Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Friday, November 13, 2009

The U.S. government is taking legal action to seize at least four U.S. mosques and a Manhattan office building controlled by a New York-based foundation the Justice Department contends is a front for the Iranian regime. Suspicions that the organization is controlled by Tehran date back for more than a decade.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

joe

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Form Responses to the Thread:

This is nothing more than (choose: fear mongering, racism, assault on freedom of religion) by a (choose: warhawk, chimp) President hell-bent on a war with Islam and Iran.

-Liberal, circa 2008

This is good.

-Liberal, circa 2009

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2009

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2008

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circe 2007

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2006

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2005

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2004

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2003

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circe 2002

"I'm a tool"

-Joe, circa 2001

"Mommy, what's a tool?"

-Joe, circa 2000

They have known this for quite awhile. That would bring the timing of the seizures into question. The Obama administration now needs to show they are not sitting on their thumbs when it comes to national security. Especially after their major failure last week to protect American citizens.

Finally, sir, does your douchebaggery know no bounds?

I think this is a response to Iran charging those three tourists with spying. You take our people we take your buildings, Mosques and bank accounts.

Obama's response was much quicker than Bush's response. Actually, Obama is the only one who had a response.

This is terrible, it's going to create more backlash and fear of Muslims! Leave them alone! Obama being a fellow Muslim should know better!

Sincerely

The Left

"1995"

Oh, so it is all Clinton's fault!

"That would bring the timing of the seizures into question"

How predictable. I expected that very response, as soon as I saw the story. No matter when the seizures took place, someone would find a reason to question the timing. After all, everything Obama does is a) wrong, or b) has an ulterior motive, right?

"Especially after their major failure last week to protect American citizens."

Wait...the Obama administration is responsible for what happened at Fort Hood?!? Please explain, expand on that comment.

This should be good! How fast and hard can you spin?

I think this is a response to Iran charging those three tourists with spying. You take our people we take your buildings, Mosques and bank accounts.

#5 | Posted by danni

Works for me, until we want our people back and they want their buildings back.

Obama administration is responsible for what happened at Fort Hood?!?
#9 | Posted by SnowDog

Of course it is! You want reasons? Go check all the It's GWB's fault accusations over the past 8 years and apply any one you want.

This is Obamas war, Obamas Economy, Obamas Military, Obamas Political correctness. He ownes it ALL. Everything that happens from now on is Obamas fault!! Deal with it.

The timing is highly suspect.

Clearly Obama's Chicago cabal of Acorn-fed socialist Muslim czars should have waited to act so as not to arouse suspicions about his motives. Had he done this, say, six months from now, the righties on this site would surely respond, "Well done, sir! We salute you, Mr. President, in your efforts to protect us Americans."

the foundation was "entirely controlled by the government of Iran."

Much like Iraq.

It's GWB's fault accusations over the past 8 years and apply any one you want.

Like Bush ignored 52 warnings pre 9-11?

Like Bush invaded Iraq? Without sufficient troops or a plan?
Like Bush invaded afghanistan? And withdrew needed forces to invade Iraq?

Like this guy was under review while Bush was C-in-C?

None of these are true?

Three American hostages, about a half billion dollars in assets: Your choice Iran. (You chickenshit bastards.)

#2 | Posted by LetUsPrey at 2009-11-12 09:04 PM | Reply | Flag: I think Joe was right on in his snark.

But thank goodness the feds are taking action!!

Yaaaay!!!!!!

Like Bush ignored 52 warnings pre 9-11?

Like Bush invaded Iraq? Without sufficient troops or a plan?
Like Bush invaded afghanistan? And withdrew needed forces to invade Iraq?

Like this guy was under review while Bush was C-in-C?

None of these are true?

#13 | Posted by northguy3 at 2009-11-13 11:30 AM | Reply | Flag:

None are true. They are your opinion. And the opinions of fools don't count.

" And the opinions of fools don't count.

#16 | Posted by slicksterWilly"

Noted, but not counted.

Isn't this the same tact taken by Carter and seizing the bank funds held by Iran.

Then they took our emabassy and held our folks for 444 days?

And then Reagan came in and they released them the first day he took office?
-----

And this has nothing to do with the tourists.

----

And all this brouhaha over religion--is a smoke screen. Like people on the DR care about that!

If Iran were hiding behind and gettings money from Methodist or Catholic churches--the same should happen.

How easy it would be to just sneak into - ala Mission Impossible - put some bugs in inconspicuous places and gather info...

"And then Reagan came in and they released them the first day he took office?"

First of several shameful (and probably treasonous) interactions the Reagan administration had with Iran.

"Go check all the It's GWB's fault accusations over the past 8 years"

Yeah, that makes sense. One form of stupidity excuses another. Brilliant.

"The Obama administration now needs to show they are not sitting on their thumbs when it comes to national security."

The WH is saying they were not cooridinated with the seizures. Just like sending Bill to NK, they are distancing themselves. Although it is telling Hillary and Bill seem to have a problem accepting money from The Alavi Foundation last year, amongst other Islamic Groups...

the Clinton foundation has also received money from the Iran-supporting Alavi Foundation. The last paragraph can be summed up in two names... Joe Biden and Barrack Obama. Chair and Sub Committee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

www.americanthinker.com
On Dec. 19, 2008, at 2 p.m., the New York-based Alavi Foundation, which supports Iranian causes, contributed between $25,000 and $50,000 to the William J. Clinton Foundation. This can be best described as the ultimate chutzpah, for on the very same day, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York indicted the president of the Alavi Foundation, Farshid Jahedi, "on a charge of obstruction of justice for allegedly destroying documents required to be produced under a grand jury subpoena concerning the Alavi Foundation's relationship with Bank Melli Iran and the ownership of a Manhattan office building."

Alavi's contribution to Clinton came just two days after the Treasury Department also designated Alavi's partner, the New York-based ASSA Corp., as a terrorist entity, and the New York Southern District's attorney seized and forfeited its assets. According to the Treasury Department, "Assa ... continued to provide services to Bank Melli by maintaining Melli's interest in 650 Fifth Avenue Co. and transferring income from 650 Fifth Avenue Co. to Bank Melli." ASSA owned 650 Fifth Avenue Co. together with the Alavi Foundation. Incredibly, the government seized only 40% of the 36-story building controlled by ASSA, leaving the Alavi Foundation in charge of the remaining 60%.

As early as 1979, the foundation and its partner Bank Melli were recognized as procurement fronts for Iran's nuclear weapons program. Twenty years later, the U.S. government recognized Bank Melli as a vehicle controlled by the Iranian Government. [emphasis added] Source: Forbes Magazine:Clinton's Iranian Connection

Why hasn't the Senate Foreign Relations Committee asked Ms Clinton specific questions about these donations ? Not only is this an abrogation of their responsibilities but it may be placing the United States in danger.

And then Reagan came in and they released them the first day he took office?

There are advantages to being a crazy motherfucker itching for an excuse to drop some bombs. Our "great" president Raygun knew that (well, then he forgot it). Ahmadinejad knows this as well.

The Clinton Foundation uses its funds for HIV/AIDS work and such. It isn't a campaign fund and the source of funds is not nearly as important as it would be if it were.

"Ahmadinejad knows this as well."

Not sure Ahmadinejad is too worried about the two who run the WH, State Department, DoD... So far all three haven't been on the same page when it comes to Iran.

BTW... Has Obama or Clinton said anything about Iran missing another deadline in regards to the recent proposal on their nukes? Which was delayed until the end of October? Or like Afghanistan, have we lost another three weeks????

The Clinton Foundation uses its funds for HIV/AIDS work and such. It isn't a campaign fund and the source of funds is not nearly as important as it would be if it were.

#24 | Posted by danni at 2009-11-13 12:22 PM

No doubt you would defend Marc Rich, and claim there was no connection to the millions going to the Clinton Library. Not surprised you would defend the Clinton Foundation accepting "corrupt" donations.

Just making the distinction between the acceptance of funds into a political campaign and into a charitable foundation.

"Just making the distinction between the acceptance of funds into a political campaign and into a charitable foundation."

What difference does it make where corrupt money goes? They still benefit the recipient. You were trying to deflect the donation and defend the cause. Hard to explain the timing though, don't you think?

#20 | Posted by danni at 2009-11-13 12:06 PM | Reply | Flag: Still thinks Elvis is alive.

They have known this for quite awhile. That would bring the timing of the seizures into question. The Obama administration now needs to show they are not sitting on their thumbs when it comes to national security. Especially after their major failure last week to protect American citizens.

#3 | Posted by KBM

And this is what you said about President Bush after 9/11? 3000 plus died... I'll wait for a response...

Their seizures don't mean squat, it's more propaganda and more lies. The only reason they claim to seize those mosques is to protect them from the public citizens, putting armed guards around them 24/7 making sure outraged American citizens don't burn the stinking shit to the ground. More somke and mirrows, is all that's coming from OLoudmouth's occupation of the shit house...

After all, everything Obama does is a) wrong, or b) has an ulterior motive, right?

#8 | Posted by SnowDog at 2009-11-13 10:20 AM | Reply | Flag:

well said

If Iran were hiding behind and gettings money from Methodist or Catholic churches--the same should happen.

#18 | Posted by MURPHY at 2009-11-13 11:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

But not Presbyterians, right?

The Clinton Foundation uses its funds for HIV/AIDS work and such. It isn't a campaign fund and the source of funds is not nearly as important as it would be if it were.

#24 | Posted by danni at 2009-11-13 12:22 PM | Reply | Flag:

The Clintons are both attention whores.

They get tainted money so they can then bask in the glory for doing good works. The money still funds what they crave most: adoration

None are true. They are your opinion.

Slickwiily

So Bush really didn't invade Iraq or afghanistan and I killed 4300 soldiers with my opinion? Or are their deaths just a matter of opinion?

wow, the level of denial about the Bush years by the rightwingnuts has reached a new level. 9-11, and two wars are simply a matter of opinion and thus, may never have occurred.

We know why Iran wanted Bush and McCain to win. Republicans have a long record of servicing the ayatollahs, from Reagan arming them to Bush1 emasculating their worst enemy to Bush2 handing them Iraq.

Nice goin', U.S. Now turn it into Baptist churches or something

That was some funny shit LETUSPREY, with whole I;m a tool bit, thanks for the laugh.

Anyone who doesn't think Iran and every other enemy we have (and probably most of our friends) all have spies in our country posing as legitimate whatever is just naive or stupid or both.

Obama Govt Clearly Shows (once again) that it is "Owned & Operated" by the State of Israel!!!

Because Israel that just waged a Devestating,Murderous and Genocidal War against the Defenseless Palestinians is not have any of its assets seized by the US Govt!!!
Israel continues its bloodshed,genocide and destabilization in the Middle East while at the same time its laughingly bleeds the US Taxpayers for even more $Billions!!!!

Don't sugar coat it, man. Tell us what you really think.

Interesting. Going after the owner and not the tenants. This seizure also includes 100 acres in Virginia. Waiting to see what kind of response this will garner. Heads up people.

Obama Govt Clearly Shows (once again) that it is "Owned & Operated" by the State of Israel!!!

Because Israel that just waged a Devestating,Murderous and Genocidal War against the Defenseless Palestinians is not have any of its assets seized by the US Govt!!!
Israel continues its bloodshed,genocide and destabilization in the Middle East while at the same time its laughingly bleeds the US Taxpayers for even more $Billions!!!!

#38 | Posted by AntiCadillac

Have you read the Hamas Charter? What a humane piece of governing framework. Especially Article 18th; guidance that every loving parent wishes for....perhaps that's part of the problem? No?

Article Eighteen
"The women in the house and the family of Jihad fighters, whether they are mothers or sisters, carry out the most important duty of caring for the home and raising the children upon the moral concepts and values which derive from Islam; and of educating their sons to observe the religious injunctions in preparation for the duty of Jihad awaiting them."

The U.S. government is taking legal action to seize at least four U.S. mosques and a Manhattan office building...

This is good. Better yet if they put in a strip joint. Karma dude and dudettes!

The Obama administration now needs to show they are not sitting on their thumbs when it comes to national security. Especially after their major failure last week to protect American citizens.

We can't count on the Army to protect themselves? That's the responsibility of the White House?

Great thinking. Maybe our snipers can learn a thing or two about fieldcraft at the annual Easter Egg Hunt on the White House Lawn. Some of those eggs, you'd never see 'em!

The Obama administration now needs to show they are not sitting on their thumbs when it comes to national security.

Is it after 9/11?

Have 3,000 plus Americans died horribly and tragically due to a terrorist attack that had been telegraphed for months?

No?

K, STFU and go DIAF.

That noted someone's ass better be on the line for the Fort Hood thing. Here we had an unhappy Muslim shrink who really didn't want to get deployed to Iraq who was being deployed to Iraq who was known to have tried to get in touch with Al Quaeda who was "under surveillance" before the slaughterfest ensued.

Rationale?

They were trying to use him to get to AQ leadership.

*facepalm*

Meanwhile, that surveillance either FAILed to pick up his legal purchase on non-military issue uber lethal weaponry or discounted it.

In either case somebody fucked up big time here.

Unless the actual goal there was to merely increase public awareness and fear of "terrorism" as some wingnuttier conspiracy types have already posited.

On Topic?

Seizing the Mosques with Iranian ties?

Fronts for the Iranian regime?

Not too hard to believe.

They had better have a case to make though or this move will backfire spectacularily.

Luff the conumdrum rtards find themselves in with this typa stuff.

If it was Dumbya doing this they would be cheering loudly and proclaiming that no "pussy lib" would have the balls to make such a bold move.

Since it's Obama and since they must reflectively decry any action he takes they must content themselves by attributing positions to the left (largely false) without actually taking one themselves.

LOL.

Rock and a hard place.

Be Well.

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable