8 of 10 wealthiest Members of Congress are Democrats

Huffington Post published top 10 wealthiest members of Congress, 8 are Dems, 2 Republican. Interesting comments from readers include this:
"Capitalism A brain-power dictatorship
Brains like handsome good looks pass from father to son, those with excessive wealth run things and until we reach the ultimate conclusion of evil they always shall.
For we are all given a different ability to earn income as a test, to see if we pass our excessive wealth down to those less fortunate where it belongs."

It was on the same site....

"It's just a goddamn piece of paper"

Chapel's Hero.

I still think "The Chapel" would be a great name for a strip club.

""It's just a goddamn piece of paper" Chapel's Hero." - JERRY

I've asked this on several occasions. Is there a link, video, or just how do you attribute that to Dubya? And if it's only hearsay, why do you run with it?

"And if it's only hearsay, why do you run with it?"

Liberals and lying go together like peas and carrots.

-Forrest Gump

And Jerry, I don't think Jesus said that. Unless I missed part of the Sermon on the Mount.

I don't think he would diss.....well Himself that way.

Try again.

Now go eat a towel.

A tit for a tat for the Boehner thread?

A shame because nobody will see how the author is right on in his analysis.

I wrote to the Boehner thread. Then I was surprised to see this thead that was very similar to my argument. You'd have to dig it from the archives now.

Your hero Duuuuhbya said while pushibg the "patriot" act on gullible idiots like yourself ooh.

The Chapel = Niceville.

I will be God damned before I will care about the WSJ's opinion concerning our respect for the Constitution. When they first come out strongly against the false notion of corporate personhood then I might listen to something else they have to say. Til then they are just shilling for their own side of a controversy using whatever tools are at their disposal, this time it being some pretend concern over constitutionality, as if that ever effected their opinion before.

I will be G** d&^%@d before...

quite a self-indictment.

To address your point, if your issue is with WSJ on hypocrisy grounds, then why don't you "think outside the box" and consider the valid point on its own merits.

L - that isn't going to happen.