Drudge Retort: Red Meat for Yellow Dogs
Thursday, November 12, 2009

....

AP reported that "some jobs credited to the stimulus program were counted two, three, four or even more times." The Bee reported that California State University said "the $268.5 million it received in stimulus funding through October allowed it to retain 26,156 employees" more than half its statewide work force. The Tribune reported that Illinois education officials grossly inflated job-saved numbers, sometimes saying school districts had saved more jobs than their total number of employees.

Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Menu

Subscriptions

Author Info

jeffj

MORE STORIES

Special Features

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in the discussion of this weblog entry should note the site's moderation policy.

Larry is going to go absolutely apeshit when he discovers this thread.

For you see, in Larry's world, blind-obedience to Obama is the norm and ALL criticisms of him, no matter what, are the product of racism.

Oh, and where in the hell is the MSM on this shit - why are these dicks incapable of being even remotely critical of this president?

For you see, in Larry's world, blind-obedience to Obama is the norm and ALL criticisms of him, no matter what, are the product of racism.
#1 | Posted by JeffJ

You're only paying attention to Larry when he says something you disagree with if you really believe that. Larry has big problems with the President, just not the same problems that you have.

The article doesn't say who is responsible for the over count of jobs saved or how that happened. And it definitely does not show a link to the President directing anyone to do so.

That said, the idea of "jobs saved" is a tricky thing to demonstrate even with the best of intentions.

Hag,

I know Larry has some issues with this president.

Having said that, he's decided to peg me as knee-jerk hate all things Obama; which is a demonstrably false-claim.

So, I thought that I'd give him a taste of his own medicine and paint him as an Obama ball-licker, even though that really isn't the case.

The article doesn't say who is responsible for the over count of jobs saved or how that happened. And it definitely does not show a link to the President directing anyone to do so.

True. But that hasn't prevented this administration from parroting the false-claims. They certainly haven't bothered to fact-check in the manner that a couple of media outlets have done (kudos to them) and thus they DO bear some responsibility for hyping numbers that are clearly false.

"True. But that hasn't prevented this administration from parroting the false-claims. They certainly haven't bothered to fact-check in the manner that a couple of media outlets have done (kudos to them) and thus they DO bear some responsibility for hyping numbers that are clearly false. "

The administration has to accept the numbers that are reported as legitimate until they have reason to suspect otherwise. Reporters have to take the opposite approach, its their job.

I don't think this is the President's fault, but, like so many other things, it is his problem.

The administration has to accept the numbers that are reported as legitimate until they have reason to suspect otherwise.

What if they DID have reason to suspect otherwise, but chose to run with the false numbers anyway?

The administration has to accept the numbers that are reported as legitimate

The bigger question is: "Who" is reporting these 'numbers' and WHY are they so demonstrably false?

As the author of this article effectively articulates - false numbers from trusted sources are a HUGE problem!

"What if they DID have reason to suspect otherwise, but chose to run with the false numbers anyway?"

Is there evidence of that?

"The bigger question is: "Who" is reporting these 'numbers' and WHY are they so demonstrably false?"

Now that is the question and I'm sure the President is as interested as you are in getting to the bottom of it.

Having said that, he's decided to peg me as knee-jerk hate all things Obama; which is a demonstrably false-claim.

So, I thought that I'd give him a taste of his own medicine and paint him as an Obama ball-licker, even though that really isn't the case.

#4 | Posted by JeffJ at 2009-11-12 09:38 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose)
FunnyNewsworthyOffensiveAbusiv
e

Dude You're so full of shit it's unbelieveable. You have had it against Obama since Jump street. NOITHING and I do mean NOTHING Obama did or said was good enough for You. Hell You pitched a fit because He didn't sport a flag pin didn't have His hand over His heart. Declared Him to be a secret muslim(Like that was scary) and attended Madrasses. Hell You couldn't even stop calling Him Hussein and Insinuating He was like Saddam Hussein. Don't give Me any shit JeffJ for You have never even given Him a shot a fair shake. Your words ring hollow to Me.

Larry

Fuck you, Larry.

I have offered up praise for him on countless occasions.

Hell, just today I complimented him for his handling of the Fort Hood massacre.

But go ahead and believe what you want to believe because you NEED to believe it.

JeffJ is an irrational Obama-hater - that is your mantra and evidence to the contrary be damned.

One time out of how G-d Damned American Thinker articles lambasting Him for bullshit. You are intellectaully and blatantly dishonest JeffJ if You declare You have given Him a fair shake. You have done no such thing. On the contrary as a matter of fact.

Larry

Comments are closed for this entry.


Drudge Retort

Home | News | Comments | User Blogs | Nooner | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Copyright 2012 World Readable