I don't agree with the jury in this product liability case. The difference in using wood vs. aluminum bats when playing baseball was no hidden secret and the fact the jury found no defect in how this particular aluminum bat was manufactured should have been a slam dunk win in favor of aluminum bat maker Hillerich & Bradsby Co.
The attorneys should immediately appeal this case on behalf of their defendant.
I also think JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE made an excellent legal argument in his #7 --
...Here is my problem with this case. The bat in question was within the parameters set fourth by the league. It is the league that is responsible for setting the appropriate ball exit velocity limits at that level. The player who died agreed to play by those rules. The court ruled the bat was not defective and outside of those limits....
This verdict kinda got me to thinking. If the aluminum bat was not found to be defective, then what about the baseball used? Could it have been one of those so-called "juiced up" baseballs? Made me curious as to just how baseballs are made and whether or not there is much difference when it comes to the brand of baseball and the material used in making it.
It doesn't appear, at least in this case, there is any legal basis for the aluminum bat maker to have been able to cross-complain against the company who made the baseball used in the game.
But I sure learned some interesting details as to just how baseballs are manufactured and the materials used to make one which I read in the following article should anyone else like to read it too --
How Baseballs Are Made
I don't agree with the jury in this case. The difference in using wooden vs. aluminum bats was no hidden secret and the fact the jury found no defect in how this particular aluminum bat was manufactured should have been a slam dunk win in favor of aluminum bat maker Hillerich & Bradsby Co.
I would immediately appeal the case if I were the defendant's attorneys.
I also think JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE made an excellent legal argument in his #7 --
...Here is my problem with this case. The bat in question was within the parameters set fourth by the league. It is the league that is responsible for setting the appropriate ball exit velocity limits at that level. The player who died agreed to play by those rules. The court ruled the bat was not defective and outside of those limits....
This verdict got me to thinking. If the aluminum bat was not found to be defective, then what about the baseball used? Could it have been one of those so-called "juiced up" baseballs? Made me curious as to just how baseballs are made and whether or not there is much difference in the brand of baseball and/or materials used to make it.
It doesn't appear from the article below there is much variation in the manufacturing of baseballs. But I sure learned some interesting details as to just how baseballs are manufactured and the materials used to make one.
Anyone else also interested, can read this article below --
How Baseballs Are Made