Malkin write their speeches? herm

No, she just doesn't resonate "president", same as the guy in office.

#6 | Posted by nanc at 2009-11-17 12:31 PM

Sure, that's why she calls herself a "fool for christ".

As far as "resonating" I'm sure you thought Gee Duuhbya was presidential.

If Bachmann and Palin run on the same ticket, where does that leave Carrie Prejean?
.....#14 | Posted by herm

.....she'll get the solo vote.....

If Bachmann and Palin run on the same ticket, where does that leave Carrie Prejean?

She will do all of their "campaign videos".

If Bachmann and Palin run on the same ticket, where does that leave Carrie Prejean?

Secretary of State.

'"BACHMANN IN 2012!"

#5 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-17 12:31 PM | Reply

God I only hope so.

You cannot make up that kind of crazy.'

#9 | Posted by 726

Ha ha ha ha hah THEY eat their OWN!

From the Article:
"Right-wing radicals are already pinning presidential ambitions on a mother-of-five from Minnesota who calls herself a 'fool for Christ' and condemns Obama as a socialist at the head of a gangster regime"

I wonder what part of "Radicals" Butch thinks is appealing.

I mean, considering the wingdings like throwing this term around as a way of frightening people away from obama ---- how could one of their very own card carrying buffoons think using this verbiage to describe their own, is helpful?

No, she just doesn't resonate "president", same as the guy in office.

Yet, he is president. I bet that makes you pop Mydol's like their M&M's.

Why can't people understand that even if you think abortion is wrong, which I do, that other people have the right to make their own choices?

Here we go again!!

BACHMANN IN 2012!
#3 | Posted by nanc

Crank is a brilliant satirist and a polished practitioner of Poe's Law.
She gets a FF.

BACHMANN-PALIN overdrive! b-b-baby you ain't seen n-n-n-nothin yet!!

as an agnostic pro-lifer through and through, i still have to say down with the fundie fundus ticket!

You will forever find someone to say that someone is to the right of someone else. herm

When will the citizens of this great nation accept the fact that abortion is legal. Don't want one; don't have one. The abortion issue is one of the most divisive issues in this country and it serves nothing to better our internal relations. The legalities have been decided by the highest court. It should no longer be a political issue. Those who make it so use it to their advantage; neither side is innocent.

This whole abortion thing is ridiculous.

Two levels of discussion here people.

1. Abortion is killing innocent people, however that killing of innocent people is voluntary and you do not have to take part in it.

2. The government is to make the laws of the land (albeit the state government in this case, according to the consitution).

3. All "Christian" are to obey the laws of the land so long as they do not inhibit the worship and following of a Christ like life.

4. Abortion being voluntary does not inhibit the worship and following of a Christ like life.

Therefore, abortion is completely alright to be rendered allowable by the state or federal government, and "Christians" do not have to rebel and bit and fight and kick and scream and flip out like little children throwing a tantrum every time it comes about.

Why?
1. It is personal responsibility to live life according to Christ and to share that lifestyle

2. You are responsible for your own morals, you cannot force them on others, you simply inform them of the error of their ways and then it is up to them.

3. The governement was not meant to do your moral and biblical obligation. The governement is not there to make your life in Christ easier, in fact it is irrelevant to your life in Christ.

So, if someone is pro-choice, they may be pro choice in terms of understanding that people can make that choice (as murderous and foolish as they may think it is) and it does not inhibit their practice of faith. These people who think this can also be "Christians."

They may not accept the practice personally or corperately, but they understand that the government is not the legislature of Biblical morality, but general morality and law, of which the "Christian" is to be obedient to.

Why flip out.

There is a subjective and an objective side to the arguement.

So called "Christians" might do well to think about it a little better, and stop trying to make the government live our your life for you just because you don't feel like taking the personal responsibility and the difficulty of standing against the grain.

I think abortion is deplorable, however I also so, if people know this and still choose it, that is up to them. Only when it becomes mandatory for a woman to abort a child (like in China) will it become a larger issue.

You cannot legislate morality, you can only suggest it.

Why can't people understand that even if you think abortion is wrong, which I do, that other people have the right to make their own choices?

Because they're authoritarians with little respect or understanding of what freedom means. And they have no use for freedom since they've put it in God's hands. They think because they willingly submit to God, others should willingly submit to the state.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable