...how about a little music to start the day?.....

But I see your true colors
Shining through
I see your true colors
And that's why I love you
So don't be afraid to let them show
Your true colors

#1 LOL FF!

Neo Nazis showed up at a Teabagger rally and got turned away?

Wow, that's amazing.

Not that they showed up that's a given.

But they actually got turned away, eh?

Spud's impressed!

good for american citizens united.

Was it a real "teabaggers" rally, you know, one of those Gay Pride thingies? Where gay men parade around in German helmets and chaps with their asses hanging out? The guys who invented the term "teabagger", in reference to a practice of performing fellatio on another man, and turned out to give Obama 90% of their vote?

Or was it another one of those small-government type rallies?

Skiziks didn't read the article. Or even the byline.

The Tea Party protesters should thank the Neo Nazi's for making them look far more human by comparison.

But wai, maybe that was the whole point?

I smell a tail... wagging a dog here.

Do you now.

"Do you now."

Nah. I was just kidding.

That story would write itself, though.

"Was it a real "teabaggers" rally, you know, one of those Gay Pride thingies?"

you would know best.

And they still should thank the Neo Nazi's.

Where gay men parade around in German helmets and chaps with their asses hanging out?
..........#5 | Posted by rightisright

......like a Republican fund-raiser ?........

It's not about racism. It's about law enforcement. Period.

Just an act. Many of the teabaggers are racist. We have one who posts here and is very racist.

Where gay men parade around in German helmets and chaps with their asses hanging out?
..........#5 | Posted by rightisright

......like a Republican fund-raiser ?........

#12 | Posted by skizziks

No, like a friends of barney fund raiser.

Now if the Democrats could do the same and cull the racists from their ranks...

...all might be swell.

No way that will happen though, the Democrats cherish their Neo-Negroes (black racist activists).

No, like a friends of barney fund raiser.
....#16 | Posted by Sniper

.....Baney is out in the open...and his friends don't wear the German helmets.....seig heil !.....

.....another closeted Republican, gay-bashing gay is making his way towards Washington.......

.....Florida's Charlie Crist is running for the Senate seat abandoned by Mel Martinez.......

......he's a well known flamer, but even got 'married' this year to a woman as a cover......

the great irony is the black cop calmly protecting the idiot with an Adolf flag. gotta love it!

Barney Frank's is a famously open tea-bagger, who is so stupid that he's oblivious to his boy buddy's using his house as a gay whorehouse, and his newest boy buddy's drug business. But we're supposed to believe he's able to oversee Wall Street banks and the world's largest financial system.

Any wonder, then, why we're in the mess we're in? If Bawney Fwank was straight, maybe we could have saved the country of few trillion dollars. Or, better still, if he didn't earn the vote of every Dumbard libbie dumbass who just votes straight-ticket. If you'll excuse the term.

"If Bawney Fwank was straight, maybe we could have saved the country of few trillion dollars."

That is the dumbest post you have ever made.

Barney Frank was at the Teabagger rally?

You're right. He's a Democrat. Wouldn't have mattered. It just seems funny how gay Democrats in Massachusetts keep getting re-elected, no matter how stupid they are. Maybe he would have lost in the primary to a straight Dem, but no.

$3.4 trillion, and climbing. Wonder how much longer his career is going to be?

Baney is out in the open...and his friends don't wear the German helmets.....seig heil !.....

#18 | Posted by skizziks

So open he had a queer whore house in his basement.

Now if the Democrats could do the same and cull the racists from their ranks...
...all might be swell.
No way that will happen though, the Democrats cherish their Neo-Negroes (black racist activists).

#17 | POSTED BY BENDOR AT 2009-11-17 11:00 AM | REPLY | FLAG:

Ummmm.... 'neo' means 'new'.

'New Negroes'????

So open he had a queer whore house in his basement.
.....#25 | Posted by Sniper

....so are you saying we should trade him to the Republicans for Ron Paul ?.......

What does the National Socialist Party have in common with the Tea-Party crowd anyhow? Tea Partiers want small government, and limited government control of our lives. What does any of that have to do with Nazism?

The NeoNazis should be showing up at Obama rallies. It's he who has a messianic complex, and his followers who have a cult of personality problem. It's his program to have government control everything, from banking to manufacturing to healthcare delivery.

The NeoNazi's aren't just stupid, they're in the wrong place.

I wonder when the Democrats will finally live up to their mantra...

...and ban all Neo-Negroes from their rallies?

What in the hell is a Neo-Negro you ask?

They are the professional race baiting racketeers like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and that old fool from the Nation of Fools.

It's his program to have government control everything, from banking to manufacturing to healthcare delivery.
......#28 | Posted by rightisright

....the American banking system would have collapsed without intervention......
......what little is left of American manufacturing was on the verge of collapse......
......healthcare is dysfunctional, so badly that it is a drain on the economy, and if left untended, is capable of causing the economy to stagnate or collapse.......

......it's a dirty job , but somebody had to fix it all.......

......it's a dirty job , but somebody had to fix it all.......

#30 | Posted by skizziks

You sure have a lot of faith in someone who has never 'fixed' anything.

Yes. Sieg heil! Gobama!

"Tea Partiers want small government, and limited government control of our lives....but keep your government hand off my Medicare."

In truth, the TEa Partiers don't know what they want. They want to express their anger about their feeling of powerlessness. They think it is the Democrats who took away their power because they don't understand that they really never had any power, only an illusion of power by electing a guy who pretended to talk like one of them but who screwed them. I think it is a good thing that they told the Neo_nazis to beat it, now they need to tell Dick Armey and the insurance industry types to do the same thing.

The tea baggers don't mind at all if the Nazis want to join, just not in uniform.

You sure have a lot of faith in someone who has never 'fixed' anything.
.......#31 | Posted by BENDOR

....the alternative was voting for someone who created the problems.......

Are the queers standing up to the skinheads now?

Mary Cheney was there? I guess she was some dance entertainment with Larry Craig and Mark Foley.

The tea baggers don't mind at all if the Nazis want to join, just not in uniform.

#34 | Posted by RingMaster
* * * *

Actually it's the Dems who have cornered the gay and the socialist vote.

Achtung! Get those goose-steps up!

They want to express their anger about their feeling of powerlessness. They think it is the Democrats who took away their power because they don't understand that they really never had any power, only an illusion of power by electing a guy who pretended to talk like one of them but who screwed them.

Good analysis. I know more than a few conservatives that are just as furious at the Republicans and Bush. But where's their alternative if they don't subscribe to liberal policies? If, and that's a big if, a third-party can focus this in the next election, we could end up with a coalition Congress rather than a majority party. Now that would be interesting to watch.

But where's their alternative if they don't subscribe to liberal policies?

You do realize of course that Obama is NOT a Liberal.

LMAO. Sure.

You do realize of course that Obama is NOT a Liberal.

#39 | Posted by donnerboy

Thanks. I needed a good laugh.

Does any intellectually honest person doubt but that many rightwing teabaggers / anti-immigrant types are also closet racists? Duh. Of course most of them are.

Obama is not even close to liberal. I wish that he were. He was elected not just because his semi-liberal words resonated with voters, but because he was not George Bush (and John McCain was.) But Bush abuses remain in place. Afghanistan, the "Patriot" Act, torture ... and we STILL lack health coverage for everyone. Maybe it's time to throw the folks who worked for him a bone. herm

Rightwing teabaggers take umbrage at the homosexual connotation associated with the term "teabag". Even though they were the first ones to call themselves teabaggers, they are now offended when leftwingers refer to them with that term. Out of sensitivity to their concerns, maybe a better label for them would be douchebaggers.

Teabaggers is better. Every time some conservative goes to google and looks up the term, he realizes gay jokes are back in. If it's not homophobic for lefties to toss the polesmokers to the wolves, then it's open game for everyone.

A lot to be said for being a straight-ticket voter. If you get my drift.

Actually it's the Dems who have cornered the gay and the socialist vote.

Achtung! Get those goose-steps up!

#36 | Posted by rightisright at 2009-11-17 12:47 PM | Reply | Flag:Dumber then a sack of hammers

What do gays and socialists have to do with the ultra conservative and fascist Nazi Party?

Dude, get some history in ya.

Hitler was the original teabagger, i don't know why they won't embrace their kindred spirits.

What do gays and socialists have to do with the ultra conservative and fascist Nazi Party?

Dude, get some history in ya.

#45 | Posted by RingMaster
* * * *

My history's fine. Not a lot of small-government libertarians running around the Nazi party. There were, however, a whole lot of people who knew by virtue of their party affiliation that they deserved to rule other people.

Your post is funny. "What do . . . Socialists have to do with the Nazi party? Dude, get some history in ya!"

Hysterical. Hitler didn't even know what a fascist was. He did, however, know himself to be a socialist. Thus, the name.

RightIs really has a hardon for Barney Frank. You got something to tell us, RightIs? Don't worry, you're in a safe place....

"RightIs really has a hardon for Barney Frank. You got something to tell us, RightIs? Don't worry, you're in a safe place...."

RubeisRube is a southern while male Christian. He's probably get's a bigger hardon for his sister.

Better than guys from California, who get a hardon for their brother.

Hitler didn't even know what a fascist was. He did, however, know himself to be a socialist. Thus, the name.

Name one socialist policy Hitler enacted or authored. You don't know what you are talking about as usual.

You have been fooled by semantics. Hitler formed the National Socialists German Workers Party. It was a ruse to get the workers support. He was, just like George Bush, a party leader in name only. His policies, like Bush, had nothing to do with his parties philosophy.

What do you think a fascist is anyway RiR?

RightIs really has a hardon for Barney Frank. You got something to tell us, RightIs? Don't worry, you're in a safe place....

#48 | Posted by mOntecOre
* * * *

I just can't help myself. There's nothing like a 60-year-old fat libtard with a lisp who pisses away $2 trillion to his friends, while guaranteeing another $1.4, that just makes me a horndog. I can see why the Massachusetts Dems can't get enough of him. So to speak. If he were in my district, I'd feel the same way. Go Bawney!

Mussolini was a fascist. Hitler was a Socialist.

Mussolini was a fascist. Hitler was a Socialist. RightisRight is a fucking idiot.

"Mussolini was a fascist."

True.

"Hitler was a Socialist."

Really? What part of Socialism includes eliminating gypsys, gays, Jehovah's Witnesses, political prisoners, and Jews?

Hitler calling himself a "socialist" was far more cynical and dishonest than Bush calling himself a "compassionate conservative". It does compare favorably to the DPRK calling itself "democratic".

Well, he was the leader of the National Socialist German Worker's Party...

National Socialism. Duh. Several types of Socialism, you know. You also had a whole lot of Socialist states in the Warsaw Pact who did the same thing.

It might be inconvenient that the most homicidal regimes in the history of the world all had "Socialist" somewhere in their names. But there ya go.

I can't blame the libbies for wanting to run away from Hitler, Stalin, and their ilk. It would have been better, had they done so when it could have mattered. Like, say, in the 1930's.

But no. Whether it was Hitler or Stalin or Che or Castro or Mao, the libbies love their left-wing totalitarians, right up to the point when it's too late.

Dear #51,

Adolph Hitler Leader of the National Socialist German Workers Party supported

Nazi Weapons Law of 18th March 1938,

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.

All for the good of the people of course!

Any of this sound familiar?

This direct comparison only frightens you because it makes you one of the sheep, which of course you are.

"can't blame the libbies for wanting to run away from Hitler, Stalin, and their ilk. It would have been better, had they done so when it could have mattered. Like, say, in the 1930's."

I can't blame rightwingers for wanting to run away from Hitler/Mussolini/Franco/ Pinochet/Marcos/Somoza/ Noriega/Suharto/The Shah of Iran, etc, etc. I would do the same.

And it's a good thing we have these smart Drudge Retort libtards around, to tell even the National Socialists that they're not really Socialists. Hitler wrote about Socialism, was jailed for it, formed a party for it, was elected because of it, fought for it, and died for it. But our resident know-it-all libbies are saying that he was actually something else. Would have been news to him, methinks.

Still funny though.

"Well, he was the leader of the National Socialist German Worker's Party..."

Kim Jong Ill heads the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. You think he's democratic? You think his government is a republic? Do you think?

Kim Jong Il is the leader of the Korean Worker's Party. Another lefty. Quite an honor roll you guys have going.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.

Ringmaster said, "Name one socialist policy Hitler enacted or authored."

WTF does fascist gun laws have to do with socialism?

Who was the last president to relax gun laws in America?

Obama did.

Try again RiR.

"the Korean Worker's Party"

Possibly the most oxymoronic phrase ever.

Better than guys from California, who get a hard on for their brother.

#50 | Posted by JOE at 2009-11-17 04:04 PM | Reply | Flag: Has a brother from California

That wasn't I who responded. But to answer your question to "name one socialist policy Hitler enacted or authored", the answer is, all of them. His was a totalitarian Socialist regime. It's like saying, name something Stalin did that was Stalinist.

If you think the National Socialists were Socialist, take it up with them. I'll just take their word for it.

weren't Socialist, meant to say. Apologies.

From wiki:

Among the key elements of Nazism were anti-parliamentarism, Pan-Germanism, racism, collectivism,[10][11] eugenics, antisemitism, anti-communism, totalitarianism and opposition to economic liberalism and political liberalism.[11][12][13]

Hmmm...seems more right-leaning attributes than left-leaning.

Uh huh. Except for the anti-parliamentarism, Pan-Germanism, racist, collectivism, eugenics, antisemitism, totalitarianism, and opposition to economic and political liberalism. Except for all those things, he may as well have been Jefferson.

"You can't assult me! You can't assault me!" one said to a Tea Party protester after the banner was torn from his hands. "If you assault me, I get to assault you."

Posted by reinheitsgebot
* * * *

In fact, even that is something a limp-wristed libbie would have said.

limp-wristed libbie
#72 | Posted by rightisright

Translation: "Help! I'm locked in the closet!"

Good one!

I don't mind you libbies knowing everything about my personal life, and making jokes accordingly. Everyone knows I've been married twice, and my taste in women ranges to the very, very ethnic. And I don't mind even gay jokes, considering I'm pretty good at dishing them out myself.

That said, 90-plus percent of actual pole-smokers voted for Obama. It makes it more fun, knowing how it ruffles his base so.

That said, 90-plus percent of actual pole-smokers...

#74 | Posted by rightisright at 2009-11-17 05:57 PM | Reply | Flag: Christian

I'm one of those carnal Christians Paul wrote about. By the way Nulli, why do fag jokes only bother you when right-wingers make them?

Dear Ringmaster,#65

Socialism is about control!

Fact: Hitler like the Democrat Party endorsed restricting gun ownership via strict laws.
____

"Who was the last president to relax gun laws in America?" "Obama did."

?????????

So Hitler wasn't a Socialist?

And

Obama is pro Second Amendment?

Got it! I think I understand now....

"What we've got here is... failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it... well, he gets it. I don't like it any more than you men. - Captain, Road Prison 36, Cool Hand Luke

"why do fag jokes only bother you when right-wingers make them?"

They don't bother me at all. I just make observations about hypocritical Christians who hate gay people. If you stop hatin', I'll stop pointing it out.

I don't hate gay people. I feel sorry for them, and think what they do is disgusting, but to each his own. Bawney Fwank finds men sexually attractive. Harder to figure, some men find Bawney sexually attractive. Naturally, that kind of twisted thinking leads one to vote Democrat.

Dear Danforth #70,

"antisemitism"???

"seams" like the right?

Why because it was George Bush who didn't support and defend Israel at every opportunity while President Barack H. Obama is leaving them alone to be turned into a glass parking lot?

It only "seams like right leaning attributes" because you only think what you are told rather then apply your own brain.

Who was the last president to relax gun laws in America?

Obama did.

Try again RiR.

#65 | Posted by RingMaster

And just exactly what did he do?

Seems to me last time fed gun laws were relaxed was when the clinton gun ban ended. I guess that was during Bush's term.

And just exactly what did he do?

Try this one, the one in #82 was corrupt as your brain.

Sniper, being a dishonest partisan POS will never acknowledge that President Obama softened the gun laws.

Sniper, being a dishonest partisan POS will never acknowledge that President Obama softened the gun laws.

#84 | Posted by moder8

Read the link in Ringmaster's post. Note the following:

This week both the House and Senate approved Sen. Tom Coburn's amendment to the credit card bill.

What does that have to do with Obama other than his signing it?

I don'ty see why the teabaggers should have any conflict with the neo-nazis---they both stand for the same thing.

I don'ty see why the teabaggers should have any conflict with the neo-nazis---they both stand for the same thing.

They're both groups of mindless, ideologically-driven morons. The specifics of their ideologies may differ a bit, though.

This week both the House and Senate approved Sen. Tom Coburn's amendment to the credit card bill.

What does that have to do with Obama other than his signing it?

Nothing other then, as usual, sniper is full of beans and hot air. Seems to be a party thing. RiR is full of it too. He still thinks fascism and socialism can exist together as a form of government. This is just the kind of thinking that hosed the RNC in the first place. Fools the lot.

I don'ty see why the teabaggers should have any conflict with the neo-nazis---they both stand for the same thing.

#86 | Posted by Buffalo_Bob

I'll try to be kind.

BoOb, honestly, what's your IQ?

Do you really think this way or is this an Internet facade?

If you think this way, then I suggest that you attend a Tea Party rally. You will be astonished at how wrong you are about them. They are your neighbor, your boss, your school bus driver, your uncle, your attorney, your doctor, your friend who works for the State Transportation Agency and holds the orange sign saying "Slow Down", your kid's teacher, your Mayor, your Copy Store owner....

They are a cross section of America.

I dare you. Go and see.

LOL!

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!

Please, don't be stupid. Try to understand them before talking about them.

So when American Citizens United throws a racist group like the Neo-Nazis out on their asses they are somehow still "ignorant racist",

however....

when Obama signs into law a "hate crimes" bill where by if a white man hits him it is a Federal "hate crime" and if he hits a white man it is simply assault, not a racist act.

Got it!

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!
#90 | Posted by Eddie

Link, please.

www.eddiesass.com

Just a guess, mind you.

www.eddiesass.com

#93 | Posted by Corky at 2009-11-18 09:56 AM | Reply | Flag:

LOL!

Translation: Eddie always kicks Corky's ass and he's pissed off about it.

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!
#90 | Posted by Eddie

Link, please.
#92 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

The tea baggers don't mind at all if the Nazis want to join, just not in uniform.

#33 | Posted by RingMaster

You just can't get your mind off of sucking a big pair of nuts! You must love it. It's all you can talk about.

Link, please.

#92 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

What did I say?

I said attend a rally and see for yourself!

LOL, nice try.

People who misrepresent their opinions as facts get called on it around here. You of all people should know that by now Mr Haskell.

"I said attend a rally and see for yourself!"

Oh, I see now. Thanks for the clarification, Eddie.

So, you attended one or more teabagging events and learned "most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!"

I'm curious, Eddie: How did you reach that conclusion? How many of these teabaggers did you talk to? Are you sure what they told you as on the up-and-up? How did you verify their statements? Was your sample of teabaggers random or representative? If the latter, how do you know? What, exactly, are your findings? Or are you just spouting anecdotal bullshit out of your nozzle?

I'm going for "just spouting anecdotal bullshit out of your nozzle," Eddie, since that[s something you really know how to do.

I love the Dems here defending Socialism, while pretending that the libbies in generations past didn't put on the pompoms for Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Che, Castro . . .

Funny. The National Socialist Party, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and so on. But to dumbasses like Ringmaster, we should just trust him when he says, no, they weren't lefties, they were right-wingers.

Small-government libertarians and conservatives would have had a rough time under any of those regimes. People like him would have put on the right badges, joined the right councils, and practiced their goose-stepping every weekend. Seig Heil, Ringmaster! Achtung!

Okay, Eddie, I have your reply ready:

What's the matter with you, Doc Dumbass?!?! Can't you read? When I wrote, "The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!" I OBVIOUSLY meant the teabaggers I saw at the rallies I went to. You freak! No, I didn't conduct a survey. Where do I say I conducted a survey? I just spoke about all the teabaggers I encountered. Surely you can't be so stupid as to thik that when I said "[t]he Tea Party goers" I meant "the Tea Party goers." Whazzamatta you? How could I be referring to people I never met? That wouldn't make any sense, would it? That would mean I don't know what I'm talking about. And I know what I'm talking about, y'know.
~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

It's okay, Eddie, no charge this time. Took no more work than your original statement, which is also made up.

People who misrepresent their opinions as facts get called on it around here. You of all people should know that by now Mr Haskell.

#99 | Posted by Corky

LOL. Whatever.

I dare you to attend a rally and speak with some of the people there. You don't have to tell them that you represent the left. Just tell them that you are there to learn more.

-Funny. The National Socialist Party

Funny the people who think that Hitler and the Nazis' political philosophy actually had anything to do with socialism other than using a popular term at the time in their name.

Same revisionist history types that think Jonah Goldberg is a political philosopher, lmao!

It's a form of mental illness Rightsright. They cannot help but defended their flawed position given the fact that they have attached their sense of self to it. It a lot like a child standing their screaming with their hands over their ears as one is trying to reason with them.

It's okay, Eddie, no charge this time. Took no more work than your original statement, which is also made up.

#102 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

LOL. It's fun making fum of the Libs on site!

You react just as predicted. It's like pushing buttons.

You can't argue with my orginal statement so you try to make fun of it which makes you look frustrated.

It's comical.

Funny the people who think that Hitler and the Nazis' political philosophy actually had anything to do with socialism other than using a popular term at the time in their name.

#104 | Posted by Corky

Talk about making shit up!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

it didn't take 5 minutes for your hypocracy to surface!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

You can't argue with my orginal statement so you try to make fun of it which makes you look frustrated.
#106 | Posted by Eddie

Your orignal statement:

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!
#90 | Posted by Eddie

Eddie, there's nothing to argue with. You can't support your original statement, which opens you to ridicule and makes you look stupid.

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!

That's certainly the narrative being fed to ones such as Slow Eddie here.

It implies, of course, that lefty activists are all unemployed, uneducated lazybones.

Trouble is if you actually try to get a teabagger to explain wot the fuck they are doing most of them either spew half remembered FOX Noiz sound bytes or issue forth pure whaargarbl.

Far from being the educated serious professions that Eddie believes them to be they are really a rag tag assemblage of racists, birfers, gun nuts, forced birth advocates, theocrats, conspiracy theorists, astroturfers and inarticulate morans.

Eddie being a case in point there.

Be Well.

Eddie, there's nothing to argue with. You can't support your original statement, which opens you to ridicule and makes you look stupid.

#108 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

No, simply, you can't argue with it.

Makes me look stupid? Really?

No, more like you are frustrated with my comment because you can't argue against it. That's stupid? ok....

Dear # 109

"racists,"
"birfers,"
"gun nuts,"
"forced birth advocates,"
"theocrats,"
"conspiracy theorists,"
"astroturfers"
"and inarticulate morans."

Good thing you don't spew. One might start to imagine that that you have no ability to make your case.

It implies, of course, that lefty activists are all unemployed, uneducated lazybones.

#109 | Posted by dethspud

no it doesn't. But, if you think that people on the left are uneducated, then that's your problem.

Liberal thinkers are traditionally well educated, perhaps TOO educated.

Trouble is if you actually try to get a teabagger to explain wot the fuck they are doing most of them either spew half remembered FOX Noiz sound bytes or issue forth pure whaargarbl.

Far from being the educated serious professions that Eddie believes them to be they are really a rag tag assemblage of racists, birfers, gun nuts, forced birth advocates, theocrats, conspiracy theorists, astroturfers and inarticulate morans.

Eddie being a case in point there.

Be Well.

#109 | Posted by dethspud

racists? Really? I feel sorry for you. You can't argue against Tea Party goers so you pull a word out of your ass to try and hurl insults.

It's sad, really.

Doc, Spud, Corky. Stop getting your information from "The Internet" and get out and experience this for yourself.

Attend one of these rallies and see for yourself. Be brave about it. Don't hide behind your computer and spew hate!

There will be plenty opportunities as the 2010 elections are still a year away.

Looks like Eddie went too far out on a rhetorical limb and was called on it. LOL.

"No, simply, you can't argue with it.
#110 | Posted by Eddie"

What's to argue, Eddie? You made a statement about your own opinion that you hoped sounded like a statement of fact. You lied, Eddie, and there's no way you can prove otherwise.

"Makes me look stupid?
#110 | Posted by Eddie"

Why, yes, Eddie, it does make you look stupid.

"Really?
#110 | Posted by Eddie"

Really.

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!
#90 | Posted by Eddie

I particularly like the "most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!" riff.

Do they? I don't know; they very well might. But there's no way Eddie knows, unless there's a Super Secret Teabagger List that Glennnn Beck uses to wrap his tear-inducing jar of Vick's VapoRub.

"Liberal thinkers are traditionally well educated, perhaps TOO educated.
#112 | Posted by Eddie"

Oops! Edddie just flew off the rhetorical tracks again.

Ahem...Link, please.

racists? Really? I feel sorry for you. You can't argue against Tea Party goers so you pull a word out of your ass to try and hurl insults.

Descriptions aren't insults.

#108 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

You know something Doc? This is revealing! I went and googled

"Tea Party" "Cross Section"

and I got back a list of articles spewing much of the same hate as in Spud's #109 post. Most talk about how the Tea Parties are not a cross section of the population because they were represented by only one race!

This, I'm afraid, is a racist sentiment from the left.

You can see that my patience is being worn down by this blanket style of mockery and all I am doing now is discounting it and make fun of you.

But, maybe Spud is right. Perhaps the people on the left hurling the racist comments are uneducated. Sure seems like it.

"Liberal thinkers are traditionally well educated, perhaps TOO educated.
#112 | Posted by Eddie"

Oops! Edddie just flew off the rhetorical tracks again.

Ahem...Link, please.

#117 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Be Well.

/Gone again
stage left.

#118 | Posted by dethspud

but, they have to be true! If not, they are insults, brainiac.

"You know something Doc? This is revealing! I went and googled "Tea Party" "Cross Section""

Why, good for you, kiddo. Good work, Eddie. But you've got it bassackwards. (Soooprise!) You don't conduct the research after making a statement you hope people will believe is based on research. You do the research first and then issue the findings.

You still haven't provided an iota of credible support for your statement.

I particularly like the "most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!" riff.

Do they? I don't know; they very well might. But there's no way Eddie knows, unless there's a Super Secret Teabagger List that Glennnn Beck uses to wrap his tear-inducing jar of Vick's VapoRub.

#116 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Why the insults Doc? Could it be that you are simply frustrated?

Just give up and leave.

You always do this. You won't argue so you hurl insults that are nothing more than conjecture which on;y demonstrate that you form your opinions after ready the Huffington Post, run my Miss Information, herself.

Why, good for you, kiddo. Good work, Eddie. But you've got it bassackwards. (Soooprise!) You don't conduct the research after making a statement you hope people will believe is based on research. You do the research first and then issue the findings.

You still haven't provided an iota of credible support for your statement.

#122 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc, my pointed headed friend, I never said it was fact! I never said I did the research. In fact, my first statement was inviting YOU to do the research by attending one of the rallies before forming a prejudice!

Have you ever been to a Tea Party Rally? Aren't you curious?

Ho boy, here it is, finally arrived, the all-purpose Eddie dodge:

"I never said it was fact! I never said I did the research.
#124 | Posted by Eddie"

Here's what you said, Eddie:

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!
#90 | Posted by Eddie

So when you say "most have" that's not meant as a statement of fact? What's it a statement of, Eddie? Wishful thinking?

I already predicted your capituation in #102. And putting on my Karnak turban I'm getting your vibes, Eddie:

-Talk about making shit up!!!

"And putting on my Karnak turban I'm getting your vibes"

Is this where you obtain all your information?

So when you say "most have" that's not meant as a statement of fact? What's it a statement of, Eddie? Wishful thinking?

I already predicted your capituation in #102. And putting on my Karnak turban I'm getting your vibes, Eddie:

Maybe I should try another door.
~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

#125 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc, sorry. You didn't pick up on it.

When I suggested that Corky attend a Tea Party Rally, I thought (assumed) I was implying that I had attended and spoke with some of the attendees. I asked them why they were there and what they did for a living.

Sorry for making an ass out of you and me

ASS U ME

:)

Sorry, Eddie, but you lied.

I thought (assumed) I was implying...Sorry for making an ass out of you and me
#128 | Posted by Eddie

Oh, bullshit, Eddie. You kept trying to defend your statement until you'd backed into a corner from which you couldn't possibly extricate yoiurself.

You didn't make an ass out you and I, Eddie. This is a self-launched boomerang you uleashed and the only person you made an ass of is yourself.

Funny the people who think that Hitler and the Nazis' political philosophy actually had anything to do with socialism other than using a popular term at the time in their name.

#104 | Posted by Corky

-Talk about making shit up!!!

www.historyplace.com

Talk about a sorry excuse for understanding history.

#126 | Posted by Corky

Corky, your article in #126 contradicts your original statement in #104.

It had everything to do with Socialism (according to your article). That's how Hitler gained power!

You must have meant to say something else. Your statement doesn't match your article.

Oh, bullshit, Eddie. You kept trying to defend your statement until you'd backed into a corner from which you couldn't possibly extricate yoiurself.

#130 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Comeon Doc, stop it! you made an ass of yourself when you couldn't argue with my statement. Oh, you're not an ass? Then why are you still arguing and not able to make your point?

All I do is to continue to reiterate my original point.

The people who attend these rallies are mostly educated.... I suggest you attend a rally and see for yourself.

I can see how this would drive you completely nuts!

Sorry, Eddie, but you lied.

#129 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Where?

LOL. Am I a racist too?

LOL!!!

Am I a racist too?
#133 | Posted by Eddie

I don't know, Eddie.
But I do know you're a liar.

Hitler had socialist leaners killed, Eddie. "Socialism" was just a popular term used to mean the opposite of Marxists at the time.

Hitler was a Fascist, Eddie.

You know what Fascism is, Eddie?

Fascism, pronounced /ˈfʃɪzəm/, is a political ideology that seeks to combine radical and authoritarian nationalism with a corporatist economic system,[5] and which is usually considered to be on the far right of the traditional left-right political spectrum.

That is what Fascism is, Eddie, a far right political ideology in bed with crony capitalists that claims to put Country First .

Sound familiar, Eddie?

Maybe I should try another door.
~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

#125 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

This is CLASSIC!

Your only retort is to show a picture of Bush... LOL!!!

Your completely frustrated with what's happening in Washington, I can tell.

#135 | Posted by Corky

An example of Corky knocking himself out!

Who are you arguing with? What are you arguing about? What point are you trying to make?

Doc:

Let it go. Eddie does that all the time....throws something out there and then backpeddals as fast as he can.

We realize that his comment was sheer opinion, trying to imply it was fact.

Eddie, you tried to pass off a statement of your opinion based on god only knows what as a statement of fact. It wasn't a statement of fact. Then you kept bobbing and weaving -- as per usual -- until you got nailed and woke up stuck in a corner. Then you tried to bullshit your way out of it and failed. (Yes, again.)

"All I do is to continue to reiterate my original point."

Which is a problem, since it is not and never has been the statement of fact you tried to make it appear to be.

Eddie, your problem is easily identified: You think other people are as stupid as you are.

I don't know, Eddie.
But I do know you're a liar.

#134 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Where did I lie?

I brought up racist because Liberals usually resort to using the word when they lose an argument.

Oh, and another word they use is "liar"

Let it go. Eddie does that all the time....throws something out there and then backpeddals as fast as he can.
We realize that his comment was sheer opinion, trying to imply it was fact.
#138 | Posted by Lisa

Okay, Lisa. But only because your eyes smile.

LOL

I wish I had a nickle for every time I heard that Doc!!

I'm just trying to save you from getting frustrated for nothing, that's all!!

Then you tried to bullshit your way out of it and failed. (Yes, again.)

#139 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

Doc,

Do you have a link for this bullshit?

LOL!!!

Dear Eddie,
You errored when you stated "most" and had no evidence to back it up. That doesn't mean that this couldn't be the case but without evidence you leave yourself open for individuals to focus on your mistake rather then the real issue that they so often avoid.

In Doc Sarvis's case he wants this conversation to be about your mistake rather than about how American Citizens United threw out racist Neo-Nazis.

Shifting focus is key in the tactics of the Left. (See Below)

"Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste," Mr. Emanuel said in an interview on Sunday. "They are opportunities to do big things." NY Times Nov 9th, 2008

-Funny the people who think that Hitler and the Nazis' political philosophy actually had anything to do with socialism other than using a popular term at the time in their name.

#104 | Posted by Corky

Talk about making shit up!!!

- What point are you trying to make?

That, unlike yourself, I wasn't making shit up.

I'll try to be kind.

BoOb, honestly, what's your IQ?

Do you really think this way or is this an Internet facade?

If you think this way, then I suggest that you attend a Tea Party rally. You will be astonished at how wrong you are about them. They are your neighbor, your boss, your school bus driver, your uncle, your attorney, your doctor, your friend who works for the State Transportation Agency and holds the orange sign saying "Slow Down", your kid's teacher, your Mayor, your Copy Store owner....

They are a cross section of America.

I dare you. Go and see.

#89 | Posted by Eddie

LOL!

The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!

Please, don't be stupid. Try to understand them before talking about them.

#90 | Posted by Eddie

Lisa, I dare you to read this.

Do I need to explain it to both you and Doc?

2 posts back to back.

Lisa, I thought you were fair. I guess not.

I thought that these 2 posts would imply that I attended a rally and would only relay what I experienced myself.

My mistake.

Back-pedal? LOL!

Let's see you back-pedal.

That, unlike yourself, I wasn't making shit up.

#145 | Posted by Corky

Corky! Read your statement. The article contradicts you. Did you read the article?

I am fair, Eddie. More than I should be at times.

Read what? I've read the entire thread.

I was going to comment right when you said it, but since you often do that and then don't admit you're wrong about anything, I felt why waste the time.

Have a good day.

In Doc Sarvis's case he wants this conversation to be about...
#144 | Posted by Dirk | Flag: Add One More Self-Proclaimed Mind-Reader To The List

#144 | Posted by Dirk

It's ok Dirk. Even when you put the truth in front of them, they are not decent enough to consider it.

I'm disappointed that we are being taken over by these back stabbers. But, they haven't outlawed elections... Yet. 2010 is coming.

Do I really need to go back and post all your comments on a non issue as a "bit" of evidence rather then what this thread is to be about Doc?

I was going to comment right when you said it, but since you often do that and then don't admit you're wrong about anything, I felt why waste the time.

Have a good day.

#148 | Posted by Lisa

How am I wrong?

Lisa, I thought you were level minded and fair.

You didn't read my post again.

Whatever.

What are you saying? Doc hung the Moon? LOL!!!

you have some admirers Doc. They like you even when you're down.

"You didn't read my post again. "

What makes you think I didn't read it? Because I don't agree with you?

Lisa,

Since we are talking about opinions here, what is your opinion of Tea Party attendees? Are you threatened by them? Have you ever been to a rally? Doc didn't dare to answer this one!

"Whatever.

What are you saying?"

#152 | Posted by Eddie

I think what Lisa is saying is that she can't wait for killfiles.

147 | Posted by Eddie at 2009-11-18 12:30 PM | Reply | Flag: No reading comprehension skills either, eh? Figures.

"You didn't read my post again. "

What makes you think I didn't read it? Because I don't agree with you?

#153 | Posted by Lisa

Nope. You said this:

"I was going to comment right when you said it, but since you often do that and then don't admit you're wrong about anything, I felt why waste the time.

Have a good day.

#148 | Posted by Lisa "

It's ok. You think I'm arrogant and pompous, probably. I can accept that. But if you say I am wrong, you have to say WHY I'm wrong.

Here fishy, fishy, fishy,....

#152 | Posted by Eddie

I think what Lisa is saying is that she can't wait for killfiles.

#155 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-18 12:42 PM | Reply | Flag: Killfile

"The Tea Party goers read and understand the Constitution of the US, they study and understand history... most have University degrees, own businesses or work in a Professionally skilled capacity!"

This is what started all this.

1. How many people were there?

2. Did you speak to each person there and quiz them on their knowledge of the Constitution?

3. Did you ask more than half of the people there reguarding their education and where they work?

I find it difficult to believe that you would number one...have that much time there to question that many people and number two, that people would volunteer that information to you when they didn't know you, and that you would have had to been seen asking numerous people and folks may have thought you were some kind of kook.

Why not just admit that this was your opinion and you don't have facts to back it up?

People would find it much more pleasant to converse with you if you were honest.

"It's ok. You think I'm arrogant and pompous, probably. I can accept that. But if you say I am wrong, you have to say WHY I'm wrong."

I don't think you are arrogant and pompous, Eddie.

I think you are partisan to the point that you would say anything to try and defend your party.

There is a difference.

I just DID ask you questions and stated why I feel you were not telling the truth. : (

"I think what Lisa is saying is that she can't wait for killfiles."

LOL

That's a FACT!!!

Do I really need to go back and post all your comments on a non issue as a "bit" of evidence rather then what this thread is to be about Doc?
#151 | Posted by Dirk

Dirk, you're a newbie. So you get some slack cut for you, albeit not for long around this pond. Threads on the DR are about whatever they're about. The title of the thread is merely indicative of a hope that the topic will actually be appreciated, understood, discussed. When a chronic prevaricator like Eddie starts spewing bullshit and gets called on it you can (a) participate in that; (b) choose not to participate in that and keep posting about whatever it is you're posting about; (c) post about something else entirely; (d) leave and go to another thread; or (e) just leave.

If you're bothered by whatever, Dirk, you've got options "a" through "e" to choose from. Or make a new menu. But, please, don't attempt to lecture people by offering to post the "non issue" comments you don't want to see hanging on the page anyway.

"I think what Lisa is saying is that she can't wait for killfiles."

LOL

That's a FACT!!!
#162 | Posted by Lisa

But what she really can't wait for is the return of Kanrei from his self-imposed exile.

Sher really misses Kanrei.

"albeit not for long around this pond."

You've got me pissing myself.

If you can't handle the scolding then don't act like a child.

Sher really misses Kanrei.

I miss kanrei, too.

"I miss kanrei, too."

Here's a tissue. He'll be back in another week I think.

"Sher really misses Kanrei."

Yep! I miss his sense of humor here. He could always lighten up a very tense mood.

1. How many people were there?

2. Did you speak to each person there and quiz them on their knowledge of the Constitution?

3. Did you ask more than half of the people there reguarding their education and where they work?

I find it difficult to believe that you would number one...have that much time there to question that many people and number two, that people would volunteer that information to you when they didn't know you, and that you would have had to been seen asking numerous people and folks may have thought you were some kind of kook.

Why not just admit that this was your opinion and you don't have facts to back it up?

People would find it much more pleasant to converse with you if you were honest.

#160 | Posted by Lisa

How many people? About 80 regulars, but not all showed up to all of the rallies.

Did you speak with each person? Not each, but I already know about 25 of them personally and then over the last couple of years, I've spoken with probably 50+ at different rallies. This goes back to the Ron Paul days.

You assume that I went to a single rally. I didn't. I attend many and I do get to know most of them as they join. They are, for the most part educated and work in professionally skilled jobs or they are business owners, etc.

Lisa, can you answer my questions now?

Have you ever been to a Tea Party rally? Do they threaten you?

And most of all, do you think I'm "some kind of kook" because I say this about other Tea Party goers?

Yes, I am assuming that you are prejudiced. Because you make up your mind before finding out all the information.

Bottomline, I don't really care if you believe me since this is an anonymous Internet blog, but I seriously enjoy pointing out the hypocracy of the Left calling these people racist! YOU HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN TO A RALLY!!! When you do, I'm sure you'll be thinking of this conversation.

If you can't handle the scolding then don't act like a child.
#165 | Posted by Dirk

You got off easy. A child would've kicked you in the ass. And try not to be such a scold. It just makes you sound like a jerk, Dirk.

Dirk, you're a newbie. So you get some slack cut for you, albeit not for long around this pond.
#163 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis

LOL!!!!

Doc, I just spent the last 100 posts making fun of you, you arrogant jackass!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Doc, I just spent the last 100 posts making fun of you, you arrogant jackass!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

#171 | Posted by Eddie

Was that a valuable use of your time, Eddie? Do you get a box of cookies when you reach 100?

I think you are partisan to the point that you would say anything to try and defend your party.

There is a difference.

I just DID ask you questions and stated why I feel you were not telling the truth. : (

#161 | Posted by Lisa

Lisa, when are you going to point out that I was wrong?

You have to, first, attend a Tea Party rally, then come back and tell me I was wrong. I'll accept your opinion. I'm asking you to accept mine.

Partisan? You don't even know which party the Tea Party crowd belongs to. Do you think they are Republicans?

Was that a valuable use of your time, Eddie? Do you get a box of cookies when you reach 100?

#172 | Posted by nullifidian at 2009-11-18 01:41 PM | Reply | Flag: Killfile

Doc, you have a lot of followers. LOL

WE ARE TEAPUBLICANS!

#175 | Posted by Eddie - well, when your guys is cic breaking-wind-while-bending-
at-waist...

"guy"

Doc, I just spent the last 100 posts making an ass of myself you jackerjackerjack.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
EEEEEEEE-HAAAAAAW!
EEEEEEEE-HAAAAAAW!
PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT!
~Mrs. Haskell's Favorite Son

breaking-wind-while-bending-
at-waist...
#177 | Posted by nanc | Flag: Thanks For Sharing That

breaking-wind-while-bending- at-waist...
#177 | Posted by nanc

Save it for the talent contest

"You assume that I went to a single rally. I didn't. I attend many and I do get to know most of them as they join. They are, for the most part educated and work in professionally skilled jobs or they are business owners, etc. "

Would that be just in your area or across the country?

You commented on "Teaparty goers"...not a few, not some...but clearly you imply ALL. And unless you have been to every single rally, spoken to every single person there, quized them on their knowledge of the Constitution and their knowledge about history...you can't possibly claim what you did with accuracy.

"And most of all, do you think I'm "some kind of kook" because I say this about other Tea Party goers? "

Where did I call you a "kook"?? Please reread my comment, Eddie. I said I'm suprised other people didn't think you were a kook for running around asking all those people what their education was and where they worked.

"Yes, I am assuming that you are prejudiced. Because you make up your mind before finding out all the information. "

Hmmm...kinda like THIS?:

"Have you ever been to a Tea Party rally?"

"YOU HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN TO A RALLY!!! "

You don't even wait for a response before you comment on the very question you had asked!!!

Seems to me you are the one making up your mind prior to finding out all the information...wouldn't you say??

"Bottomline, I don't really care if you believe me since this is an anonymous Internet blog"

Your integrity only matters in "real life"? That's quite sad, Eddie.

You would have no problem coming here and lying then would you? I mean...if you don't care if one believes you then you wouldn't care if you were speaking the truth then either.

And that being the case, you shouldn't be so defensive when someone challenges you on your words.

"You got off easy. A child would've kicked you in the ass."

Another "brave and noble" member of the left ready to get into fisticuffs....

over the internet that is.

Really Doc who looks like the pussy here???

Eddie:

One would have to be deaf, blind and dumb not to realize what side of the political fence you are on. So don't pretend that you would be attending one democratic rally much less the several that you claimed you had attended.

Really Doc who looks like the pussy here???
#183 | Posted by Dirk

Taking umbrage because I said "A child would've kicked you the ass" for being a pompous scold? Well, Dirk, that would be you.

Lisa - I've attended five rallies and a few training events and there have been people of all political parties there - at our own group, one lady stated that when she first registered to vote as a republican 30 years ago and went to cast her vote on some thing or another said the people looked at her ballot and tore it up and threw it into the garbage - strangely enough, awhile later someone brutally killed their family pet and left it on her doorstep. Why are conservatives scared? Because the left uses tactics that are unimaginable to us. Some people are democrats in name only for fear of retribution - this isn't the only story I've heard like this.

We are lining up a Constitution workshop for our area for teens on up to adults. Many areas are doing the same.

Have you been to a TEA party or rally?

People DO want to know the backgrounds of other TPP's - we are looking for common ground mostly, not that which keeps U.S. apart.

Have you been to a TEA party or rally?

The sweeping judgments people make of U.S. are to their own peril.

No what you said was,

"You got off easy. A child would've kicked you in the ass."

but I think my point has been made. Cheers!

That you[re a pompous ass? Yes, Dirk, you've made that quite clear already. Thanks for the update.

"I know you are but what am I"

"I know you are but what am I"

"I know you are but what am I"

"I know you are but what am I"

"I know you are but what am I"

I really "hope" you are not a Doctor.

I know Tourette's when I see it, Dirk. Seek the assistance of a licensed professional.

Funny; I just thought I was going insane watching my fellow country persons give away their power to the Federal Government in the "hope" of gaining a little security. A false sense of security at that!

Given the fact that there has never been one one government in the history of the world that hasn't become abusive to its people. Including the United States Federal Government. Indians, Slaves, Japanese Americans, Branch Davidians, Randy Weaver, etc....

But I know....I am the crazy one because "this time" President Obama and his merry band of mother fuckers will "change" millions of years of human behavior and do it better.

That is why we should give up our Individual Liberties.

Got it!

The Professor must teach only TTh classes.

Would that you'd attended a few more.

Tea-bagging neo-Nazi skinheads?

I think I have that video...

I knew which classes were important, and which ones weren't.

Tea-bagging neo-Nazi skinheads?

I think I have that video...

Rule #34 of the Internet: If it exists, there is porn of it.

Don't believe me? Prove it. You might want to have a barf bag handy before you do.

Wow, this thread sure turned into a bag of turds for the righty rights.

It does prove my point that most right wing know-it-alls don't know shit about history or political science. There is a good reason for that actually. They are prejudiced against every one but other right wingers. Everyone else is a socialist, communist, liberal, fascist, egalitarian who believe in capitalist exploitation of non existent climate changes, and are enviro creeps that hug trees and love animals because they are godless non Christians with atheistic Muslim tenancies.

Don't worry boys and girls of the Tea Party persuasion, the rest of us will die off soon from our own ignorance.

We can only hope.

Eddie:

One would have to be deaf, blind and dumb not to realize what side of the political fence you are on. So don't pretend that you would be attending one democratic rally much less the several that you claimed you had attended.

#184 | Posted by Lisa

I think you may be confused or just ignorant, Lisa, and this is my point.

You, Doc and Corky are judging Tea Party goers without knowing anything about them.

A Tea Party attendee is probably someone who has the same political views as Ron Paul or Thomas Jefferson.

Like I said in the beginning, all I am saying is order to keep your integrity, you must do more research and honestly understand what you are talking about before you pass judgement.

If you do less than this, then you are prejudiced.

HA! The very thing Spud is saying about them.

It's funny that you think you are right and I am wrong.

#197 | Posted by RingMaster

you see Lisa? This is the kind of ignorant shit I'm talking about. Morons like this don't want to have an open mind and the result is prejudice and lies.

RingMaster, you obviously can't stand the truth.

Can you link to a post that even remotely supports your bullshit?

#182 | Posted by Lisa

Lisa,

Since you and Doc can't argue with me, you call me a liar. Great!

Are you claiming victory?

Eddie, I'll tell you what....

I was just brought back to what I am suppose to do as a Christian.
I have no intention of calling you a liar nor do I think it.

I believe your partisanship leads you to over exaggerate a bit in defense of your party but that does not necessarily mean a blatant lie.

I think you try and twist words in order to further a point you try to make.

However, as I have said in your defense on another thread, I don't think you're all that bad! : )

I think you try and twist words in order to further a point you try to make.

However, as I have said in your defense on another thread, I don't think you're all that bad! : )

#202 | Posted by Lisa

Thank you for saying that, but unfortunately I have to say that you are either being lazy or pig-headed just because you choose to not consider this simple request:

I asked you to go and see for yourself before passing judgment on these people. That's all!

You and Doc back yourselves into a corner by trying to prove me wrong "at this very moment"! You can't! How can you? You must find out more about Tea Party goers before you can honestly say that I am wrong.

BTW, let me tell you how much you are NOT paying attention which demonstrates your ignorance. You think that Tea Party goers are Republicans. AGAIN! They are not. They are registering Republican only to vote in the primaries to get OUR people nominated. Our people are running as Conservative Republicans because running as an independent gets you nowhere (for now).

People in the US will either vote Democrat or Republican. They don't vote independent.

When you and Doc ridicule me from your point of view, you make yourself simply appear ignorant. That's why I appealed to your sense of fairness to actually read what I asked of you and perhaps act on it.

Doc will never compromise. He's too high up in his "Ivory" Tower (more like an out of work Professor who didn't get tenured)