"I was responding to RCADE's statement about people who are in an "uninsurable condition" because of their own choices, not as to what I think should be covered."
Okay, thanks. I'm not sure whether that's hair-splitting, but you responded calmly, so I'll take the same tack. : )
"If you are not insured and get pregnant, I shouldn't have to pay for it. "
Hm. I'd have to think about that one. Of course, I'm inclined toward single-payer or something like, so I guess I don't agree. But assuming we don't have that, and we won't for at least a couple of decades, I bet, well, shit. I might have to go along with it, given my "If you can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em" attitude. But then, on the purely economic scale, it's still cheaper to help the pregnant than to not. Medical treatments catch up to all of us sooner than later, economically speaking, right? Or do we not agree on that, either? That rises in costs affect everyone? That insurance companies raise rates when medical costs go up, no matter the reason?
"If you are uninsured and get pregnant and want an abortion, I shouldn't have to pay for it. "
Different discussion. Has the abortion hot button. Hard to even go there. Is abortion covered in this bill? For reasons other than health of the mother? Is it covered in a majority of existing insurance plans? For reasons other than health of the mother?
And btw, you said "I shouldn't have to..." Which means you are talking about what you think should be covered. Or what you're willing to accept, perhaps, as coverable. If it's coming out of your taxes, that is.
"As to AIDS, there are three ways to get AIDS. Sex, needles, blood transfusion. The third is statistically not heard of. The other two are choices and i don't care about the sexual preference of the person if that is what you were fishing for."
Didn't mean to fish. It was a straight question. So to speak. 'Cause if you held to different standards, my answer would be different. And you left out birth. Should a baby born to a drug-addicted mother suffer because he/she was born to a drug-addicted mother. Whether there are 1 of these a year or 10,000 is irrelevant. You said "AIDS patients," as in all.
""Drugs" how about "illegal drugs or drugs for which you don't have a prescription but one is required.""
Fair enough. As long as you include cigarette smokers as well as pot smokers. Which I think you did. (Of all the pot smokers I know, well, let's just say I know more cigarette smokers with health issues than I do pot smokers. But I don't think that was your point.)